Abstract
Purpose:
Single port laparoscopic surgery is an area of active investigation in abdominal surgery. A standard procedure for single port laparoscopic adrenal surgery has not been established. We retrospectively investigated intraoperative and postoperative outcomes following laparo-scopic adrenalectomy via mono-port (LAMP).
Methods:
Between March 2009 and December 2009,10 patients underwent LAMP at Kangbuk Samsung Hospital. The same surgeon performed all surgeries. The first 5 cases underwent LAMP using an Alexis Wound Retractor (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA) with surgical gloves, and others were done with an OCTO Port (Dalim Surgnet, Korea).
Results:
Of the 10 patients, 5 were male and 5 were female. The mean age was 43.7±9.9 years (range, 34∼ 62), and the mean BMI was 24.1±4.0 kg/m2 (Range, 17.1 ∼30.0). The mean tumor size was 32.5±16.9 mm (range, 12∼60),mean operative time was 127.0±29.5 min (range, 90∼180), and mean hospital stay was 4.5 days (range, 3∼7). Three patients were diagnosed with non-functioning cortical adenoma, 3 with Cushing's syndrome, 2 patients with pheochromocytoma, and others with primarily hyperaldosteronism and myelolipoma. Major postoperative morbidity, blood transfusions, or conversion to open surgery did not occur.
Go to : 

REFERENCES
1.Gagner M., Lacroix A., Bolté E. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy in Cushing's syndrome and pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med. 1992. 327:1033.


2.Guazzoni G., Montorsi F., Bocciardi A., Da Pozzo L., Rigatti P., Lanzi R, et al. Transperitoneal laparoscopic versus open adrenalectomy for benign hyperfunctioning adrenal tumors: a comparative study. J Urol. 1995. 153:1597–600.


3.Thompson GB., Grant CS., van Heerden JA., Schlinkert RT., Young WF Jr., Farley DR, et al. Laparoscopic versus open posterior adrenalectomy: a case-control study of 100 patients. Surgery. 1997. 122:1132–6.


5.Faria EF., Andreoni C., Krebs RK., Nascimento H., Goldman SM., Kater C, et al. Advances in pheochromocytoma management in the era of laparoscopy. J Endourol. 2007. 21:1303–7.


6.Wilhelm SM., Prinz RA., Barbu AM., Onders RP., Solorzano CC. Analysis of large versus small pheochromocytomas: ope- rative approaches and patient outcomes. Surgery. 2006. 140:553–9.
7.Romanelli JR., Earle DB. Single-port laparoscopic surgery: an overview. Surg Endosc. 2009. 23:1419–27.


8.Kagaya T. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy via two ports, using the "Twin-Port" system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2001. 8:76–80.


9.Leggett PL., Churchman-Winn R., Miller G. Minimizing ports to improve laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2000. 14:32–6.


10.Podolsky ER., Rottman SJ., Poblete H., King SA., Curcillo PG. Single port access (SPA) cholecystectomy: a completely trans-umbilical approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009. 19:219–22.


Go to : 

![]() | Fig. 1(A) Hand-made mono-port using an AlexisⓇ Wound Retractor (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA) and a surgical glove. (B) OCTO PortⓇ (Dalim Surgnet, Korea). |
Table 1.
Characteristics of 10 patients undergoing LAMP
LAMP | |
---|---|
Patients (n) | 10 |
Gender (M:F) | 5:5 |
Age (years) | 43.7±9.9 (Range, 34∼62) |
Site (Rt:Lt) | 4:6 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 24.1±4.0 (Range, 17.1∼30.0) |
Previous abdomen op | 1 |
Table 2.
Outcomes following LAMP