Journal List > Korean J Adult Nurs > v.28(3) > 1076393

Jin and Lee: The Effects of Reinforced Walking Exercise on Dyspnea-fatigue Symptoms, Daily Activities, Walking Ability, and Health related Quality of Life in Heart Failure Patients

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to identify the effects of reinforced walking exercise on dyspnea-fatigue symptoms, daily activities, walking ability and health related quality of life (HRQoL) in heart failure patients.

Methods

This study used a randomized controlled trial design. The participants (experimental group=16, control group=25) were recruited from a university hospital in Kyeong-nam area. Data were collected from March to September, 2015. The reinforced walking exercise included goal setting and feedback (telephone and text message) provided for 12 weeks. Dyspnea-Fatigue Index, Korean Activity Scale/Index (KASI), six-minute walking distance (6MWD) and HRQoL were measured. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-test, Fisher's exact test, χ² test, and Kolmogrove-Smirnov test.

Results

Prior to the intervention there were no differences in the research variables between two groups. The exercise compliance in the experimental group was 100% (walking for 50 minutes per day, 5 times per week). The experimental group had improved dyspnea-fatigue symptoms (t=8.63, p<.001), daily activities (t=-4.92, p<.001), longer 6MWD (t=-5.66, p<.001), and increased HRQoL (t=-9.05, p<.001) compared to the control group.

Conclusion

The reinforced walking exercise could be a cost-effective intervention in heart failure patient, which could enhance patients’ outcomes, such as improving dyspnea-fatigue symptoms, daily activities, walking ability, and quality of life.

