Celecoxib induces cell death on non-small cell lung cancer cells through endoplasmic reticulum stress

Bomi Kim; Jayoung Kim; Yeong Seok Kim

doi:10.5115/acb.2017.50.4.293

Journal List > Anat Cell Biol > v.50(4) > 1071913

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Kim, Kim, and Kim: Celecoxib induces cell death on non-small cell lung cancer cells through endoplasmic reticulum stress

Original Article

Disease-oriented Research

Anatomy & Cell Biology 2017; 50(4): 293-300.

Published online: 29 December 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.2017.50.4.293

Celecoxib induces cell death on non-small cell lung cancer cells through endoplasmic reticulum stress

Bomi Kim^1,^*, Jayoung Kim^2,^*, Yeong Seok Kim²

¹Department of Pathology, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea.

²Department of Anatomy and Research Center for Tumor Immunology, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.

Corresponding author: Yeong Seok Kim. Department of Anatomy and Research Center for Tumor Immunology, Inje University College of Medicine, 75 Bokji-ro, Busanjin-gu, Busan 47392, Korea. Tel: +82-51-890-6634, Fax: +82-51-896-6634, newsoft@inje.ac.kr

Equal contributor:

*These two authors contributed equally to this work.

Received 27 November 2017 Revised 30 November 2017 Accepted 1 December 2017

Anatomy & Cell Biology

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is an enzyme induced by various proinflammatory and mitogenic stimuli. Celecoxib is a selective inhibitor of COX-2 that have been shown to affect cell growth and apoptosis. Lung cancer cells expressing COX-2 is able to be a target of celecoxib, this study focuses on investigating that celecoxib induces apoptosis via endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress on lung cancer cells. We investigated whether celecoxib induced apoptosis on non-small cell lung cancer cell line, A549 and H460. The 50 µM of celecoxib increased apoptotic cells and 100 µM of celecoxib significantly induced apoptosis. To check involvement of caspase cascade, pretreatment of z-VAD-fmk blocked celecoxib-induced apoptosis. However, caspase-3, -8, and -9 were not activated, but cleavage of non-classical caspase-4 was detected using western blot. As checking ER stress associated molecules, celecoxib did not increase expressions of growth arrest and DNA damage inducible protein 34, activating transcription factor 4, and spliced X-box binding protiens-1, but increase of both glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) and C/EBP homologous transcription factor were detected. Salubrinal, inhibitor of eIF2 and siRNA for IRE1 did not alter celecoxib-induced apoptosis. Instead, celecoxib-induced apoptosis might be deeply associated with ER stress depending on GRP78 because siRNA for GRP78 enhanced apoptosis. Taken together, celecoxib triggered ER stress on lung cancer cells and celecoxib-induced apoptosis might be involved in both non-classical caspase-4 and GRP78.

Keywords: Celecoxib, Lung neoplasms, ER stress, Apoptosis

Introduction

Lung cancer is a common cancer and life-threatening disease in Korea. The mortality of lung cancer is highest than colon, breast, or prostate cancers [1 2 3 4]. Lung cancer is classified as two types which are small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The molecular pathogenesis of SCLC and NSCLC is different. SCLC accounts for 15% of lung cancer cases and it is a highly malignant and clinically aggressive tumor. On the other hand, 85% of lung cancers are diagnosed as NSCLC and has three major subtypes: adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and large cell carcinoma [3 5 6 7].

A lot of agents have been used for clinical treatment of lung cancer [7]. One of the targets is the cyclooxygenase (COX) which is evaluated in the treatment of lung cancer. COX is essential enzyme for the prostaglandins (PGs) synthesis. PGs are involved in various physiological and pathogenetic processes such as inflammatory reaction, gastro-intestinal cytoprotection, ulceration, hemostasis, and thrombosis [8 9 10 11 12 13 14]. COX enzyme has two isoforms, COX-1 and COX-2. While COX-1 is consistutively expressed in most cells and tissues, COX-2 is expressed in central nervous system, kidney, and seminal vesicles. However, it can be induced by various proinflammatory and mitogenic stimuli [8 9 10].

