Abstract
Purpose:
The purposes of this study were to develop a nursing assessment tool for senior center nurses, and to test its feasibility and content validity. Methods: The study utilized a psychometric test design. Preliminary items were developed based on geriatric health needs and Gordon's 11 domains of functioning health. Initially, the tool was evaluated for content validity and feasibility. Then, it was administered among 195 older adults in a senior center by a gerontological nurse practitioner. Data were analyzed to describe the nursing problems of the senior center older adults. Results: The final version of the nursing assessment tool consisted of 27 items. The internal consistency, measured with the Cronbach's ⍺, was .74. The result of the assessment showed that senior center older adults had high nursing needs in the area of management of chronic diseases (hypertension, diabetes, and lipids), dental care, community relations, safety, elder abuse, health behaviors (such as drinking), mental health (depression, suicide, and cognitive function), and health consultations. Conclusion: The new tool was feasible for use with senior center participants, and it was evaluated as having high content validity by senior center nurses.
REFERENCES
1.Statistics Korea. 2015 Statistics on the aged [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea;2015. Sep 24. Available from:. http://kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/2/1/index.-board?bmode=read&aSeq=348565.
2.Seon WD., Kim HR., Ko SJ., Lee SY., Kim DJ., Kim CW, et al. The correspondent strategy development of health care services for older persons with a view to health status cycle. Sejong: Institute of Health and Social Affairs;2014. Report No. 2014-. p. 22–9.
3.Yoon JL. A research for the development of national health screening program for Korean older persons. Health Promotion Report. Chuncheon: University of Hallym;2009. September. Report No. 2009-. p. 09–18.
4.Korea Health Industry Development Institute. A study on the standardized system of health management service. Cheongju: Korea Health Industry Development Institute;2011. November.
5.Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2014 Senior survey [Internet]. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare;2014. Dec 31. Available from:. http://www.korea.kr/archive/expDocView.do?docId=36342.
6.Skarupski KA., Pelkowski JJ. Multipurpose senior centers: opportunities for community health nursing. J Community Health Nurs. 2003. 20(2):119–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327655JCHN2002_05.
7.Haber D. Community-oriented primary care: applying the model to a senior center. Fam Community Health. 1996. 18(4):33–9.
8.Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2016 Senior health, welfare and business information [Internet]. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare;2016. May 25. Available from:. http://www.mohw.go.kr/front_new/jb/sjb030301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=03&MENU_ID=0329&CONT_SEQ=331999.
9.Kim SH. The health services of senior centers [dissertation]. Seoul: Seoul National University;2005.
10.Kim CJ. Development of a conceptual framework of nursing from selected concepts of nursing diagnoses. J Korean Acad Nurs. 1996. 26(1):177–93.
11.Gordon M. Nursing diagnosis: process and application. 3rd ed.St. Louis, MO: Mosby;1994.
12.Chung J. Development and application of nursing service quality indicators in nursing homes. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2007. 37(3):401–13.
13.Won CW., Rho YG., Kim SY., Cho BR., Lee YS. The validity and reliability of Korean Activity of Daily Living (K-ADL) scale. J Korean Geriatr Soc. 2002. 6(2):98–106.
14.Hwang HS., Kwon IS., Park BJ., Cho B., Yoon JL., Won CW. The validity and reliability of Korean frailty index. J Korean Geriatr Soc. 2010. 14(4):191–202.
15.Won CW., Rho YG., SunWoo D., Lee YS. The validity and reliability of Korean Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (K-IADL) scale. J Korean Geriatr Soc. 2002. 6(4):273–80.
16.Fehring RJ. Methods to validate nursing diagnoses. Heart Lung. 1987. 16(6):625–9.
17.Graneheim UH., Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004. 24(2):105–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.
18.Aday RH., Kehoe GC., Farney LA. Impact of senior center friendships on aging women who live alone. J Women Aging. 2006. 18(1):57–73.
19.Lee SY., Lee JY., Jo SY., Lee SH., Oh YI., Jang JY. Strengthening the health promotion service delivery systems in Korea. Sejong: Institute of Health and Social Affairs;2012. Report No.p. 20142–09.
20.Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. Interaction of medicines and health supplements [Internet]. Cheongju: Ministry of Food and Drug Safety;2012. Dec 26. Available from:. http://drug.mfds.go.kr/html/boardLinkBody.jsp?p_menuId=030105&p_boardSeq=28&p_seq=174&p_sub_menuId=03010503.
21.Kim SH. A survey on the use of and significant variables for health functional foods among Korean elderly. J Korean Soc Food Cult. 2011. 26(1):30–8.
22.Bickley L., Szilagyi PG. Bates' guide to physical examination and history-taking. 10th ed.Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2012.
23.Touger-Decker R., Mobley CC., Association AD. Position of the American Dietetic Association: oral health and nutrition. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2003. 103(5):615–25.
24.Jung HK., Kwak DJ. The effects of oral health behaviors of elderly on periodontal status (from the 2010 Korean National Examination Health and Nutrition survey). Korean Acad Dent Technol. 2012. 34(2):157–64.
25.Statistics Korea. Korean statistical information service [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea;2014. May 25. Available from:. http://kosis.kr/statisticsList/statisticsList_01List.jsp?vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&parmTabId=M_01_01#SubCont.
26.Kwon SJ., Kim NH., Kim YH., Bark NH., Yang MK., Lee KH, et al. School health. 1th ed.Paju: Soomoonsa;2011. p. 26–81.
27.Choi SJ., Jang IH. Social welfare for older persons in aging society. Seoul: Seoul University Press;2010. p. 289.
Table 1.
Domain | Item | CVI∗ (N=14) | Reliability† | Response rate‡ (N=195, %) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1. Medical history | 1-1 Current disease | .94 | .66 | 100 |
1-2 Family history | .73 | 30 | ||
1-3 Number of medication | .95 | 100 | ||
2. Nutrition | 2-1 Nutrition risk | .86 | .29 | 100 |
2-2 Weight management | .73 | 100 | ||
2-3 Number of health functional foods | .48 | 100 | ||
3. Hygiene | 3-1 Bath frequency | .70 | .34 | 100 |
3-2 Oral care | .80 | 100 | ||
4. Activity and rest | 4-1 ADL | .79 | .86 | 100 |
4-2 IADL | .79 | 100 | ||
4-3 Frailty | .82 | 100 | ||
4-4 Exercise | .80 | 100 | ||
4-5 Sleep | .82 | 100 | ||
5. Social activity | 5-1 Family relations | .75 | .76 | 100 |
5-2 Friendship | .73 | 100 | ||
5-3 Community relations | .73 | 100 | ||
6. Safety | 6-1 Safety awareness | .86 | .54 | 100 |
6-2 Safety precautions | .84 | 100 | ||
7. Elder abuse | 7-1 Elder abuse exposure | .79 | .61 | 100 |
8. Health habit | 8-1 Smoking | .73 | .17 | 100 |
8-2 Alcohol | .73 | 100 | ||
8-3 Drug abuse | .80 | 100 | ||
9. Sexual function | 9-1 Sex problem | .61 | .62 | 100 |
9-2 Sexual perceptions | .63 | 100 | ||
10. Mental health | 10-1 Depression | .95 | .61 | 100 |
10-2 Suicide | .95 | 100 | ||
10-3 Cognitive function | .93 | 100 | ||
11. Counseling | 11-1 Health counseling needs | .89 | .53 | 100 |