Journal List > Korean J Endocr Surg > v.16(2) > 1060160

Sung, Lee, Sung, Yoon, Chung, and Hong: Risk Factors for Distant Metastasis in Patients with Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma

Abstract

Purpose

The major issue of follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) diagnosed after hemithyroidectomy is whether to undergo further treatments. The aim of this study is to examine the clinicopathological characteristics of FTC and to evaluate the risk factors for distant metastasis.

Methods

From 1993 to 2010, 274 patients underwent initial thyroid surgery and were subsequently diagnosed as FTC. After review of the histological sections by an experienced pathologist, 211 patients were confirmed as FTC and were enrolled in this study. Clinicopathological features were compared based on the presence or absence of distant metastases, and the risk factors for distant metastases and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) rates were analyzed.

Results

The patients included 39 males (18.5%) and 172 females (81.5%), with a mean age of 44.0±14.5 years. The median follow-up period was 99.5 months (range, 13.0∼222.0). Distant metastases were detected in 23 patients (10.9%), including 15 synchronous distant metastases and 8 metachronous distant metastases. In multivariate analysis, age ≥45 years, widely invasive FTC, tumor size ≥4.3 cm, and vascular invasion were independent risk factors for distant metastasis. DMFS rates in patients with these risk factors were significantly poorer than those in patients without these risk factors.

Conclusion

Older age, aggressive histological classification, larger tumor size, and vascular invasion were independent risk factors for distant metastasis. FTC patients with these risk factors may be candidates for further treatments after diagnostic thyroid hemithyroidectomy.

References

1. DeLellis R, Lloyd R, Heitz P, Eng C. WHO Classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of endocrine organs. Lyon: IARC Press;2004. p. 73–6.
2. Lo CY, Chan WF, Lam KY, Wan KY. Follicular thyroid carcinoma: the role of histology and staging systems in predicting survival. Ann Surg. 2005; 242:708–15.
3. Ito Y, Hirokawa M, Higashiyama T, Takamura Y, Miya A, Kobayashi K, et al. Prognosis and prognostic factors of follicular carcinoma in Japan: importance of postoperative pathological examination. World J Surg. 2007; 31:1417–24.
crossref
4. Goffredo P, Cheung K, Roman SA, Sosa JA. Can minimally invasive follicular thyroid cancer be approached as a benign lesion?: a population-level analysis of survival among 1,200 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 20:767–72.
5. Sugino K, Kameyama K, Nagahama M, Kitagawa W, Shibuya H, Ohkuwa K, et al. Does completion thyroidectomy improve the outcome of patients with minimally invasive follicular carcinoma of the thyroid? Ann Surg Oncol. 2014; 21:2981–6.
crossref
6. Ito Y, Miyauchi A, Tomoda C, Hirokawa M, Kobayashi K, Miya A. Prognostic significance of patient age in minimally and widely invasive follicular thyroid carcinoma: investigation of three age groups. Endocr J. 2014; 61:265–71.
crossref
7. Ban EJ, Andrabi A, Grodski S, Yeung M, McLean C, Serpell J. Follicular thyroid cancer: minimally invasive tumours can give rise to metastases. ANZ J Surg. 2012; 82:136–9.
crossref
8. Sugino K, Kameyama K, Ito K, Nagahama M, Kitagawa W, Shibuya H, et al. Outcomes and prognostic factors of 251 patients with minimally invasive follicular thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid. 2012; 22:798–804.
crossref
9. Delbridge L, Parkyn R, Philips J, Barraclough B, Robinson B. Minimally invasive follicular thyroid carcinoma: completion thyroidectomy or not? ANZ J Surg. 2002; 72:844–5.
crossref
10. O'Neill CJ, Vaughan L, Learoyd DL, Sidhu SB, Delbridge LW, Sywak MS. Management of follicular thyroid carcinoma should be individualised based on degree of capsular and vascular invasion. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011; 37:181–5.
11. Ito Y, Hirokawa M, Masuoka H, Yabuta T, Kihara M, Higashiyama T, et al. Prognostic factors of minimally invasive follicular thyroid carcinoma: extensive vascular invasion significantly affects patient prognosis. Endocr J. 2013; 60:637–42.
crossref
12. D'Avanzo A, Treseler P, Ituarte PH, Wong M, Streja L, Greenspan FS, et al. Follicular thyroid carcinoma: histology and prognosis. Cancer. 2004; 100:1123–9.
13. Collini P, Sampietro G, Pilotti S. Extensive vascular invasion is a marker of risk of relapse in encapsulated non-Hürthle cell follicular carcinoma of the thyroid gland: a clinicopathological study of 18 consecutive cases from a single institution with a 11-year median follow-up. Histopathology. 2004; 44:35–9.
14. Lang BH, Lo CY, Chan WF, Lam KY, Wan KY. Staging systems for follicular thyroid carcinoma: application to 171 consecutive patients treated in a tertiary referral centre. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2007; 14:29–42.
crossref