To regulate function of COX, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been used traditionally for several decades. NSAIDs are agents for treatment of pain, inflammation, and fever [12 15]. NSAIDs has been used to manage pain and suppress inflammation in arthritis, but these days they are also used as the agents for cancer therapeutics. NSAIDs have contributed to anti-proliferation and pro-apoptosis on a various cancer cells, such as colorectal cancer, breast cancer, or gastric cancer [8 11 12 13 16 17 18]. NSAIDs block a production of PGs by the inhibition of COX-1 and COX-2 in normal and inflammatory tissues. There are side effects such as gastrointestinal tract bleeding and kidney failure when NSAIDs are treated for a long time [12 15 18 19]. These side effects are known by inhibition of COX-1 [12 19]. On the other hand, COX-2 inhibitors are widely used because they have little side effect. There are several selective COX-2 inhibitors, for example rofecoxib, etoricoxib, and celecoxib. The celecoxib makes little effects for COX-1, and inhibits tumor initiation and tumor cell growth. In past studies, celecoxib was reported which decreases risk of colon, breast, esophagus, and gastric cancer, it is also effective for chemotherapy and radiotherapy of cancer patients [16]. Celecoxib induces cell cycle arrest, inhibits tumor growth, suppresses tumor angiogenesis and induces apoptosis in several types of cancers [14 16 18]. Moreover, celecoxib induces apoptotic cell death in tumor cells and endothelial cells [11 16 19]. Therefore, investigation of mechanism on celecoxib-induced apoptosis is important to understand anti-cancer activity.

Recently, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress has been reported as a major mechanism that celecoxib can induce cell death in cancer [20 21 22 23 24]. Unfolded protein response (UPR) is a pro-survival mechanism and remains homeostasis of cells in ER stress state. However, if this adaptation is not proven to be sufficient, the apoptosis starts [20 21 25 26]. Several solid tumors undergo ER stress and are going to fall a fate, such as adaptation or apoptosis. Three types of ER transmembrane proteins are important: protein-kinase and site-specific endoribonuclease inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1), protein-kinase R-like ER kinase (PERK)/pancreatic eIF2 kinase and activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) [20 21 26]. C/EBP homologous transcription factor (CHOP) is a major transcription factor of pro-apoptosis and regulates ER stress-induced apoptosis. CHOP induces cell death through controlling the expression of other genes [20 21]. ER stress is induced by NSAIDs treatment which causes ER membrane protein PERK to phosphorylate eIF2α. CHOP is up-regulated after the phospho-eIF2α protein activates ATF4. NSAIDs also induces apoptosis through another complicated mechanism as well as ER stress [19].

Taken together, celecoxib affects obviously cell death of lung cancer but its mechanism is unclear. In this study, the involvement of ER stress in cell death is investigated when celecoxib is treated on lung cancer cells.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture

Human lung carcinoma cell line A549 and H460 (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) were maintained in RPMI1640 medium (Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone) and 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Hyclone) at 37℃ in humiditied 5% CO₂ atmosphere.

Analysis of cytotoxicity

Cell viability was examined through the WST-1 assay (Takara, Shiga, Japan). Cells were seeded in 96-well plates and incubated for 24 hours. Celecoxib (TRC, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) of various concentrations was treated on cells for overnight. WST-1 was added each well and the plates were incubated for 1 hour and the absorbance was measured using microplate reader (Thermo Pierce, Waltham, MA, USA) at 450 nm wavelength.

Annexin V assay

Cells were collected by centrifugation and washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled annexin V (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA) was added in dark after cell pellet was resuspended with annexin V binding buffer. Cells were detected by flow cytometry (Miltenyi Biotech, Bergisch Gladhach, Germany) after incubation for 15 minutes. To assess involvement of caspase cascade, Z-VAD-fmk (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was treated for 1 hour before celecoxib treatment.

