Journal List > Allergy Asthma Respir Dis > v.5(3) > 1059246

Gang, Kim, Bang, Kim, Lee, Hwangbo, and Park: Pediatric anaphylaxis at a university hospital including the rate of prescribing epinephrine autoinjectors

Abstract

Purpose

Anaphylaxis is an acute, life-threatening systemic reaction which should be treated by epinephrine, and patients should be prescribed epinephrine autoinjector after the event. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical features of pediatric anaphylaxis, including the rate of using epinephrine at hospital and prescribing epinephrine autoinjector.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study of 68 anaphylactic patients at in-hospital, out-hospital, and Emergency Department of Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan, Korea, who were under 15 years of age, from January 2013 through December 2014. We reviewed their clinical features, doctor's treatment methods, rate of follow-up and prescribing epinephrine autoinjectors.

Results

Causes of anaphylaxis were food (76.5%), drug (10.3%), and idiopathic (13.2%). The involved organs were the skin (86.8%), respiratory tract (80.9%), cardiovascular system (23.5%), and gastrointestinal tract (17.7%). Patients were treated with systemic steroids (91.2%), antihistamines (88.2%), and epinephrine (75.0%). Fifty-three patients (77.9%) revisited our pediatric allergy clinic and epinephrine autoinjectors were prescribed for 25 patients (36.8%).

Conclusion

Physicians should make an effort to use epinephrine as an initial treatment of anaphylaxis, to prescribe epinephrine autoinjectors, and to give proper information about disease.

REFERENCES

1. Portier P, Richet C. De 1'action anaphylactique de certains venins. Soc Biol (Paris). 1902; 54:170–2.
2. Sampson HA, Muñoz-Furlong A, Bock SA, Schmitt C, Bass R, Chowd-hury BA, et al. Symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: summary report. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005; 115:584–91.
crossref
3. Sampson HA, Muñoz-Furlong A, Campbell RL, Adkinson NF Jr, Bock SA, Branum A, et al. Second symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: summary report–Second National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network symposium. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006; 117:391–7.
crossref
4. Lee SY, Kim KW, Lee HH, Lim DH, Chung HL, Kim SW, et al. Incidence and clinical characteristics of Pediatric Emergency Department Visits of children with severe food allergy. Korean J Asthma Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012; 32:169–75.
5. Lim DH. Epidemiology of anaphylaxis in Korean children. Korean J Pediatr. 2008; 51:351–4.
crossref
6. Yocum MW, Butterfield JH, Klein JS, Volcheck GW, Schroeder DR, Sil-verstein MD. Epidemiology of anaphylaxis in Olmsted County: a popu-lation-based study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999; 104(2 Pt 1):452–6.
crossref
7. Simons FE, Ebisawa M, Sanchez-Borges M, Thong BY, Worm M, Tanno LK, et al. 2015 update of the evidence base: World Allergy Organization anaphylaxis guidelines. World Allergy Organ J. 2015; 8:32.
crossref
8. Simons FE. First-aid treatment of anaphylaxis to food: focus on epinephrine. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004; 113:837–44.
crossref
9. Gavalas M, Sadana A, Metcalf S. Guidelines for the management of anaphylaxis in the emergency department. J Accid Emerg Med. 1998; 15:96–8.
crossref
10. Brown AF, McKinnon D, Chu K. Emergency department anaphylaxis: a review of 142 patients in a single year. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001; 108:861–6.
crossref
11. Kim JS, Sinacore JM, Pongracic JA. Parental use of EpiPen for children with food allergies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005; 116:164–8.
crossref
12. Keum HS, Lee DK, Cho SJ, Hong YM, Kwon JH. Comparison of anaphylaxis and angioedema with oral mucosal involvement in a single Pediatric Emergency Department. Ewha Med J. 2015; 38:14–21.
crossref
13. Jacobs TS, Greenhawt MJ, Hauswirth D, Mitchell L, Green TD. A survey study of index food-related allergic reactions and anaphylaxis management. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2012; 23:582–9.
crossref
14. Webb LM, Lieberman P. Anaphylaxis: a review of 601 cases. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006; 97:39–43.
crossref
15. Kemp SF, Lockey RF, Simons FE. World Allergy Organization ad hoc Committee on Epinephrine in Anaphylaxis. Epinephrine: the drug of choice for anaphylaxis-a statement of the world allergy organization. World Allergy Organ J. 2008; 1(7 Suppl):S18–26.
crossref
16. Hitti EA, Zaitoun F, Harmouche E, Saliba M, Mufarrij A. Acute allergic reactions in the emergency department: characteristics and management practices. Eur J Emerg Med. 2015; 22:253–9.
17. Manivannan V, Hess EP, Bellamkonda VR, Nestler DM, Bellolio MF, Hagan JB, et al. A multifaceted intervention for patients with anaphylaxis increases epinephrine use in adult emergency department. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2014; 2:294–9.e1.
crossref
18. Choo KJ, Simons FE, Sheikh A. Glucocorticoids for the treatment of anaphylaxis. Evid Based Child Health. 2013; 8:1276–94.
crossref
19. Muraro A, Roberts G, Worm M, Bilò MB, Brockow K, Fernández Rivas M, et al. Anaphylaxis: guidelines from the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Allergy. 2014; 69:1026–45.
crossref
20. Campbell RL, Li JT, Nicklas RA, Sadosty AT. Members of the Joint Task Force; Practice Parameter Workgroup. Emergency department diagnosis and treatment of anaphylaxis: a practice parameter. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014; 113:599–608.
crossref
21. Fleming JT, Clark S, Camargo CA Jr, Rudders SA. Early treatment of food-induced anaphylaxis with epinephrine is associated with a lower risk of hospitalization. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015; 3:57–62.
crossref
22. Wood RA, Camargo CA Jr, Lieberman P, Sampson HA, Schwartz LB, Zitt M, et al. Anaphylaxis in America: the prevalence and characteristics of anaphylaxis in the United States. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014; 133:461–7.
crossref
23. Altman AM, Camargo CA Jr, Simons FE, Lieberman P, Sampson HA, Schwartz LB, et al. Anaphylaxis in America: a national physician survey. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015; 135:830–3.
crossref
24. Sampson HA, Wang J, Sicherer SH. Anaphylaxis. Kliegman RM, Stanton BF, St. Geme JW III, Schor NF, Behrman RE, editors. Nelson textbook of pediatrics. 20th ed.Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders;2015. p. 1131–5.
25. NIAID-Sponsored Expert Panel. Boyce JA, Assa'ad A, Burks AW, Jones SM, Sampson HA, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of food allergy in the United States: report of the NIAID-sponsored expert panel. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010; 126(6 Suppl):S1–58.
26. Korea Orphan Drug Center [Internet]. Seoul: Korea Orphan Drug Center;c2017. [cited 2016 Sep 1]. Available from. http://www.kodc.or.kr/home/main.do.
27. Bonds RS, Asawa A, Ghazi AI. Misuse of medical devices: a persistent problem in self-management of asthma and allergic disease. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015; 114:74–6.e2.
crossref

