Journal List > J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs > v.27(1) > 1058448

Lee and Park: Survey Study of Current Status of and Need for Mental Health Education Enhancing Protective Factors in the Elementary Schools

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to survey the current status of mental health education and need for mental health education enhancing protective factors in the elementary schools.

Methods

We surveyed 10 school health teachers and 328 fifth- and sixth-grade students using 19- and 20-item questionnaires, respectively.

Results

All of the teachers and 65.2% of the students replied that they were either teaching or being taught mental health in school. Topics covered suicide, depression, school violence, and Internet addiction. All of the teachers and 84.1% of the students expressed the need for mental health education enhancing protective factors in school. Both groups replied that two sessions are enough. The teachers preferred role play and discussion as teaching methods, and audiovisual materials and computer as instructional media. The students preferred lecture and role play as teaching methods, and audiovisual materials and smartphone as instructional media. Both groups ranked self-esteem, parent-child relationship, peer relationship, and emotional regulation as the most important topics to be covered in the education.

Conclusion

There is a high demand for mental health education enhancing protective factors. Therefore, it is recommended to develop educational programs enhancing protective factors by enabling formal and informal learning using smartphone.

References

1. Ahn DH, Jung SA, Kim SH, Song WJ, Lee MS. Mental health of elementary and middle school students, and related familial-social factors in health promoting school. The Korean Society of School Health. 2008; 21(2):35–46.
2. Kim MS. The subjective well-being of Korean children and its policy implications. Health-Welfare Policy Forum. 2015; 220:14–26.
3. Mo SH, Kim HJ, Lee SY, Kim JH, Yoon KM. A study on mental health improvement policy for children and adolescents III. General report. Seoul: National Youth Policy Institute;2013. Report No.: 13-R16.
4. Choi IJ, Mo SH, Lee SY. A study on mental health improvement policy for children and adolescents II. General report. Seoul: National Youth Policy Institute;2012. Report No.: 12-R15.
5. Jeong CW. Theoretical structure of social and emotional learning and its implications for moral education. Journal of Moral & Ethics Education. 2013; 38:153–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.18338/kojmee.2013.38.153.
6. Yeo JY, Park TY. A study of adolescent's suicidal ideation - the mediation effect of resilience and self-esteem. Korean Journal of Youth Studies. 2013; 20(8):121–145.
7. Shin WY, Choi MN, Kim JH. The effects of the three resilience factors on problematic online game uses. Journal of Cybercom-munication Academic Society. 2009; 26(3):43–81.
8. Sim MY, Kim KH. Risk and protective factors for suicidal ideation of korean adolescents: moderating effect of sex and developmental period. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology. 2005; 10(3):313–325.
9. Chung OB, Chung SH, Lim JH. Emotional development & emotional intelligence. Seoul: Hakjisa;2007. p. 493 p.
10. Din ASE. Prevention and intervention in school settings. Remschmidt H, Belfer M, Goodyer P editors, editors. Facilitating pathways: Care, treatment and prevention in child and adolescent mental health. New York: Springer;2004. p. p. 326–334.
11. Lee DY, Roh EM, Kim IY, Ko GN, Choi JW, Lee YR. . School-based short term mental health awareness and school bullying prevention programs: Preliminary Report. Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2014; 25(4):196–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.5765/jkacap.2014.25.4.196.
12. Lee CH, Kang SY, Lee DH. A study on mental health improvement policy for children and adolescents III: Efficient intervention program for children and adolescents. Seoul: National Youth Policy Institute;2013. Report No.: 13-R16-2.
