Abstract
Medical certificate, post-mortem examination or certificate guarantee their authenticity of the content through the article 233 of the criminal act. The article 233 of the criminal act states that if a medical or oriental medical doctor, dentist or midwife prepare false medical certificate, postmortem examination or certificate life or death, one shall be punished. To constitute the crime of issuance of falsified medical certificates, it is necessary for the contents of the certificate to be substantially contrary to the truth, as well as it is needed the subjective perception that the contents of the certificate are false. On the article 17 of the medical service act, no one may prepare a medical certificate, a report or certificate of postmortem examination to a patient or public prosecutor in a district public prosecutors' office, who conducts a medical service and has given the medical treatment or conducted the postmortem examination by him/herself: Provided that, such certificate or report may be issued for a patient without giving any medical treatment, if the patient has died within 48 hours after his/her last medical treatment, while if the medical doctor, dentist or oriental medical doctors who examined a patient or conducted a postmortem examination of the dead patient is unable to issue such certificate or report due to an inevitable cause or event, any other medical doctor, dentist or oriental medical doctor who works for the same medical institution, may issue such certificate or report based on the medical records of the patient.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2012S1A3A2033416).
References
1. Korean Medical Association. Medical law. 1st ed. Paju: Bobmunsa;2008.
2. Supreme Court Decision 89Do2083. 1990. 03. 27.
3. Lee CW. 'luxurious ward life' of madam who murdered by contract...prosecutors permit 10 times only through medical certificate. Chosun.com [Internet]. 2013. 06. 13. cited 2013 Aug 10. society section. Available from: http://www.chosun.com/.
4. Lee H. Suspension of execution of penalty operation and improvement. Isyu-wa Nonjeom. 2013; 683:1–4.
5. Supreme Court Decision 96Do2013. 1996. 06. 28.
6. Constitutional Court Decision 2010Hunba83. 2012. 03. 29.
7. Supreme Court Decision 2010Do1388. 2013. 04. 11.
8. Lee J. Criminal law. 5th ed. Seoul: Pakyoungsa;2007.
9. Dongbu District Court 2003Godan2941. 2004. 05. 13.
10. Park YH. The law of medical malpractice. 1st ed. Seoul: Lawbookcenter;2005.
11. Bae HA, Lee SB, Jang HY. Resolving conflicts between informed consent and patients' privacy in medical emergencies. Korean J Med Ethics Educ. 2007; 10:73–81.
12. Supreme Court Decision 84Do1653. 1984. 09. 25.
13. Supreme Court Decision 2010Do12728. 2011. 01. 27.
14. Supreme Court Decision 2007Do136. 2007. 05. 10.
15. Supreme Court Decision 95Do852. 1995. 09. 29.
16. Supreme Court Decision 2004Do3360. 2006. 03. 23.
17. Kim JH, Lee YS. Medicine and law. 2nd ed. Seoul: E*Public;2008.
18. Korean Medical Association. Guidelines for medical certificates. Seoul: Korean Medical Association;2003.
19. Bae JD. Criminal law. Seoul: Hongmunsa;2006.
20. Supreme Court Decision 2011Du4794. 2012. 07. 26.
21. Supreme Court Decision 75Do1888. 1976. 02. 10.
22. Supreme Court Decision 2004Do6557. 2006. 01. 12.
23. Park K. Whether to put on criminal conviction on the medical examination records prepared by medical personnels. Med Law. 2007; 8:107–135.