Abstract
Purpose:
This study attempted to estimate the need for home visiting nurse at public health centers. Methods: A model was generated to estimate a community's home visiting health service needs in 16 regions and a workload analysis was adopted to estimate the number of required Nurses. Data were collected from 16 public health centers using the South Korean government's open-information systems. Subjects were divided into three groups: vulnerable social group, bottom 10% income group, and bottom 20% income group. Results: The analysis revealed that 2,158 and 6,667 nurses were needed to provide home visiting health service for the bottom 10% and 20% income groups, respectively. It was estimated that for the vulnerable social group, 10,336 nurses were needed to provide home visiting health service, implying that the need-based demand for nurses is well over 5 times the number currently employed. Conclusion: The results indicate that the number of currently employed nurses is insufficient for the health management of vulnerable social groups. The government should consider active employment policies to encourage nurses to apply for home visiting health service.
REFERENCES
1.Kim YR. A study on the new poverty and the change of poverty policies: focusing on the working poor. Soc Welfare Policy. 2004. 20:245–73.
2.Ministry of Health and Welfare & Korean Health Promotion Foundation. Guidebook for 2014 community integrated health promotion services [Internet]. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2014. [cited 2014 August 09]. Available from:. http://www.inhealth.or.kr/index.jsp.
3.Kim JH., Lee TJ., Ko Y., Lim ES. Effects of customized home visiting health care on health promotion and employment. Evaluation report of customized home visiting health care. Seoul: Seoul National University and Korea Health Promotion Foundation;2011. December. Report No.: Policy. p. 11–18.
4.Lee SH., Kim SY., Lim ES., Kim JH. Development for evaluation system of customized home health care program. Policy Report of Health Service. Seoul: Health Technology Portal Service;2008. Feb. Report No.: HPRB. p. 08–24.
5.Song MS., Kim YH., Kim HS., Bae HI. Estimation of optimal workload for the visiting nurses of customizing health care through the job analysis. Policy Report of Health Promotion Business. Seoul: Ajou University and Korea Health Promotion Foundation;2009. March. Report No.: Policy-Health care-2008.
6.Hall TL., Mejia A. Health manpower planning: principles, methods, issues. Geneva: World Health Organization;1978.
7.Park JS., Oh YJ. The effect of case management for clients with hypertension·DM registered in customized home visiting health care services. J Korea Community Health Nurs Acad Soc. 2010. 24(1):135–50.
8.Yang SO., AHN SY., Yim ES., Kwon MS. The effects of customized home visiting health service in Gangwon-do. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2008. 19(1):88–100.
9.Chin YR., Lee IS., Chang HS. Analysis of the effects and nursing intervention of home health care in public health centers. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2004. 15(3):353–64.
10.Hyoung HK., Jang HS. The comparison of health status and health behavior among hypertension group, DM group, and hypertension DM group for the aged provided with customized home care service by visiting nurses. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2011. 22(1):11–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2011.22.1.11.
11.Ko Y., Lee IS. Cost-benefit analysis of home visiting care for vulnerable populations with hypertension. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2011. 22(4):438–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2011.22.4.438.
12.Kim JH., Lee TJ., Lee JH., Shin SJ., Lee EH. A cost-benefit analysis of individual home visiting health care. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2010. 21(3):362–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2010.21.3.362.
13.Lee TW. Economic evaluation of visiting nurse services for the low income elderly with long-term care needs. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2004. 34(1):191–201.
14.Ryu HS., Myeong JI., Hwang NI. Estimation of the supply and demand for home visiting nurses in Seoul public health center. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2003. 14(4):587–97.
15.Grumbach K., Ash M., Seago JA., Spetz J., Coffman J. Measuring shortages of hospital nurses: how do you know a hospital with a nursing shortage when you see one? Med Care Res and Rev. 2001. 58(4):387–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107755870105800401.
