Abstract
Objective
The aim of this study was to examine whether the presence of anti-ribonucleoprotein (anti-RNP) antibodies at diagnosis is associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) flares in newly diagnosed patients during the first year of follow-up.
Methods
The medical records of 71 newly diagnosed SLE patients without other concomitant autoimmune disease, serious infection, or malignancy were reviewed retrospectively. SLE flares were defined according to the SLE Disease Activity Index 2000. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence or absence of anti-RNP, and variables were compared between the groups.
Results
During the first year of follow-up, SLE patients with anti-RNP at diagnosis more frequently presented with mucosal ulcers (p=0.003), rash (p=0.001), and arthritis (p=0.007), compared to those without anti-RNP. The SLE flare incidence was remarkably higher in patients with anti-RNP than in those without anti-RNP (62.5% vs. 23.1%, p=0.001). SLE patients with anti-RNP at diagnosis had a significantly higher risk of ever experiencing a SLE flare during the first year of follow-up, compared to those without anti-RNP (odds ratio=8.250).
REFERENCES
3. Benito-Garcia E, Schur PH, Lahita R. American College of Rheumatology Ad Hoc committee on immunologic testing guidelines. Guidelines for immunologic laboratory testing in the rheumatic diseases: anti-Sm and anti-RNP antibody tests. Arthritis Rheum. 2004; 51:1030–44.
4. Greidinger EL, Hoffman RW. The appearance of U1 RNP antibody specificities in sequential autoimmune human an-tisera follows a characteristic order that implicates the U1-70 kd and B'/B proteins as predominant U1 RNP immunogens. Arthritis Rheum. 2001; 44:368–75.
5. Cappelli S, Bellando Randone S, Martinović D, Tamas MM, Pasalić K, Allanore Y, et al. “To be or not to be,” ten years after: evidence for mixed connective tissue disease as a distinct entity. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2012; 41:589–98.
6. Lundberg I, Hedfors E. Clinical course of patients with an-ti-RNP antibodies. A prospective study of 32 patients. J Rheumatol. 1991; 18:1511–9.
7. Arbuckle MR, McClain MT, Rubertone MV, Scofield RH, Dennis GJ, James JA, et al. Development of autoantibodies before the clinical onset of systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349:1526–33.
8. Cozzani E, Drosera M, Gasparini G, Parodi A. Serology of lupus erythematosus: correlation between immunopathological features and clinical aspects. Autoimmune Dis. 2014; 2014; 321359.
9. Li PH, Wong WH, Lee TL, Lau CS, Chan TM, Leung AM, et al. Relationship between autoantibody clustering and clinical subsets in SLE: cluster and association analyses in Hong Kong Chinese. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013; 52:337–45.
10. Allen D, Fischer A, Bshouty Z, Robinson DB, Peschken CA, Hitchon C, et al. Evaluating systemic lupus erythematosus patients for lung involvement. Lupus. 2012; 21:1316–25.
11. Carpintero MF, Martinez L, Fernandez I, Romero AC, Mejia C, Zang YJ, et al. Diagnosis and risk stratification in patients with anti-RNP autoimmunity. Lupus. 2015; 24:1057–66.
12. Hochberg MC. Updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1997; 40:1725.
13. Gladman DD, Ibañez D, Urowitz MB. Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index 2000. J Rheumatol. 2002; 29:288–91.
14. Amigues JM, Cantagrel A, Abbal M, Mazieres B. Comparative study of 4 diagnosis criteria sets for mixed connective tissue disease in patients with anti-RNP antibodies. Autoimmunity Group of the Hospitals of Toulouse. J Rheumatol. 1996; 23:2055–62.
15. Touma Z, Urowitz MB, Ibañez D, Gladman DD. SLEDAI-2K 10 days versus SLEDAI-2K 30 days in a longitudinal evaluation. Lupus. 2011; 20:67–70.