The purpose of this study is to evaluate the immediate survival, complication and follow-up results of aortic dissection and to analyze the risk factors that determine the prognosis after aortic dissection.

29 patients(M : 12, Age : 59.0±11 yrs) with aortic dissection were reviewed retrospectively. Any dissection involving the ascending aorta was classified as proximal dissection and the dissection was considered to be acute if time from clinical onset of the dissection to admission was less than 2 weeks. The immediate survival rate and follow-up results of aortic dissection was compared by type, onset and mode of treatment.

1) The studied patient were 29(Acute onset : 24, Proximal type : 14) and 17 patients(Proximal type : 14) were surgically treated. 2) Five of 10 patients with proximal dissection and 4 of 12 patients with distal dissection, who were managed by medical treatment, died, and 1 of 4 patients with proximal dissection and none of 3 patients with distal dissection, who were managed by surgical treatment, died at hospital. There was no significant statistical difference in mortality according to type, onset and mode of treatment. 3) Nine of 14 patients with proximal dissection and 8 of 15 patients with distal dissection had one or more complications. 4) The cause of death could be established in 10 patients. The most frequent cause of death was aortic rupture including cardiac tamponade(4 of 6 patients for proximal dissection, 2 of 3 patients for distal dissection). 5) The most of death, 8 of 10 deaths occurred within 2 weeks of onset of disease. there was a good life expectancy for the discharged patient regardless of type, onset and mode of treatment.

These data showed that there was equivalent outcomes in patients with aortic dissection regardless of type, onset and mode of treatment. But these data would not be applied to general population with aortic dissection because of limited number of the study.