Changes in 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in the Spinal Cord in a Healthy Population on Serial Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography

Ari Chong; Ho-Chun Song; Byung-Hyun Byun; Sun-Pyo Hong; Jung-Joon Min; Hee-Seung Bom; Jung-Min Ha; Jung-Kil Lee

doi:10.4068/cmj.2013.49.1.38

Journal List > Chonnam Med J > v.49(1) > 1074894

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Chong, Song, Byun, Hong, Min, Bom, Ha, and Lee: Changes in 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in the Spinal Cord in a Healthy Population on Serial Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography

Original Article

Neuroscience

Chonnam Medical Journal

Chonnam Medical Journal 2013; 49(1): 38-42.

Published online: 25 April 2013

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4068/cmj.2013.49.1.38

Changes in ¹⁸F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in the Spinal Cord in a Healthy Population on Serial Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography

Ari Chong, Ho-Chun Song¹, Byung-Hyun Byun², Sun-Pyo Hong², Jung-Joon Min², Hee-Seung Bom², Jung-Min Ha, Jung-Kil Lee³

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chosun University Hospital, School of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea.

¹Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.

²Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea.

³Department of Neurosurgery, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.

Corresponding Author: Ho-Chun Song. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, 42 Jebong-ro, Dong-gu, Gwangju 501-757, Korea. TEL: +82-62-220-5642, FAX: +82-62-223-1666, songhc@jnu.ac.kr

Received 10 January 2013 Revised 15 January 2013 Accepted 22 January 2013

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

We aimed to determine the changes in ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the spinal cord on two serial positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scans in a healthy population. We retrospectively enrolled healthy people who underwent PET/CT twice for cancer screening. We excluded those who had degenerative vertebral disease, neurologic disease, or a history of a vertebral operation. The standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the spinal cord of each mid-vertebral body was obtained by drawing a region of interest on an axial image of PET/CT. For analysis, the cord-to-background ratio (CTB) was used (CTB=SUVmax of each level/SUVmax of L5 level). Differences in pattern, sex, age, and intervals of the two serial PET/CT scans were analyzed. A total of 60 PET/CT images of 30 people were analyzed. The mean interval between the two PET/CT imaging studies was 2.80±0.94 years. On the follow-up PET/CT, significant change was shown only at the level of the C6 and T10 vertebrae (p<0.005). Mean CTB showed a decreasing pattern from cervical to lumbar vertebrae. There were two peaks at the lower cervical level (C4-6) and at the lower thoracic level (T12). Neither sex nor age significantly affected CTB. The FDG uptake of the spinal cord changed significantly on follow-up PET/CT only at the level of the C6 and T10 vertebrae. This finding is valuable as a baseline reference in the follow-up of metabolic changes in the spinal cord.

Keywords: Spinal cord, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Positron-emission tomography and computed tomography

INTRODUCTION

To date, no successful treatments for severe spinal cord injury are available because damaged nerve fibers are incapable of regeneration.1 Novel therapeutic approaches such as the transplantation of stem cells or neurons have been suggested.2,3 However, monitoring the therapeutic effect with conventional imaging is limited.4 Molecular imaging such as the use of positron emission tomography (PET) has been proposed for monitoring changes in the spinal cord.

No reports are available on whether ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in the spinal cord changes on serial PET/CT measurements performed in the same healthy population. There are several reports about FDG uptake in the spinal cord.5-7 However, those studies were done in patients with a cancer history and were conducted without follow-up PET/CT. Therapy such as radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or surgery might affect FDG uptake in the spinal cord.8-12 Also, many diseases, including spinal metastasis,13,14 spinal sarcoidosis,15,16 and myelopathy,17-19 can increase FDG uptake in the spinal cord. In addition, knowledge about possible variations of FDG uptake in the spinal cord of a normal population is fundamental for monitoring the spinal cord in various clinical settings.