REFERENCES

1.Baliga RR., Dec GW., Narula J. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of systolic heart failure in low- and middle-income countries. Global Heart. 2013. 8(2):141–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gheart.2013.05.002.
2.Alosco ML., Spitznagel MB., Miller L., Raz N., Cohen R., Sweet LH, et al. Depression is associated with reduced physical activity in persons with heart failure. Health Psychology: Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology. American Psychological Association. 2012. 31(6):754–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028711.
3.Dontje ML., van der Wal MH., Stolk RP., Brugemann J., Jaarsma T., Wijtvliet PE, et al. Daily physical activity in stable heart failure patients. The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2014. 29(3):218–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0b013e318283ba14.
crossref
4.Alahmari AD., Patel AR., Kowlessar BS., Mackay AJ., Singh R., Wedzicha JA, et al. Daily activity during stability and exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. BMC Pulmonary Medicine. 2014. 14:98–2466. -14-98.http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-14-98.
crossref
5.Araiza P., Hewes H., Gashetewa C., Vella CA., Burge MR. Efficacy of a pedometer-based physical activity program on parameters of diabetes control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental. 2006. 55(10):1382–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2006.06.009.
crossref
6.Conraads VM., Deaton C., Piotrowicz E., Santaularia N., Tierney S., Piepoli MF, et al. Adherence of heart failure patients to exercise: Barriers and possible solutions: A position statement of the study group on exercise training in heart failure of the heart failure association of the european society of cardiology. European Journal of Heart Failure. 2012. 14(5):451–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurjhf/hfs048.
7.Heo S., Lennie TA., Okoli C., Moser DK. Quality of life in patients with heart failure: Ask the patients. Heart & Lung: The Journal of Critical Care. 2009. 38(2):100–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2008.04.002.
crossref
8.Juenger J., Schellberg D., Kraemer S., Haunstetter A., Zugck C., Herzog W, et al. Health related quality of life in patients with congestive heart failure: comparison with other chronic diseases and relation to functional variables. Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2002. 87(3):235–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heart.87.3.235.
crossref
9.European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation Committee for Science Guidelines, EACPR. Corra U., Piepoli MF., Carre F., Heuschmann P, et al. Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: Physical activity counselling and exercise training: Key components of the position paper from the cardiac rehabilitation section of the european association of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation. European Heart Journal. 2010. 31(16):1967–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq236.
crossref
10.Jolly K., Taylor RS., Lip GY., Davies M., Davis R., Mant J, et al. A randomized trial of the addition of home-based exercise to specialist heart failure nurse care: the birmingham rehabilitation uptake maximisation study for patients with congestive heart failure (BRUM-CHF) study. European Journal of Heart Failure. 2009. 11(2):205–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurjhf/hfn029.
crossref
11.Corvera-Tindel T., Doering LV., Woo MA., Khan S., Dracup K. Effects of a home walking exercise program on functional status and symptoms in heart failure. American Heart Journal. 2004. 147(2):339–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2003.09.007.
crossref
12.Gary R., Lee SY. Physical function and quality of life in older women with diastolic heart failure: effects of a progressive walking program on sleep patterns. Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing. 2007. 22(2):72–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0889-7204.2007.05375.x.
crossref
13.Oka RK., De Marco T., Haskell WL., Botvinick E., Dae MW., Bolen K, et al. Impact of a home-based walking and resistance training program on quality of life in patients with heart failure. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2000. 85(3):365–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00748-1.
crossref
14.Dracup K., Evangelista LS., Hamilton MA., Erickson V., Hage A., Moriguchi J, et al. Effects of a home-based exercise program on clinical outcomes in heart failure. American Heart Journal. 2007. 154(5):877–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2007.07.019.
crossref
15.Baker G., Mutrie N., Lowry R. Using pedometers as motivational tools: Are goals set in steps more effective than goals set in minutes for increasing walking? International Journal of Health Promotion and Education. 2008. 46(1):21–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14635240.2008.10708123.
crossref
16.Evangelista LS., Dracup K., Erickson V., McCarthy WJ., Hamilton MA., Fonarow GC. Validity of pedometers for measuring exercise adherence in heart failure patients. Journal of Cardiac Failure. 2005. 11(5):366–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2004.10.005.
crossref
17.Kang SM. Cardiac rehabilitation of heart failure. Korean Journal of Medicine. 2012. 82(6):667–70.
crossref
18.Corvera-Tindel T., Doering LV., Gomez T., Dracup K. Predictors of noncompliance to exercise training in heart failure. The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 2004. 19(4):269–77. quiz 278-9.http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005082-200407000-00006.
crossref
19.Duncan K., Pozehl B. Effects of an exercise adherence intervention on outcomes in patients with heart failure. Rehabilitation Nursing: The Official Journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses. 2003. 28(4):117–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2048-7940.2003.tb01728.x.
crossref
20.Foster C., Hillsdon M., Thorogood M., Kaur A., Wedatilake T. Interventions for promoting physical activity. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2005. 1:CD003180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003180.pub2.
crossref
21.Lee ES., Shin ES., Hwang SY., Chae MJ., Jeong MH. Effects of tailored supportive education on physical, emotional status and quality of life inpatients with congestive heart failure. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2013. 25(1):62–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2013.25.1.62.
22.Song EK. Effect of a telephone monitoring on self-management & symptom experiences in patients with heart failure. Journal of Korean Academy of Adult Nursing. 2005. 17(1):56–67.
23.Kim SM., Lee HJ. Effects of motivational interviewing on disease-related knowledge, depression, self-care, and quality of life in patients with heart failure. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Nursing. 2013. 15(2):143–54.
24.Oh JY., Yang YJ., Kim BS., Kang JH. Validity and reliability of Korean version of international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) short form. Journal of the Korean Academy on Family Medicine. 2007. 28(7):532–41.
25.Feinstein AR., Fisher MB., Pigeon JG. Changes in dyspnea-fatigue ratings as indicators of quality of life in the treatment of congestive heart failure. The American Journal of Cardiology. 1989. 64(1):50–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(89)90652-8.
crossref
26.Sung JD., On YK., Chae IH., Kim HS., Sohn DW., Oh BH, et al. Development of korean activity scale/index (KASI). Korean Circulation Journal. 2000. 30(8):1004–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2000.30.8.1004.
crossref
27.Guyatt GH., Sullivan MJ., Thompson PJ., Fallen EL., Pugsley SO., Taylor DW, et al. The 6-minute walk: A new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 1985. 132(8):919–23.
28.Green CP., Porter CB., Bresnahan DR., Spertus JA. Development and evaluation of the Kansas city cardiomyopathy questionnaire: a new health status measure for heart failure. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2000. 35(5):1245–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00531-3.
crossref
29.Lee HJ., Kim SM., Lim YJ., Ahn JJ., Kim YS., Park HK. Comparison of characteristics of drop-outs from study participation between intervention and comparison groups. Journal of the Korean Gerontological Nursing. 2012. 14(2):110–7.
30.Mun CI., Rhim YT. Psychological and physiological variables appreciation for adherence of exercise. Journal of Coaching Development. 2007. 9(4):57–69.

Figure 1.
Flow chart of data collection.
kjan-28-266f1.tif
Table 1.
Reinforced Walking Exercise Program
Categories Contents Time
1) Preparation (1) Perform physical assessment (Vital sign & SpO2) 10 min
(2) Instruct how to use pedometer: Mode & Reset
(3) Offer exercise diary & teach how to use the diary: Recording number of steps, duration of exercise, weekly frequency, heart rate, and dyspnea/fatigue borg scale
2) Goal setting (1) Perform walking exercise using the pedometer 5 min
(2) Start from 5,000 steps & 10% increase/week
 Start from 1 day/week → 5 days/week
 1st week: 5,000 steps & 1 day/week
 2nd week: 6,000 steps & 2 days/week
 3rd week: 7,000 steps & 3 days/week
 4th week: 8,000 steps & 4 days/week
 5th week: 9,000 steps & 5 days/week
 6th week: 10,000 steps & 5 days/week
 7~12th week: maintain 10,000↑steps & 5 days/week
(3) Maintain symptom of dyspnea/fatigue based on borg scale 12~13 point, maximum heart rate 60~70%
3) Feedback (1) Check pedometer data and incomplete data 5 min
(2) Mutually set a weekly goal of walking.
(3) Reinforce maintenance of walking exercise
 → through telephone call:
  1st~6th week=once a week
  7~12th week=every other week
 → by text message: 2 days/week
Table 2.
Characteristics and Homogeneity Test between Control and Experimental Groups (N=41)
Characteristics Categories Total Control (n=25) Exp. (n=16) x2 or t (p)
n (%) or M±SD D n (%) or M±SD n (%) or M±SD
Age (year) (range 40~77) <65 30 (73.2) 17 (68.0) 13 (81.3) 0.87 (.287)§
≥65 11 (26.8) 8 (32.0) 3 (18.8) -0.86 (.393)
58.02±12.04 56.72±14.38 60.06±6.97  
Gender Male 30 (73.2) 17 (68.0) 13 (81.3) 0.87 (.478)§
Female 11 (26.8) 8 (32.0) 3 (18.8)  
Spouse No 2 (4.9) 0 (0.0) 2 (12.5) 3.29 (.146)§
Yes 39 (95.1) 25 (100.0) 14 (87.5)  
Level of education ≤Junior high school 9 (22.0) 7 (28.0) 2 (12.5) 6.61 (.085)
High school 13 (31.7) 5 (20.0) 8 (50.0)  
≥College 19 (46.3) 13 (52.0) 6 (37.5)  
Regular exercise No 41 (100.0) 25 (100.0) 16 (100.0)  
Monthly household income (10,000 won) <100 4 (9.8) 2 (8.0) 2 (12.5) 0.32 (.854)
100~199 7 (17.1) 4 (16.0) 3 (18.8)  
≥200 30 (73.2) 19 (76.0) 11 (68.8)  
Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) 31.15±6.92 31.88±6.98 30.00±6.88 0.85 (.403)
NYHA class II 36 (87.8) 22 (88.8) 14 (87.5) 0.01 (>.999)§
III 5 (12.2) 3 (12.0) 2 (12.5)  
Comorbidity No 16 (39.0) 11 (44.0) 5 (31.3) 0.67 (.519)§
Yes 25 (61.0) 14 (56.0) 11 (68.8)  
 Hypertension 25 (100.0) 14 (56.0) 11 (44.0)  
 Diabetes mellitus 6 (24.0) 2 (8.0) 4 (16.0)  
 Etc. 7 (28.0) 3 (12.0) 4 (16.0)  
Medication Beta-blocker Yes 35 (85.4) 21 (84.0) 14 (87.5) 0.10 (>.999)§
No 6 (14.6) 4 (16.0) 2 (12.5)  
ACE inhibitor Yes 29 (70.7) 17 (68.0) 12 (75.0) 0.23 (.734)§
No 12 (29.3) 8 (32.0) 4 (25.0)  
Diuretics Yes 31 (75.6) 19 (76.0) 12 (75.0) 0.01 (>.999)§
No 10 (24.4) 6 (24.0) 4 (25.0)  
Physical activity (MET-minutes/week) Inactive 26 (63.4) 18 (72.0) 8 (50.0) 3.11 (.211)
Minimally active 11 (26.8) 6 (24.0) 3 (31.3)  
HEPA 4 (9.8) 1 (2.4) 3 (18.8)  

Exp.=experimental group; NYHA=New York Heart Association; HEPA=Health enhancing physical activity;

Multiple responses;

Liver disease, osteoporosis, angina pectoris, pulmonary disease;

§ Fisher's exact test.

Table 3.
Levels of Dyspnea-fatigue Symptoms, Daily Activities, Walking Ability and Health related QoL and Homogeneity Test (N=41)
Characteristics Total Cont. (n=25) Exp. (n=16) t (p)
M±SD M±SD Z (p) M±SD Z (p)
Dyspnea-fatigue symptoms 5.90±1.88 6.20±1.78 0.967 (.307) 5.44±2.00 .943 (.336) 1.28 (.210)
Daily activities (KASI) 34.76±11.75 35.02±11.57 0.646 (.798) 34.35±12.40 .817 (.517) 0.18 (.861)
Walking ability (6MWD; m) 337.32±71.03 339.20±79.11 1.019 (.251) 334.38±58.53 .388 (.998) 0.21 (.835)
HRQoL 69.80±11.69 72.54±11.77 1.052 (.219) 65.53±10.53 .823 (.508) 1.94 (.060)

Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group; KASI=Korean Activity Scale/Index; 6MWD=Six-minute walk distance; HRQoL=Health related quality of life.

Kolmogorov-Smirnove test.

Table 4.
Walking Compliance and Levels of Physical Activity in Experimental Group (N=16)
Characteristics Pretest Posttest t (p)
n (%) or M±SD n (%) or M±SD
Walking compliance (MET-minute/week)
 <825 15 (93.8) 0 (0.0)
 ≥825 1 (6.3) 16 (100.0)
Physical activity 2110.50±1693.79 3611.25±2513.51 3.45 (.041)
 Inactive 8 (50.0) 0 (0.0)
 Minimally active 5 (31.3) 12 (75.0)
 HEPA 3 (18.8) 4 (25.0)

MET=metabolic equivalent task; HEPA=health enhancing physical activity;

Walking 3.3 MET × 50 min/day × 5 times/week=825 MET-min/week;

International Physical Activity Questionnaire scoring protocol (MET-min/week).

Table 5.
Effects of Reinforced Walking Exercise Program on Patients Outcomes (N=41)
Variables Groups Pretest Posttest t (p) Mean differences t (p)
M±SD M±SD
Global perceived improvement in dyspnea-fatigue Cont. (n=25) - 4.08±0.57     8.63
Exp. (n=16) - 2.56±0.51     (<.001)
Daily activities (KASI) Cont. (n=25) 35.02±11.57 35.38±12.00 0.60 (.553) 0.36±3.02 -4.92 (<.001)
Exp. (n=16) 34.35±12.40 39.80±13.03 6.16 (<.001) 5.45±3.53  
Walking ability (6MWD, m) Cont. (n=25) 339.20±79.11 349.60±78.87 -1.64 (.114) 10.40±31.69 -5.66 (<.001)
Exp. (n=16) 334.38±58.53 403.13±52.50 -8.23 (<.001) 68.75±33.04  
Health related quality of life Cont. (n=25) 72.54±11.77 72.77±12.48 -0.37 (.709) 0.23±3.04 -9.05 (<.001)
Exp. (n=16) 65.53±10.53 79.79±7.340 -9.99 (<.001) 14.26±5.71  

Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group; KASI=Korean Activity Scale/Index; 6MWD=6 minute walk distance;

t-tests for mean differences between pretest and posttests within groups,

t-test for mean differences between experimental and control groups.

TOOLS
Similar articles