Journal List > Allergy Asthma Respir Dis > v.2(5) > 1059055

Lee, Ye, Park, Jang, Jee, Park, Koh, Kim, Kim, Hur, Kim, Kim, Choi, Kim, Sohn, and KAAACI Work Group for Urticaria/Angioedema/Anaphylaxis: Hymenoptera venom anaphylaxis in adult Korean: a multicenter retrospective case study

Abstract

Purpose

We investigated the causes, clinical features, and risk factors of bee venom anaphylaxis in Korea.

Methods

The medical records of the diagnosis of anaphylaxis during a 5-year period from the 14 hospitals in Korea have been retrospectively reviewed. Cases of bee venom anaphylaxis were identified among anaphylaxis patients, and subgroup analyses were done.

Results

A total of 291 patients were included. The common cause of bee species was vespid (24.6%) in bee venom anaphylaxis, followed by honeybee and vespid (8.8%), apitherapy (7.7%), and honeybee (2.0%), although the causative bee species were commonly unknown (56.9%). The severity of anaphylaxis was mostly mild-moderate (72.9%), and common clinical manifestations included cutaneous (80.6%), cardiovascular (39.2%), respiratory (38.1%), and gastrointestinal (13.1%) symptoms. Portable epinephrine auto-injectors were prescribed to 12.1% of the patients. Subject positive to both vespid and honeybee showed more severe symptoms and higher epinephrine use (P<0.05). The severity was significantly associated with older age, but not with gender, underlying allergic disease, or family history. Apitherapy-induced anaphylaxis showed a higher rate of hospitalization and epinephrine use than bee sting anaphylaxis (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Vespid is the most common cause of bee venom anaphylaxis in Korea. It is suggested that positivity to honeybee and vespid may be associated with more severe symptoms.

Figures and Tables

Table 1
Clinical characteristics of subjects (n=291)
aard-2-344-i001

Values are presented as number of subjects (%) unless otherwise indicated. Denominators are number of patients from which data collection was available.

SD, standard deviation.

Table 2
Clinical manifestation of bee venom anaphylaxis
aard-2-344-i002

Values are presented as number of subjects (%) unless otherwise indicated. Denominators are number of patients from which data collection was available.

SD, standard deviation; OPD, outpatient department; ER, emergency room; ICU, intensive care unit.

Table 3
Comparison of clinical parameters between the causes in bee venom anaphylaxis
aard-2-344-i003

Values are presented as number of subjects (%) unless otherwise indicated. Denominators are number of patients from which data collection was available.

SD, standard deviation; OPD, outpatient department; ER, emergency room; ICU, intensive care unit.

*P-value is compared among Honeybee, Vespid, and Honeybee+vespid groups.

Table 4
Comparison of clinical parameters between severe and mild-moderate bee venom anaphylaxis
aard-2-344-i004

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation/number or number of subjects (%). Denominators are number of patients from which data collection was available.

OPD, outpatient department; ER, emergency room; ICU, intensive care unit.

Table 5
Comparison of clinical parameters between bee sting anaphylaxis and apitherapy
aard-2-344-i005

Values are presented as number of subjects (%) or mean±standard deviation/number. Denominators are number of patients from which data collection was available.

OPD, outpatient department; ER, emergency room; ICU, intensive care unit.

