Journal List > J Korean Soc Spine Surg > v.18(1) > 1075927

Song, Yang, Lee, Joo, and Cha: Variations of Neurotrophic Factors and It's Importances in Spinal Cord Injured Rats and Beagle Dogs

Abstract

Study Design

Experimental, prospective study

Objectives

To examine the changes in the variable factors after an acute spinal cord injury(SCI) in rats and dogs simultaneously.

Summary of Literature Review

No study has examined the variations of several factors in a SCI model in different species.

Materials and Methods

In rats, a laminectomy was performed at the T10 level and the injured spinal cord was extracted. In Beagle dogs, the laminectomy level was T10 and T11. The motor function was evaluated using a modified Tarlov's scale. A RT2 profiler PCR array was used to examine each factor (inflammatory cytokines, factors-related with apoptosis, neurotrophic factors, factors-related with extraceullar matrix).

Results

IL-2, TNF, TNFRSF11B increased with time and showed no statistical difference between two species, but TNFSF13B showed a significant difference. BDNF decreased with time in both species, and GDNF was significantly lower in dogs. NGFβ, CTNF and its receptors showed no significant changes in the two species. MMP1 increased in both species but MMP7 decreased in rats and increased in dogs with time, and showed a significant difference between species.

Conclusion

The change in inflammatory cytokines and extracellular matrix correlates with each factor in the combined patterns. Moreover, during the first week after SCI, inflammatory cytokines, apoptosis, neutrophic factors, and extracellular matrix factors may show a partial difference between experimental animals, which means that an animal model can be selected according to the particular experimental plan.

REFERENCES

1. Lee JK. Pathophysiology of acute spinal cord injury. J Korean Soc Spine Surg. 2009; 16:64–70.
crossref
2. You JW, Sohn HM. Recent advances in the pathophysiology and treatment of acute spinal cord injury. J Korean Soc Spine Surg. 2008; 15:204–13.
3. Fernandez E, Pallini R, Marchese E, et al. Experimental studies on spinal cord injuries in the last fifteen years. Neurol Res. 1991; 13:138–59.
crossref
4. West NR, Leblanc V, Collins GH. Support of axonal regrowth by endogenous mechanisms following spinal cord injury in adult rats. Neuropathology. 2001; 21(3):188–202.
crossref
5. Yang JY, Lee HH, Lee JK. The Impact of Combined Treatment with Aminoguanidine and Methylprednisolone on Neurological Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2007; 42:444–52.
6. Becker D, Sadowsky CL, Mcdonald JW. Restoring function after spinal cord injury. Neurologist. 2003; 9:1–15.
crossref
7. Gonç alves L, Silva R, Pinto-Ribeiro F, et al. Neuropathic pain is associated with depressive behaviour and induces neuroplasticity in the amygdala of the rat. Exp Neurol. 2008; 213:48–56.
8. Crowe MJ, Bresnahan JC, Shuman SL, Masters JN, Beattie MS. Apoptosis and delayed degeneration after spinal cord injury in rats and monkeys. Nat Med. 1997; 3:73–6.
crossref
9. Akassoglou K, Bauer J, Kassitotis G, et al. Oligodendrocyte apoptosis and primary demyelination induced by local TNF/p55TNF receptor signaling in the central nervous system of transgenic mice: Models for multiple sclerosis with primary oligodendrogliopathy. Am J Pathol. 1998; 153:801–13.
10. Yang JY, Lee JK, Kim KT, Lee HJ, Byun BN, Ahn SH. The Expression and Function of the Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor I (TNFRI), TNFRII, and X-Linked Inhibitor of Apoptosis Genes after Spinal Cord Injury in Rats. J Korean Soc Spine Surg. 2004; 11:14–23.
crossref
11. Baker SJ, Reddy EP. Modulation of life and death by the TNF receptor superfamily. Oncogene. 1998; 17:3261–70.
crossref
12. Johnson Jr EM, Greenlund LJ, Akins PT, Hsu CY. Neuronal apoptosis: current understanding of molecular mechanisms and potential role in ischemic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 1995; 12:843–52.
13. Olson L. Medicine: clearing a path for nerve growth. Nature. 2002; 416:589–90.
14. Conover JC, Erickson JT, Katz DM, et al. Neuronal deficits, not involving motor neurons, in mice lacking BDNF and/or NT4. Nature. 1995; 375:235–8.
crossref
15. Coumans JV, Lin TT, Dai HN, et al. Axonal regenration and functional recovery after complete spinal cord transection in rats by delayes treatment with transplants and neurotrophins. J Neurosci. 2001; 21:9334–44.
16. Davies AM. Role of neurotrophins in the developing nervous system. J Neurobiol. 1994; 25:1334–48.
17. Hofer MM, Barde YA. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor prevents neuronal death in vivo. Nature. 1988; 331:261–2.
crossref
18. Baker-Herman TL, Fuller DD, Bavis RW, et al. BDNF is necessary and sufficient for spinal respiratory plasticity following intermittent hypoxia. Nature Neurosci. 2004; 7:48–55.
crossref
19. Lawrence JM, Keegan DJ, Muir EM, et al. Transplantation of Schwann cell line clones secreting GDNF or BDNF into the retinas of dystrophic Royal College of Surgeons rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004; 45:267–74.
crossref
20. Longo FM, Holtzman DM, Grimes ML, Mobley WC. Nerve growth factor: actions in the peripheral and central nervous systems. Fallon J, Loughlin S, editors. eds.Neurotrophic factors. New York: Academic Press;1993. 209-56.
crossref
21. Arenas E, Trupp M, Akerud P, Ibanez CF. GDNF prevents degeneration and promotes the phenotype of brain norad-renergic neurons in vivo. Neuron. 1995; 15:1465–73.
crossref
22. Lin LF, Doherty DH, Lile JD, Bektesh S, Collins F. GDNF: a glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor for midbrain do-paminergic neurons. Science. 1993; 260:1130–2.
crossref
23. Lee R, Kermani P, Teng KK, Hempstead BL. Regulation of cell survival by secreted proneurotrophins. Science. 2001; 294:1945–8.
crossref
24. DeChiara TM, Vejsada R, Poueymirou WT, et al. Mice lacking the CNTF receptor, unlike mice lacking CNTF, exhibit profound motor neuron deficits at birth. Cell. 1995; 83:313–22.
crossref
25. Sleeman MW, Anderson KD, Lambert PD, et al. The ciliary neurotrophic factor and its receptor, CNTFR alpha. Phar-maceutica acta Helvetiae. 2000; 74:265–72.
26. Busch SA, Silver J. The role of extracellular matrix in CNS regeneration. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007; 17:120–7.
crossref
27. Fawcett JW, Asher RA. The glial scar and central nervous system repair. Brain Res Bull. 1999; 49:377–91.
crossref
28. Sandvig A, Berry M, Barett LB, Butt A, Logan A. Myelin-, reactive glia-, and scarderived CNS axon growth inhibi-tors: expression, receptor signaling, and correlation with axon regeneration. Glia. 2004; 46:225–51.
crossref
29. Hong CH, Yang JY, Lee JK, Song HS. The Effect of Methylprednisolone and Riluzole on Axonal Growth after Acute Spinal Cord Injury in Rats. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2008; 43:783–90.
crossref