16.Scheffler RM., Liu JX., Kinfu Y., Dal Poz MR. Forecasting the global shortage of physicians: an economic-and needs-based approach. Bull World Health Organ. 2008. 86(7):516–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0042-96862008000700011.
17.Ryu HS., Park ES., Park YJ., Han KS., Lim JY. A workload analysis of a visiting nursing service based on a health center in Seoul. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2003. 33(7):1018–27.
18.Gmach D., Rolia J., Cherkasova L., Kemper A. editors.Workload analysis and demand prediction of enterprise data center applications. Workload Characterization, 2007 IISWC 2007 IEEE 10th International Symposium on. 2007. IEEE.
19.Jung MH., Yoo IY. A study on visiting nurse's perception of the service between health and welfare. J Korean Soc Health Educ and Promot. 2002. 19(2):155–68.
20.Park CG., Park KS., Kang YS. Job stress, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment of customized home health care nurse. J Agrie Med Community Health. 2013. 38(1):39–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.5393/JAMCH.2013.38.1.039.
21.Seoul Metropolitan Government [internet]. 2014. plan of customized home visiting health service. Seoul: Seoul Information Communication Square, Inc.;c-2014 [updated 2014 March 27; cited 2014 December 27]. Available from:. http://opengov.seoul.go.kr/public/1124002.
22.Ryu HS. Estimating the cost of visiting nursing services by visiting nursing model for urban public health center in Korea. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2004. 34(6):983–93.
23.Ministry of Health and Welfare & Korean Health Promotion Foundation. Guidebook for 2015 community integrated health promotion services [Internet]. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2015. [cited 2015 Jan 09]. 8p. Available from:. http://www.inhealth.or.kr/index.jsp.
24.Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs. A limit of responsibilities on Korean child-rearing and condition for the child-rearing expenditure. Health and Welfare Issue & Focus. 2010. 51(68):1–8.
Table 1.
Region | Intensive care (household) | Regular care (household) | Self-care (household) | Total (A) (household) | A/B∗(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Seoul | 1,318 | 130,299 | 38,973 | 170,591 | 33.8 |
Busan | 148 | 89,249 | 38,986 | 128,382 | 52.1 |
Daegu | 52 | 54,910 | 14,333 | 69,295 | 40.6 |
Incheon | 965 | 61,869 | 16,829 | 79,662 | 56.4 |
Gwangju | - | - | - | - | 9.8 |
Daegeon | - | - | - | - | 13.0 |
Ulsan | 70 | 12,327 | 3,202 | 15,600 | 47.9 |
Gyeonggi | 755 | 94,474 | 31,943 | 127,172 | 43.5 |
Gangwon | - | - | - | - | 18.5 |
Chungbuk | 293 | 28,587 | 11,317 | 40,198 | 71.0 |
Chungnam | - | - | - | - | 47.3 |
Jeonbuk | 10 | 725 | 321 | 1,056 | 60.8 |
Jeonnam | 6 | 437 | 150 | 593 | 50.1 |
Gyeongbuk | 549 | 15,786 | 6,199 | 22,533 | 40.8 |
Gyeongnam | 564 | 37,107 | 8,539 | 46,210 | 43.7 |
Jeju | - | - | - | - | 15.7 |
Total | 4,017 | 470,120 | 151,892 | 626,029 | 49.0 |
Table 2.