Fig. 1.
The algorithm of selection for eligible patients in this study. All Hemotoxylin and eosin slides were reviewed by an experienced pathologist (DE Song). FA = follicular adenoma; cPTC = classical papillary thyroid carcinoma; FTC = follicular thyroid carcinoma; FVPTC = follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma; HA = Hurthle cell adenoma; SVPTC = solid variant papillary thyroid carcinoma; MIFTC = minimally thyroid carcinoma; WIFTC = widely invasive follicular thyroid carcinoma.
kjes-16-25f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Distant metastasis free survival rates according to the independent risk factors. (A) Age, (B) histological classification, (C) primary tumor size, (D) the presence of vascular invasion.
kjes-16-25f2.tif
Table 1.
clinicopathological characteristics of patients with follicular thyroid carcinoma
N=211 N (%)
Sex  
 Female 172 (81.5)
 Male 39 (18.5)
Age (years)  
 Mean±SD (range) 44.01±14.45 (13∼78)
 <45 112 (53.1)
 ≥45 99 (46.9)
Surgical extent  
 Hemithyroidectomy 97 (46.0)
 Total thyroidectomy 114 (54.0)
Lymph node dissection  
 No 148 (70.1)
 CCND 63 (29.9)
Diagnosis  
 Minimally invasive 195 (92.4)
 Widely invasive 16 (7.6)
Tumor size (cm)  
 Mean±SD (range) 3.95±2.08 (0.5∼15)
Thyroiditis  
 No 195 (92.4)
 Yes 16 (7.6)
Extrathyroidal extension  
 No 154 (73.0)
 Yes 57 (27.0)
Vascular invasion  
 No 160 (75.8)
 Yes 51 (24.2)
RAI ablation*  
 No 6 (7.0)*
 Yes 108 (93.0)*
Distant metastasis  
 No 88 (89.1)
 Yes 23 (10.9)
 Synchronous 15
 Metachronous 8
Final status  
 No evidence of disease 188 (89.1)
 Alive with disease 13 (6.2)
 Death 10 (4.7)

CI = confidence interval; CCND = central compartment node dissection; RAI = radioactive iodine.

* This calculation was performed in the patient who underwent total thyroidectomy.

Table 2.
Univariate and multivariate analysis for distant metastasis in the patients with follicular thyroid carcinoma
N=211 NED 188 (89.1%) Distant metastasis 23 (10.9%) Univariate
Multivariate
Hazard ratio (95% CI) P Hazard ratio (95% CI) P
Sex            
 Female 156 (83.0) 16 (69.6) Ref.      
 Male 32 (17.0) 7 (30.4) 2.4 (0.97∼5.93) 0.075    
Age (years)            
 <45 108 (57.4) 4 (17.4) Ref.   Ref.  
 ≥45 80 (42.6) 19 (82.6) 5.79 (1.97∼17.02) 0.001 3.5 (1.08∼11.36) 0.037
Surgical extent            
 Hemithyroidectomy 94 (50.0) 3 (13.0) Ref.   Ref.  
 Total thyroidectomy 94 (50.0) 20 (87.0) 5.61 (1.66∼18.9) 0.005 2.74 (0.76∼9.91) 0.125
Lymph node dissection            
 No 137 (72.9) 11 (47.8) Ref.   Ref.  
 CCND 51 (27.1) 12 (52.2) 2.72 (1.2∼6.2) 0.017 2.35 (0.83∼5.57) 0.082
Final pathologic diagnosis            
 Minimally invasive 180 (95.7) 15 (65.2) Ref.   Ref.  
 Widely invasive 8 (4.3) 8 (34.8) 11.27 (4.5∼28.19) <0.001 3.11 (1.04∼9.32) 0.043
Tumor size (cm)            
 ≤4.3* 126 (67.0) 7 (30.4) Ref.   Ref.  
 >4.3* 62 (33.0) 16 (69.6) 4.31 (1.77∼10.5) 0.001 3.56 (1.35∼9.36) 0.01
Thyroiditis            
 No 172 (91.5) 23 (100.0) Ref.      
 Yes 16 (8.5) 0 (0) 0.044 (0∼45.07) 0.38    
Extrathyroidal extension            
 No 137 (72.9) 17 (73.9) Ref.      
 Yes 51 (27.1) 6 (26.1) 1.02 (0.4∼2.59) 0.97    
Vascular invasion            
 No 149 (79.3) 11 (47.8) Ref.   Ref.  
 Yes 39 (20.7) 12 (52.2) 3.32 (1.46∼7.53) 0.004 2.45 (1.05∼5.71) 0.038
RAI ablation            
 No 98 (52.1) 5 (21.7) Ref.   Ref.  
 Yes 90 (47.9) 23 (78.3) 3.43 (1.27∼9.27) 0.015 2.56 (0.80∼8.94) 0.088

CI = confidence interval; NED = no evidence of disease; CCND = central compartment node dissection; RAI = radioactive iodine; Ref. = reference.

* This cutoff value was calculated by receiver operation characteristic curve.

TOOLS
Similar articles