Journal List > J Korean Assoc Pediatr Surg > v.23(2) > 1071984

TOOLS
Cho and Kim: Laparoscopic versus Open Herniorrhapy in Corrected Age 3 Months
Original Article

Journal of the Korean Association of Pediatric Surgeons 2017; 23(2): 48-51.

Published online: 20 December 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13029/jkaps.2017.23.2.48

Laparoscopic versus Open Herniorrhapy in Corrected Age 3 Months

Yu Jeong Cho, Dae Yeon Kim

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Correspondence: Dae Yeon Kim, Department of Pediatric Surgery, Asan Medical Center Children's Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea. Tel: +82-2-3010-3510, Fax: +82-2-3010-6701, kimdy@amc.seoul.kr

Received 11 May 2017       Revised 16 August 2017       Accepted 23 August 2017

Copyright © 2017 Korean Association of Pediatric Surgeons

Korean Association of Pediatric Surgeons

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

Inguinal hernia in early infant is a challenging surgical condition. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LH) for small babies in corrected age 3 months compared with the traditional open inguinal hernia repair (OH).

Methods

Medical records were retrospectively reviewed in 232 pediatric patients under corrected age 3 months who underwent inguinal hernia repair from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2015. The chi-squared and Fisher's exact test were used to analyze the results of the study.

Results

As for operative time, in unilateral/bilateral inguinal hernia repair, OH is faster than LH (p<0.05 vs. p=0.06). But operation time gap is shorter in bilateral hernia than unilateral hernia. As for operation site, bilateral inguinal hernia case was more performed in LH than OH (p<0.05). For comparison with the spontaneous breathing recovery time, there was no statistical difference between the two techniques (p=0.96). As for the recurrence rate, no significant difference was observed between the two techniques (p=0.36), whereas the relative risk of recurrence was higher for OH compared with LH (OR=1.56).

Conclusion

LH is also feasible and safe procedure as OH for small babies in corrected age 3 months for experienced pediatric surgeons.

Keywords: Infant, Hernia, Inguinal, Herniorrhaphy, Laparoscopy

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

View of vas and spermatic vessel.

jkaps-23-48-g001
Fig. 2

The purse-string suture with non-absorbable suture.

jkaps-23-48-g002
Table 1

Data for the Study Patients according to Operative Type

jkaps-23-48-i001

Values are presented as n (%), mean±SD (median), or mean (median).

OH, open inguinal hernia repair; LH, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

*p<0.05.

Right/left: a)56/60; b)8/13.

Notes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Pastore V, Bartoli F. Neonatal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a 3-year experience. Hernia. 2015; 19:611–615.
2. Shalaby R, Ibrahem R, Shahin M, Yehya A, Abdalrazek M, Alsayaad I, et al. Laparoscopic hernia repair versus open herniotomy in children: a controlled randomized study. Minim Invasive Surg. 2012; 2012:484135.
3. Shalaby R, Ismail M, Dorgham A, Hefny K, Alsaied G, Gabr K, et al. Laparoscopic hernia repair in infancy and childhood: evaluation of 2 different techniques. J Pediatr Surg. 2010; 45:2210–2216.
4. Schier F. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair-a prospective personal series of 542 children. J Pediatr Surg. 2006; 41:1081–1084.
5. Cam C, Celik C, Sancak A, Iskender C, Karateke A. Inguinal herniorrhaphy in childhood may result in tubal damage and future infertility. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009; 279:175–176.
6. Eshtewi SA. Laparoscopy complications in neonates and small infants. World J Laparosc Surg. 2008; 1:15–19.
7. Hillier SC, Krishna G, Brasoveanu E. Neonatal anesthesia. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2004; 13:142–151.
8. Turial S, Enders J, Krause K, Schier F. Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy in babies weighing 5 kg or less. Surg Endosc. 2011; 25:72–78.
9. Chan IH, Lau CT, Chung PH, Chan KL, Lan LC, Wong KK, et al. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in premature neonates: is it safe? Pediatr Surg Int. 2013; 29:327–330.
10. Lee SL, Gleason JM, Sydorak RM. A critical review of premature infants with inguinal hernias: optimal timing of repair, incarceration risk, and postoperative apnea. J Pediatr Surg. 2011; 46:217–220.
11. Lautz TB, Raval MV, Reynolds M. Does timing matter? A national perspective on the risk of incarceration in premature neonates with inguinal hernia. J Pediatr. 2011; 158:573–577.
12. Schier F. Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy in girls. J Pediatr Surg. 1998; 33:1495–1497.
13. Chan KL, Tam PK. Technical refinements in laparoscopic repair of childhood inguinal hernias. Surg Endosc. 2004; 18:957–960.
14. Lee Y, Liang J. Experience with 450 cases of micro-laparoscopic herniotomy in infants and children. Pediatr Endo Surg Innov Tech. 2002; 6:25–28.
15. Ron O, Eaton S, Pierro A. Systematic review of the risk of developing a metachronous contralateral inguinal hernia in children. Br J Surg. 2007; 94:804–811.
TOOLS
Similar articles