RNA interference

A549 cells were transfected with glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78), IRE1, or negative control siRNA (GenePharma, Shanghai, China) according to manufacturer's instruction. A549 cells were seeded in 6-well plates with growth medium without antibiotics and allowed to reach 50% confluence for transfection. Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and siRNA were respectively diluted in medium without serum and incubated for 5 minutes at room temperature. Two solutions were mixed and incubated for 20 minutes at room temperature. The mixture was treated on cells for 16 hours.

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, harvested cells were mixed TRIzol and added chloroform. The mixture was centrifugated at 13,000 rpm for 15 minutes at 4℃. Upper solution of the separated two layer was transferred new tube and combined with isopropanol. After incubation for 10 minutes, combined was centrifugated for 15 minutes at 4℃. Supernatant was discarded and washed with 75% ethanol in diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC) treated water. RNA containing pellet was resuspended with DEPC treated water. RT-premix (Bioneer, Daejeon, Korea) was used for cDNA synthesis from total RNA. cDNA was amplified using primers and Tenuto PCR premix (Enzynomics, Daejeon, Korea) in PCR Thermal Cycler (Takara). PCR products were analyzed by gel electrophoresis in TAE buffer through agarose gel.

Western blot analysis

Cells were lysed in lysis buffer (Invitrogen) supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) after the cells were harvested. Samples were incubated on ice for 10 minutes and centrifugated for 10 minutes at 13,000 rpm. Proteins were determined by the bicinchoninic acid assay (Thermo Pierce) and were separated in 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate gel overlaid with a 4% polyacrylamide staking gel. Proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane after separation. The membrane was blocked with 5% skim milk for 1 hour at room temperature and washed with Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20 (TBST, pH 7.4) for 10 minutes each time for three times. The membrane was incubated with primary antibodies of caspase 3 (Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA, USA), caspase-4 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), caspase 8 (Cell Signaling), caspase 9 (Cell Signaling), GRP78 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), CHOP (Cell Signaling), and β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) in 0.1% TBST at 4℃ overnight. The membrane was incubated with secondary antibody (anti-goat IgG for GRP78; anti-rabbit IgG for caspase 3 and caspase 9; anti-mouse IgG for caspase 8, CHOP and β-actin at 1:5,000 dilutions) for 1 hour at room temperature after the membrane was washed with 0.1% TBST three times for 10 minutes. Following incubation, membrane was washed with 0.1% TBST three times. The band signals were detected by chemiluminescence (Fuji Photo Film Co., Tokyo, Japan).

Results

Effect of celecoxib on cell death of lung cancer cells

Cytotoxicity was examined when celecoxib was treated on lung cancer cells. A549, H460 lung cancer cell lines were incubated with various concentration of celecoxib (0, 25, 50, 100, and 200 µM). Cell viability was observed by WST-1 assay after overnight treatment of celecoxib.

Approximately, the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) of celecoxib was between 50 and 100 µM (Fig. 1). To determine whether celecoxib induces apoptosis, celecoxib (50 and 100 µM) was treated on A549 and H460 cells for overnight and then analyzed by flow cytometry after staining with FITC-labeled annexin V. Apoptosis was induced on A549 and H460 cells which were treated 100 µM of celecoxib. The rate of apoptosis by celecoxib was 61.7% on A549 and 25.5% on H460 respectively when 100 µM of celecoxib was treated (Fig. 2).

