Abstract
Purpose:
We compared clinical characteristics between pheochromocytoma and abdominal paragangliomas and identified predictive factors of malignancy.
Methods:
Between November, 1995 and January, 2011, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 145 patients with pheochromocytoma and abdominal paraganglioma at Samsung Medical Center. We compared two tumors (pheochromocytoma vs abdominal paraganglioma) about a potential of hypersecretion of cathecholamines and identified predictive factors of malignancy by analysis of clinical characteristics, biochemical markers, tumor features. Their postoperative results were also evaluated.
Results:
This study included 103 (71%) pheochromocytomas and 42 (29%) abdominal paragangliomas. Eighty-six percent were benign and 14% were malignant. Patients with paraganglioma were more predominantly men and exhibited a higher malignancy rate (P<0.01) than pheochromocytoma patients. Most (95%) pheochromocytoma was hyperfunctional, but abdominal paraganglioma were hyperfunctional in 74%. There were no significant differences in biochemical markers between the pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma groupd. When compared with benign tumor, malignant tumors were significantly related with higher mean PASS (P<0.01) and higher 24-hour urinary VMA (P=0.02), but not with larger tumor size.
Conclusion:
It is not easy to distinguish malignant from be-nign tumors by clinical characteristics and pathologic features in the management of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. We should keep in mind that abdominal paraganglioma can be also hyperfunctional in many pheochromocytoma patients and has a higher risk of malignancy.
REFERENCES
1.Kim JC., Yoon JH., Jegal YJ. A clinical analysis of pheochromocytoma. J Korean Surg Soc. 1997. 52:662–70.
2.van der Harst E., Bruining HA., Jaap Bonjer H., van der Ham F., Dinjens WN., Lamberts SW, et al. Proliferative index in phaeochromocytomas: does it predict the occurrence of metastases? J Pathol. 2000. 191:175–80.
3.Tischler AS. Pheochromocytoma and extra-adrenal paraganglioma: updates. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008. 132:1272–84.
4.Grossrubatscher E., Dalino P., Vignati F., Gambacorta M., Pugliese R., Boniardi M, et al. The role of chromogranin A in the management of patients with phaeochromocytoma. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2006. 65:287–93.
5.Raue F., Frank-Raue K., Grauer A. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. Clinical features and screening. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1994. 23:137–56.
6.Thompson LD. Pheochromocytoma of the Adrenal gland Scaled Score (PASS) to separate benign from malignant neoplasms: a clinicopathologic and immunophenotypic study of 100 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2002. 26:551–66.
7.Eisenhofer G., Bornstein SR., Brouwers FM., Cheung NK., Dahia PL., de Krijger RR, et al. Malignant pheochromocytoma: current status and initiatives for future progress. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2004. 11:423–36.
9.Scholz T., Eisenhofer G., Pacak K., Dralle H., Lehnert H. Clinical review: Current treatment of malignant pheochromocytoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007. 92:1217–25.
10.Wen J., Li HZ., Ji ZG., Mao QZ., Shi BB., Yan WG. A decade of clinical experience with extra-adrenal paragangliomas of retroperitoneum: Report of 67 cases and a literature review. Urol Ann. 2010. 2:12–6.
11.Hayes WS., Davidson AJ., Grimley PM., Hartman DS. Extra-adrenal retroperitoneal paraganglioma: clinical, pathologic, and CT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990. 155:1247–50.
12.Mahoney EM., Harrison JH. Malignant pheochromocytoma: clinical course and treatment. J Urol. 1977. 118:225–9.
13.Dahia PL. Evolving concepts in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Curr Opin Oncol. 2006. 18:1–8.
14.Szalat A., Fraenkel M., Doviner V., Salmon A., Gross DJ. Malignant pheochromocytoma: predictive factors of malignancy and clinical course in 16 patients at a single tertiary medical center. Endocrine. 2011. 39:160–6.
15.Strong VE., Kennedy T., Al-Ahmadie H., Tang L., Coleman J., Fong Y, et al. Prognostic indicators of malignancy in adrenal pheochromocytomas: clinical, histopathologic, and cell cycle/apoptosis gene expression analysis. Surgery. 2008. 143:759–68.
16.Agarwal A., Mehrotra PK., Jain M., Gupta SK., Mishra A., Chand G, et al. Size of the tumor and pheochromocytoma of the adrenal gland scaled score (PASS): can they predict malignancy? World J Surg. 2010. 34:3022–8.
