Abstract
Background
Recently, many Korean people travel abroad where malaria is prevalent. However, in Korea, relatively little is known about compliance of chemoprophylaxis against malaria. This study was performed to determine the factors influencing compliance of chemoprophylaxis against malaria in Korean travelers.
Materials and Methods
Face to face interview, telephone interview and e-mail correspondence were performed to 241 people who were prescribed with atovaquone-proguanil at the international travelers' clinic of National Medical Center between February 2007 and October 2007.
Results
Total of 55 people out of 235 reported one or more events of adverse reactions after chemoprophylaxis (total 76 events). However, in 38 adverse events the link between chemoprophylaxis and adverse events were very weak. Compliance of malaria chemoprophylaxis with atovaquone-proguanil was 53.9% in the study group. The predictive factors for non-compliance were package tour, travel of business affair and young age group.
Figures and Tables
Table 1
Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit χ2=2.307 (df=8) P=0.9701
*Continous variable expressed as mean ± std
†P-values based on linear trend test or Chi-squared test
‡Unadjusted odds ratio(OR) with 95% confidence intervals(CI) based on univariate logistic regression
§Adjusted ORs with 95% CIs after controlling for all other variables in the model by multiple logistic regression
‖P-value=0.0052 based on linear trend test
References
1. Byun KS. Recent epidemiologic changes of acute and chronic hepatitis in Korea. J Korean Med Assoc. 2005. 48:423–427.
2. Behrens RH, Roberts JA. Is travel prophylaxis worth while? Economic appraisal of prophylactic measures against malaria hepatitis A, and typhoid in travellers. BMJ. 1994. 309:918–922.
3. Phillips-Howard PA, Radalowicz A, Mitchell J, Bradley DJ. Risk of malaria in British residents returning from malarious areas. BMJ. 1990. 300:499–503.
4. Steffen R, Heusser R, Mchler R, Bruppacher R, Naef U, Chen D, Hofmann AM, Somaini B. Malaria chemoprophylaxis among European tourists in tropical Africa: use, adverse reactions, and efficacy. Bull World Health Organ. 1990. 68:313–322.
5. World Health Organization. International travel and health. Vaccination requirements and health advice. 1991. Geneva: WHO.
6. Bradley DJ, Warhurst DC. Malaria prophylaxis: guidelines for travellers from Britain. Malaria Reference Laboratory of the Public Health Laboratory Service, London. BMJ. 1995. 310:709–714.
7. Lobel HO, Roberts JM, Somaini B, Steffen R. Efficacy of malaria prophylaxis in American and Swiss travelers to Kenya. J Infect Dis. 1987. 155:1205–1209.
8. Gyorkos TW, Svenson JE, Maclean JD, Mohamed N, Remondin MH, Franco ED. Compliance with antimalarial chemoprophylaxis and the subsequent development of malaria: a matched case-control study. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995. 53:511–517.
9. Behrens RH, Curtis CF. Malaria in travellers: epidemiology and prevention. Br Med Bull. 1993. 49:363–381.
10. Lobel HO, Phillips-Howard PA, Brandling-Bennett AD, Steffen R, Campbell CC, Huong AY, Were JB, Moser R. Malaria incidence and prevention among European and North American travellers to Kenya. Bull World Health Organ. 1990. 68:209–215.
11. Huzly D, Schnfeld C, Beuerle W, Bienzle U. Malaria chemoprophylaxis in German tourists: A prospective study on compliance and adverse reactions. J Travel Med. 1996. 3:148–155.
12. Cobelens FG, Leentvaar-Kuijpers A. Compliance with malaria chemoprophylaxis and preventative measures against mosquito bites among Dutch travellers. Trop Med Int Health. 1997. 2:705–713.
13. Carme B, Peguet C, Nevez G. Compliance with and tolerance of mefloquine and chloroquine+proguanil malaria chemoprophylaxis in French short-term travellers to sub-Saharan Africa. Trop Med Int Health. 1997. 2:953–956.
14. Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention. National notifiable infectious diseases (NNID) in Korea 2007. Public Health Weekly Report. 2008. 1:309–310.