Involvement of caspases in celecoxib-induced apoptosis

Celecoxib-induced apoptosis on lung cancer cells (Fig. 2). To investigate that celecoxib induces apoptosis through caspases, celecoxib was treated on A549 cells. It was observed whether pan-caspase inhibitor, z-VAD-fmk reduced celecoxib-induced apoptosis. The z-VAD-fmk was treated for 1 hour before treatment of celecoxib. Celecoxib-induced apoptosis was decreased at pretreatment with z-VAD-fmk than only treatment with celecoxib (Fig. 3). Then, caspases were detected using western blot after celecoxib treatment on A549. Caspase-3, -8, and -9 did not be activated, but caspase-4 was cleaved with treatment of 75 and 100 µM celecoxib (Fig. 4).

Involvement of ER stress in celecoxib-induced apoptosis

To examine whether celecoxib-induced apoptosis is involved in ER stress, markers of ER stress were investigated. These markers include GRP78/immunoglobulin heavy chain binding protein (BiP), CHOP/growth arrest and DNA damage inducible protein (GADD) 153, ATF4, GADD34, and spliced X-box binding protiens-1 (sXbp-1). According to the results of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, expression of GADD34 and CHOP was increased but GRP78, sXbp-1, and ATF4 was not in A549 cells. GRP78, sXBP-1, GADD34, and CHOP was increased in H460 but ATF4 was not increased (Fig. 5A). Also, GRP78 and CHOP was increased in protein level in A549 (Fig. 5B).

UPR induces transcription of folding chaperones. However, ER stress signaling pathways trigger cell apoptosis when UPR is continued. These signaling pathway-related molecules are IRE1, PERK, and ATF6. GRP78 regulates pro-survival pathway in UPR and is important to protein folding and assembly. To detect whether GRP78 is related to celecoxib-induced apoptosis, GRP78 was inhibited using by siRNA. Proportion of apoptotic cells induced by 75 µM of celecoxib was 25.86% and apoptosis was increased (42.54%) when GRP78 siRNA and celecoxib were combined (Fig. 6). When sXBP-1 as a downstream effector of IRE1α was inhibited by siRNA, the rate of apoptosis was not changed (27.55%).

PERK induces ATF4 and CHOP after eIF2α is phosphorylated. To examine whether PERK pathway was played by celecoxib, salubrinal, inhibitor of eIF2, was pre-incubated for 1 hour and Annexin V was detected by flow cytometry after 100 µM of celecoxib treatment. The rate of apoptosis was little changed on celecoxib treatment A549 cells when eIF2 was inhibited (Fig. 7).

Discussion

NSAIDs are most common drugs that reduce pain and inhibit synthesis of PGs. NSAIDs have been contributed anti-proliferation and pro-apoptosis on a various cancer cells. This study found out how lung cancer cells undergo celecoxib-induced apoptosis. It was confirmed that ER stress is a key role in celecoxib-induced apoptosis in lung cancer cells.

Evidences that NSAIDs induce cell death are reported in many studies. Other studies observe that aspirin and indomethacin induce apoptosis on gastric cancer [27], aspirin induces apoptosis on ovarian cancer [28], and NS398 induces apoptosis on colon cancer [29]. As shown in Fig. 1, celecoxib among NSAIDs induced cell death on H460 by dose-dependent manner. However, when celecoxib was treated on A549 cells, cell viability was slightly increased at low concentration of celecoxib (25 µM). In other study, cell death was observed when 30 µM of celecoxib was treated on A549 cells [30]. Although WST-1 assays for celecoxib was retried on A549 cells several time, similar results that viability was increased at low concentration of celecoxib were detected. The low concentration of celecoxib might regulate other signal pathways and then temporarily increase cell viability. To find solution to this problem, other investigations are needed.

