Journal List > Nat Prod Sci > v.23(4) > 1060673

Ebadollahi, Geranmayeh, and Kamrani: Colorado Potato Beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say) Control Potential of Essential Oil Isolated from Iranian Cymbopogon citratus Stapf

Abstract

Colorado potato beetle is a most destructive insect pest of potato throughout the world. Although utilization of chemical insecticides is a main method for management of this pest, their negative side-effects such as threat to humans and the environmental pollution prompted researchers to search for natural alternatives. Recently plant essential oils with low or without side-effects against noun-targeted organisms and with high availability were considered as safe bio-pesticides. In the present study, toxicity of essential oil of Iranian lemongrass, Cymbopogon citratus Stapf, was evaluated against 3th instar larvae and adults of Colorado potato beetle by a leaf dipping method. Results displayed essential oil had notable toxicity against both larvae and adults after 24 and 48 h exposure times. Probit analysis revealed LC50 values (lethal concentration to kill 50% of population) with 95% confidence limits were 10.32 (9.17 – 11.72) and 7.76 (6.80 – 8.74) µl/ml for larvae and 6.27 (4.82 – 8.15) and 4.35 (3.24 – 5.62) µl/ml for adults after 24 and 48 h, respectively. Based on regression analysis, a positive correlation between log concentration of essential oil and insect mortality was achieved. Results indicated C. citratus essential oil can be candidate as a natural alternative to the harmful chemical insecticides in the management of Colorado potato beetle.

Introduction

After China and India, Iran is a third chief producer of potato (Solanum tuberosum) in Asia so that its cultivation in Iran is about 146,000 ha with an annually production of 4,300,000.1 The Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), is a key pest of potato throughout the world. It has been considered as most destructive pest in Ardabil and Hamadan provinces at north-west of Iran.2 Its adults and larvae feed on the leaves and stems of potato plants. Further, the adults considered as a vector of plant diseases.3 Numerous chemical insecticides have been used to the management of L. decemlineata. Along with the negative side-effects of chemical pesticides such as environmental contamination and threat to human health, there are several studies indicating the resistance of L. decemlineata to the most classes of insecticides such as organochlorine, organophosphorus, carbamate, and pyrethroid ones.4567 So, there is an urgent need to introduce an eco-friendly and effective method to control this pest. Plants have undergone a co-evolution with their natural enemies including insects, in which plant secondary metabolites are developed against them. Essential oils as demotic secondary metabolites evinced a major role in the plant-enemies interactions. Plant essential oils have a complex mixture of aromatic and aliphatic components which affected by several endogenous and exogenous factors such as environmental conditions, plant genetic and extraction method.8 These materials have been characterized with low or non-toxicity to fish, birds and mammals. They are easily biodegrade in the environment because of their volatile quiddity. Further, pest resistance to the essential oils is lower than synthetic chemicals because of their multiple modes of action and several bio-effects.910 Consequently, essential oils considered as potential bioagents to the insect pest management.1112 Although lemongrass [Cymbopogon citratus (DC) Stapf (Poaceae)] is native of Southeast Asia, it is usually used by folk medicine in the numerous countries.13 Several biological effects of lemongrass such as anti-amoebic, antifungal and antidiarrheal activities have been documented.141516 Terpenic compounds such as citral and its isomers have high amount in the C. citratus essential oil and it was found that the biological effects of this oil have been related to these components.8917 The aim of the present study is to evaluate the toxicity of C. citratus essential oil against the damaging stages of L. decemlineata; larvae and adults. Findings may be useful to recognize a biorational and safe agent for management of L. decemlineata.

Experimental

Plant materials and essential oil extraction

The leaves of C. citratus were collected at flowering stage from Tehran, Iran and dried in the shade. C. citratus was identified through its morphological structures by using the Flora Iranica.18 Extraction of essential oil was carried out using a Clevenger apparatus by hydro-distillation method via 50 g dried leaves and 500 ml distilled water within 3 h. Obtained essential oil was dried by anhydrous sodium sulfate and stored in refrigerator at 4 ℃.

Tested insect

The first generation adults of L. decemlineata were collected from potato fields in Anzab region, Ardabil province, Iran and reared on potato, Solanum tuberosum, cv. Agria, under 26 – 27 ℃, 60 – 65% RH and 16: 8 h (L: D) photoperiod conditions. Adults and 3th instar larvae obtained from a colony were considered for insecticidal bioassays.

Bioassay

Leaf-dipping bioassay was used to evaluate the toxicity of C. citratus essential oil against synchronized 3th instar larvae and adults of L. decemlineata. Five concentrations of essential oil ranged from 5.00 to 17.00 µl/ml for larvae and 2.00 to 19.00 µl/ml for adults were organized using Tween-80 (0.02 %) and distilled water. Leaf discs with 3 cm diameter were cut from fresh leaves of potato and were immersed in prepared concentrations for 20 seconds. After drying at room temperature for 10 minutes, the discs were placed in the Petri dishes and 5 larvae and adults separately were transferred to them. The control groups were kept under the same conditions on leaf disks without any essential oil's concentrations. Mortality counted after 24 and 48 exposure times. The insects were touched with the tip of a fine hair brush. If there were not any movement, they were considered as dead.

