Journal List > J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs > v.28(1) > 1058497

Kim: A Study on Adult Women's Cosmetic Tattoo Experiences and Comparison of Health Concern and Health Practice between the Cosmetic Tattooed and Non-cosmetic Tattooed Groups

Abstract

Purpose

This study was conducted to compare the level of health concern and the health practice of adult women depending on their experiences with cosmetic tattooing.

Methods

The participants were 396 adult women in Jeonnam and Jeonbuk Provinces and G City. Their levels of health concern were measured using the 5-point-5-item scale designed by Kim. For measuring their health practice, the 5-point-12-item scale designed by Kwak was used.

Results

The percentage of cosmetic tattooed women was 58.8%. The average score of their health concern was 3.12 and that of their health practice 3.54. As for their levels of health concern, no differences were observed between those with cosmetic tattoo experience and those without. However, the group with cosmetic tattoo experience exhibited a higher level of health practice. Also, most members of the cosmetic tattooed group decided to visit their tattoo shops based on the availability of tattoo shapes or prices rather than considering infection risks.

Conclusion

Health education is necessary to increase people's sensitivity to infection. This study shows that urgent attention for the management and regulation of the relevant ministries is required. Also, this study provides foundational information that will serve health education.

Figures and Tables

Table 1

State of Cosmetic Tattooing

jkachn-28-69-i001
Groups Variables Categories n (%)
Tattooed group Experienced 233 (58.8)
Whether unlicensed medical practice or not (n=233) Yes 146 (62.7)
No 87 (37.3)
Place for tattooing (n=233) Tattoo parlor 174 (74.7)
Hospital 16 (6.9)
Home visit 43 (18.5)
Reason for choice tattoo parlor instead of hospital (n=217) Low price 62 (27.0)
Far to seek hospital for tattoo procedure 56 (24.3)
Prettier than hospital's procedure 50 (21.7)
Believes that only get in parlors 49 (21.3)
Others 13 (5.7)
Choice criteria among other parlors (n=217) Skillful 151 (69.6)
Low price 25 (11.5)
After service 19 (8.8)
Hygiene 12 (5.5)
Others 10 (4.6)
Action of infection control (n=217) Unaware 117 (53.9)
Yes 40 (18.4)
No 60 (27.6)
Satisfaction with hygienic conditions (n=217) Good 68 (31.3)
Moderate 125 (57.6)
Bad 24 (11.1)
Notice of side effect (n=217) Yes 77 (35.5)
No 140 (64.5)
Experience of side effect (n=217) Unaware 70 (32.3)
Yes 29 (13.4)
No 118 (54.3)
Non-tattooed group Unexperienced 163 (41.2)
Plan tattooing 93 (57.1)
Whether unlicensed medical practice or not (n=163) Yes 120 (73.6)
No 43 (26.4)
Place for tattooing (n=93) Tattoo parlor 52 (55.9)
Hospital 39 (41.9)
Home visit 2 (2.2)
Reason for choice tattoo parlor instead of hospital (n=54) Prettier than hospital's procedure 31 (57.4)
Believes that only get in parlors 9 (16.7)
Far to seek hospital for tattoo procedure 7 (13.0)
Low price 5 (9.3)
Others 2 (3.7)
Table 2

Tattooed Group and Non-tattooed Group Depending on General Characteristics (N=396)

jkachn-28-69-i002
Characteristics Categories Tattooed group (n=233) Non-tattooed group (n=163) x2 or t p
n (%) or M±SD n (%) or M±SD
Age (year) 20~29 30 (12.9) 94 (57.7) 93.49 <.001
30~39 56 (24.0) 18 (11.0)
40~49 57 (24.5) 29 (17.8)
50~59 90 (38.6) 22 (13.5)
43.2±10.75 31.5±12.86
Marital status Single 35 (26.1) 99 (73.9) 89.53 <.001
Married 198 (75.6) 64 (24.4)
Religion Yes 147 (63.1) 107 (65.6) 0.27 .340
No 86 (36.9) 56 (34.4)
Family monthly income ≥600 66 (28.3) 22 (13.5) 20.57 <.001
400~<600 72 (30.9) 51 (31.3)
200~<400 78 (33.5) 59 (36.2)
<200 17 (7.3) 31 (19.0)
Educational level High school 72 (30.9) 25 (15.3) 81.40 <.001
Be at university 35 (15.0) 95 (58.3)
≥University 126 (54.1) 43 (26.4)
Occupation Student 38 (16.3) 96 (58.9) 87.87 <.001
Housewife 139 (59.7) 42 (25.8)
Worker 56 (24.0) 25 (15.3)
State of health Good 171 (73.3) 131 (80.4) 4.82 .307
Moderate 54 (23.2) 30 (18.4)
Bad 8 (3.5) 2 (1.2)
Table 3

Comparison between Health Concern and Health Practice between Tattooed Group and Non-tattooed Group (N=396)

jkachn-28-69-i003
Variables Total M±SD Tattooed group (n=233) Non-tattooed group (n=163) F p
M±SD M±SD
Health concern 3.12±0.81 3.25±0.77 2.95±0.83 0.64 .426
Health practice 3.54±0.50 3.55±0.48 3.52±0.53 10.21 .002

