Journal List > Korean J Urol > v.47(6) > 1069920

TOOLS
Choi, Choo, and Lee: Efficacy and Safety of Cystocele Repair Reinforced with a Monofilament Polypropylene Mesh
Original Article
Korean Journal of Urology

Korean Journal of Urology 2006; 47(6): 640-644.

Published online: 30 June 2006

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2006.47.6.640

Efficacy and Safety of Cystocele Repair Reinforced with a Monofilament Polypropylene Mesh

Yang Su Choi, Myung-Soo Choo1, Kyu-Sung Lee

Department of Urology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

1Department of Urology, Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

Corresponding author (LKS@smc.samsung.co.kr)

Received 7 February 2006       Accepted 3 May 2006

Copyright © 2006 The Korean Urological Association

Abstract

Purpose

Although surgical options for a cystocele repair have changed diversely over the past twenty years, a 29% recurrence rate after an operation has been reported. We assessed the efficacy and safety of a cystocele repair using monofilament polypropylene mesh (MPM) to reinforce the weakened muscular pelvic floor.

Materials and Methods

28 women underwent a cystocele repair using MPM. According to the International Continence Society (ICS) stage classification, 5, 20 and 3 women had stages II, III and IV cystocele, respectively. The operations were performed through the vaginal approach. An anterior colporrhaphy was performed, and mesh (15×5cm), with the lateral extensions, was then positioned into the retropubic space, without fixation, for tension free support of the bladder. The cure of cystocele was defined as stage 0, improvement as stage I, and failed treatment as stage II or greater.

Results

The mean follow-up, catheterization time and hospital stay were 20.4±3.2 months, 2.4±1.2 days and 6.6±3.4 days, respectively. The anatomical cure rate of cystocele was 89.3% (25/28). The cystocele repair improved 2 patients, but failed in 1. No significant intraoperative complications occurred. The postoperative complications included voiding difficulty (2 cases), vaginal bleeding around the suture site (1 case) and de novo urgency (2 cases). There were no mesh related complications.

Conclusions

Cystocele repair using MPM showed a success rate of 89.3%, with no complications associated with the use of mesh. This procedure seems to be safe and efficient, but a prospective randomized trial and longer follow-up will be required to confirm these results.

Keywords: Bladder disease, Surgical mesh, Surgery

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
Mesh design, with lateral extensions. (A) Diagram of the designed mesh (B) photograph of the designed mesh.
kju-47-640-g001
Table 1
Clinical characteristics of the 28 patients
kju-47-640-i001
Table 2
Pelvic organ prolapse staging of the 28 patients before the operation (n, %)
kju-47-640-i002

References

1. MacLennan AH, Taylor AW, Wilson DH, Wilson D. The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery. BJOG. 2000. 107:1460–1470.
2. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997. 89:501–506.
3. Boreham MK, Wai CY, Miller RT, Schaffer JI, Word RA. Morphometric analysis of smooth muscle in the anterior vaginal wall of women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002. 187:56–63.
4. Iglesia CB, Fenner DE, Brubaker L. The use of mesh in gynecologic surgery. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1997. 8:105–115.
5. Birch C, Fynes MM. The role of synthetic and biological prostheses in reconstructive pelvic floor surgery. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2002. 14:527–535.
6. Flood CG, Drutz HP, Waja L. Anterior colporrhaphy reinforced with Marlex mesh for the treatment of cystoceles. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1998. 9:200–204.
7. Weber AM, Abrams P, Brubaker L, Cundiff G, Davis G, Dmochowski RR, et al. The standardization of terminology for researchers in female pelvic floor disorders. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001. 12:178–186.
8. Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A. Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women's Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002. 186:1160–1166.
9. Macer GA. Transabdominal repair of cystocele, a 20 year experience, compared with the traditional vaginal approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978. 131:203–207.
10. Porges RF, Smilen SW. Long-term analysis of the surgical management of pelvic support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994. 171:1518–1526.
11. Paraiso MF, Ballard LA, Walters MD, Lee JC, Mitchinson AR. Pelvic support defects and visceral and sexual function in women treated with sacrospinous ligament suspension and pelvic reconstruction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996. 175:1423–1430.
12. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997. 89:501–506.
13. Safir MH, Gousse AE, Rovner ES, Ginsberg DA, Raz S. 4-Defect repair of grade 4 cystocele. J Urol. 1999. 161:587–594.
14. Albo M, Dupont MC, Raz S. Transvaginal correction of pelvic prolapse. J Endourol. 1996. 10:231–239.
15. Miyazaki FS, Miyazaki DW. Raz four-corner suspension for severe cystocele: poor results. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1994. 5:94–97.
16. Kim HH, Kwon DD, Park YG. Modified 4-defect repair of cystocele. Korean J Urol. 2001. 42:233–237.
17. Yan A, Anne M, Karine A, Vanessa F, Christophe P, Anne T, et al. Cystocele repair by a synthetic vaginal mesh secured anteriorly through the obturator foramen. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004. 115:90–94.
18. de Tayrac R, Gervaise A, Chauveaud-Lambling A, Fernandez H. Combined genital prolapse repair reinforced with a polypropylene mesh and tension-free vaginal tape in women with genital prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: a retrospective case-control study with short-term follow-up. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004. 83:950–954.
19. Canepa G, Ricciotti G, Introini C, Vigliercio G, Puppo P. Horseshoe-shaped marlex mesh for the treatment of pelvic floor prolapse. Eur Urol. 2001. 39:Suppl 2. 23–26.
20. Dwyer PL, O'Reilly BA. Transvaginal repair of anterior and posterior compartment prolapse with Atrium polypropylene mesh. BJOG. 2004. 111:831–836.
21. Hung MJ, Liu FS, Shen PS, Chen GD, Lin LY, Ho ES. Factors that affect recurrence after anterior colporrhaphy procedure reinforced with four-corner anchored polypropylene mesh. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004. 15:399–406.
22. Samli MM, Demirbas M, Guler C, Aktepe F, Dincel C. Early tissue reactions in the rat bladder wall after contact with three different synthetic mesh materials. BJU Int. 2004. 93:617–621.
23. Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte M, Ballard LA. Anterior colporrhaphy: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001. 185:1299–1306.
TOOLS
Similar articles