Journal List > J Korean Assoc Pediatr Surg > v.22(1) > 1071963

TOOLS
Kim, Kim, Kim, Kim, Kim, Nam, Park, Park, Park, Park, Seo, Seol, Shin, Oh, Lee, Lee, Lee, Jang, Jang, Jung, Jung, Jung, Jung, Jung, Cho, Choi, Choi, Choi, Choi, Han, and Heo: Newborns Surgery with Congenital Anomalies: A National Survey of Its Members by Korean Association of Pediatric Surgeons
Review Article

Journal of the Korean Association of Pediatric Surgeons 2016; 22(1): 1-5.

Published online: 30 June 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13029/jkaps.2016.22.1.1

Newborns Surgery with Congenital Anomalies: A National Survey of Its Members by Korean Association of Pediatric Surgeons

D Y Kim, S C Kim, S H Kim, H Y Kim, H Y Kim, S H Nam, K W Park, J B Park, J Y Park, T J Park, J M Seo, J Y Seol, J H Shin, J T Oh, M D Lee, S K Lee, S C Lee, E Y Jang, H K Jang, S Y Jung, S E Jung, S M Jung, Y J Jung, E Y Jung, M J Cho, S J N Choi, S O Choi, S H Choi, Y M Choi, S J Han, T K Heo

Korean Association of Pediatric Surgeons, Korea.

Correspondence: Dae Yeon Kim, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea. Tel: +82-2-3010-3961, Fax: +82-2-3010-6841, kimdy@amc.seoul.kr

Received 17 May 2016       Accepted 17 May 2016

Copyright © 2016 by the Korean Association of Pediatric Surgeons

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

National survey for newborns surgery with congenital anomalies by Korean Association of Pediatric Surgeons (KAPS) was done. A questionnaire was sent to all members of the KAPS on March 2014. The current survey is to review three years status of the newborn surgery from 2012 to 2013. Thirty-four members (27.9%) took part in the survey that included data for the diagnosis, number and procedures of neonatal surgical cases. The result was discussed at the Topic Discussion section of the 30th Annual Congress of KAPS, 2014.

Keywords: Neonate, National surveys, Surgery, Korea

Figures and Tables

Table 1

Newborn Surgery by ICD-10

jkaps-22-1-i001

ICD, International Classification of Diseases.

Table 2

The Comparisons according to Gestational Age (n=893)

jkaps-22-1-i002

Values are presented as n only or mean±SD.

Table 3

The Comparisons according to Birth Weight (n=893)

jkaps-22-1-i003

Values are presented as n only or mean±SD.

Table 4

The Comparisons according to Body Weight on Operation (n=893)

jkaps-22-1-i004

Values are presented as n only or mean±SD.

Table 5

Complication (n=893)

jkaps-22-1-i005
Table 6

The Status of Congenital Small Bowel Obstructions (n=134)

jkaps-22-1-i006

Values are presented as n (%), n only, or mean±SD (range).

Table 7

The Status of Imperforate Anus (n=124)

jkaps-22-1-i007

Values are presented as n (%), n only, or mean±SD (range).

Table 8

The Status of Esophageal Atresia (n=103)

jkaps-22-1-i008

Values are presented as n (%), n only, or mean±SD (range).

Table 9

The Status of Congenital Abdominal Wall Defects (n=38)

jkaps-22-1-i009

Values are presented as n (%), n only, or mean±SD (range).

Table 10

The Status of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia (n=75)

jkaps-22-1-i010

Values are presented as n (%), n only, or mean±SD (range).

Table 11

The Status of Congenital Rotational Anomaly (n=62)

jkaps-22-1-i011

Values are presented as n (%), n only, or mean±SD (range).

Table 12

The Status of Stomy Operation (n=153)

jkaps-22-1-i012

Values are presented as n (%), n only, or mean±SD (range).

Notes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Lee MD, Kim SY, Kim WK, Kim IK, Kim SC, Kim SK, et al. Index cases in pediatric surgery: a national survey by the Korean Association of Pediatric Surgeons, 2000. J Korean Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2001; 7:147–156.
TOOLS
Similar articles