This study focused the mechanism of celecoxib-induced apoptosis on lung cancer. Several studies suggest that NSAIDs-induced cell death is related with ER stress in various cancer cells [22 26 31 32 33 34]. UPR induces transcription of genes encoding ER resident chaperones. However, if ER stress is continuously persisted, signaling pathways including PERK, IRE1, and ATF6 trigger apoptosis. In this study, two of three pathways involved in ER stress-induced apoptosis were determined. Celecoxib-induced apoptosis might be less related to PERK pathway because salubrinal, eIF2α inhibitor did not block apoptosis (Fig. 7). The rate of apoptosis was also not changed by inhibition of IRE1 on lung cancer cells (Fig. 6). siRNA for CHOP also did not diminish celecoxib-induced apoptosis (data not shown), although CHOP as an important effector of ER stress was increased after celecoxib treatment. In contrast, inhibition of GRP78 increased apoptosis of lung cancer cells. Continuous ER stress consumes GRP78 and subsequently increases GRP78 production; thus, down-regulation of GRP78 by siRNA might aggravate ER stress conditions. This result suggests that celecoxib-induced apoptosis is deeply associated with ER stress depending on GRP78.

However, other studies suggest that celecoxib-induced apoptosis is involved in caspase cascade [17 18 34]. Liu et al. [34] investigated that celecoxib treatment appears to activate the caspase cascade in lung cancer cells. They showed that apoptosis with celecoxib was involved in cleavage of upstream and downstream of caspase cascades, caspase-3, -8, -9, and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, so celecoxib is regarded to induce apoptosis through ER stress and caspases cascade. Actually, we investigated that z-VAD-fmk, pan-caspase inhibitor, reduced celecoxib-induced apoptosis but celecoxib did not activate caspase-3, -8, and -9 on lung cancer cells (Fig. 4). ER stress is also associated with non-classical caspases such as caspase-4 [35]. We found that celecoxib activated caspase-4 on A549 (Fig. 4).

Taken together, celecoxib triggered ER stress on lung cancer cells and celecoxib-induced apoptosis might be involved in both non-classical caspase-4 and GRP78. These finding could provide an insight of a therapeutic approach using celecoxib as an adjuvant with anti-cancer drugs.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Viability of celecoxib-treated A549 (A) and H460 (B). A549 and H460 were treated with celecoxib (0, 25, 50, 100, and 200 µM) for 16 hours. Cell viability was measured by WST-1 assay as described in materials and methods.

Fig. 2

Flow cytometry analysis for celecoxib-induced apoptosis on A549 and H460. A549 and H460 were treated with 50 and 100 µM of celecoxib for 16 hours. Then, cells were harvested and analyzed using flow cytometry after staining with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled annexin V. Indicated percentile numbers mean cell proportion in gated region. A representative example of five independent experiments is shown.

Fig. 3

Effect of z-VAD-fmk on celecoxib-induced apoptosis. Z-VAD-fmk (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was treated on A549 for 1 hour before celecoxib treatment. A549 was washed with phosphate buffered saline, and then treated with 100 µM of celecoxib for 16 hours. Cells were harvested and analyzed using flow cytometry after staining with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled annexin V. Indicated percentile numbers mean cell proportion in gated region. A representative example of three independent experiments is shown.

Fig. 4

Western blot for caspase-3, 4, 8, and 9 in celecoxib-treated A549. A549 was treated with celecoxib (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100 µM) for 16 hours. After washing with phosphate buffered saline, cell lysates were obtained using lysis buffer. Western blot for caspase-3, -4, -8, and -9 were performed using antibodies against each caspase, and visualized as described in Materials and Methods. A representative example of six independent experiments is shown. NC, negative control.

Fig. 5

Expressions of endoplasmic reticulum stress markers in A549 and H460 after celecoxib treatment. Celecoxib 75 µM was treated on A549 and H460 cells for 16 hours and RNA and protein were isolated respectively. (A) Glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78), spliced X-box binding protiens-1 (sXBP-1), growth arrest and DNA damage inducible protein 34 (GADD34), activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4), and C/EBP homologous transcription factor (CHOP) mRNA were measured by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. A representative example of three independent experiments is shown. (B) GRP78 and CHOP protein were measured using western blot. A representative example of four independent experiments is shown.

