Journal List > J Rheum Dis > v.24(2) > 1064359

Lee and Song: Urinary Tumor Necrosis Factor-like Weak Inducer of Apoptosis as a Biomarker for Lupus Nephritis: A Meta-analysis

Abstract

Objective

This study evaluates serum or urinary tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK) as a biomarker for lupus nephritis (LN).

Methods

We conducted a meta-analysis examining serum or urinary TWEAK levels in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), patients with LN (active or inactive), and healthy controls. We tabulated correlation coefficients between urinary TWEAK level and total or renal SLE Disease Activity Index (tSLEDAI or rSLEDAI).

Results

Eight studies were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that serum TWEAK levels tended to be higher in patients with SLE than in controls (standard mean difference [SMD]=0.850, 95% confidence interval [CI]=−0.067∼1.767, p=0.069). Urinary TWEAK was significantly higher in patients with active LN than in those with inactive LN (SMD=2.865, 95% CI=−0.831∼4.898, p=0.006). In addition, urinary TWEAK was positively associated with tSLEDAI and rSLEDAI (correlation co-efficient=0.436, 95% CI=0.204∼0.622, p=4.3×10−4; correlation coefficient=0.483, 95% CI=0.108∼0.738, p=0.014). Pooled sensitivity and specificity of urinary TWEAK for diagnosis of LN were 81.3% (95% CI, 73.3∼87.8) and 76.0% (95% CI, 66.3∼84.2), indicating good diagnostic accuracy.

Conclusion

The meta-analysis demonstrated that urinary TWEAK was significantly higher in patients with active LN than in those with inactive LN, and that urinary TWEAK levels were positively correlated with renal disease activity.

REFERENCES

1. Waldman M, Appel GB. Update on the treatment of lupus nephritis. Kidney Int. 2006; 70:1403–12.
crossref
2. Lech M, Anders HJ. The pathogenesis of lupus nephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013; 24:1357–66.
crossref
3. Ogura Y, Mishra V, Hindi SM, Kuang S, Kumar A. Proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK) suppresses satellite cell self-renewal through inversely modulating Notch and NF-κ B signaling pathways. J Biol Chem. 2013; 288:35159–69.
4. Winkles JA. The TWEAK-Fn14 cytokine-receptor axis: discovery, biology and therapeutic targeting. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008; 7:411–25.
crossref
5. Campbell S, Burkly LC, Gao HX, Berman JW, Su L, Browning B, et al. Proinflammatory effects of TWEAK/ Fn14 interactions in glomerular mesangial cells. J Immunol. 2006; 176:1889–98.
6. Zhao Z, Burkly LC, Campbell S, Schwartz N, Molano A, Choudhury A, et al. TWEAK/Fn14 interactions are instrumental in the pathogenesis of nephritis in the chronic graft-versus-host model of systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol. 2007; 179:7949–58.
crossref
7. Michaelson JS, Wisniacki N, Burkly LC, Putterman C. Role of TWEAK in lupus nephritis: a bench-to-bedside review. J Autoimmun. 2012; 39:130–42.
crossref
8. Chicheportiche Y, Bourdon PR, Xu H, Hsu YM, Scott H, Hession C, et al. TWEAK, a new secreted ligand in the tumor necrosis factor family that weakly induces apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272:32401–10.
crossref
9. Sanz AB, Sanchez-Niño MD, Ortiz A. TWEAK, a multifunctional cytokine in kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2011; 80:708–18.
crossref
10. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6:e1000097.
crossref
11. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005; 5:13.
crossref
12. Ridout KK, Ridout SJ, Price LH, Sen S, Tyrka AR. Depression and telomere length: A meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2016; 191:237–47.
crossref
13. Egger M, Smith GD, Phillips AN. Meta-analysis: principles and procedures. BMJ. 1997; 315:1533–7.
crossref
14. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986; 7:177–88.
crossref
15. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002; 21:1539–58.
crossref
16. Walter SD. Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data. Stat Med. 2002; 21:1237–56.
crossref
17. Zamora J, Abraira V, Muriel A, Khan K, Coomarasamy A. Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006; 6:31.
crossref
18. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997; 315:629–34.
crossref
19. Salem MN, Taha HA, Abd El-Fattah El-Feqi M, Eesa NN, Mohamed RA. Urinary TNF-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK) as a biomarker of lupus nephritis. Z Rheumatol. 2016; Sep 12 [Epub].DOI: DOI:10.1007/s00393-016-0184-1.
20. Choe JY, Kim SK. Serum TWEAK as a biomarker for disease activity of systemic lupus erythematosus. Inflamm Res. 2016; 65:479–88.
crossref
21. Xuejing Z, Jiazhen T, Jun L, Xiangqing X, Shuguang Y, Fuyou L. Urinary TWEAK level as a marker of lupus nephritis activity in 46 cases. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012; 2012; 359647.
crossref
22. Wang C, Chen LL, Pan HF, Leng RX, Qin WZ, Ye DQ. Expression of human tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rheumatol. 2012; 31:335–9.
crossref
23. El-Shehaby A, Darweesh H, El-Khatib M, Momtaz M, Marzouk S, El-Shaarawy N, et al. Correlations of urinary biomarkers, TNF-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK), osteoprotegerin (OPG), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and IL-8 with lupus nephritis. J Clin Immunol. 2011; 31:848–56.
crossref
24. Schwartz N, Rubinstein T, Burkly LC, Collins CE, Blanco I, Su L, et al. Urinary TWEAK as a biomarker of lupus nephritis: a multicenter cohort study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2009; 11:R143.
crossref
25. ElGendi SS, El-Sherif WT. Anti-C1q antibodies, sCD40L, TWEAK and CD4/CD8 ratio in systemic lupus erythematosus and their relations to disease activity and renal involvement. Egypt J Immunol. 2009; 16:135–48.
26. Schwartz N, Su L, Burkly LC, Mackay M, Aranow C, Kollaros M, et al. Urinary TWEAK and the activity of lupus nephritis. J Autoimmun. 2006; 27:242–50.
crossref
27. Lee YH, Song GG. Urinary MCP-1 as a biomarker for lupus nephritis: a meta-analysis. Z Rheumatol. 2016 Jun 9; [Epub].DOI: DOI:10.1007/s00393-016-0109-z.
28. Mok CC. Biomarkers for lupus nephritis: a critical appraisal. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010; 2010; 638413.
crossref
29. Illei GG, Tackey E, Lapteva L, Lipsky PE. Biomarkers in systemic lupus erythematosus. I. General overview of biomarkers and their applicability. Arthritis Rheum. 2004; 50:1709–20.
crossref
30. Reyes-Thomas J, Blanco I, Putterman C. Urinary biomarkers in lupus nephritis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2011; 40:138–50.
crossref

