Journal List > J Korean Soc Spine Surg > v.23(1) > 1076120

Park, Moon, Kim, Oh, and Yang: Whiplash Injury

Abstract

Study Design

Review of the literature.

Objectives

To present an overview of current research on whiplash injury.

Summary of Literature Review

There are controversies over the definition, symptoms, and treatment of whiplash injury.

Materials and Methods

Review of the relevant literature.

Results

Symptoms of whiplash injury caused by an acceleration-deceleration force may present as widespread pain involving the neck or trapezius muscles, the interscapular area, the shoulders and arms, or as suboccipital headaches. Accompanying symptoms may include neurologic symptoms such as sensory dysfunction, motor weakness, or deep tendon reflex loss; non-specific symptoms such as dyspha-gia, dizziness, visual disturbances, tinnitus, deafness, memory loss, or temporo-mandibular joint disorders; and psychological symptoms such as depression, acute stress syndrome, or fear avoidance. The most important factor that facilitates spontaneous resolution of whip-lash injury, which is a self-limiting disorder, has been shown to be prevention of the acute-to-chronic pain transition. Yet in spite of this knowledge the efficacy of several treatment methods for whiplash injury remains controversial.

Conclusions

The appropriateness of treatment for whiplash injury should be evaluated on the basis of up to date academic research on its diagnosis and natural history.

REFERENCES

1. Spitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR, et al. Scientific mono-graph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: redefining “whiplash” and its management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995; 20(Suppl):1–73.
2. Schofferman J, Bogduk N, Slosar P. Chronic whiplash and whiplash-associated disorders: an evidence-based approach. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007; 15:596–606.
crossref
3. Barnsley L, Lord S, Bogduk N. Whiplash injury. Pain. 1994; 58:283–307.
crossref
4. 김광해, 장준동, 정인희. 편타성 외상의 임상적 고찰. 대한정형외과학회. 1981; 16:277–82.
5. McKenzie JA, Williams JF. The dynamic behaviour of the head and cervical spine during ‘whiplash’. J Biomech. 1971; 4:477–90.
crossref
6. Stemper BD, Yoganandan N, Gennarelli TA, et al. Localized cervical facet joint kinematics under physiological and whiplash loading. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005; 3:471–6.
crossref
7. Siegmund GP, Winkelstein BA, Ivancic PC, et al. The anatomy and biomechanics of acute and chronic whiplash injury. Traffic Inj Prev. 2009; 10:101–12.
crossref
8. Luan F, Yang KH, Deng B, et al. Qualitative analysis of neck kinematics during low-speed rear-end impact. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2000; 15:649–57.
crossref
9. Kaneoka K, Ono K, Inami S, et al. Motion analysis of cervical vertebrae during whiplash loading. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999; 24:763–9.
crossref
10. Lee KE, Davis MB, Winkelstein BA. Capsular ligament involvement in the development of mechanical hyperal-gesia after facet joint loading: behavioral and inflamma-tory outcomes in a rodent model of pain. J Neurotrauma. 2008; 25:1383–93.
crossref
11. Lord SM, Barnsley L, Wallis BJ, et al. Chronic cervical zyg-apophysial joint pain after whiplash. A placebo-controlled prevalence study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996; 21:1737–44.
12. Ito S, Ivancic PC, Pearson AM, et al. Cervical intervertebral disc injury during simulated frontal impact. Eur Spine J. 2005; 14:356–65.
crossref
13. Seroussi R, Singh V, Fry A. Chronic whiplash pain. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2015; 26:359–73.
crossref
14. Dwyer A, Aprill C, Bogduk N. Cervical zygapophyseal joint pain patterns. I: A study in normal volunteers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990; 15:453–7.
15. Gorski JM, Schwartz LH. Shoulder impingement presenting as neck pain. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85-A:635–8.
crossref
16. Chauhan SK, Peckham T, Turner R. Impingement syndrome associated with whiplash injury. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003; 85:408–10.
crossref
17. Ames EL. Carpal tunnel syndrome and motor vehicle ac-cidents. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1996; 96:223–6.
crossref
18. Bannister G, Amirfeyz R, Kelley S, et al. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91:845–50.
19. Hurwitz EL, Carragee EJ, van der Velde G, et al. treatment of neck pain: noninvasive interventions: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(Suppl):123–52.
20. Nansel D, Peneff A, Cremata E, et al. Time course consider-ations for the effects of unilateral lower cervical adjustments with respect to the amelioration of cervical lateral-flexion passive end-range asymmetry. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1990; 13:297–304.
21. Barnsley L, Lord SM, Wallis BJ, et al. The prevalence of chronic cervical zygapophysial joint pain after whiplash. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995; 20:20–5.
crossref
22. Wong JJ, Cote P, Ameis A, et al. Are non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs effective for the management of neck pain and associated disorders, whiplash-associated disorders, or non-specific low back pain? A systematic review of systematic reviews by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration. Eur Spine J. 2015; 25:34–61.
crossref
23. Sutton DA, Cote P, Wong JJ, et al. Is multimodal care effective for the management of patients with whiplash-associated disorders or neck pain and associated disorders? A systematic review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration. Spine J. 2014 Jul 8. [Epub ahead of print].
crossref
24. Norris SH, Watt I. The prognosis of neck injuries resulting from rear-end vehicle collisions. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983; 65:608–11.
crossref
25. Benoist M, Rouaud JP. Whiplash: myth or reality? Joint Bone Spine. 2002; 69:358–62.
crossref