Table 1.
Causes of anaphylaxis of subjects by age group (n=68)
Cause of anaphylaxis 0–2 Yr (n=28) 3–6 Yr (n=19) 7–15 Yr (n=21) Total (n=68) P-value II
Food 26 (92.9%) 14 (73.7%) 12 (57.1%) 52 (76.5%) 0.006
 Dairy 8 3 0 11  
 Egg 7 2 0 9  
 Wheat 6 0 2 8  
 Nuts 0 2 2 4  
 Peanut 0 1 0 1  
 Sea foods 0 3 3 6  
 Etc.§ 5 3 5 13  
Drug 0 (0%) 1 (5.3%) 6 (28.6%) 7 (10.3%)  
 OTC 0 1 3 4  
 Antibiotics 0 0 1 1  
 NSAID 0 0 1 1  
 RCM 0 0 1 1  
Idiopathic 2 (7.1%) 4 (21.1%) 3 (14.3%) 9 (13.2%)  

OTC, over the counter drug-cold preparations; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; RCM, radio contrast media.

Dairy: milk, cheese, baby milk powder, yogurt.

Nuts: walnut, almond, pine nut.

Sea foods: fish, shrimp, swimming crab, small octopus.

§ Etc.: red bean, snack, chicken, fried potato, jelly, plant, cheese & egg, kiwi & egg, dried mango

II Fisher exact test was used to compare the proportions of causes of anaphylaxis (food, drug, idiopathic) by age group.

Table 2.
Symptoms of patients when diagnosed with anaphylaxis by age group
Symptom 0–2 Yr (n=28) 3–6 Yr (n=19) 7–15 Yr (n=21) Total (n=68) P-value
Cutaneous 26 (92.9) 15 (78.9) 18 (85.7) 59 (86.8) 0.359
Respiratory 27 (96.4) 14 (73.7) 14 (66.7) 55 (80.9) 0.013
Cardiovascular 6 (21.4) 4 (21.1) 6 (28.5) 16 (23.5) 0.820
Gastrointestinal 6 (21.4) 2 (10.5) 4 (19.1) 12 (17.7) 0.665

Values are presented as number (%).

Table 3.
Treatment methods used to patients, revisit rate after anaphylaxis and prescribing rate of epinephrine autoinjector
Treatment method 0–2 Yr (n=28) 3–6 Yr (n=19) 7–15 Yr (n=21) Total (n=68) P-value
Epinephrine 22 (78.6) 10 (52.6) 19 (90.5) 51 (75.0) 0.019
Systemic steroid 26 (92.9) 16 (84.2) 20 (95.2) 62 (91.2) 0.487
Antihistamine 27 (96.4) 14 (73.7) 19 (90.5) 60 (88.2) 0.060
Revisit 26 (92.9) 16 (84.2) 11 (52.4) 53 (77.9) 0.003
Epinephrine autoinjector 12 (42.9) 11 (57.9) 4 (19.1) 27 (39.7) 0.039

Values are presented as number (%).

Epinephrine: All patients of this category were injected epinephrine at hospital, no one used epinephrine autoinjector before arrival of hospital.

Revisit: patients who revisited the allergy clinic within 2 weeks after the onset of anaphylaxis.

Epinephrine autoinjector: patients who prescribed epinephrine autoinjector after anaphylaxis.

TOOLS
Similar articles