Fig. 6

Analysis for celecoxib-induced apoptosis after transfection of siRNA for glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78) or IRE1 in A549. Two hundred pmol of siRNA for GRP78 or inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1) was transfected in A549 cells and stabilized overnight. And then celecoxib 75 µM was treated for 16 hours. Cells were harvested and analyzed using flow cytometry after staining with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled annexin V. Indicated percentile numbers mean cell proportion in gated region. A representative example of four independent experiments is shown.

Fig. 7

Analysis for celecoxib-induced apoptosis after treatment of salubrinal in A549. The 10 µM of salubrinal, eIF2 inhibitor was preincubated with A549 for 1 hour and then then celecoxib 75 µM was treated for 16 hours. Cells were harvested and analyzed using flow cytometry after staining with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled annexin V. Indicated percentile numbers mean cell proportion in gated region. A representative example of three independent experiments is shown.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Basic Science Research Program through NRF funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2015R1D1A1A01060152).

References

1. Hirsch FR, Lippman SM. Advances in the biology of lung cancer chemoprevention. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23:3186–3197.

2. Keith RL. Lung cancer chemoprevention. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012; 9:52–56.

3. Dela Cruz CS, Tanoue LT, Matthay RA. Lung cancer: epidemiology, etiology, and prevention. Clin Chest Med. 2011; 32:605–644.

4. Sandler AB, Dubinett SM. COX-2 inhibition and lung cancer. Semin Oncol. 2004; 31:2 Suppl 7. 45–52.

5. Salgia R, Skarin AT. Molecular abnormalities in lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1998; 16:1207–1217.

6. Collins LG, Haines C, Perkel R, Enck RE. Lung cancer: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 2007; 75:56–63.

7. Dy GK, Adjei AA. Novel targets for lung cancer therapy: part I. J Clin Oncol. 2002; 20:2881–2894.

8. Gasparini G, Longo R, Sarmiento R, Morabito A. Inhibitors of cyclo-oxygenase 2: a new class of anticancer agents? Lancet Oncol. 2003; 4:605–615.

9. Breyer MD, Harris RC. Cyclooxygenase 2 and the kidney. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2001; 10:89–98.

10. Frungieri MB, Calandra RS, Mayerhofer A, Matzkin ME. Cyclooxygenase and prostaglandins in somatic cell populations of the testis. Reproduction. 2015; 149:R169–R180.

11. Vosooghi M, Amini M. The discovery and development of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors as potential anticancer therapies. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2014; 9:255–267.

12. Ghosh N, Chaki R, Mandal V, Mandal SC. COX-2 as a target for cancer chemotherapy. Pharmacol Rep. 2010; 62:233–244.

13. Rizzo MT. Cyclooxygenase-2 in oncogenesis. Clin Chim Acta. 2011; 412:671–687.

14. Grösch S, Maier TJ, Schiffmann S, Geisslinger G. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)-independent anticarcinogenic effects of selective COX-2 inhibitors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006; 98:736–747.

15. Kismet K, Akay MT, Abbasoglu O, Ercan A. Celecoxib: a potent cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor in cancer prevention. Cancer Detect Prev. 2004; 28:127–142.

16. Jendrossek V. Targeting apoptosis pathways by celecoxib in cancer. Cancer Lett. 2013; 332:313–324.

17. Ko SH, Choi GJ, Lee JH, Han YA, Lim SJ, Kim SH. Differential effects of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in inhibiting proliferation and induction of apoptosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2008; 19:425–433.

18. Wu T, Leng J, Han C, Demetris AJ. The cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor celecoxib blocks phosphorylation of Akt and induces apoptosis in human cholangiocarcinoma cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2004; 3:299–307.

19. Liggett JL, Zhang X, Eling TE, Baek SJ. Anti-tumor activity of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: cyclooxygenase-independent targets. Cancer Lett. 2014; 346:217–224.

20. Wang WA, Groenendyk J, Michalak M. Endoplasmic reticulum stress associated responses in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014; 1843:2143–2149.