Figure 1.
Meta-analysis of the relationship between serum TWEAK level and SLE compared with control (A), and between urinary TWEAK level and active LN compared with inactive LN (B). TWEAK: tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis, SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus, LN: lupus nephritis, CI: confidence interval, Std diff: standardized difference.
jrd-24-85f1.tif
Figure 2.
Meta-analysis of the correlation coefficient between urinary TWEAK and total SLEDAI (A) and renal SLEDAI (B). TWEAK: tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis, SLEDAI: systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index, CI: confidence interval.
jrd-24-85f2.tif
Figure 3.
Summary receiver-operating characteristic curves for urinary TWEAK for the diagnosis of LN. Solid circles represent individual studies included in this meta-analysis. The curve shown is a regression line that summarizes the overall diagnostic accuracy. TWEAK: tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis, LN: lupus nephritis, SROC: summary receiver operating characteristic, SE (AUC): standard error of the area under the curve, Q*: an index defined by the point on the SROC curve where the sensitivity and specificity are equal; and SE (Q*): Q* index standard error.
jrd-24-85f3.tif
Table 1.
Characteristics of individual studies included in the meta-analysis
Author Country Number Age, yr Disease duration Main findings
SLE Control SLE Control
Salem, 2016 [19] Egypt 14* 24 25.6±10.7* 27.3±9.0 2.2±2.1* The uTWEAK levels were significantly higher in patients with SLE with active LN compared to those without or with inactive renal disease and normal healthy subjects.
Choe, 2016 [20] Korea 70 61 40.4±11.2 4.6±9.1 6.4±4.4 sTWEAK might be a serologic biomarker candidate that reflects disease activity and renal involvement in patients with SLE.
Xuejing, 2012 [21] China 34* 12 14∼53* 14∼53 12.7±3.4* uTWEAK levels were correlated with all active indexes of LN, suggesting its potential role as a novel biomarker of active lupus nephritis.
Wang, 2012 [22] China 62 15 34.1±10.0 36.6±11.6 NA Patients with SLE express low levels of TWEAK mRNA but high levels of sTWEAK. Additionally, sTWEAK level was associated with several clinical manifestations of SLE, indicating that TWEAK may play a complex role in SLE.
El-shehaby, 2011 [23] Egypt 50* 23 29.1±7.9* 29.7±8.8 6.1±4.2* Urinary levels of TWEAK positively correlate with renal involvement as assessed by rSLEDAI with reasonable sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values to detect LN.
Schwartz, 2009 [24] USA 30 61 40.4±11.2 4.6±9.1 6.4±4.4 High uTWEAK levels are indicative of LN, as opposed to non-LN SLE and other healthy and disease control populations, and reflect renal disease activity in longitudinal follow-up.
ElGendi, 2009 [25] Egypt 47 20 25.3±7.2 NA 25.7±3.1 sTWEAK may be used as a serum biomarker for the assessment of disease activity and development of LN.
Schwartz, 2006 [26] USA 83 NA 35 NA NA Urinary TWEAK levels may be useful as a novel biomarker in LN.