17.Bertherat J., Gimenez-Roqueplo AP. New insights in the genetics of adrenocortical tumors, pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. Horm Metab Res. 2005. 37:384–90.
18.Feng F., Zhu Y., Wang X., Wu Y., Zhou W., Jin X, et al. Predictive factors for malignant pheochromocytoma: analysis of 136 patients. J Urol. 2011. 185:1583–90.
19.Rao F., Keiser HR., O'Connor DT. Malignant pheochromocytoma. Chromaffin granule transmitters and response to treatment. Hypertension. 2000. 36:1045–52.
20.Ayala-Ramirez M., Feng L., Johnson MM., Ejaz S., Habra MA., Rich T, et al. Clinical risk factors for malignancy and overall survival in patients with pheochromocytomas and sympathetic paragangliomas: primary tumor size and primary tumor location as prognostic indicators. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011. 96:717–25.
21.Khorram-Manesh A., Ahlman H., Nilsson O., Friberg P., Odén A., Stenström G, et al. Long-term outcome of a large series of patients surgically treated for pheochromocytoma. J Intern Med. 2005. 258:55–66.
22.Safford SD., Coleman RE., Gockerman JP., Moore J., Feldman JM., Leight GS Jr, et al. Iodine-131 metaiodobenzylguanidine is an effective treatment for malignant pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Surgery. 2003. 134:956–62.
23.Gedik GK., Hoefnagel CA., Bais E., Olmos RA. 131I-MIBG therapy in metastatic phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008. 35:725–33.
24.Grogan RH., Mitmaker EJ., Duh QY. Changing paradigms in the treatment of malignant pheochromocytoma. Cancer Control. 2011. 18:104–12.
25.Ahlman H. Malignant pheochromocytoma: state of the field with future projections. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006. 1073:449–64.
26.Rose B., Matthay KK., Price D., Huberty J., Klencke B., Norton JA, et al. High-dose 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine therapy for 12 patients with malignant pheochromocytoma. Cancer. 2003. 98:239–48.
Table 1.
Parameter | Pheochromocytoma | Paraganglioma | P value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean age | 52.2 | 56.4 | 0.30 | ||
No. men/women (proportion of men %) | 41/62 | (40) | 29/13 | (69) | <0.01 |
No. hypertension (%) | 93 | (90) | 34 | (81) | 0.51 |
Hyperfunction (%) | 98 | (95) | 31 | (74) | |
Mean tumor largest diameter (cm) | 6.23 | 6.75 | 0.74 | ||
No. tumor site (%): | |||||
Rt adrenal gland | 57 | (55) | – | ||
Lt adrenal gland | 41 | (40) | – | ||
Bilateral | 5 | (5) | – | ||
No. malignancy (%) | 10 | (9.7) | 10 | (23.8) | <0.01 |
PASS∗ | 0.95 | 1.41 | 0.07 | ||
Mean mg/day urine(refrence) [sensitivity %] | |||||
VMA† (<6.8) | 21.9 | [76.0] | 18.9 | [71.4] | 0.86 |
Mean ug/day urine | |||||
MN‡ (<290) | 2,226.0 | [60.0] | 1,287.1 | [50.0] | 0.25 |
NMN§ (<500) | 5,506 | [84.5] | 4,898 | [61.5] | 0.71 |
Epi∥ (<20) | 222.5 | [77.5] | 131.4 | [47.0] | 0.38 |
NE¶ (<80) | 1,018.8 | [80.9] | 771.3 | [64.7] | 0.76 |
Dopa∗∗ (<400) | 1,181.0 | [36.0] | 940.7 | [35.3] | 0.69 |
Mean pg/ml plasma | |||||
Epi∥ (<90) | 717.1 | [73.4] | 365.9 | [53.8] | 0.18 |
NE¶ (<700) | 2,540.3 | [76.6] | 3,177.8 | [69.2] | 0.67 |
Dopa∗∗ (<87) | 136.8 | [32.8] | 81.2 | [25.0] | 0.30 |
Table 2.
Table 3.
Parameter | Benign | Malignant | P value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean age | 53.9 | 50.4 | 0.35 | ||
No. men/women (proportion of men %) | 57/68 | (46) | 13/7 | (65) | 0.08 |
No. preop hypertension (%) | 109 | (87) | 18 | (90) | 0.30 |
Mean tumor largest diameter (cm) | 6.3 | 6.9 | 0.20 | ||
No. tumor site (%): | |||||
Rt adrenal gland | 50 | (40) | 6 | (30) | 0.39 |
Lt adrenal gland | 36 | (29) | 3 | (15) | 0.19 |
Bilateral | 4 | (3) | 1 | (5) | 0.68 |
Extra-adrenal | 35 | (28) | 10 | (50) | 0.04 |
No. tumor recurrence (%) | 0 | 5 | (25) | <0.01 | |
NO. 5-yr survival (%) | 121 | (96.8)†† | 14 | (70.0) | <0.01 |
PASS∗ | 0.84 | 3.6 | <0.01 | ||
Mean, mg/day, urine(reference) [sensitivity %] | |||||
VMA† (<6.8) | 17.1 | [73.2] | 35.9 | [86.6] | 0.02 |
Mean, ug/day, urine | |||||
MN‡ (<290) | 1,854.8 | [59.3] | 2,867. | [63.6] | 0.54 |
NMN§ (<500) | 4,640 | [82.6] | 6,513 | [77.7] | 0.78 |
Epi∥ (<20) | 180.9 | [71.6] | 55.3 | [72.7] | 0.34 |
NE¶ (<80) | 801.0 | [77.9] | 1,332.5 | [81.8] | 0.13 |
Dopa∗∗ (<400) | 839.1 | [32.6] | 1,117.7 | [35.0] | 0.83 |
Mean, pg/ml, plasma | |||||
Epi∥ (<90) | 571.3 | [70.6] | 707.3 | [75.0] | 0.69 |
NE¶ (<700) | 340.3 | [75.0] | 18,581 | [87.5] | 0.25 |
Dopa∗∗ (<87) | 88.3 | [29.8] | 326.9 | [50.0] | 0.11 |
Table 4.
Patient | Sex | Age | Location | Tumor size (cm) | PASS∗ | Lymph node metastasis | No. of operations | Elapsed time at recurrence or metastasis since 1st diagnosis (yrs) | Follow-up period (yrs) | Survival | Remarks |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | M | 62 | Lt.adrenal | 17 | 5 | 2 | <1 | 1 | O | ||
2 | F | 54 | Rt.adrenal | 8 | 5 | (+) | 1 | 1 | O | ||
3 | M | 48 | Rt.perirenal | 5.5 | 2 | (+) | 1 | 4 | X | ||
4 | F | 47 | Lt.adrenal | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 | <1 | X | Liver, lung meta | |
5 | M | 59 | Liver | 7.5 | 2 | 1 | 5 | O | |||
6 | M | 54 | Bladder | 7 | 4 | (+) | 1 | 0 | 7 | O | Multiple bone meta |
7 | F | 50 | Small bowel | 4 | 2 | (+) | 1 | 1 | 5 | X | |
8 | M | 43 | Rt.perirenal | 6 | 3 | (+) | 1 | 4 | O | ||
9 | M | 22 | Rt.adrenal | 7.5 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 | O | Lung meta | |
10 | M | 75 | Rt.perirenal | 3 | 4 | (+) | 1 | 14 | O | ||
11 | M | 65 | Precaval | 5 | 0 | 0 | 8 | O | Liver meta | ||
12 | F | 58 | Rt.perirenal | 7.3 | 2 | 1† | 4 | 4 | X | Liver, bone meta | |
13 | F | 44 | Rt.adrenal | 4 | (+) | 1 | 11 | O | |||
14 | M | 55 | Aortocaval | 5 | 5 | (+) | 1 | 1 | O | ||
15 | F | 38 | Rt.adrenal | 10 | 3 | 7 | 11 | O | |||
16 | M | 48 | Bilateral | 9.5 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 2 | X | Lllung, bone, liver meta | |
17 | F | 55 | Rt.adrenal | 9 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 8 | O | ||
18 | M | 70 | Portocaval | 3 | 2 | (+) | 1 | <1 | X | ||
19 | M | 40 | Lt.adrenal | 4.5 | 2 | 5 | 9 | O | 1 re-op. d/t recurrence | ||
20 | M | 8 | Rt.adrenal | 4.5 | 3 | 4 | 14 | O | 2 re-op. d/t recurrence |