Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether or not the early use of steroid is useful for treating Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia.
Methods
A prospective study was conducted on 85 patients with M. pneumoniae pneumonia admitted to Gwangju Christian Hospital between September 2015 and April 2016. A total of 85 patients were enrolled. Of these, 33 were treated with steroids (methylprednisolone 1 mg/kg/day), while 52 were not; both were treated with macrolides. The overall duration of fever was compared between the 2 groups and findings on chest radiographs were evaluated for their deterioration.
Results
The duration of fever after admission (1.36±0.92 days vs. 2.17±1.30 days, P =0.003) and the overall duration of fever (4.42±2.13 days vs. 6.07±2.59 days, P=0.003) were significantly lower in the steroid group. The duration of fever before admission was not different between the steroid and macrolide groups (3.06±1.74 days vs. 3.90±2.21 days, P=0.068). On chest radiographs taken 3 days later, 1 of 33 patients in the steroid group and 5 of 50 patients in the macrolide group worsened, although there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P=0.395). There was no significant difference in the duration of hospitalization between the 2 groups (6.72±1.54 days vs. 6.92±1.87 days, P=0.618).
REFERENCES
1. Chen ZR, Yan YD, Wang YQ, Zhu H, Shao XJ, Xu J, et al. Epidemiology of community-acquired Mycoplasma Pneumoniae respiratory tract infections among hospitalized Chinese children, including relationships with meteorological factors. Hippokratia. 2013; 17:20–6.
2. Atkinson TP, Balish MF, Waites KB. Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, pathogenesis and laboratory detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008; 32:956–73.
3. Miyashita N, Kawai Y, Inamura N, Tanaka T, Akaike H, Teranishi H, et al. Setting a standard for the initiation of steroid therapy in refractory or severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in adolescents and adults. J Infect Chemother. 2015; 21:153–60.
4. Shin JE, Cheon BR, Shim JW, Kim DS, Jung HL, Park MS, et al. Increased risk of refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children with atopic sensitization and asthma. Korean J Pediatr. 2014; 57:271–7.
5. Waites KB. New concepts of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections in children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2003; 36:267–78.
6. Kawai Y, Miyashita N, Yamaguchi T, Saitoh A, Kondoh E, Fujimoto H, et al. Clinical efficacy of macrolide antibiotics against genetically determined macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in paediatric patients. Respirology. 2012; 17:354–62.
7. Chan ED, Welsh CH. Fulminant Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. West J Med. 1995; 162:133–42.
8. Lee KY, Lee HS, Hong JH, Lee MH, Lee JS, Burgner D, et al. Role of prednisolone treatment in severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2006; 41:263–8.
9. Miyashita N, Obase Y, Ouchi K, Kawasaki K, Kawai Y, Kobashi Y, et al. Clinical features of severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in adults admitted to an intensive care unit. J Med Microbiol. 2007; 56(Pt 12):1625–9.
10. Radisic M, Torn A, Gutierrez P, Defranchi HA, Pardo P. Severe acute lung injury caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae: potential role for steroid pulses in treatment. Clin Infect Dis. 2000; 31:1507–11.
11. Tamura A, Matsubara K, Tanaka T, Nigami H, Yura K, Fukaya T. Methylprednisolone pulse therapy for refractory Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children. J Infect. 2008; 57:223–8.
12. Jung HW, Jearn LH, Kim TY. The comparison between particle aggluti-nation assay and enzyme immunoassay in the detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae-specific antibody. Lab Med Online. 2012; 2:41–6.
13. Peuchant O, Ménard A, Renaudin H, Morozumi M, Ubukata K, Bébéar CM, et al. Increased macrolide resistance of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in France directly detected in clinical specimens by realtime PCR and melting curve analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009; 64:52–8.
14. Averbuch D, Hidalgo-Grass C, Moses AE, Engelhard D, Nir-Paz R. Macrolide resistance in Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Israel, 2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011; 17:1079–82.
15. Chironna M, Sallustio A, Esposito S, Perulli M, Chinellato I, Di Bari C, et al. Emergence of macrolide-resistant strains during an outbreak of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections in children. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011; 66:734–7.
16. Kawai Y, Miyashita N, Kubo M, Akaike H, Kato A, Nishizawa Y, et al. Nationwide surveillance of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in pediatric patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013; 57:4046–9.
17. Okada T, Morozumi M, Tajima T, Hasegawa M, Sakata H, Ohnari S, et al. Rapid effectiveness of minocycline or doxycycline against macrolide-re-sistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in a 2011 outbreak among Japanese children. Clin Infect Dis. 2012; 55:1642–9.
18. Yamada M, Buller R, Bledsoe S, Storch GA. Rising rates of macrolide-re-sistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the central United States. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2012; 31:409–11.
19. Zheng X, Lee S, Selvarangan R, Qin X, Tang YW, Stiles J, et al. Macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae, United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015; 21:1470–2.
20. Bébéar C, Pereyre S, Peuchant O. Mycoplasma pneumoniae: susceptibili-ty and resistance to antibiotics. Future Microbiol. 2011; 6:423–31.
21. Luo Z, Luo J, Liu E, Xu X, Liu Y, Zeng F, et al. Effects of prednisolone on refractory mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014; 49:377–80.
22. Yoo SJ, Kim HB, Choi SH, Lee SO, Kim SH, Hong SB, et al. Differences in the frequency of 23S rRNA gene mutations in Mycoplasma pneumoniae between children and adults with community-acquired pneumonia: clinical impact of mutations conferring macrolide resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012; 56:6393–6.
23. Youn YS, Lee KY, Hwang JY, Rhim JW, Kang JH, Lee JS, et al. Difference of clinical features in childhood Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia. BMC Pediatr. 2010; 10:48.
24. Youn YS, Lee SC, Rhim JW, Shin MS, Kang JH, Lee KY. Early additional immune-modulators for Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia in children: an observation study. Infect Chemother. 2014; 46:239–47.
Table 1.
Table 2.
Table 3.
Characteristic | 1st day of admission | 4th day of admission | P-value∗ |
---|---|---|---|
Not use of steroid | |||
CRP (mg/dL) | 2.68±2.70 | 1.09±0.32 | 0.002 |
LDH (U/L) | 599.89±161.34 | 571.23±131.48 | 0.418 |
AST (U/L) | 41.10±24.55 | 32.54±10.84 | 0.056 |
ALT (U/L) | 20.95±20.36 | 21.92±21.23 | 0.841 |
Use of steroid | |||
CRP (mg/dL) | 2.82±3.05 | 0.61±0.90 | 0.002 |
LDH (U/L) | 603.86±147.76 | 525.77±125.83 | 0.066 |
AST (U/L) | 31.88±9.98 | 26.08±8.44 | 0.035 |
ALT (U/L) | 22.79±30.02 | 18.08±5.51 | 0.454 |