Journal List > Perspect Nurs Sci > v.12(1) > 1060405

Bae and Kim: Estimating need for Home Visiting Nurse from Public Health Centers

Abstract

Purpose:

This study attempted to estimate the need for home visiting nurse at public health centers. Methods: A model was generated to estimate a community's home visiting health service needs in 16 regions and a workload analysis was adopted to estimate the number of required Nurses. Data were collected from 16 public health centers using the South Korean government's open-information systems. Subjects were divided into three groups: vulnerable social group, bottom 10% income group, and bottom 20% income group. Results: The analysis revealed that 2,158 and 6,667 nurses were needed to provide home visiting health service for the bottom 10% and 20% income groups, respectively. It was estimated that for the vulnerable social group, 10,336 nurses were needed to provide home visiting health service, implying that the need-based demand for nurses is well over 5 times the number currently employed. Conclusion: The results indicate that the number of currently employed nurses is insufficient for the health management of vulnerable social groups. The government should consider active employment policies to encourage nurses to apply for home visiting health service.

REFERENCES

1.Kim YR. A study on the new poverty and the change of poverty policies: focusing on the working poor. Soc Welfare Policy. 2004. 20:245–73.
2.Ministry of Health and Welfare & Korean Health Promotion Foundation. Guidebook for 2014 community integrated health promotion services [Internet]. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2014. [cited 2014 August 09]. Available from:. http://www.inhealth.or.kr/index.jsp.
3.Kim JH., Lee TJ., Ko Y., Lim ES. Effects of customized home visiting health care on health promotion and employment. Evaluation report of customized home visiting health care. Seoul: Seoul National University and Korea Health Promotion Foundation;2011. December. Report No.: Policy. p. 11–18.
4.Lee SH., Kim SY., Lim ES., Kim JH. Development for evaluation system of customized home health care program. Policy Report of Health Service. Seoul: Health Technology Portal Service;2008. Feb. Report No.: HPRB. p. 08–24.
5.Song MS., Kim YH., Kim HS., Bae HI. Estimation of optimal workload for the visiting nurses of customizing health care through the job analysis. Policy Report of Health Promotion Business. Seoul: Ajou University and Korea Health Promotion Foundation;2009. March. Report No.: Policy-Health care-2008.
6.Hall TL., Mejia A. Health manpower planning: principles, methods, issues. Geneva: World Health Organization;1978.
7.Park JS., Oh YJ. The effect of case management for clients with hypertension·DM registered in customized home visiting health care services. J Korea Community Health Nurs Acad Soc. 2010. 24(1):135–50.
8.Yang SO., AHN SY., Yim ES., Kwon MS. The effects of customized home visiting health service in Gangwon-do. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2008. 19(1):88–100.
9.Chin YR., Lee IS., Chang HS. Analysis of the effects and nursing intervention of home health care in public health centers. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2004. 15(3):353–64.
10.Hyoung HK., Jang HS. The comparison of health status and health behavior among hypertension group, DM group, and hypertension DM group for the aged provided with customized home care service by visiting nurses. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2011. 22(1):11–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2011.22.1.11.
crossref
11.Ko Y., Lee IS. Cost-benefit analysis of home visiting care for vulnerable populations with hypertension. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2011. 22(4):438–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2011.22.4.438.
crossref
12.Kim JH., Lee TJ., Lee JH., Shin SJ., Lee EH. A cost-benefit analysis of individual home visiting health care. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2010. 21(3):362–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2010.21.3.362.
13.Lee TW. Economic evaluation of visiting nurse services for the low income elderly with long-term care needs. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2004. 34(1):191–201.
14.Ryu HS., Myeong JI., Hwang NI. Estimation of the supply and demand for home visiting nurses in Seoul public health center. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2003. 14(4):587–97.
15.Grumbach K., Ash M., Seago JA., Spetz J., Coffman J. Measuring shortages of hospital nurses: how do you know a hospital with a nursing shortage when you see one? Med Care Res and Rev. 2001. 58(4):387–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107755870105800401.
crossref
16.Scheffler RM., Liu JX., Kinfu Y., Dal Poz MR. Forecasting the global shortage of physicians: an economic-and needs-based approach. Bull World Health Organ. 2008. 86(7):516–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0042-96862008000700011.
17.Ryu HS., Park ES., Park YJ., Han KS., Lim JY. A workload analysis of a visiting nursing service based on a health center in Seoul. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2003. 33(7):1018–27.
crossref
18.Gmach D., Rolia J., Cherkasova L., Kemper A. editors.Workload analysis and demand prediction of enterprise data center applications. Workload Characterization, 2007 IISWC 2007 IEEE 10th International Symposium on. 2007. IEEE.
crossref
19.Jung MH., Yoo IY. A study on visiting nurse's perception of the service between health and welfare. J Korean Soc Health Educ and Promot. 2002. 19(2):155–68.
20.Park CG., Park KS., Kang YS. Job stress, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment of customized home health care nurse. J Agrie Med Community Health. 2013. 38(1):39–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.5393/JAMCH.2013.38.1.039.
crossref
21.Seoul Metropolitan Government [internet]. 2014. plan of customized home visiting health service. Seoul: Seoul Information Communication Square, Inc.;c-2014 [updated 2014 March 27; cited 2014 December 27]. Available from:. http://opengov.seoul.go.kr/public/1124002.
22.Ryu HS. Estimating the cost of visiting nursing services by visiting nursing model for urban public health center in Korea. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2004. 34(6):983–93.
23.Ministry of Health and Welfare & Korean Health Promotion Foundation. Guidebook for 2015 community integrated health promotion services [Internet]. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2015. [cited 2015 Jan 09]. 8p. Available from:. http://www.inhealth.or.kr/index.jsp.
24.Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. A limit of responsibilities on Korean child-rearing and condition for the child-rearing expenditure. Health and Welfare Issue & Focus. 2010. 51(68):1–8.