Figures and Tables%

Fig. 1.
EMG recorded after spinal cord inury in dog: Noted severe training wave when spinal cord impacted. *SCI, spinal cord injury.
jkss-18-1f1.tif
Fig. 2.
This photograph shows the procedure and instrument of extraction RNA.
jkss-18-1f2.tif
Fig. 3.
Quality control of total RNA. All experimental material was well controlled.
jkss-18-1f3.tif
Fig. 4.
(A) Motor function after spinal cord injury at 1 day, 7 days by Tarlov's scale. (B) The count of motor function; There was no statistical difference between two groups. (C) Slides from Extracted spinal cord, vesicle and infiltration of inflammatory cells, edema was shown(H&E stain, ×20).
jkss-18-1f4.tif
Fig. 5.
This graphs show the acute inflammatory cytokines changes after spinal cord injury. Between two species, there was no significant difference(p>0.05).
jkss-18-1f5.tif
Fig. 6.
This graphs show the factors related with apoptosis. Also, there was no significant differences after spinal cord injury(p>0.05).
jkss-18-1f6.tif
Fig. 7.
This graphs show the changes of several neurotrophic factors. (A) GDNF was reduced more, statistically in dogs(p<0.05). (B),(C) These factors were no statistically differences(p>0.05).
jkss-18-1f7.tif
Fig. 8.
This graphs show the changes of factors related with extracellular matrix. (A), (B) These factors were all increased after spinal cord injury and there was no statistical differences(p>0.05). (C) MMP7 was reduced in rat, but increased in dog, also there was significant difference in changes(<0.05).
jkss-18-1f8.tif
Table 1.
Modified Tarlov's scale for motor function evaluation
Scale Degree of Paraplegia Symptoms
0 Flaccid Minimal or no leg movements; variable tone; loss of bowel/bladder control
1 Spastic Moderate or vigorous purposeless legmovements; leg spastic and extended; no sitting; loss of bowel/bladder control
2 Severe Only moderate spasticity in legs;vigorous, coordinated movements suggesting walking; can sit and stand; loss of bowel/bladder control
3 Moderate Sitting, standing, and walking are shown; legs and hips obviously unstable; leg lagging; loss of bowel/bladder control
4 Mild Walking with some leg and hip instability; bowel/bladder functional
5 Normal Hip instability seen only with jumping or running
Table 2.
Prepare of RT Cocktail
RT Cocktail 1 reaction 2 reaction 4 reaction
BC3(5X Rt Buffer 3) 4µl 8µl 16µl
P2(Primer & External Control Mix) 1µl 2µl 4µl
RE3(RT Enzyme Mix3) 2µl 4µl 8µl
H2 O 3µl 6µl 12µl
Final Volume 10µl 20µl 40µl
TOOLS
Similar articles