Therefore, we examined whether FDG uptake in the spinal cord significantly changes on follow-up PET/CT imaging performed in the same healthy group.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1. Patient selection

The study was carried out in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This was a retrospective observation study. We enrolled people who underwent FDG PET/CT twice for cancer screening from January 2007 to December 2010. All PET/CT data were reevaluated by two nuclear medicine physicians. By screening the medical records and PET/CTs of these patients, we excluded all subjects with these characteristics: 1) a cancer history, 2) an abnormal PET/CT finding suggestive of malignant disease in any organ, 3) inflammatory or congenital vertebral disease, 4) compression fracture of the vertebra, 5) degenerative vertebral disease affecting the vertebral canal or normal curvature, 6) a history of a spinal operation, 7) a spinal tumor, or 8) a neurological deficit such as is seen after cerebral infarction or post-herpetic neuralgia. We also excluded those whose fusion images of PET/CT were incorrect owing to patient movement during the imaging. In the end, a total of 60 PET/CT images of 30 healthy people were analyzed. Twenty-four males and six females were enrolled. Age at first PET/CT was 52.80±8.19 years (mean±standard deviation; range: 42-77 years). The mean interval between the two PET/CT scans was 2.80±0.94 years (range: 0.93-3.62 years).

2. FDG PET/CT

After the healthy subjects had fasted for at least 6 hours, approximately 375 MBq of FDG was injected via an antecubital vein. FDG PET/CT scanning was performed by using a dedicated PET scanner (DST PET/CT; Discovery ST PET-CT, General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI, USA). Non-contrast-enhanced CT scans (helical, 8 slice, 120 Kvp, 10-130 mAs, and 3.79-mm slice thickness) were performed for attenuation correction. PET scans (3 min/bed, 6-8 beds) were obtained at 60 minutes after FDG injection. PET and CT data were reconstructed by OSEM (ordered subset expectation maximization) after attenuation correction [128×128 matrix, 3.27-mm slice thickness, subsets: 21, iteration: 2, post-Filter: 5.14 FWHM (mm), loop-Filter: 4.69 FWHM, diameter: 60 cm].

3. Drawing region-of-interest for SUVmax

The standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the spinal cord was obtained at each vertebral level (the midpoint level of each vertebral body) by using Advanced Workstation 4.3 (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences). Fig. 1 describes the methods. We recorded all SUVmax values of the spinal cord from C1 to L5.

4. Statistical analysis

For internal control, we used the SUVmax of the spinal cord at the L5 vertebra. From this, the cord-to-background ratio (CTB=SUVmax of each level/SUVmax of L5 level) was calculated.6 Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS software (version 19.0).

The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to test the normality of continuous variables. Based on the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, the nonparametric test was used in this study. We used significance levels of 0.001 and 0.005. The mean CTB of each vertebral level was obtained for the first and second PET/CT scans. The pattern of spinal uptake was determined by drawing a graph based on the mean CTB of each vertebral level by using the clustered multiple variables graph function of Medcalc (version 11.2.1.0.).

The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for comparison of the CTB at each vertebral level between the first and second PET/CT scans. Mann-Whitney's U test was used for comparison of CTBs between males and females. Spearman's correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship between age and the CTB of each vertebral level. To assess whether the second PET/CT scan in a warmer season showed lower spinal uptake than the first PET/CT scan in a colder season, we used Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

The mean CTB in healthy subjects showed a decreasing pattern along the spinal cord from the cervical to the lumbar vertebrae. There were two peaks at the lower cervical level (C4-6) and at the lower thoracic level (T12), respectively (Fig. 2).

The graph of the second PET/CT was lower than the graph of the first PET/CT (Fig. 2). However, the Wilcoxon signed rank test (with a significance level of p<0.001) failed to show significant differences in FDG uptake in the spinal cord for each vertebral level between the first and second PET/CT (Table 1). With a significance level of p<0.005, only two levels (C6 and T10 vertebrae) showed a significant difference between the first and second PET/CT (Table 1, Fig. 2).

For C6 and T10, we analyzed whether the difference in season resulted in lower spinal uptake on the second PET/CT than on the first PET/CT. However, Fisher's exact test revealed no significant difference (p=1).

Mann-Whitney's U test revealed that there was no significant difference in CTB between males and females (p>0.1). Spearman's correlation analysis revealed that there was no correlation between age and CTB at any vertebral level (p>0.001). Even though this finding did not meet the significance levels of this study, a moderate positive correlation between age and CTB was seen at several vertebral levels: C6 (rho=0.4, p=0.029), C7 (rho=0.385, p=0.035), T6 (rho=0.429, p=0.018), T8 (rho=0.366, p=0.048), and L3 (rho=0.431, p=0.017). All other levels showed insignificant differences (p>0.05).