13. Park HS. The development of an integrated suicide·violence prevention program for adolescents. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2008; 38(4):513–521. http://dx.doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2008.38.4.513.
crossref
14. Yang SO, Kwon MS, Jeong GH, Lee SH. A study on the awareness of importance, performance level, and perceived competence level of school health promotion programs. Journal of Korean Academy Community Health Nursing. 2009; 20(1):96–104.
15. Hyun MS, An YM, Nam KA, Park SW. The school related stress and mental health education need among the middle school students. Journal of Korean Academy Psych Mental Health Nursing. 2005; 14(2):119–128.
16. Oh GS. The school related stress and the need of mental health education among high school students. Journal of Korean Academy Community Health Nursing. 2007; 18(2):320–330.
17. Kim KR, Ju HO, Kim YH. A descriptive analysis on health education in elementary school after introduction of 7th curriculum modification. Journal of Korean society for Health Education and Promotion. 2005; 22(1):41–54.
18. Choi MJ, Jin SW. Needs assessment of in-service education on teaching for school health teachers. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society. 2014; 15(11):6509–6517. http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/kais.2014.15.11.6509.
crossref
19. Lim JH, Kim SH. Effects of individual learning and collaborative learning on academic achievement, self-directed learning skills and social efficacy in smart learning. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media. 2013; 19(1):1–24.
20. Lee GY. A survey on needs and current conditions of school health education contents in the elementary school. The Korean Society of School Health. 2006; 19(2):1–12.
21. Moon YL, Kwak BS, Ahn KH, Han GC. Development of curriculum for human-rights education in the kindergarten, elementary, middle and high school. Seoul: Educational Research Institute Seoul National University;2003. p. 357 p.
22. Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education. 2013 consulting manual for the school health teacher on the mental health and sex education [Internet]. Seoul: Ministry of Education and Korean Educational Development Institute;2013. [cited 2015 March 25]. Available from:. http://www.schoolhealth.kr/shnhome/bbs/bbs01002v.php?LstNum1=1690&PageNum=2&msch_gbn=total&GbnCode=&RGbnCode=&sch_subject=Y&sch_contents=Y&sch_keyword=Y&sch_pub_src=Y&totSearchGbn=Y&searchkey=%EC%BB%A8%EC%84%A4%ED%8C%85&data_gbn_m_list=01,02,03,04,05,06,07&data_type_list=01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08,99&sch_gbn=ALL&file_type_list=PDF,HWP,MOV,XLS,PPT,JPG,ETC&purl=bbs01005s.
23. Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education. 2015 guidelines for school health services [Internet]. Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education;2015. [cited 2015 March 21]. Available from:. http://www.bogun.seoul.kr/sub06/index.asp?spc=6&sp=D01.
24. Woo OK. The implementation process of school health education act. The Korean Society of School Health. 2015; 28(1):38–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.15434/kssh.2015.28.1.38.
crossref
25. Park JH, Kim DY, Woo OK, Kim MK, Kim JH, Kim HJ. . Research on achievement standards and achievement levels based on the national curriculum revised in 2009: Middle school and high school health. Seoul: Korean Educational development Institute;2013. Report No.: CRC 2012-18.
26. Han SH. Effects of smoking prevention education on knowledge and attitude toward smoking and the satisfaction of education among middle school students. The Journal of Korean Community Nursing. 2002; 13(2):230–238.
27. Yoo JS, Lee JS. The effects of the psychological environment perceived by early adolescents on their psychosocial maladjustment. Journal of Korean Home Management Association. 2004; 22(5):175–183.
28. Ministry of Gender Equality and Family Republic of Korea. 2013 a study of adolescents’ media use [Internet]. Seoul: Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education;2015. [cited 2015 December 3]. Available from:. http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=154&tblId=DT_MOGE_3020400126&vw_cd=T_STOP_TITLE&list_id=154_1 5414_DD&seqNo=&lang_mode=ko&language=kor&obj_var _id=&itm_id=&conn_path=E1.

