Journal List > Allergy Asthma Respir Dis > v.1(1) > 1058983

Yoon, Yoon, Kim, and Hahn: Relationship between methacholine PC20 level and asthma control status among pediatric patients with atopic asthma

Abstract

Purpose

Although methacholine PC20 helps clinicians to identify asthma, there are practical limitations in using methacholine PC20 to assess asthma control. We assessed the relationship between methacholine PC20 levels and asthma control status in child patients with atopic asthma.

Methods

We enrolled 153 children of 8 to 15 years of age with atopic asthma and measured methacholine PC20 of these children when their asthma was controlled. We followed up these patients for more than 2 years with measurements of asthma control score, lung function, bronchodilator response (BDR), and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO).

Results

The geometric mean of methacholine PC20 in the study population was 2.81 mg/mL. Lower methacholine PC20 was found to be associated with lower lung function, higher rate of BDR greater than 12%, higher level of BDR, higher rate of FeNO levels greater than 23 ppb, higher FeNO, higher numbers of asthma aggravation per year, and higher rate of asthma control test scores of 19 or less.

Conclusion

These data provide evidences that the degree of methacholine PC20 is linked to disease severity in children with atopic asthma. Thus, regular and close monitoring of asthma control should be required for patients with lower levels of methacholine PC20.

Figures and Tables

Fig. 1
Study schedule. PC20, provocative concentration causing 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FeNO, fraction of exhaled nitric oxide.
aard-1-35-g001
Table 1
Baseline characteristics of the study population (n= 153)
aard-1-35-i001

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

PC20, provocative concentration causing 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second.

*Geometric mean.

Table 2
Association of spirometric values with the level of methacholine PC20
aard-1-35-i002

FVC, forced vital capacity; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FEV25-75, forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75%; PC20, provocative concentration causing 20% fall in FEV1.

*Logarithm of PC20.

Table 3
Association of bronchodilator response with the level of methacholine PC20
aard-1-35-i003

BDR, bronchodilator response; PC20, provocative concentration causing 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second.

*Logarithm of PC20.

Table 4
Association of FeNO levels with the level of methacholine PC20
aard-1-35-i004

FeNO, fraction of exhaled nitric oxide; PC20, provocative concentration causing 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second.

*Logarithm of PC20.

Table 5
Association of asthma aggravations with the level of methacholine PC20
aard-1-35-i005

PC20, provocative concentration causing 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 second.

*Logarithm of PC20.

Notes

This work was supported by the research grant of Chungbuk National University in 2011.

