Journal List > J Korean Diabetes Assoc > v.31(2) > 1062425

Song, Kim, Park, Cho, Lee, and Huh: Clinical Characteristics of Korean Type 2 Diabetic Patients According to Insulin Secretion and Insulin Resistance

Abstract

Background

Korean type 2 diabetic patients are known to differ from western diabetes because of their unique characteristics, such as non-obese but centrally obese anthropometry and relatively more insulin secretory defects than insulin resistance compared to western diabetic patients.

Methods

We recruited 1,646 diabetic patients in the present study and excluded the 45 patients with fasting C-peptide < 0.20 nmol/L. We had assessed insulin secretion by fasting serum C-peptide level and insulin resistance by short insulin tolerance test (Kitt; rate constant for plasma glucose disappearance, %/min) in the private diabetes clinic. The insulin secretory defect was divided by severe (C-peptide < 0.37 nmol/L), moderate (C-peptide 0.37~0.56 nmol/L), and normal (C-peptide ≥ 0.57 nmol/L) group. The insulin resistance was divided by insulin resistant (IR) (Kitt < 2.5 %/min) and insulin sensitive (IS) (Kitt ≥ 2.5 %/min) group.

Results

We analysed the data of 1,601 type 2 diabetic patients (831 men and 770 women, age 56.5 ± 10.8 years, duration of diabetes 9.6 ± 7.3 years). The prevalence of BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m2 is 42.5% and BMI ≥ 23.0 kg/m2 is 70.2%. The prevalence of abdominal obesity (waist ≥ 90 cm in men and 80 cm in women) is 45.2% (36.0% and 55.2%, respectively in men and women). Fasting C-peptide level is 0.64 ± 0.29 nmol/L and Kitt value is 2.03 ± 0.96%/min. According to fasting C-peptide level, the degree of insulin secretory defect were severe (13.1%), moderate (33.0%) and normal (53.9%). According to Kitt value, the IR group is 70.6% and the IS group is 29.4%.

Conclusion

Obese type 2 diabetes is markedly increasing in Korea. Therefore, the major problem in Korean type 2 diabetic patients is being changed into insulin resistance instead of insulin secretory defect.

Figures and Tables

Table 1
Clinical and metabolic characteristics of subjects
jkda-31-123-i001

Data are mean ± standard deviation. Statistics were analyzed by t-test.

BMI, body mass index; Kitt, rate constant for glucose disappearance; HDL, high density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein. OAD, oral anti-diabetic agents.

*P < 0.05.

P < 0.01.

P < 0.001.

Table 2
Body mass index of subjects
jkda-31-123-i002

Data are n (%). BMI, body mass index.

Table 3
Degree of insulin secretion and insulin resistance of subjects
jkda-31-123-i003

Data are n (%). Kitt, rate constant for glucose disappearance.

Table 4
Comparison of obesity parameters with insulin resistance
jkda-31-123-i004

Data are n (%). Kitt, rate constant for glucose disappearance; BMI, body mass index. Statistics were analyzed by chi-square test.

Table 5
HbA1c level in 6 subgroups according to insulin resistance and insulin secretion
jkda-31-123-i005

Data are mean ± standard deviation. Kitt, rate constant for glucose disappearance.

References

1. Min HK, Yoo HJ, Lee HK, Kim EJ. Changing patterns of the prevalence of diabetes mellitus in Korea. J Korean Diabetes Assoc. 1981. 6:1–4.
5. Zimmet P, Dowse G, Finch C, Serjeantson S, King H. The epidemiology and natural history of NIDDM-lessons from the South Pacific. Dia Metab Rev. 1990. 6:91–124.
6. Kopelman PG. Obesity as a medical problem. Nature. 2000. 404:635–643.
7. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Johnson CL. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999-2000. JAMA. 2002. 288:1723–1727.
13. Western Pacific Regional Office of the World Health Organization. The International Obesity Task Force. The Asia-Pacific perspective: redefining obesity and its treatment. 2000. In : Health Communications Australia; Sydney. http://www.obesityasiapacific.com.
14. Kim DJ, Lee MS, Kim KW, Lee MK. Insulin secretory dysfunction and insulin resistance in the pathogenesis of Korean type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metabolism. 2001. 50:590–593.
16. Lee TH. Prevalence of obesity in Korean non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1996. 32:71–80.
TOOLS
Similar articles