One of major limitations of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty(PTCA) is restenosis. The reliable factors predicting restenosis after successful PTCA might be important in the prevention and treatment of coronary restenosis after PTCA.

To see whether any of the clinical, angiographic. or procedural factors is likely coronary angiography due to recurrent ischemic symptoms and positive stress tests among 529 patients recived PTCA between Jul '90 and Sep 93' at the Chonnam University Hospital were analysed.

1) Follow-up coronary angiogram demonstrated restenosis in 67 patient(group A, 55.1±10.3 year, 58 male, 9 female) and no restenosis in 27 patients(group B, 55.4±10.3 year, 24 male, 3 female) demonstrating restenosis rate of 60.6% in this clinically suspicious group.

2) Age, sex, class and duration of angina, and clinical diagnosis were not different from each other between two groups. But the time interval from PTCA to follow-up angiogram was shorter in group A (5.3 ±5.2 months) than in group B(9.1±5.6 months) and hypertension was more prevalent in group A (83.3%) than in group B(16.7%).

3) Angiographic findings such as AHA lesion types, lesion sites, TIMI flow, angulation, lesion length, branching lesion, dissection and residual stenosis were similar in two groups. But all of the eleven lesions with coronary artery calcification were found to develop restenosis.

4) As procedural factors, total ballon inflation time, the numbers of repeated inflations and maximal inflation pressure were not significantly different between two groups.

Above results show that any single or combined clinical and angiographic findings except symptoms or signs suggesting myocardial ischemia, hypertension and coronary calcification could not predict the development of coronary restenosis ie the patients with shorter duration from PTCA to the clinical evidence suggestive of myocardial ischemia, hypertension and coronary calcification demonstrated by cineangiography were more likely to develop subsequent restenosis.