Fig. 1.
Pre-existing foraminal stenosis of cervical spine at the oblique view of MRI.
jkss-23-63f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Anteroposterior (A) and lateral view (B) of cervical spine showing the alignment of spinous process, vertebral body and lateral mass.
jkss-23-63f2.tif
Fig. 3.
Right oblique view (A) and left oblique view (B) of cervical spine showing the alignment of facet joints.
jkss-23-63f3.tif
Table 1.
The ouebec classification of whiplash-associated disorders.1)
Grade Clinical presentation
0 No complaint about the neck No physical sign(s)
I Neck complaint of pain, stiffness or tenderness only No physical sign(s)
II Neck complaint AND Musculoskeletal sign(s)
III Neck complaint AND Neurologic sign(s)
IV Neck complaint AND Fracture or dislocation

Musculoskeletal signs include decreased range of motion and point tenderness.

Neurologic signs include decreased or absent deep tendon reflexes, weakness, and sensory deficits. Symptoms and disorders that can be manifested in all grades include deafness, dizziness, tinnitus, headache, memory loss, dysphagia and temporo-mandibular joint pain.

Table 2.
Presentation of symptoms of whiplash injury.1)
Symptoms Study
Norris 1983 (%) Radanov 1991 (%) Hildingsson 1990 (%)
Neck Pain 100 100 88
Neck stiffness 69
Headache 66 57 54
Shoulder pain 42 40
Arm pain/numbness - - 14
Paresthesia 62 13 -
Weakness 18 - -
Dysphagia 16 - -
Visual 8 21 9
Auditory 18 - 4
Dizziness 25 17 23
Table 3.
Studies in which an inception cohort was assembled to determine prognosis following whiplash injury.1)
Reference Type of study Study Population N F/U rate (%) Mean duration of F/U† Proportion with neck pain at end of F/U (%)
Norris (1983) Prospective All patients presenting to a single hospital after rear-end collision 61 100 20 67(15% severe)
Olsson (1990) Prospective Volvo drivers with non-serious neck injury 33 100 12 36
Pennie (1991) Prospective Consecutive whiplash patients at 2 hospital accident departments 144 95 5 14
Miles (1988) Prospective Consecutive whiplash patients at a hospital who had X-rays taken 76 100 24 29
Deans (1987) Retrospective Consecutive car accident victims who developed neck pain 85 78 18 42(6% constant pain)
Maimaris (1988) Retrospective Consecutive whiplash patients at a hospital accident department 102 85 24 35
Gargan (1990) Retrospective Same cohort as Norris and Watt 43 70 120 88(12% severe)
Watkinson (1991) Retrospective Same cohort as Norris and Watt 35 57 120 86(9% severe)

F/U: Follow-up

months.

TOOLS
Similar articles