References

1. Health & Welfare Committee. The 331st in the 7th minutes of health & welfare committee [Internet]. Seoul: Health & Welfare Committee;2015. cited 2016 June 25. Available from: http://pokr.kr/meeting/19331730001/pdf.
2. Woo JH. A study on awareness and satisfaction of cosmetic behavior about semi-permanent make up of women's [master's thesis]. Daejeon: Hannam University;2015. 96.
3. Safire W. The way we live now: 8-27-00: on language; Lookism. New York Times Magazine. 2000. 08. 27. 4–5.
4. Kim SN, Lee KS. Theses: A research of appearance - Management behavior in 20-40’s women according to degree of appearance concern. J Fash Bus. 2007; 11(4):29–41.
5. Nam KY. A study on tattoos and civil liability. Artic Law. 2012; 36(2):447–469.
6. Park JS, Kim SK, Kim MJ, Kim SK. Pilot study for understanding the present situation of decorative tattoos. Seoul: National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency;2015. p. 130.
7. Kim JH. The invasiveness of tattoo and unlicensed medical practice. Korean Criminol Rev. 2007; 18(3):165–198.
8. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Tattoo legalization [Internet]. Seoul: Ministry of Health and welfare;2014. cited 2016 October 20. Available from: http://www.mohw.go.kr/front_new/jb/sjb030301vw.jsp.
9. Ministry of Government Legislation. Public health control act [Internet]. Chungnam: Ministry of Government Legislation;2015. cited 2016 June 16. Available from: http://www.law.go.kr/lsSc.do?menuId=0&subMenu=1&qu ery=%EA%B3%B5%EC%A4%91%EC%9C%84%EC%83%9D %EA%B4%80%EB%A6%AC%EB%B2%95#undefined.
10. Ministry of Government Legislation. public health control act [Internet]. Chungnam: Ministry of Government Legislation;2015. cited 2016 August 18. Available from: http://www.law.go.kr/lsSc.do?menuId=0&subMenu=1&qu ery=%EA%B5%AD%EB%AF%BC%EA%B1%B4%EA%B0%9 5%EB%B3%B4%ED%97%98%EB%B2%95#undefined.
11. Cho HW. Legal and institutional tasks of similar medical practice including tattoo [Internet]. Seoul: Green Consumer Network in Korea;2008. cited 2016 September 15. Available from: www.gcn.or.kr/common/news_download.gcn?seq=4078.
12. Kim HK. A study on beauty behavior for female permanent make-up at user aspect [master's thesis]. Seoul: Chung-Ang University;2007. 108.
13. Jeun YS, Kim HS. A study on the relationship of health promoting behavior, skin health care and appearance management behavior-focus on high school students. J Korean Soc Cosmetol. 2008; 14(3):985–991.
14. Lee YR, JEGAL J, Moon WH, Lee SY. Health education. Paju: Soomoonsa;2013. p. 400.
15. Yoon CK. The study on the relationship between health concern, health behavior, and subjective health cognition. J Korea Soc Health Inform Stat. 2004; 29(1):37–46.
16. Kwak HN. A study of health conditions and health practice of esthetician following their job-related stress [master's thesis]. Seoul: SeoKyeong University;2011. 80.
17. Kim NJ. A study on the relation of health concern, health behavior, and subjective health status between the aged and the preliminary aged group. J Korean Soc Health Educ Promot. 2000; 17(2):99–110.
18. Yoon HS, Choi YS. Analysis of correlation among health consciousness and nutrition knowledge, dietary habits and nutrition attitudes of elementary and middle school teachers in Masan city. J Nutr Health. 2002; 35(3):368–379.
19. Kim IW. The effect of health concern on purchase behavior of the environmental friendly agricultural products [master's thesis]. Chungnam: Hanseo University;2010. 74.
20. Lee ES. The influence of perception of physical attractiveness on health promoting behavior and appearance management behavior. Fam Environ Res. 2011; 49(6):47–56. DOI: 10.6115/khea.2011.49.6.047.
crossref
21. Seol BR, Kwon JW, Wee WR. A case of meibomian gland dysfunction after cosmetic eyelid tattooing procedure. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2013; 54(8):1309–1313. DOI: 10.3341/jkos.2013.54.8.1309.
crossref
22. Kim HJ, Yoon SN, Kim SY, Kim CM, Kim HS, Park SH, et al. Community health nursing. Paju: Soomoonsa;2013. p. 126.
23. Park IH, Go JE, Choi HJ, An OH, Kim HG, Yang SJ, et al. Community health nursing. Seoul: Hyunmoonsa;2016. p. 311–372.
24. Lee HJ, Park JY. Correlations between old people’s watching of television programs and practice of health behaviors. J Korea Contents Assoc. 2011; 11(1):294–301. DOI: 10.5392/JKCA.2011.11.1.294.
crossref
25. Park SH, Kim YK. Effects of health and appearance consciousness on intention to buy healthy menus at a fast food restaurant: An application of theory of planned behavior. Korean J Tour Res. 2010; 25(3):81–100.
26. Sung MH, Kim NY, Chio HY. Factors influencing performance of the nurses about the management of nosocomial infection. Korean J Occup Health Nurs. 2007; 16(1):5–14.
27. Lee K, Park BC, Lim HS, Kweon SS, Choi JS, Kim JR, et al. 2012 comparison of the awareness and knowledge of scrub typhus between case and control groups. J Agric Med Community Health. 2012; 37(1):1–11. DOI: 10.5393/JAMCH.2012.37.1.001.
28. Hong MH, Park JY. Nurses’ perception of accreditation, awareness and performance of infection control in an accredited healthcare system. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2016; 22(2):167–177. DOI: 10.11111/jkana.2016.22.2.167.
crossref
29. Newsom JT, McFarland BH, Kaplan MS, Huguet N, Zani B. The health consciousness myth: implications of the near independence of major health behaviors in the North American population. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 60(2):433–437.
crossref
30. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Hepatitis C prevention and control program [Internet]. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare;2016. cited 2016 June 16. Available from: http://www.mohw.go.kr/front_new/al/sal0301vw.jsp?PAR _MENU_ID=04&MENU_ID=0403&page=1&CONT_SEQ=33 4121.
TOOLS
Similar articles