Values are presented as number and mean±standard deviation. SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus, TWEAK: tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis, uTWEAK: urinary TWEAK, LN: lupus nephritis, sTWEAK: serum TWEAK, NA: not available, rSLEDAI: renal SLE disease activity index. Definition of Active LN in this analysis: rSLEDAI score ≥4.

* Active LN

non-LN SLE

LN.

Table 2.
Meta-analysis of serum and urinary TWEAK levels in lupus nephritis
Comparison Population Number of study Test of association Test of heterogeneity Publication bias p-value
SMD 95% CI p-value Model p-value I2
Serum TWEAK
 SLE vs. Control Overall 4 0.850 −0.067∼1.767 0.069 R 0.000 92.5 0.823
 LN vs. Control Overall 3 1.326 −0.695∼3.347 0.198 R 0.000 95.9 0.244
 LN vs. Non-LN Overall 3 0.997 −0.513∼2.506 0.196 R 0.000 94.8 0.025
Urinary TWEAK
 LN vs. Control Overall 2 1.655 −0.289∼3.600 0.095 R 0.000 93.2 NA
 Active LN vs. Overall 3 2.865 0.831∼4.898 0.006 R 0.000 92.5 0.441
  Inactive LN

TWEAK: tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis, SMD: standard mean difference, CI: confidence interval, SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus, LN: lupus nephritis, R: random effects model, NA: not available.

Table 3.
Meta-analysis of the correlation coefficient between urinary TWEAK level and SLE and renal activity, and the diagnosis of LN
A. Correlation between uTWEAK and SLE or renal activity
Comparison Number Test of association Test of heterogeneity Publication bias p-value
Study Patient Correlation coefficient 95% CI p-value Model p-value I2
tSLEDAI 4 212 0.436 0.204∼0.622 4.3×10−4 R 0.002 79.7 0.949
rSLEDAI 4 289 0.483 0.108∼0.738 0.014 R 0.000 92.0 0.705
TWEAK: tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis, SLE: systemic lupus erythematosus, LN: lupus nephritis, uTWEAK: urinary TWEAK, CI: confidence interval, tSLEDAI: total SLE disease activity index, rSLEDAI: renal SLE disease activity index, R: random effects model.
B. Diagnosis of LN
Population Study No. Number Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) PLR (95% CI) NLR (95% CI) DOR (95% CI) AUC (SE) Q* (SE)
LN N Non-LN
Overall 3 123 96 0.813 (0.733∼0.878) 0.760 (0.663∼0.842) 2.723 (1.774∼4.180) 0.248 (0.073∼0.843) 11.28 (5.128∼24.82) 0.836 (0.038) 0.768 (0.035

LN: lupus nephritis, PLR: positive likelihood ratio, NLR: negative likelihood ratio, DOR: diagnostic odds ratio, AUC: area under the curve, CI: confidence interval, SE: standard error.

TOOLS
Similar articles