PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Abstract
Objective:
The Korean government has legislated for Medical Dispute Mediation Act in 2011. As a member of medical accident appraisal board, the medical doctor should have well-balanced mind along with the thorough knowledge and experiences on his specialty.
Methods:
We evaluated precedents related to the medical accidents of neurosurgery in Korea. We searched precedents in the Korean Supreme Court web site. There were 60 suits of damages in 108 precedents related to the neurosurgery from 1978 to 2010. We found 23 precedents related to neurosurgical treatment.
Results:
Doctors or medical institutions were liable for damages in 12 precedents including 4 cases of partial responsibility such as solatium. In 11 precedents, liability for damages was disclaimed. The judgment was unrelated to the level of court, dead or disabled, main issue (11 medical error, 7 explanation, 5 negligence and others), or methods of treatment. Liability for damages was usually disclaimed (6 : 2) in 1980s, more frequently claimed (1 : 7) in 1990s, and it became almost same (4 : 3) in 2000s.
REFERENCES
1). Cho HS., Lee SH., Shon MS., Yang SH., Lee HR. Reasons why patients and families choose medical dispute. J Korean Acad Fam Med. 19:274–291. 1998.
2). Chung HS. Prevention and counterplan on medical dispute. J Korean Med Assoc. 47:910–912. 2004.
3). Dove JT., Brush JE Jr., Chazal RA., Oetgen WJ. Medical professional liability and health care system reform. J Am Coll Cardiol. 55:2801–2803. 2010.
4). Epstein NE. A medico-legal review of cases involving quadriplegia following cervical spine surgery: is there an argument for a no-fault compensation system? Surg Neurol Int. 1:3. 2010.
5). Gallagher TH., Garbutt JM., Waterman AD., Flum DR., Larson EB., Waterman BM, et al. Choosing your words carefully: how physicians would disclose harmful medical errors to patients. Arch Intern Med. 166:1585–1593. 2006.
6). Gallagher TH., Waterman AD., Ebers AG., Fraser VJ., Levinson W. Patients' and physicians' attitudes regarding the disclosure of medical errors. JAMA. 289:1001–1007. 2003.
7). Jena AB., Seabury S., Lakdawalla D., Chandra A. Malpractice risk according to physician specialty. N Engl J Med. 365:629–636. 2011.
8). Kim DG. Issues and problems associated with neurosurgery in South Korea. World Neurosurg. 75:348–349. 2011.
9). Kim HM. The legal understandings on the obligatory explanation of medical practice. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 50:1607–1614. 2007.
10). Lee KS. Disability Evaluation and Independent Medical Examination. Seoul: Jungang Munhwa, pp111-128. 2002.
11). Lee KS., Doh JW., Bae HG., Yun IG. Medico-legal problems in the treatment of spinal disorders: report of three cases: case report. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 33:602–605. 2003.
12). Lee YS. Medical dispute. Korean J Anesthesiol. 29:1–7. 1995.
13). Min YD., Lee IO., Choung JT. Medical malpractice: what is the difference between an anesthesiologist and a lawyer. Korean J Anesthesiol. 47:389–392. 2004.
14). Studdert DM., Mello MM., Gawande AA., Gandhi TK., Kachalia A., Yoon C, et al. Claims, errors, and compensation payments in medical malpractice litigation. N Engl J Med. 354:2024–2033. 2006.
15). Weinstein SL. Medical liability reform crisis 2008. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 467:392–401. 2009.
16). Yang SH., Cho HS., Lee SH., Shon MS. Factors affecting the settlement amount of medical malpractice claims. J Korean Acad Fam: 604-620. 1998.
17). Yook HS., Lee YH., Lee H. A clinicomedical jurisprudence approach to medical disputes. Korean J Leg Med. 31:180–184. 2007.
TABLE 1.
Precedents related to the medical accidents of neurosurgery in Korea (1978-2010)
TABLE 2.
Judgements of damage suits related to the medical accidents of neurosurgery in Korea (1978-2010)
XML Download