References

1. Ben-Shoshan M, Clarke AE. Anaphylaxis: past, present and future. Allergy. 2011; 66:1–14.
crossref
2. Cianferoni A, Novembre E, Mugnaini L, Lombardi E, Bernardini R, Pucci N, et al. Clinical features of acute anaphylaxis in patients admitted to a university hospital: an 11-year retrospective review (1985-1996). Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001; 87:27–32.
crossref
3. Ye YM, Kim MK, Kang HR, Kim TB, Sohn SW, Koh YI, et al. Anaphylaxis in Korean adults: a multicenter retrospective case study. Korean J Asthma Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012; 32:S226.
4. Clark S, Camargo CA Jr. Epidemiology of anaphylaxis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2007; 27:145–163.
crossref
5. Lockey RF, Bukantz SC. Allergen immunotherapy. . New York: Marcel Dekker;1991.
6. Bilo BM, Rueff F, Mosbech H, Bonifazi F, Oude-Elberink JN. EAACI Interest Group on Insect Venom Hypersensitivity. Diagnosis of Hymenoptera venom allergy. Allergy. 2005; 60:1339–1349.
crossref
7. Golden DB, Marsh DG, Freidhoff LR, Kwiterovich KA, Addison B, Kagey-Sobotka A, et al. Natural history of Hymenoptera venom sensitivity in adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997; 100(6 Pt 1):760–766.
crossref
8. Neugut AI, Ghatak AT, Miller RL. Anaphylaxis in the United States: an investigation into its epidemiology. Arch Intern Med. 2001; 161:15–21.
9. Kim SS, Park HS, Kim HY, Lee SK, Nahm DH. Anaphylaxis caused by the new ant, Pachycondyla chinensis: demonstration of specific IgE and IgE-binding components. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001; 107:1095–1099.
crossref
10. Simons FE. Anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010; 125:2 Suppl 2. S161–S181.
crossref
11. Kang S, Chang S, Min K, Moon H, Choi B, Kee M. A survey on the bee venom allergy in children of a rural area. Allergy. 1987; 7:1–7.
12. Kim YK, Jang YS, Jung JW, Lee BJ, Kim HY, Son JW, et al. Prevalence of bee venom allergy in children and adults living in rural area of Cheju Island. J Asthma Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998; 18:451–457.
13. Im JH, Kwon HY, Ye YM, Park HS, Kim TB, Choi GS, et al. Food-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis in Korea: a multicenter retrospective case study. Allergy Asthma Respir Dis. 2013; 1:203–210.
crossref
14. Brown SG. Clinical features and severity grading of anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004; 114:371–376.
crossref
15. Lee JD, Park HJ, Chae Y, Lim S. An overview of bee venom acupuncture in the treatment of arthritis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2005; 2:79–84.
crossref
16. Mueller UR. Cardiovascular disease and anaphylaxis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007; 7:337–341.
crossref
17. Rueff F, Placzek M, Przybilla B. Mastocytosis and Hymenoptera venom allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006; 6:284–288.
crossref
18. Bilo BM, Bonifazi F. Advances in hymenoptera venom immunotherapy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007; 7:567–573.
crossref
19. Kim JC, Kim SC, Kim YS, Kim CH, Do HH, Lee BS, et al. Clinical study of anaphylactic patients with bee stings who visited the Emergency Department. J Korean Soc Emerg Med. 2005; 16:403–409.
20. Bilo BM, Bonifazi F. Epidemiology of insect-venom anaphylaxis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008; 8:330–337.
crossref
21. Fernandez J, Blanca M, Soriano V, Sanchez J, Juarez C. Epidemiological study of the prevalence of allergic reactions to Hymenoptera in a rural population in the Mediterranean area. Clin Exp Allergy. 1999; 29:1069–1074.
crossref
22. Sturm GJ, Heinemann A, Schuster C, Wiednig M, Groselj-Strele A, Sturm EM, et al. Influence of total IgE levels on the severity of sting reactions in Hymenoptera venom allergy. Allergy. 2007; 62:884–889.
crossref
23. Ali MA. Studies on bee venom and its medical uses. Int J Adv Res Technol. 2012; 1:69–83.
24. Jung JW, Jeon EJ, Kim JW, Choi JC, Shin JW, Kim JY, et al. A fatal case of intravascular coagulation after bee sting acupuncture. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2012; 4:107–109.
crossref
25. Clark S, Long AA, Gaeta TJ, Camargo CA Jr. Multicenter study of emergency department visits for insect sting allergies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005; 116:643–649.
crossref
26. Park JW, Nahm DH, Hong CS. Detection of honeybee venom specific igE and igG4 in honeybee venom allergy. Allergy. 1993; 13:312–325.
27. Reisman RE. Natural history of insect sting allergy: relationship of severity of symptoms of initial sting anaphylaxis to re-sting reactions. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1992; 90(3 Pt 1):335–339.
crossref
28. Reisman RE, Livingston A. Venom immunotherapy: 10 years of experience with administration of single venoms and 50 micrograms maintenance doses. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1992; 89:1189–1195.
crossref
TOOLS
ORCID iDs

Hae-Sim Park
https://orcid.org/http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2614-0303

Similar articles