Journal List > Korean J Adult Nurs > v.27(2) > 1076320

Bae and Yeum: Effect of a Telephone-administered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for the Management of Depression, Anxiety, and Chronic Illness Anticipated Stigma in Parkinson's Disease

Abstract

Purpose

Parkinson's disease (PD) has a high incidence of psychiatric comorbidity, specifically depression and anxiety. This study examined the effectiveness of group cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in treating depression and anxiety.

Methods

The study included 42 participants, aged between 52 and 77 years, who were diagnosed with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) and reported suffering from depression and anxiety. Patients were attending a department of outpatient neurology at D University Schools of Medicine in B Metropolitan city. A structured telephone-administered cognitive behavioral therapy was conducted for eight weeks. A repeated measure ANOVA was used to analyze results at pretest, post-test, and four weeks follow up.

Results

According to service method, there were significant differences between the two groups in depression, anxiety and stigma was significant difference between time (p<.05). Analysis of the interaction between time and service method revealed significant differences in depression and anxiety (p<.05).

Conclusion

The results suggest that telephone-administered cognitive behavioral therapy may be effective and may provide opportunity to adapt to individual needs for treating depression and anxiety in patients with Parkinson's disease.

REFERENCES

1.Pandya M1., Kubu CS. Giroux ML Parkinson's disease: not just a movement disorder. Cleveland Clinical Journal of Medicine. 2008. 75(12):856–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.75a.07005.
2.McDonald WM., Righard IH., DeLong MR. Prevalence, etiology and treatment ofdepressionin Parkinson's disease. Society of Biological Psychiatry. 2003. 54(3):363–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(03)00530-4.
3.Cubo E., Bernard B., Leurgans S., Raman R. Cognitive and motor function in patients with Parkinson's disease with and without depression. Clinical Neuropharmacology. 2000. 23(6):331–4.
crossref
4.Veazey C., Aki SOE., Cook KJ., Lai E., Kunik ME. Prevalence and treatment of depression in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 2005. 17(3):310–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/jnp.17.3.310.
crossref
5.Veazy C., Cook KF., Stanley M., Lai EC., Junik ME. Telephone-administered cognitive behavioral therapy: a case of anxiety and depression in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Clinical Psychologic Medical Settings. 2009. 16:243–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10880-009-9167-6.
6.Brooks DJ., Doder M. Depression in Parkinson's disease. Current Opinion in Neurology. 2001. 14:465–70.
crossref
7.Starkstein S., Dragovic M., Jorge R., Brockman1 S., Merello M., Robinson RG, et al. Diagnostic criteria for depression in Parkinson's disease: a study of symptom patterns using latent class analysis. Movement Disorders. 2011. 26(12):2239–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.23836.
crossref
8.Ragnhild SH., Kjersti RL., Kathleen MG., Tom W., Martin E., Knut W, et al. The clinical effectiveness of web-based cognitive behavioral therapy with face-to-face therapist support for depressed primary care patients: randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2013. 15(8):e153. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2714.
9.Wrigley S., Jackson H., Judd F., Komiti A. The role of stigma and attitudes towards help seeking for mental health problems in a rural town. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2005. 39(6):514–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1614.2005.01612.x.
10.Weintraub D., Moberg PJ., Duda JE., Katz IR., Stem MB. Recognition and treatment of depression in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology. 2003. 16(3):178–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891988703256053.
crossref
11.Shimotsu S., Horikawab N., Emurac R., Ishikawad SI., Nagaob A., Ogataf A, et al. Effectiveness of group cognitive-behavioral therapy in reducing self-stigma in Japanese psychiatric patients. Asian Journal of Psychiatry. 2014. 10:39–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2014.02.006.
crossref
12.Simpson J., McMillan H., Reeve D. Reformulating psycholo-gicaldifficulties inpeople withParkinson'sdisease: the potential of a social relational approach to disablism. Parkinson's Disease. 2013. Article ID 608562:. 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/608562.
13.Beck JS. Cognitive therapy: basics and beyond. New York: Guilford press;1995.
14.Chambless DL., Ollendick TH. Empirically supported psychologic intervention: controversies and evidence. Annual Review of Psycology. 2001. 52:685–716. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.685.
15.Yeh AH., Taylor S., Thordarson DS., Corcoran KM. Efficacy of telephone-administered cognitive behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders: case studies. cognitive behavioral therapy. 2003. 32(2):75–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16506070302323.
16.Ludman E., Simon GE., Tutty S., VonKorff M. Arandomizedtrial of telephone psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for depression: continuation durability of effects. Journal of Counselling and Clinical Psychology. 2007. 75(2):257–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.75.2.257.
17.Hoehn MM., Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality. Neurology. 1967. 17:427–42.
crossref
18.Fahn S. Marsden C, Jennifer P, Teychenne P. Eds. Recent development in Parkinson's disease. Florham Park NJ: Macmillan Health care Information;1987. p. 2.
19.Beck AT. Depression: clinical, experimental and theoretical aspects. New York: Harper & Row;1967.
20.Lee YH. The relations between attributionalstyle, life events, event attribution, hopelessness and depression. [dissertation]. Seoul National University;1992.
21.Spielberger CD. Manual for the State-trait anxiety inventory. Palo alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press;1970.
22.Kim JT. Correlation between trait anxiety and sociality: Spiel-berger's STA. [dissertation]. Seoul: Korea University;1978.
23.Kurzban R., Leary MR. Evolutionary origins of stigmatization: the functions of social exclusion. PsychologicalBulletin. 2001. 127:187–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.187.
crossref
24.Earnshaw VA., Quinn DM., Kalichman SC., Park CL. Development and psychometric evaluation of the chronic illness anticipated stigma scale. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2013. 36930:270–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10865-012-9422-4.
crossref
25.Robert LL., Stephen JF. Lata KM. Treatment plans and interventions for depression and anxiety disorders. The Guilford Press;Second Edition. 2011.
26.Yang S., Sajatovic M., Walter BL. Psychosocial intervention for depression and anxiety in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology. 2012. 25(2):113–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891988712445096.
27.Simmon GE., Ludman EJ., Opeskaliski BH. Randomized trialof telephone care management program: for outpatient starting antidepressant treatment. Psychiatric Services. 2006. 57(10):1441–5.
28.Dobkin RD., Allen LA., Menza M. Cognitive behavioral therapy for depression in Parkinson's disease: a pilot study. Movement Disorders. 2007. 22(7):946–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.21455.
29.Dobkin RD., Allen LA., Menza M., Gara MA., Mark MH., Jade Tiu J. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression in Parkinson's disease: a randomized, controlled trial. America Journal of Psychiatry. 2011. 168(10):1066–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10111669.
crossref
30.Cole K., Vaughan FL. The feasibility of using cognitive behavioral therapy for depression associated with Parkinson's disease: a literature review. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders. 2005. 11(5):270–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2005.03.002.