21. Chevet E, Hetz C, Samali A. Endoplasmic reticulum stress-activated cell reprogramming in oncogenesis. Cancer Discov. 2015; 5:586–597.

22. Huang KH, Kuo KL, Chen SC, Weng TI, Chuang YT, Tsai YC, Pu YS, Chiang CK, Liu SH. Down-regulation of glucose-regulated protein (GRP) 78 potentiates cytotoxic effect of celecoxib in human urothelial carcinoma cells. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e33615.

23. Tsutsumi S, Namba T, Tanaka KI, Arai Y, Ishihara T, Aburaya M, Mima S, Hoshino T, Mizushima T. Celecoxib upregulates endoplasmic reticulum chaperones that inhibit celecoxib-induced apoptosis in human gastric cells. Oncogene. 2006; 25:1018–1029.

24. Sano R, Reed JC. ER stress-induced cell death mechanisms. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013; 1833:3460–3470.

25. McGuckin MA, Eri RD, Das I, Lourie R, Florin TH. ER stress and the unfolded protein response in intestinal inflammation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010; 298:G820–G832.

26. Tsutsumi S, Gotoh T, Tomisato W, Mima S, Hoshino T, Hwang HJ, Takenaka H, Tsuchiya T, Mori M, Mizushima T. Endoplasmic reticulum stress response is involved in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 2004; 11:1009–1016.

27. Zhou XM, Wong BC, Fan XM, Zhang HB, Lin MC, Kung HF, Fan DM, Lam SK. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs induce apoptosis in gastric cancer cells through up-regulation of bax and bak. Carcinogenesis. 2001; 22:1393–1397.

28. Duncan K, Uwimpuhwe H, Czibere A, Sarkar D, Libermann TA, Fisher PB, Zerbini LF. NSAIDs induce apoptosis in nonproliferating ovarian cancer cells and inhibit tumor growth in vivo. IUBMB Life. 2012; 64:636–643.

29. Li M, Wu X, Xu XC. Induction of apoptosis in colon cancer cells by cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor NS398 through a cytochrome c-dependent pathway. Clin Cancer Res. 2001; 7:1010–1016.

30. Ramer R, Walther U, Borchert P, Laufer S, Linnebacher M, Hinz B. Induction but not inhibition of COX-2 confers human lung cancer cell apoptosis by celecoxib. J Lipid Res. 2013; 54:3116–3129.

31. Gentz SH, Bertollo CM, Souza-Fagundes EM, da Silva AM. Implication of eIF2alpha kinase GCN2 in induction of apoptosis and endoplasmic reticulum stress-responsive genes by sodium salicylate. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2013; 65:430–440.

32. Chen ST, Thomas S, Gaffney KJ, Louie SG, Petasis NA, Schönthal AH. Cytotoxic effects of celecoxib on Raji lymphoma cells correlate with aggravated endoplasmic reticulum stress but not with inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2. Leuk Res. 2010; 34:250–253.

33. Mandegary A, Torshabi M, Seyedabadi M, Amirheidari B, Sharif E, Ghahremani MH. Indomethacin-enhanced anticancer effect of arsenic trioxide in A549 cell line: involvement of apoptosis and phospho-ERK and p38 MAPK pathways. Biomed Res Int. 2013; 2013:237543.

34. Liu X, Yue P, Zhou Z, Khuri FR, Sun SY. Death receptor regulation and celecoxib-induced apoptosis in human lung cancer cells. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004; 96:1769–1780.

35. Hitomi J, Katayama T, Eguchi Y, Kudo T, Taniguchi M, Koyama Y, Manabe T, Yamagishi S, Bando Y, Imaizumi K, Tsujimoto Y, Tohyama M. Involvement of caspase-4 in endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis and Abeta-induced cell death. J Cell Biol. 2004; 165:347–356.

TOOLS

Similar articles