Journal List > Tuberc Respir Dis > v.44(3) > 1061376

Lee, Park, Kim, Ahn, Lee, Chang, and Kim: The Significance of Plasma Urokinase-type Plasminogen Activator and Type 1 Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor in Lung Cancer

Abstract

Background

Cancer invasion and metastasis require the dissolution of the extracellular matrix in which several proteolytic enzymes are Involved. One of these enzymes is the urokinase - type plasminogen activator(u-PA), and plasminogen activator inhibitors(PAI-1, PAI-2) a]so have a possible role in cancer invasion and metastasis by protection of cancer itself from proteolysis by u-PA. It has been reported that the love]s of u-PA and plasminogen activator inhibitors in various cancer tissues are significantly higher than those in normal tissues and have significant correlations with tumor size and lymph node involvement Here, we measured the concentration of plasma u-PA and PAI- 1 antigens in the patients with lung cancer and compared the concentration of them with histologic types and staging parameters.

Methods

We measured the concentration of plasma u-PA and PAI-1 antigens using commercial ELISA kit in 37 lung cancer patients, 21 benign lung disease patients and 24 age-matched healthy controls, and we compared the concentration of them with histologic types and staging parameters in lung cancer patients.

Results

The concentration of u-PA was 1.0α0.3ng/mL in controls, 1.0α0.3ng/mL in benign lung disease patients and 0.9α0.3ng/mL in lung cancer patients. The concentration of PAI-1 was 14.2α6.7ng/mL in controls, 14.9α6.3ng/mL in benign lung disease patients, and 22.1 α9.8ng/mL in lung cancer patients. The concentration of PAI- 1 in lung cancer patients was higher than those of benign lung disease patients and controls. The concentration of u-PA was 0.7α0.4ng/mL in squamous cell carcinoma, 0.8α 0.3ng/mL in adenocarcinoma, 0.9ng/mL in large cell carcinoma, and 1.1α0.7ng/mL in small cell carcinoma. The concert traction of PAI-1 was 22.3α7.2ng/mL in squamous cell carcinoma, 22.6α9.9ng/mL in adenocarcinoma, 42ng/mL in large cell carcinoma, and 16.0α14.2ng/mL in small cell carcinoma. The concentration of u-PA was 0.74ng/mL in stage I, 1.2α0.6ng/mL in stage II, 0.7 α 0.4ng/mL in stage IIIA, 0.7α0.4ng/mL in stage IIIB, and 0.7α0.3ng/mL in stage IV. The concentration of PAI-1 was 21.8ng/mL in stage I, 22.7α8.7ng/mL in stage II, 18.4 α4.9ng/mL in stage IIIA, 25.3α9.0ng/mL in stage IIIB, and 21.5α10.8ng /mL in stage IV. When we divided T stage unto T1-3 and 74, the concentration of u-PA was 0.8α 0.4ng/mL in T1-3 and 0.7α0.4ng/mL in T4, and the concentration of PAI-1 was 17.9α 5.6ng/mL in T1-3 and 26.1α9.1ng/mL in T4. The concentration of PAI-1 in T4 was significantly higher than that in T1-3. The concentration of u-PA was 0.8α 0.4ng/mL in M0 and 0.7α0.3ng/mL in Ml, and the concentration of PAI-1 was 23.6α8.3ng/mL in M0 and 21.5α10.8ng/mL in M1

Conclusions

The plasma levels of PAI-1 in lung cancer were higher than benign lung disease and control, and the plasma levels of PAI-1 in 74 were significantly higher than T1-3. These findings suggest involvement of PAI-1 with local invasion of lung cancer, but it should be confirmed by the data on comparison with pathological staging and tissue level in lung cancer.

TOOLS
Similar articles