Statistical analysis

Experiments were organized in a completely randomized design and the data were analyzed using the SPSS 16 software. Differences between means were determined using Tukey's test at P = 0.05. Program also calculates the LC50 values and confidence limits with Probit analysis. Regression analysis was done to denote mortality in contradiction of essential oil concentrations.

Result and Discussion

Results indicated that the essential oil of C. citratus showed significant toxicity against both larvae and adults of L. decemlineata after 24 and 48 h exposure times while there was not any mortality in the control groups. Comparison of mean mortality by Tukey's test revealed there are statistically significant differences between mortality of larvae and adults of insect against essential oil concentrations and exposure times (Fig. 1).
The results of Probit analysis are shown in Table 1; The LC50 values with 95% confidence limits were 10.32 (9.17 – 11.72) and 7.76 (6.80 – 8.74) µl/ml for larvae after 24 and 48 h exposure time, respectively. These values were, respectively, calculated as 6.27 (4.82 – 8.15) and 4.35 (3.24 – 5.62) µl/ml for adults. The LC50 values for both stages decreased with increasing of exposure time and there are statistically significant differences between these values after 24 and 48 h (Table 1).
Further, based on regression analysis and according to R2 values, a positive correlation between logarithm of concentrations and mortality has been achieved for both larvae and adults (Fig. 2).
Chemical composition of C. citratus essential oil from different country was assessed in the recent studies (Table 2). According to the Table 2, different isomers of citral including as α-citral, β-citral, geranial and neral, geraniol, myrcene, neryl acetate, caryophyllene, caryophyllene oxide, geranyl acetate, verbenol, 1,8-cineole, and β-pinene were the main components, which all are among terpenic compounds. Toxicity of such terpenic compounds was approved against L. decemlineata and some of other insect pests.1719 Further, toxicity of some essential oils was evaluated against L. decemlineata in the recent years. For example, toxicity of Eugenia caryophyllus (Sprengel), Mentha spicata L., Myrtus communis L., Ocimum basilicum L., Satureja khuzistanica Jamzad and Thymus daenensis Celak essential oils were evaluated against the 4th instar larvae and adults of L. decemlineata. All essential oils were toxic against both stages in which the essential oil of S. khuzistanica was the most efficient.20 Toxicity of four Achillea species including A. biebersteinii Afan., A. coarctata Poir., A. wilhelmsii Koch and Achillea biserrata Bieb. was investigated against the adults of L. decemlineata by Cakır et al.21 L. decemlineata adults were affected by the concentrations and exposure times of all essential oils. They concluded that observed toxicity might be caused by the occurrence of main components or by synergistic effect of them with the other compounds. In the present study, the insecticidal activity of C. citratus essential oil was approved against the larvae and adults of L. decemlineata. This effects may be related to being some terpenic compounds specially citral, geranial, neral, geraniol, myrcene, and 1,8-cineole. Furthermore, the insecticidal effects of C. citratus essential oil were reported against some major insect pests such as Aedes aegypti L., Tribolium castaneum Herbst, Sitophilus oryzae L., Zabrotes subfasciatus (Boheman), and Musca domestica L., which support the results of present study for insecticidal potential of this oil.2223242526 One of the most attractive features of plant essential oils is that they are low-risk materials to mammals and other non-target organisms. Essential oils have short residual half-lives. So, their consumption can reduce risks to foraging pollinators such as honeybees. Furthermore, because of being several components with multiple modes of action against pests, pest resistance to these bio-agents will be low. Based on the previous findings C. citratus essential oil has a great potential for management of some insect pests and according to the our results it was a sound candidate as a new bio-pesticide for L. decemlineata management. However, additional studies should be made for enhancement of its toxicity against L. decemlineata and other economical insect pest, improvement its stability in the field application and reducing its cost problem.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1

Toxicity of essential oil of Cymbopogon citratus against the 3th instar larvae (A) and adults (B) of Leptinotarsa decemlineata after 24 and 48 h exposure times. According to Tukey's test, means with the dissimilar letters are significantly different at P = 0.05. There was not any mortality in the control groups.

nps-23-235-g001
Fig. 2

Concentration-response lines for different concentrations of Cymbopogon citratus essential oil against 3th instar larvae and adults of Leptinotarsa decemlineata.

nps-23-235-g002
Table 1

Probit analysis of the obtained data from toxicity Cymbopogon citratus essential oil against 3th instar larvae and adults of Leptinotarsa decemlineata

nps-23-235-i001
Insect stage Time (h) LC50 with 95% confidence Limits (μl/ml) Slope SE χ2 (df = 3) ρ values a Relative median potency b
Larvae 24 10.32 (9.17 – 11.72) 2.19 ± 0.32 0.38 0.94 -
48 7.76 (6.80 – 8.74) 2.21 ± 0.32 0.87 0.83 0.75 (0.62 – 0.89)
Adults 24 6.27 (4.82 – 8.15) 1.06 ± 0.17 0.09 0.99 -
48 4.35 (3.24 – 5.62) 0.96 ± 0.17 0.75 0.86 0.69 (0.46 – 0.99)

aSince the ρ values are greater than 0.05, no heterogeneity factor is used in the calculation of confidence limits.

b Relative median potency was considered for each stage separately. According to the relative median potency records, differences between LC50 values of each stage are statistically significant.