References

1. Busse WW. The relationship of airway hyperresponsiveness and airway inflammation: airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: its measurement and clinical significance. Chest. 2010. 138:2 Suppl. 4S–10S.
2. Cockcroft DW, Davis BE. Mechanisms of airway hyperresponsiveness. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006. 118:551–559.
crossref
3. O'Byrne PM, Gauvreau GM, Brannan JD. Provoked models of asthma: what have we learnt? Clin Exp Allergy. 2009. 39:181–192.
4. Sumino K, Sugar EA, Irvin CG, Kaminsky DA, Shade D, Wei CY, et al. Methacholine challenge test: diagnostic characteristics in asthmatic patients receiving controller medications. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012. 130:69–75.e6.
crossref
5. Cockcroft D, Davis B. Direct and indirect challenges in the clinical assessment of asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2009. 103:363–369.
crossref
6. Sont JK, Han J, van Krieken JM, Evertse CE, Hooijer R, Willems LN, et al. Relationship between the inflammatory infiltrate in bronchial biopsy specimens and clinical severity of asthma in patients treated with inhaled steroids. Thorax. 1996. 51:496–502.
crossref
7. Rosi E, Ronchi MC, Grazzini M, Duranti R, Scano G. Sputum analysis, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and airway function in asthma: results of a factor analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999. 103(2 Pt 1):232–237.
crossref
8. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. National asthma education and prevention program. Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Full report 2007 [Internet]. cited 2012 Nov 13. Bethesda: National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute;Available from: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/asthgdln.pdf.
9. The Global Initiative for Asthma. GINA Report, Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. Updated Dec. 2011 [Internet]. c2011. cited 2012 Nov 13. The Global Initiative for Asthma;Available from: http://www.ginasthma.org/guidelines-gina-report-global-strategy-for-asthma.html.
10. Nathan RA, Sorkness CA, Kosinski M, Schatz M, Li JT, Marcus P, et al. Development of the asthma control test: a survey for assessing asthma control. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004. 113:59–65.
crossref
11. Liu AH, Zeiger R, Sorkness C, Mahr T, Ostrom N, Burgess S, et al. Development and cross-sectional validation of the Childhood Asthma Control Test. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007. 119:817–825.
crossref
12. Hankinson JL, Odencrantz JR, Fedan KB. Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general U.S. population. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999. 159:179–187.
crossref
13. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005. 26:319–338.
crossref
14. Crapo RO, Casaburi R, Coates AL, Enright PL, Hankinson JL, Irvin CG, et al. Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing-1999. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000. 161:309–329.
15. Recommendations for standardized procedures for the on-line and off-line measurement of exhaled lower respiratory nitric oxide and nasal nitric oxide in adults and children-1999. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999. 160:2104–2117.
16. Cockcroft DW. Direct challenge tests: airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: its measurement and clinical significance. Chest. 2010. 138:2 Suppl. 18S–24S.
17. Weiss ST, Van Natta ML, Zeiger RS. Relationship between increased airway responsiveness and asthma severity in the childhood asthma management program. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000. 162:50–56.
crossref
18. Ichinose M, Takahashi T, Sugiura H, Endoh N, Miura M, Mashito Y, et al. Baseline airway hyperresponsiveness and its reversible component: role of airway inflammation and airway calibre. Eur Respir J. 2000. 15:248–253.
crossref
19. De Meer G, Heederik D, Postma DS. Bronchial responsiveness to adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) and methacholine differ in their relationship with airway allergy and baseline FEV(1). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002. 165:327–331.
crossref
20. Colon-Semidey AJ, Marshik P, Crowley M, Katz R, Kelly HW. Correlation between reversibility of airway obstruction and exhaled nitric oxide levels in children with stable bronchial asthma. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2000. 30:385–392.
crossref
21. Synek M, Beasley R, Frew AJ, Goulding D, Holloway L, Lampe FC, et al. Cellular infiltration of the airways in asthma of varying severity. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996. 154:224–230.
crossref
22. Szefler SJ, Leung DY. Severe asthma: pathogenesis and clinical management. 1996. New York: Marcel Dekker.
23. Suh DI, Lee JK, Lee JH, Koh YY. Bronchodilator response and its relationship to bronchial hyperresponsiveness in children with allergic rhinitis/asthma. Pediatr Allergy Respir Dis. 2010. 20:59–67.
24. Short PM, Lipworth SI, Lipworth BJ. Relationships between airway hyperresponsiveness, inflammation, and calibre in asthma. Lung. 2011. 189:493–497.
crossref
25. Langley SJ, Goldthorpe S, Custovic A, Woodcock A. Relationship among pulmonary function, bronchial reactivity, and exhaled nitric oxide in a large group of asthmatic patients. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2003. 91:398–404.
crossref
26. Crimi E, Spanevello A, Neri M, Ind PW, Rossi GA, Brusasco V. Dissociation between airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness in allergic asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998. 157:4–9.
crossref
27. Reid DW, Johns DP, Feltis B, Ward C, Walters EH. Exhaled nitric oxide continues to reflect airway hyperresponsiveness and disease activity in inhaled corticosteroid-treated adult asthmatic patients. Respirology. 2003. 8:479–486.
crossref
28. Berlyne GS, Parameswaran K, Kamada D, Efthimiadis A, Hargreave FE. A comparison of exhaled nitric oxide and induced sputum as markers of airway inflammation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000. 106:638–644.
crossref
29. Brightling CE, Symon FA, Birring SS, Bradding P, Wardlaw AJ, Pavord ID. Comparison of airway immunopathology of eosinophilic bronchitis and asthma. Thorax. 2003. 58:528–532.
crossref
30. Warke TJ, Fitch PS, Brown V, Taylor R, Lyons JD, Ennis M, et al. Exhaled nitric oxide correlates with airway eosinophils in childhood asthma. Thorax. 2002. 57:383–387.
crossref
31. Woo SI, Lee JH, Kim H, Kang JW, Sun YH, Hahn YS. Utility of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (F(E)NO) measurements in diagnosing asthma. Respir Med. 2012. 106:1103–1109.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles