Abstract
Purpose
We have many choices of surgical methods with scrotal reconstruction after Fournier's gangrene. From the aesthetic perspective, the reconstruction method with anterolateral thigh perforator pedicled flap is better than other options. We report our experience with postoperative results and aesthetics of the anterolateral thigh perforator pedicled flap.
Materials and Methods
From November 2011 to May 2013, 4 patients underwent anterolateral thigh perforator pedicled flaps. The authors checked the aesthetic results and occurrence of complications at followup exams.
REFERENCES
1. Ferreira PC, Reis JC, Amarante JM, Silva AC, Pinho CJ, Oliveira IC, et al. Fournier's gangrene: a review of 43 reconstructive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 119:175–84.
2. Datubo-Brown DD. Alternative techniques for scrotal reconstruction. Br J Urol. 1990; 65:115–7.
4. Tiwari IN, Seth HP, Mehdiratta KS. Reconstruction of the scrotum by thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980; 66:605–7.
5. Westfall CT, Keller HB. Scrotal reconstruction utilizing bilateral gracilis myocutaneous flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981; 68:945–7.
6. Lee SR, Kang NH, Oh SH. Resurfacing the large penoscrotal defects with various local flaps after ablation of extramammary Paget's disease. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 34:753–8.
7. Kim BJ, Heo CY. Scrotal reconstruction with pedicled anterolateral thigh perforator flap. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 36:348–50.
8. Yu P, Sanger JR, Matloub HS, Gosain A, Larson D. Anterolateral thigh fasciocutaneous island flaps in perineoscrotal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 109:610–6.
9. Hallock GG. Scrotal reconstruction following Fournier's gangrene using the medial thigh fasciocutaneous flap. Ann Plast Surg. 1990; 24:86–90.
10. Kim KS, Noh BK, Kim DY, Lee SY, Cho BH. Thin paraumbilical perforator-based cutaneous island flap for scrotal resurfacing. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 108:447–51.
Table 1.
Age (year) | Durationa (day) | Flap size (cm) | Perforator | Defect | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Case 1 | 56 | 27 | 11×23 | 2 | Nearly total |
Case 2 | 74 | 21 | 7×20 | 1 | Total |
Case 3 | 54 | 45 | 6×24 | 3 | Total |
Case 4 | 57 | 30 | 8×25 | 3 | Total |