Journal List > J Korean Radiol Soc > v.38(3) > 1068161

Huh, Yoon, Lee, Jeong, Jang, Kim, and Kim: Usefulness of Stereotactic Localization of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions1

Abstract

Purpose:

To evaluate the usefulness of stereoscopic localization of nonpalpable breast lesions

Materials and Methods:

The authors retrospectively analyzed 60 cases of stereotactic localization performed for lesions which were mammographically visible but not palpable. Each case was reviewed for chief complaint, indication of localization on a mammograph, location of the lesion, pathological diagnosis, and complications during and after the procedure.

Results:

Most patients(75%) had no specific complaint. Among the 60 cases, microcalcification, mass and combined lesions were found in 34(57%), 12(20%), and 14 cases(23%), respectively. The most common location of the lesion was the upper outer quadrant(29 cases). A histopathologic report was available in 56 of 60 cases. Among 43 benign cases(76.8%), fibrocystic disease was most common(38 cases, 67.9%), while among 13 malignant cases, ductal carcinoma was most common(9 cases, 16.1%). In four of 56 cases(7.1%), failure to remove the target lesion was identified. Retrospective analysis suggests that movement of the patient during the procedure is the most likely cause of failure. There were no major complications.

Conclusion:

Stereotactic localization is simple and accurate, and compared with the conventional method, requires less experience on the part of the practitioner. Movement of the patient during the procedure may be the major cause of failure.

REFERENCES

최형식, 김용민., Smith DW., Bender GM. 대형병원에서의PACS 구현: 매디간육군병원실태(PACS and its hospital implementation: a case study at the Madigan Army Medical Center). 대한방사선의학희지. 1993. 29:573–579.
Hynes DM., Stevenson G., Nahmias C. Towards filmless and distance radiology. Lancet. 1997. 350:657–660.
crossref
Bauman RA., Gell G., Dwyer SJ 3rd. Large picture archiving and communication systems of the world - Part 1. J Digit Imaging. 1996. 9:99–103.
Bauman RA., Gell G., Dwyer SJ 3rd. Large picture archiving and communication systems of the world - Part 2. J Digit Imaging. 1996. 9:172–177.
Choplin RH., Boehme JM 2d., Maynard CD. Picture archiving and communication systems: an overview. RadioGraphics. 1992. 12:127–129.
crossref
Meyer-Ebrecht D. Picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) for medical application. Int J Biomed Comput. 1994. 35:91–124.
crossref
Nissen-Meyer SA., Fink U., Pleier M., Becker C. The full-scale PACS archive. A prerequisite for the filmless hospital. Acta Radiol. 1996. 37:838–846.
Osteaux M., Van den Broeck R., Verhelle F., de Mey J. Picture archiving and communication system (PACS): a progressive approach with small systems. Eur J Radiol. 1996. 22:166–174.
crossref
Huang HK., Taira RK., Lou SL., Wong AW., Breant C., Ho BK., Chuang KS., Stewart BK., Andriole K., Tecotzky R, et al. Implementation of a large-scale picture archiving and communication system. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1993. 17:1–11.
crossref
Schrader U., Kotter E., Pelikan E., Zaiss A., Timmermann U., Klar R. Critical success factors for a hospital-wide PACS. Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1997. 439–443.
Gur D., Fuhrman CR., Thaete FL. Requirements for PACS: users'perspective. RadioGraphis. 1993. 13:457–460.
Naylor AF. Radiology department design to accommodate the future introduction of global PACS. Eur J Radiol. 1992. 16:51–53.
crossref
Horii SC., Mun SK., Levine B., Lo B., Garra BS., Zeman RK., Freedman M., Leftridge C., Schellinger D., Keyes J, et al. PACS clinical experience at Georgetown University. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1991. 15:183–190.
crossref
Langlotz CP., Even-Shoshan O., Seshadri SS., Brikman I., Kishore S., Kundel HL., Schwartz JS. A methodology for the economic assessment of picture archiving and communication systems. J Digit Imaging. 1995. 8:95–102.
crossref
Strickland NH. Review article: some cost-benefit considerations for PACS: a radiological perspective. Br J Radiol. 1996. 69:1089–1098.
Crowe BL., Hailey DM., Carter R. Assessment of costs and benefits in the introduction of digital radiology systems. Int J Biomed Comput. 1992. 30:17–25.
crossref
Hilsenrath PE., Smith WL., Berbaum KS., Franken EA., Owen DA. Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of PACS. AJR. 1991. 156:177–180.
crossref

Fig. 1.
A. Stereograph shows clustered microcalcifications on right subareolar region. Note symmetry of hyperlucent area(open arrows) and radiopaque strip(arrows) on both sides, which represent fenestration in compression plate and edge of the plate respectively. B. Stereograph obtained after placing the needle with curved-wire. Needle tip is well located to the lesion. C. Specimen radiograph reveals clustered microcalcifications within excised specimen. Pathologic diagnosis was ductal carcinoma.
jkrs-38-553f1.tif
Table 1.
Pathologic Diagnosis of the Excised Breast Lesions
Benign disease Malignant disease
Fibrocystic disease 38 Ductal carcinoma 9
Fibroadenoma 2 Ductal/lobular carcinoma 1
Cavernous hemangioma 1 Commedocarcinoma 1
Lipoma 1 Carcinoma in situ 2
Sclerosing adenosis 1
Total 43 13 (76.8%) 13 (23.2%)
TOOLS
Similar articles