Figure 1.
Estimation scheme of demand on home visiting nurses.
pns-12-23f1.tif
Table 1.
Needs for Home Visiting Health Services by Region in the Lower 10% Income Group
Region Intensive care (household) Regular care (household) Self-care (household) Total (A) (household) A/B(%)
Seoul 1,318 130,299 38,973 170,591 33.8
Busan 148 89,249 38,986 128,382 52.1
Daegu 52 54,910 14,333 69,295 40.6
Incheon 965 61,869 16,829 79,662 56.4
Gwangju - - - - 9.8
Daegeon - - - - 13.0
Ulsan 70 12,327 3,202 15,600 47.9
Gyeonggi 755 94,474 31,943 127,172 43.5
Gangwon - - - - 18.5
Chungbuk 293 28,587 11,317 40,198 71.0
Chungnam - - - - 47.3
Jeonbuk 10 725 321 1,056 60.8
Jeonnam 6 437 150 593 50.1
Gyeongbuk 549 15,786 6,199 22,533 40.8
Gyeongnam 564 37,107 8,539 46,210 43.7
Jeju - - - - 15.7
Total 4,017 470,120 151,892 626,029 49.0

B: Vulnerable social group in each region.

Table 2.
Needs for Home Visiting Health Services by Region in the Lower 20% Income Group
Region Intensive care (household) Regular care (household) Self-care (household) Total (A) (household) A/B(%)
Seoul 3,830 378,529 113,220 495,579 70.0
Busan 322 194,659 85,031 280,012 87.2
Daegu 44 46,834 12,225 59,104 36.4
Incheon 2,284 146,495 39,848 188,627 106.0
Gwangju 594 11,884 4,681 17,159 29.4
Daegeon 4 40,838 11,206 52,048 58.4
Ulsan 124 21,758 5,652 27,534 63.8
Gyeonggi 2,748 343,681 116,205 462,634 85.9
Gangwon 273 29,645 9,063 38,982 46.9
Chungbuk 796 77,511 30,687 108,994 114.3
Chungnam 71 10,108 3,912 14,090 66.2
Jeonbuk 809 60,392 26,767 87,968 105.1
Jeonnam 1,142 83,262 28,565 112,969 100.3
Gyeongbuk 2,778 79,860 31,359 113,997 74.7
Gyeongnam 1,192 78,473 18,058 97,724 60.3
Jeju 122 8,669 2,976 11,768 31.5
Total 17,159 1,612,836 539,070 2,169,066 95.0

B: Vulnerable social group in each region.

Table 3.
Needs for Home Visiting Health Services by Region in the Vulnerable Social Group
Region Intensive care (household) Regular care (household) Self-care (household) Total (A) (household) A/B (%)
Seoul 5,917 584,838 174,929 765,684 100.0
Busan 385 233,115 101,830 335,330 100.0
Daegu 160 169,095 44,137 213,392 100.0
Incheon 2,125 136,291 37,073 175,489 100.0
Gwangju 3,936 78,736 31,010 113,682 100.0
Daegeon 9 83,844 23,006 106,859 100.0
Ulsan 246 43,117 11,201 54,563 100.0
Gyeonggi 3,411 426,689 144,272 574,372 100.0
Gangwon 1,185 128,477 39,278 168,939 100.0
Chungbuk 630 61,374 24,298 86,302 100.0
Chungnam 387 55,271 21,392 77,050 100.0
Jeonbuk 717 53,516 23,720 77,953 100.0
Jeonnam 1,136 82,838 28,420 112,394 100.0
Gyeongbuk 4,483 128,032 49,508 182,023 100.0
Gyeongnam 2,688 176,911 40,711 220,310 100.0
Jeju 905 64,328 22,084 87,318 100.0
Total 28,320 2,506,471 816,869 3,351,660 100.0

B: Vulnerable social group in each region.

Table 4.
Demands for Home Visiting Nurse Practitioner by Region
Region 10% 20% Vulnerable 2013y§
n n n n
Seoul 530 1,540 2,380 317
Busan 379 827 991 186
Daegu 216 184 666 63
Incheon 251 595 553 94
Gwangju - 54 355 46
Daegeon - 162 332 49
Ulsan 49 86 171 45
Gyeonggi 389 1,417 1,759 385
Gangwon - 121 523 138
Chungbuk 121 329 260 121
Chungnam - 42 232 120
Jeonbuk 3 262 232 108
Jeonnam 2 347 345 173
Gyeongbuk 69 352 563 176
Gyeongnam 148 313 705 38
Jeju - 36 268 47
Total 2,158 6,667 10,336 2,106

10%: the lower 10% income group;

20%: the lower 20% income group;

Vulnerable: the vulnerable social group;

§ 2013y: the number of registered nurses employed for home visiting health services.

TOOLS
Similar articles