Region | Intensive care (household) | Regular care (household) | Self-care (household) | Total (A) (household) | A/B∗(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Seoul | 3,830 | 378,529 | 113,220 | 495,579 | 70.0 |
Busan | 322 | 194,659 | 85,031 | 280,012 | 87.2 |
Daegu | 44 | 46,834 | 12,225 | 59,104 | 36.4 |
Incheon | 2,284 | 146,495 | 39,848 | 188,627 | 106.0 |
Gwangju | 594 | 11,884 | 4,681 | 17,159 | 29.4 |
Daegeon | 4 | 40,838 | 11,206 | 52,048 | 58.4 |
Ulsan | 124 | 21,758 | 5,652 | 27,534 | 63.8 |
Gyeonggi | 2,748 | 343,681 | 116,205 | 462,634 | 85.9 |
Gangwon | 273 | 29,645 | 9,063 | 38,982 | 46.9 |
Chungbuk | 796 | 77,511 | 30,687 | 108,994 | 114.3 |
Chungnam | 71 | 10,108 | 3,912 | 14,090 | 66.2 |
Jeonbuk | 809 | 60,392 | 26,767 | 87,968 | 105.1 |
Jeonnam | 1,142 | 83,262 | 28,565 | 112,969 | 100.3 |
Gyeongbuk | 2,778 | 79,860 | 31,359 | 113,997 | 74.7 |
Gyeongnam | 1,192 | 78,473 | 18,058 | 97,724 | 60.3 |
Jeju | 122 | 8,669 | 2,976 | 11,768 | 31.5 |
Total | 17,159 | 1,612,836 | 539,070 | 2,169,066 | 95.0 |
Table 3.
Region | Intensive care (household) | Regular care (household) | Self-care (household) | Total (A) (household) | A/B∗ (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Seoul | 5,917 | 584,838 | 174,929 | 765,684 | 100.0 |
Busan | 385 | 233,115 | 101,830 | 335,330 | 100.0 |
Daegu | 160 | 169,095 | 44,137 | 213,392 | 100.0 |
Incheon | 2,125 | 136,291 | 37,073 | 175,489 | 100.0 |
Gwangju | 3,936 | 78,736 | 31,010 | 113,682 | 100.0 |
Daegeon | 9 | 83,844 | 23,006 | 106,859 | 100.0 |
Ulsan | 246 | 43,117 | 11,201 | 54,563 | 100.0 |
Gyeonggi | 3,411 | 426,689 | 144,272 | 574,372 | 100.0 |
Gangwon | 1,185 | 128,477 | 39,278 | 168,939 | 100.0 |
Chungbuk | 630 | 61,374 | 24,298 | 86,302 | 100.0 |
Chungnam | 387 | 55,271 | 21,392 | 77,050 | 100.0 |
Jeonbuk | 717 | 53,516 | 23,720 | 77,953 | 100.0 |
Jeonnam | 1,136 | 82,838 | 28,420 | 112,394 | 100.0 |
Gyeongbuk | 4,483 | 128,032 | 49,508 | 182,023 | 100.0 |
Gyeongnam | 2,688 | 176,911 | 40,711 | 220,310 | 100.0 |
Jeju | 905 | 64,328 | 22,084 | 87,318 | 100.0 |
Total | 28,320 | 2,506,471 | 816,869 | 3,351,660 | 100.0 |
Table 4.
Region | 10%∗ | 20%† | Vulnerable‡ | 2013y§ |
---|---|---|---|---|
n | n | n | n | |
Seoul | 530 | 1,540 | 2,380 | 317 |
Busan | 379 | 827 | 991 | 186 |
Daegu | 216 | 184 | 666 | 63 |
Incheon | 251 | 595 | 553 | 94 |
Gwangju | - | 54 | 355 | 46 |
Daegeon | - | 162 | 332 | 49 |
Ulsan | 49 | 86 | 171 | 45 |
Gyeonggi | 389 | 1,417 | 1,759 | 385 |
Gangwon | - | 121 | 523 | 138 |
Chungbuk | 121 | 329 | 260 | 121 |
Chungnam | - | 42 | 232 | 120 |
Jeonbuk | 3 | 262 | 232 | 108 |
Jeonnam | 2 | 347 | 345 | 173 |
Gyeongbuk | 69 | 352 | 563 | 176 |
Gyeongnam | 148 | 313 | 705 | 38 |
Jeju | - | 36 | 268 | 47 |
Total | 2,158 | 6,667 | 10,336 | 2,106 |