DISCUSSION

The present study in which two serial FDG PET/CT scans in the same healthy subjects were analyzed showed changes in spinal cord FDG uptake at the level of the C6 and T10 vertebrae (p<0.005). The individual FDG uptake in the spinal cord in each person showed a highly variable pattern. Therefore, we used a strict standard of p<0.001 or p<0.005 to determine statistical significance. Even under this strict standard, we found that FDG uptake in the spinal cord changed significantly only at the vertebral levels of C6 and T10 (p<0.005). As far as we are aware, this is the first report showing differences in spinal uptake in normal subjects with serial PET/CT measurements.

The peaks of FDG uptake in the spinal cord in our study correlate well with the results of previous reports.5-7 Do et al.6 reported two peaks of uptake: at the T11-T12 vertebral body levels and at the C4 vertebral body level. McCarville et al.7 reported two peaks at the mid-cervical and lower-thoracic cord in a study of children with a history of malignancy. Do et al.6 and McCarville et al.7 provided both anatomical and functional reasons to explain the FDG peaks in the spinal cord. Anatomically, the cross-sectional area of the spinal cord decreases along the spinal cord in a cranial to caudal direction with two exceptions that are related to cervical and lumbar enlargement.20 Cervical enlargement of the spinal cord is from the C3 to the T2 vertebral body level (spinal cord segments C6 to C8). Lumbar enlargement of the spinal cord is from the T9 to the T12 vertebral body level (spinal cord segment L4 to S1).20 (Note that vertebral body levels do not correspond to the same-numbered spinal cord segments.) Do et al.6 pointed out that the amount of gray matter in the spinal cord may partly influence the pattern of FDG uptake. The amount of gray matter is known to be most abundant in the spinal cord at the C4 to C8 vertebral levels and at vertebral levels of L4 to S1.21,22 Functionally, the cervical cord modulates neurologic transmission from the upper extremities; the distal cord from segment T11 through L1 modulates neurologic transmission from the lower extremities. Do et al.6 suggested that the FDG peak in the spinal cord represents the neurological demands at these levels. Therefore, these two levels of the spinal cord would be expected to be more metabolically active than other levels.

Our results may support the hypothesis that the FDG peaks in the spinal cord at the levels of cervical and lumbar enlargement are partially due to the functional activity of the corresponding spinal cord segments. The changes at the C6 and T10 vertebral levels were not associated with age in our subjects, because in our study, FDG uptake in the spinal cord at each vertebral level was not correlated with age. The reason for the differences in uptake at the C6 and T10 vertebral levels is not clear, but we speculate that it might be due to differences in neurologic demand such as sensory stimuli during the second PET/CT scan. There are some reports showing that sensory stimuli to the extremities increase metabolic activity in the affected level of the spinal cord on functional magnetic resonance imaging.23,24 It is well known that brain FDG metabolism is affected by sensory stimuli.25,26 However, as far as we know, there has been no FDG PET study reporting on spinal cord activity and sensory stimuli to the extremities.

Amin et al.5 reported an interesting result in spinal cord uptake in cancer patients. They found that spinal cord uptake occurred more often in winter than in summer.5 They explained that a fasting state, a stressful state, and cold weather could be additional physical stress factors. They suggested that activation of the sympathico-adrenal system in such circumstances inhibits glucose uptake by peripheral tissue by inhibiting insulin release, inducing insulin resistance, and increasing hepatic glucose production; thus, increased glucose flux to the CNS occurs.5,27 In our study, we analyzed whether the seasonal difference (colder to warmer season) affected the lower spinal uptake on the second PET/CT compared with the first PET/CT. We failed to show a significant result. However, most of the first PET studies of our study were conducted during February to April (regarding first PET/CT: 1 case in January, 7 cases in February, 9 cases in March, 6 cases in April, 2 cases in May, 2 cases in June, and 1 case in October). This might cause the different result between our study and that of Amin et al.5

There are limitations to this study. There was no correlation between CTB and age in our study. However, FDG uptake on the follow-up PET/CT seemed to be lower than that on the first PET/CT (Fig. 2), even though it was not statistically significant at the level of p<0.001. However, owing to the small number of enrolled subjects, the analysis of the correlation between age and FDG uptake of the spinal cord is limited. Moreover, we were not able to enroll subjects younger than 42 years. Most enrolled subjects were in their forties (n=12) or fifties (n=14). The interval between the two PET/CT scans was only 2.80±0.94 years (mean). Previously, McCarville et al.7 reported that the metabolic activity of the spinal cord increases with age in children. Therefore, further study with a larger population with various age groups is needed for the analysis of effect of aging on spinal cord FDG uptake. In addition, we did not exclude subjects with arthritis or other diseases in the extremities. There is a report showing that arthritis in the rat knee induces changes in the immunoreactivity of the spinal cord.28 Furthermore, tactile or thermal stimuli to the extremities before or during the FDG injection could not be strictly controlled in the PET/CT procedure. In addition, we only measured FDG uptake at the mid-vertebral body level. Volumetric data were not used. Another limitation is that we used OSEM, not fully 3D ordinary-Poisson LOR-OSEM with PSF (LOR-OSEM-3D-PSF; HD*PET) as did Amin et al.5 Despite these limitations, however, the results of this study are meaningful as a baseline reference in the follow-up of metabolic changes to the spinal cord.

Figures and Tables

FIG. 1

Demonstration of a drawing of the region-of-interest for FDG uptake in the spinal cord at each vertebral body level. (A) Fused PET/CT image in sagittal view. (B) Sagittal PET image. (C) Sagittal CT image. (D) Axial view of fused PET/CT image at the level of the yellow cross mark of the image. (E) Axial view of the CT image at the same level as in D. First, we placed a cursor at the level of the specific vertebra (at the middle height of the vertebral body). Then, Advanced Workstation 3.4 automatically showed axial views of each PET, CT, and fusion PET/CT images at the same level. Using the fused image, we drew the region-of-interest (ROI) in the spinal canal. The SUVmax of the ROI was obtained. We repeated the same process at all vertebral levels in every subject.

FIG. 2

Changes of mean ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in the spinal cord of 30 healthy people between the first and follow-up PET/CT. FDG uptake is shown as the cord-to-background ratio (CTB, cord SUVmax to L5 SUVmax). The graph shows the mean CTB of each vertebral level of the spinal cord of 30 healthy people (white circle mark). It shows a decreasing pattern along the spinal cord from the cervical to lumbar vertebrae. There are two peaks at the lower cervical level (C4-7) and at the lower thoracic level (T12). The follow-up FDG PET/CT (rectangular mark) was done after more than a year (2.80±0.94 years). The cervical peak was not prominent in the follow-up PET/CT. Moreover, the mean CTB of each level was lower in the second PET. However, the Wilcoxon signed rank test showed that there was no significant change in FDG uptake in the spinal cord at each vertebral level between the first and second PET/CT with the significance level of p<0.001 (Also see Table 1). Note: Error bars represent the 9% confidence interval (CI) of each mean value.

TABLE 1

Comparison of FDG uptake in the spinal cord at each vertebral level between the first and second PET/CT

CTB: the cord-to-background ratio (cord SUVmax to L5 SUVmax), SD: standard deviation. ^*p<0.005 between the first and second CTB by Wilcoxon signed rank test, ^†Median CTB of the spinal cord at each vertebral level on the first PET/CT.

References

1. Zhang N, Wimmer J, Qian SJ, Chen WS. Stem cells: current approach and future prospects in spinal cord injury repair. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2010. 293:519–530.

2. Saporta S, Makoui AS, Willing AE, Daadi M, Cahill DW, Sanberg PR. Functional recovery after complete contusion injury to the spinal cord and transplantation of human neuroteratocarcinoma neurons in rats. J Neurosurg. 2002. 97:1 Suppl. 63–68.

3. Coutts M, Keirstead HS. Stem cells for the treatment of spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol. 2008. 209:368–377.

4. Frangioni JV, Hajjar RJ. In vivo tracking of stem cells for clinical trials in cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2004. 110:3378–3383.

5. Amin A, Rosenbaum SJ, Bockisch A. Physiological ¹⁸F-FDG uptake by the spinal cord: is it a point of consideration for cancer patients? J Neurooncol. 2012. 107:609–615.

6. Do BH, Mari C, Tseng JR, Quon A, Rosenberg J, Biswal S. Pattern of 18F-FDG uptake in the spinal cord in patients with non-central nervous system malignancy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011. 36:E1395–E1401.

7. McCarville MB, Monu N, Smeltzer MP, Li CS, Laningham FH, Morris EB, et al. PET-CT of the normal spinal cord in children. Acad Radiol. 2009. 16:881–885.

8. Esik O, Emri M, Szakáll S Jr, Herzog H, Sáfrány G, Lengyel E, et al. PET identifies transitional metabolic change in the spinal cord following a subthreshold dose of irradiation. Pathol Oncol Res. 2004. 10:42–46.