Figure 1.
Research design of the study.
kjan-27-223f1.tif
Table 1.
Homogeneity of Demographic Characteristics and Disease Characteristics between the Two Groups (N=42)
Variables Categories Exp. (n=19) Cont. (n=23) Fisher exact or t p
n (%) or M±SD n (%) or M±SD
Gender Female 15 (78.9) 17 (73.9) 0.145 1.000
Male 4 (21.1) 6 (26.1)
Age (year)   60.9±6.13 68.3±7.15 9.181 .080
≤49 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
50~59 7 (36.3) 3 (13.0)
60~69 9 (47.4) 8 (34.7)
≥70 3 (15.8) 12 (52.1)
Education level No 0 (0.0) 5 (21.7) 5.052 .289
Elementary 4 (21.1) 5 (21.7)
Middle school 8 (42.1) 7 (30.4)
High school 4 (21.1) 3 (13.0)
college ≥ 3 (15.8) 3 (13.0)
Marital state Married (live spouse) 15 (78.9) 18 (78.3) 0.303 1.000
Unmarried 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Divorce 2 (10.5) 2 (8.7)
Separation 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Bereavement 2 (10.5) 3 (13.0)
Average monthly income (10,000 won) ≤50 10 (52.6) 9 (39.1) 5.122 .421
≤100 3 (15.8) 4 (17.4)
≤150 0 (0.0) 4 (17.4)
≤200 2 (10.5) 1 (4.3)
≤250 2 (10.5) 1 (4.3)
≥251 2 (10.5) 4 (17.4)
Occupation Yes 1 (5.3) 5 (21.7) 2.307 .197
No 18 (94.7) 18 (78.3)
Duration of illness (year) ≤1 1 (5.6) 3 (13.0) 2.294 .885
≤3 7 (38.9) 5 (21.7)
≤6 5 (27.8) 7 (30.4)
≤9 2 (11.1) 4 (17.4)
≤12 2 (11.1) 2 (8.7)
12 > 1 (5.6) 2 (8.7)
Age of onset (year) ≤49 4 (16.7) 1 (4.3) 5.489 .514
≤59 8 (44.4) 6 (26.1)
≤69 6 (33.3) 10 (43.5)
≥70 1 (5.6) 6 (26.1)
H & Y stage S & E ADL MMSE   2.39±0.49 2.37±0.53 0.159 .874
  82.11±8.55 79.05±12.21 0.908 .370
  28.53±1.26 26.78±2.45 2.970 .005

H & Y stage=Hoehn & Yahr stage; S & E ADL=Schwab & England activities of daily living; MMSE=mini-mental state examination; Exp.=experimental group, Cont.=control group;

by x2-test (p <.05),

Table 2.
Homogeneity Test of Study Variables between the Two Groups (N=42)
variables Exp. (n=19) Cont. (n=23) t p
M±SD M±SD
Depression 20.79±7.84 24.17±9.51 1.73 .222
Anxiety 53.42±8.30 54.96±8.50 2.24 .560
CIAS 58.58±17.41 60.65±19.13 2.82 .718

Exp.=experimental group, Cont.=control group; CIAS=chronic illness anticipated stigma.

Table 3.
Repeated Measure ANOVA of Depression, Anxiety and CIAS between the Two Groups (N=42)
Variables Groups Pretest Posttest 1 Posttest 2 p for time differences F (p) Sources F p
M±SD M±SD M±SD (Post 1/ Pre) (Post 2/ Pre)
Depression Exp. 20.79±7.84 17.68±11.85 22.05±12.69 .067 .084 0.80 (.457) Group 5.70 .022
Cont. 24.17±9.51 29.83±13.47 28.14±13.72 1.27 (.288) Time 1.05 .349
p for group .222 .004 .155   TimeGroup 4.22 .022
differences              
Anxiety Exp. 53.42±8.30 44.26±14.06 44.26±13.65 .003 .007 3.51 (.037) Group 6.67 .014
Cont. 54.96±8.51 56.52±11.10 53.43±13.63 0.34 (.712) Time 4.30 .017
p for group .560 .003 .040   TimeGroup 4.94 .010
differences              
CIAS Exp. 58.58±17.41 45.11±16.80 42.95±15.48 .006 .001 4.96 (.011) Group 2.55 .119
Cont. 60.65±19.13 56.09±18.97 50.24±14.59 1.89 (.160) Time 12.60 < .001
p for group .718 .056 .134   TimeGroup 1.60 .208
differences              

CIAS=chronic illness anticipated stigma; Exp.=experimental group; Cont.=control group; Pre=Pretest; Post 1=Posttest 1: week after intervention trials ended; Post 2=Posttest 2: 4 weeks after intervention trials ended.

TOOLS
Similar articles