Table 2

Chemical composition of Cymbopogon citratus essential oil from different locations

nps-23-235-i002
Source country Main components
Argentina Geranial (45.4%), neral (31.3%), neryl acetate (13.6%), caryophyllene oxide (9.7%).24
Brazil Geranial (E–citral) (53.2%), neral (Z–citral) (36.4%), geraniol (2.6%) and geranyl acetate (1.5%).27
Cameroun Geranial (39.3%), neral (21.9%), geraniol (15.6%) and myrcene (14.0%).28
China Citral (45.9%) and verbenol (37.9%).29
Columbia Geranial (34.4%), neral (28.4%), geraniol (11.5%) and β-Pinene (8.1%).23
Cuba Geranial (51.1%), neral (35.2%), myrcene (6.5%) and geraniol (2.2%).27
India α-Citral (17.9%), β-citral (29.0%), 1,8-cineole (7.5%) and caryophyllene (6.4%).26
Sri Lanka α-Citral (46.2%), β-citral (31.6%), geraniol (3.6%) and geranyl acetate (1.3%).30

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.

References

1. Malekmohammadi M. J Asia-Pacific Entomol. 2014; 17:213–220.
2. Nouri-Ganbalani G. J Agri Sci. 1989; 29:1–9.
3. Hare JD. Annu Rev Entomol. 1990; 35:81–100.
4. Allahyari H, Fard PA, Talebi K. Res Pest Manag News. 2005; 14:13–15.
5. Cutler GC, Tolman JH, Scott-Dupree CD, Harris CR. J Econ Entomol. 2005; 98:1685–1693.
6. Mohammadi Sharif M, Hejazi MJ, Mohammadi A, Rashidi MR. J Insect Sci. 2007; 7:1–7.
7. Alyokhin A, Baker M, Mota-Sanchez D, Dively G, Grafius E. Am J Pot Res. 2008; 85:395–413.
8. Bakkali F, Averbeck S, Averbeck D, Idaomar M. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008; 46:446–475.
9. Isman MB. Annu Rev Entomol. 2006; 51:45–66.
10. Isman MB, Miresmailli S, Machial C. Phytochem Rev. 2011; 10:197–204.
11. Isman MB, Grieneisen ML. Trends Plant Sci. 2014; 19:140–145.
12. Ebadollahi A, Jalali-Sendi J. Toxin Rev. 2015; 34:76–91.
13. Sousa SM, Silva PS, Viccini LF. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2010; 82:305–311.
14. Tangpu V, Yadav AK. Pharmacologyonline. 2006; 48:290–298.
15. Tzortzakis NG, Economakis CD. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2007; 8:253–258.
16. Shah G, Shri R, Panchal V, Sharma N, Singh B, Mann AS. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2011; 2:3–8.
17. Kordali S, Kesdek M, Cakir A. Ind Crops Prod. 2007; 26:278–297.
18. Rechinger KH. Graz: Flora Iranica (Umbelliferae);Germany: Akademische Druck-u;1978. p. 130.
19. Safaei-Khorram M, Jafarnia S, Khosroshahi S. J Plant Protect Res. 2011; 51:225–233.
20. Taghizadeh Saroukolai A, Nouri-Ganbalani G, Rafiee-Dastjerdi H, Hadian J. Plant Protect Sci. 2014; 50:207–216.
21. Cakır A, Ozer H, Aydýn T, Kordali S, Cavusoglu AT, Akcin T, Mete E, Akcin A. Rec Nat Prod. 2016; 10:154–167.
22. Cavalcanti ES, Morais SM, Lima MA, Santana EW. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2004; 99:541–544.
23. Olivero-Verbel J, Nerio LS, Stashenko EE. Pest Manag Sci. 2010; 66:664–668.
24. Stefanazzi N, Stadler T, Ferrero A. Pest Manag Sci. 2011; 67:639–646.
25. Franca SM, Oliveira JV, Esteves Filho AB, Oliveira CM. Acta Amaz. 2012; 42:381–386.
26. Kumar P, Mishra S, Malik A, Satya S. Parasitol Res. 2013; 112:69–76.
27. Pinto ZT, Sánchez FF, dos Santos AR, Amaral AC, Ferreira JL, Escalona-Arranz JC, Queiroz MM. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet. 2015; 24:36–44.
28. Tchoumbougnang F, Dongmo PMJ, Sameza ML, Mbanjo EGN, Fotso GBT, Zollo PHA, Menut C. Biotechnol Agro Soc Environ. 2009; 13:77–84.
29. Jiang ZL, Akhtar Y, Zhang X, Bradbury R, Isman MB. J Appl Entomol. 2012; 136:191–202.
30. Paranagama PA, Abeysekera KHT, Nugaliyadde L, Abeywickrama KP. J Natn Sci Foundation Sri Lanka. 2004; 4:127–138.
TOOLS
Similar articles