9. Esik O, Csere T, Stefanits K, Szakáll S Jr, Lengyel Z, Sáfrány G, et al. Increased metabolic activity in the spinal cord of patients with long-standing Lhermitte's sign. Strahlenther Onkol. 2003. 179:690–693.

10. Chamroonrat W, Posteraro A, El-Haddad G, Zhuang H, Alavi A. Radiation myelopathy visualized as increased FDG uptake on positron emission tomography. Clin Nucl Med. 2005. 30:560.

11. Esik O, Emri M, Csornai M, Kásler M, Gödény M, Trón L. Radiation myelopathy with partial functional recovery: PET evidence of long-term increased metabolic activity of the spinal cord. J Neurol Sci. 1999. 163:39–43.

12. Esik O, Lengyel Z, Sáfrány G, Vönöczky K, Agoston P, Székely J, et al. A PET study on the characterization of partially reversible radiogenic lower motor neurone disease. Spinal Cord. 2002. 40:468–473.

13. Komori T, Delbeke D. Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis and intramedullary spinal cord metastases from lung cancer: detection with FDG positron emission tomography. Clin Nucl Med. 2001. 26:905–907.

14. Jeon MJ, Kim TY, Han JM, Yim JH, Rhim SC, Kim WB, et al. Intramedullary spinal cord metastasis from papillary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid. 2011. 21:1269–1271.

15. Ota K, Tsunemi T, Saito K, Yamanami F, Watanabe M, Irioka T, et al. 18F-FDG PET successfully detects spinal cord sarcoidosis. J Neurol. 2009. 256:1943–1946.

16. Sakushima K, Yabe I, Shiga T, Yashima-Yamada M, Tsuji-Akimoto S, Terae S, et al. FDG-PET SUV can distinguish between spinal sarcoidosis and myelopathy with canal stenosis. J Neurol. 2011. 258:227–230.

17. Floeth FW, Stoffels G, Herdmann J, Jansen P, Meyer W, Steiger HJ, et al. Regional impairment of 18F-FDG uptake in the cervical spinal cord in patients with monosegmental chronic cervical myelopathy. Eur Radiol. 2010. 20:2925–2932.

18. Uchida K, Nakajima H, Yayama T, Kobayashi S, Shimada S, Tsuchida T, et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging and 18FDG-PET findings of the cervical spinal cord before and after decompressive surgery in patients with compressive myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009. 34:1185–1191.

19. Baba H, Uchida K, Sadato N, Yonekura Y, Kamoto Y, Maezawa Y, et al. Potential usefulness of 18F-2-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography in cervical compressive myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999. 24:1449–1454.

20. Gray H. William PL, editor. Gray's anatomy. Spinal Medulla or Cord. 1989. 37th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone;922.

21. Kameyama T, Hashizume Y, Sobue G. Morphologic features of the normal human cadaveric spinal cord. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996. 21:1285–1290.

22. Schafer EA. Quain J, Schafer EA, Thane GD, editors. Quain's elements of anatomy. The Spinal Cord. 1900. 10th ed. London: Longmans, Green and Co.;1–219.

23. Cahill CM, Stroman PW. Mapping of neural activity produced by thermal pain in the healthy human spinal cord and brain stem: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Magn Reson Imaging. 2011. 29:342–352.

24. Stroman PW, Coe BC, Munoz DP. Influence of attention focus on neural activity in the human spinal cord during thermal sensory stimulation. Magn Reson Imaging. 2011. 29:9–18.

25. Chen YY, Shih YY, Chien CN, Chou TW, Lee TW, Jaw FS. MicroPET study of brain neuronal metabolism under electrical and mechanical stimulation of the rat tail. Nucl Med Commun. 2009. 30:188–193.

26. Chen YY, Shih YY, Lo YC, Lu PL, Tsang S, Jaw FS, et al. MicroPET imaging of noxious thermal stimuli in the conscious rat brain. Somatosens Mot Res. 2010. 27:69–81.

27. Fehm HL, Kern W, Peters A. The selfish brain: competition for energy resources. Prog Brain Res. 2006. 153:129–140.

28. Mapp PI, Terenghi G, Walsh DA, Chen ST, Cruwys SC, Garrett N, et al. Monoarthritis in the rat knee induces bilateral and time-dependent changes in substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide immunoreactivity in the spinal cord. Neuroscience. 1993. 57:1091–1096.

TOOLS

Similar articles