Interhemispheric subdural hematoma (IHSDH) is an uncommon type of subdural hematoma (SDH) because of their unusual location.1012) It accounts for approximately 6% of all traumatic SDH, or 0.8% of all hospitalized patients after head trauma.1314) Till 1995, less than 70 cases were reported in the literature.2) Although the IHSDH is uncommon, it is a distinct lesion with its unique characteristics. We have treated consecutive 42 patients with IHSDH, and retrospectively investigated their clinical features and outcomes.

Go to :

From January 2006 to December 2015, we treated 105 patients with IHSDH. All patients were diagnosed by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging. We excluded 63 patients since thickness of the hematoma were less than 3 mm or difficult to differentiate from interhemispheric (IH) subarachnoid hemorrhages. Thickness was measured at the thickest part of the hematoma. This study focused on 42 patients with thick (3 mm or more) IHSDH. We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiological findings, associated medical history, management and outcomes. The level of consciousness and outcome were assessed by the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score at admission and the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score at final follow-up. We defined heavy alcoholics as who drank more than one bottle every day. Average follow-up period was 910 days (range, 12–2,555 days) except six expired cases. We classified GOS scores into favorable (good recovery and moderate disability) or poor outcomes (severe disability, vegetative state, or death) for statistical analysis. Statistical analyses were performed by the multivariate logistic regression analysis. A p<0.05 was considered statically significant.

Go to :

Table 1 showed a baseline characteristics of patients. Two thirds of the patients were over 60 years old. The ratio of male to female was 2:1. Slip or fall was the most common cause of trauma. In eight patients, IHSDH was developed without trauma. Coagulopathy was found in five of them. In two patients, spontaneous cerebral hemorrhage leaking into the hemispheric fissure result IHSDH (Figure 1). Acute IHSDH occurred on the convexity chronic SDH in one patient (Figure 2). The level of consciousness on admission was GCS 13 to 15 in 25 patients. The most common symptom was headache. So-called falx syndrome was noticed in only two patients.

All IHSDH was hyperdense on CT at the time of diagnosis. IHSDH was located anterior part of the falx in 17 patients, posterior part in 12 patients, and whole falx in 11 patients (Table 2). IHSDH frequently accompanied other lesions. Convexity SDH was the most frequently concurrent lesion. Isolated IHSDH was found in only 4 patients. Overall six patients were expired. The outcome was favorable in 27 patients (Table 3). Twenty-two patients were managed conservatively. Decompressive craniectomy (5 cases) and craniotomy (1 case) were performed to remove the concurrent lesion, usually convexity SDH. In four patients, delayed burr hole was sufficient to remove the liquefied convexity subacute or chronic SDH. The patients with favorable outcome were more frequently observed in good initial neurologic status (GCS>13), traumatic cause and surgical treatment, but according to multivariate logistic regression analysis, there were no factors that influence to poor outcome in patients with IHSDH.

Go to :

During 10 year period, we could find 42 patients with thick IHSDH. Prior to 1974, there were only 10 cases reported in the literature. With the advent of CT scans, the number of reported cases has increased.26) However, it is still rare, especially the isolated one. About 150 cases with ISH were reported in the literature up till 2005.1)

IHSDH occurred more common in the aged, over 60 years old. The ratio of male to female was 2:1. Slip or fall was the most common cause of trauma. The most common cause of this lesion is trauma, especially over the occipital region, accounting for 80% to 90% of cases.101114) As the pathogenic mechanism of posttraumatic IHSDH, tearing of the parasagittal bridging veins were proposed by some authors,257) however, the origin of this hematoma actually identified by surgery was veins in the IH fissure, branches of pericallosal artery or brain laceration in the IH fissure.16)

In eight cases of spontaneous IHSDH, we could find out coagulopathy in five. Aneurysms, coagulopathies were considered as risk factors of IHSDH.211) In addition, hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage or convexity chronic SDH may cause spontaneous IHSDH. The GCS on admission was 13 to 15 in more than a half of the cases. The most common symptom was headache. Falx syndrome may be present in 6% to 30% of patients with IHSDH,614) however, it may depend on the size of hematoma or combined intracranial lesions.14)

All IHSDH was acute at the time of diagnosis. Chronic IHSDH is extremely rare being 0.4% of chronic SDH.9) Till 2010, only 13 cases were reported in the literature.8) They usually result from acute IHSDH.4) IHSDH may be more common in the posterior part of the falx due to the gravity, however, thick (3 mm or more) IHSDH was more common in the anterior part in this study. It may be related to the frequency of concurrent lesions. IHSDH frequently accompanied convexity SDHs, which might extend to the anterior part of the falx. Convexity SDH was the most common concurrent lesion in a series of traumatic IHSDH.14)

Overall mortality rate was 14%. The outcome was favorable in 64%. There were two different prospects on the outcome of IHSDH. IHSDH is associated with high mortality rate around 25%, like a traumatic acute SDH.26714) Contrary to this view, it may be considered as a benign variant of acute SDH.15) This view may be related to the fact that the IHSDH does not directly correlate with the increase of intracranial pressure (ICP),17) and most IHSDH could be treated conservatively.14) The outcome was poor in spontaneous one, patients with low GCS, and patients with conservative treatment in this study. Spontaneous IHSDH was usually associated with coagulopathy. According to multivariate logistic regression analysis, there were no factors that influence to poor outcome in patients with IHSDH. Although surgery was performed to remove the combined lesions in 24%, the IHSDH itself was not the target for surgical removal in this study. Although some recommended surgical treatment,3) the mortality rate of conservative management was lower than that of surgery (10.5% and 31.7%, respectively).2) In 50 cases of IHSDH and tentorial SDH, the hematoma was resolved within two weeks in 80%.18) However, surgery may be helpful if: 1) progression of the clinical symptoms and signs especially exacerbation of lower extremity weakness, occurs; 2) paralysis of both lower extremities is present; 3) there is persistent increased ICP (>30 mmHg); and 4) the hematoma volume is >40 mL and/or the hematoma thickness is >15 mm 16). Otherwise, conservative treatment is generally preferred. Although the outcome was poor in patients with conservative treatment in this study, it did not mean surgical treatment was better than conservative one, since we managed conservatively all cases of IHSDH.

Go to :

IHSDH is rare especially the isolated one. The most common cause is trauma. Coagulopathy may cause spontaneous IHSDH. Surgery may be helpful to remove the concurrent mass lesion, however, conservative treatment is generally preferred. The exact risk factors for poor outcome of IHSDH are still unknown, more studies are needed.

Go to :