Journal List > J Korean Soc Echocardiogr > v.4(1) > 1075239

Han, Kim, Hur, Hyun, Kim, and Kim: Efficacy of 2-dimensional Contrast Echocardiography During Pericardiocentesis

Abstract

Background

Pericardiocentesis is simple procedure in itself but has been associated with serious complications. In this study we assess the mortality and morbidity of 2-dimentional contrast echocardiographically directed pericardiocentesis.

Method

Fourteen patients(8 males and 6 females, mean age: 55 years) with pericardial effusion were included in this study. The 2-dimensional echocardiographic transducer was placed at the apex and a 4-chamber view was obtained. When return of fluid was obtained at least 10cc were aspirated and discarded, then 5cc of agitated saline solution were injected through the explorating needle and cloud of echoes indicated the position of the needle. When its position in the pericardial sac was confirmed, the needle was replaced by a catheter, then 5cc of agitated saline solution were injected through the catheter and cloud of echoes confirm the location of the catheter.

Results

In all 14 patients a satisfactory apical 4-chamber view was obtained. The echocardiogram showed explorating needle in all patients but did'nt show exact location. The echocardiographic contrast effect produced by hand-agitated saline was seen in the pericardiac sac in all patients. The contrast study confirmed the position of the needle and catheter in the pericardial cavity in all patients. The life-threatening complications were not developed.

Conclusion

2-dimensional contrast echocardiographically directed pericardiocentesis is simple, safe and effective. It is useful in early detection of locating needle and catheter position, thus it could reduce the mortality and morbidity of pericardiocentesis.

References

1). Schlant RC, Alexander RW. Hurst's The Heart. 8th Ed. p. 1675–1676. New York: McGRAW-HILL. INC;1994.
2). Krikorian JG, Hankock EW. Pericardiocentesis. Am J med. 65:808–814. 1978.
crossref
3). Morin Je, Hollomby D, Gonda A, Long R, Dobell RC. Manegement of Uremic Pericarditis: A report of 11 patients with Cardiac Tamponade and a Review of the Literature. Annal Thorac Surg. 22:588–592. 1976.
4). Guberman BA, Fowler NO, Engel PJ, Gueron M, Allem JM. Cardiac Tamponade in Medical Patients. Circulation. 64:633–640. 1981.
crossref
5). Wong B, Murphy J, Hassenein K, Dunn M. The Risk of Pericardiocentesis. Am J Cardiol. 44:1110–1114. 1979.
crossref
6). Clarke DP, Cosgrove DO. Real-time Ultrasound Scanning in the Planning and Guidence of periocardiocentesis. Clinical Radiology. 38:119–122. 1987.
7). Chandraratna PAN, Reid CL, Mimalasuriya A, Kawanishi D, Rahimtoola SH. Application of 2-Dimentional Contrast Studies During Pericardiocentesis. Am J Cardiol. 52:1120–1122. 1983.
8). Preis LK, Taylor GJ, Martin RP. Traumatic Pericardiocentesis: Two-Dimensional Echocardiographic Visualization of an Unfortunate Event. Arch intern Med. 142:2327–2329. 1982.
9). Chandraratna PAN, First j, Langevin E, O'Dell R. Echocardiographic contrast studies during Pericardiocentesis. Ann Intern Med. 87:199–200. 1977.
crossref
10). Kiopatrick ZM, Chapman CB. On Pericardiocentesis. Am J Cardiol. 16:722–727. 1965.
11). Bishop LH Jr, Estes EH Jr, McIntosh HD. The Electrocardiogram as a Safeguard in Pericardiocentesis. JAMA. 162:264–265. 1956.
crossref
12). Feigenbaum H, Waldhausen JA, Hyde LP. Ultrasound Diagnosis of Pericardial Effusion. JAMA. 191:711–714. 1965.
crossref
13). Feigenbaum H, Zaky A, Waldhausen JA. Use of Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Pericardial Effusion. Ann of Intern Med. 65:443–452. 1966.
crossref
14). Tajik AJ. Echocardiography in Peficardial Effusion. Am J Med. 63:29–40. 1977.
15). Goldberg BB, Pollack HM. Ultrasonically Guided Pericardiocentesis. Am J Cardiol. 31:490–493. 1973.
crossref
16). Martin RP, Rakowski H, French J, Popp RL. Localization of Pericardial Effusion with Wide Angle Phased Array Echocardiography. Am J Cardiol. 42:904–912. 1978.
crossref
17). Callahan JA, Seward JB, Nishimura RA, Miller Jr FA, Reeder GS, Shub C, Callahan MJ, Schattenberg TT, Tsjik AJ. Two-Dimensional Echocardiographically Guided pericardiocentesis: Experience in 117 Consecutive Patients. Am J Cardiol. 55:476–479. 1985.
crossref
18). Callahan JA, Seward JB, Holmes Jr DR, Smith HC, Reeder GS, Miller Jr FA. Enhanced safety of Two-Dimensional Echocardiography-Directed Pericardiocentesis: A technique of Choice. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1(2):738. 1983.
19). Taavirsainen M, Bondestam S, Mankinen P, Pitkaranta P, Tierala E. Ultrsound guidence for pericardiecentesis. Acta Radiologica. 32:9–11. 1991.
20). Chandraratna PAN. Echocardiography and Doppler Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Pericardial Disease. Circulation. 84(suppl I):I–303-I-310. 1991.
21). Schuster AH, Nanda NC. Pericardiocentesis induced intrapericardial thrombus: Detection by two-dimentional echocardiography. Am Heart Journ. 104:308–311. 1982.
22). Susini G, Pepi M, Sisillo E, Bortone F, Salvi L, Barbier P, Fiorentini C. Percutatneous pericardiocentesis Versus Subxiphoid Pericardiotomy in Cardiac Tamponade Due to Postoperative pericardial Effusion. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia. 7:173–183. 1993.
23). Duvernoy O, Borowiec J, Helmius G, Erikson U. Complication of percutaneous pericardiocentesis under fluoroscopic guidence. Acta Radiologica. 33:309–313. 1992.

Fig. 1.
Apical 4-chamber view showing the pericardiocentesis needle within the pericardial sac.
jkse-4-80f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Saline solution injected through the needle has produced a contrast effect(arrow).
jkse-4-80f2.tif
Fig. 3.
2-dimentional echocardiogram showing the draining catheter within the pericardial sac(arrow).
jkse-4-80f3.tif
Fig. 4.
The two apical 4-chamber views show the massive pericardial effusion(left) and contrast effect(arrow) through the draining catheter confirmed the catheter position(right).
jkse-4-80f4.tif
TOOLS
Similar articles