Table 1.
General Characteristics of the Study Subjects
Participants Variables Categories n (%)
School health teachers (n=10) Age 40~44 6 (60.0)
45~49 4 (40.0)
Clinical Experience as mental health nurse Yes 0 (0.0)
No 10 (100.0)
Length of teaching career (in year) ≤10 2 (20.0)
11~15 1 (10.0)
16~20 5 (50.0)
≥21 2 (20.0)
Number of classes Under 18 2 (20.0)
Over 18 8 (80.0)
Number of students 400~499 2 (20.0)
500~599 1 (10.0)
600~699 4 (40.0)
700~799 3 (30.0)
Students (n=328) Grade 5th 158 (48.2)
6th 170 (51.8)
Gender Boys 148 (45.1)
Girls 180 (54.9)
Smart phone ownership Yes 233 (71.0)
No 95 (29.0)
Religion Yes 180 (54.9)
No 148 (45.1)
Parent(s) who live together Mother & Father 311 (94.8)
Mother 12 (3.7)
Father 3 (0.9)
Other 2 (0.6)
Relationship with parents Very good 233 (71.0)
Good 91 (27.8)
Bad 4 (1.2)
Very bad 0 (0.0)
Relationship with siblings Very good 119 (36.3)
Good 146 (44.5)
Bad 20 (6.1)
Very bad 3 (0.9)
No siblings 40 (12.2)
Family life satisfaction Very satisfied 209 (63.7)
Satisfied 109 (33.2)
Dissatisfied 9 (2.7)
Very dissatisfied 1 (0.3)
Relationship with teachers Very good 172 (52.4)
Good 152 (46.3)
Bad 3 (0.9)
Very bad 1 (0.3)
Relationship with friends Very good 187 (57.0)
Good 140 (42.7)
Bad 1 (0.3)
Very bad 0 (0.0)
School life satisfaction Very satisfied 166 (50.6)
Satisfied 155 (47.3)
Dissatisfied 6 (1.8)
Very dissatisfied 1 (0.3)
Major consultant Mother 202 (61.6)
Father 7 (2.1)
Teacher 2 (0.6)
Friend (same sex) 93 (28.4)
Friend (opposite sex) 2 (0.6)
Siblings 10 (3.0)
Other 5 (1.6)
No person 7 (2.1)
Feeling of happiness Very happy 186 (56.7)
Happy 130 (39.6)
Unhappy 11 (3.4)
Very unhappy 1 (0.3)
Table 2.
Status of Mental Health Education from School Health Teacher and Students
Participants Variables Categories n (%)
School health teachers (n=10) Health education Yes 10 (100.0)
No 0 (0.0)
Number of hours (per year) 5th grader
Over 17 6 (60.0)
Under 17 3 (30.0)
Not applicable 1 (10.0)
6th grader
Over 17 4 (40.0)
Under 17 4 (40.0)
Not applicable 2 (20.0)
Mental health education Teach a class Yes 10 (100.0)
No 0 (0.0)
Number of hours (per year) 5th grader
3 1 (10.0)
2 4 (40.0)
1 4 (40.0)
Not applicable 1 (10.0)
6th grader
3 1 (10.0)
2 3 (30.0)
1 4 (40.0)
Not applicable 2 (20.0)
Topics Suicide 4 (21.1)
Depression 3 (15.8)
School violence 3 (15.8)
Internet addiction 2 (10.5)
Friendship 2 (10.5)
Self-esteem 2 (10.5)
Emotion 2 (10.5)
Stress 1 (5.3)
Teaching method Lecture 9 (39.1)
Discussion 6 (26.1)
Role play 3 (13.0)
Case 'study 4 (17.4)
Self-directed learning 1 (4.3)
Instructional media Printed media such as textbook 2 (11.1)
Audiovisual media such as video 10 (55.6)
Non-projected media such as real objects 2 (11.1)
Computer media such as multimedia 4 (22.2)
Smart media such as smart phone 0 (0.0)
Source of teaching material Book 2 (10.0)
Periodical 0 (0.0)
Internet 10 (50.0)
Peer school health teacher 8 (40.0)
Information leaflet 0 (0.0)
Difficulty Mental health education
Low priority 3 (17.6)
No method and time for feedback 3 (17.6)
Lack of materials 3 (17.6)
Lack of capacity of health teacher 3 (17.6)
Health education
Lack of time 3 (17.6)
Excessive school health task 2 (11.8)
Students (n=328) Mental health education Yes 214 (65.2)
No 114 (34.8)
Never 79 (69.3)
Don't remember 24 (21.1)
Other 11 (9.6)
Topics Response 202 (94.4)
Internet addiction 120 (43.8)
Suicide 76 (27.7)
Depression 37 (13.5)
Psychosis 14 (5.1)
Don't remember 14 (5.1)
School violence 9 (3.3)
Friendship 1 (0.4)
Self-esteem 2 (0.7)
Stress 1 (0.4)
Non-response 12 (5.6)

Multiple responses are possible;

Free text response.

Table 3.
Needs for Protective factors in Mental Health Education from School Health Teachers (N=10)
Variables Categories n (%)
Demand Extremely Very 10 (100.0) 0 (0.0)
Moderately Slightly 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Not at all 0 (0.0)
Goal Understanding of concept and knowledge Acquisition of attitude and value 0 (0.0) 8 (80.0)
Practice of health behaviour Development of critical thinking 1 (70.0) 1 (70.0)
Frequency 3 4 (40.0)
2 1 5 (50.0) 0 (0.0)
Other 1 (10.0)
Teaching method Lecture Discussion 1 (4.0) 8 (32.0)
Role play Case study 10 (40.0) 5 (20.0)
Self-directed learning 1 (4.0)
Instructional media Printed media such as textbook Audiovisual media such as video 1 (5.3) 10 (52.6)
Non-projected media such as real objects Computer media such as multimedia 2 (10.5) 4 (21.1)
Smart media such as smart phone 2 (10.5)
Accessibility to information Very good Good 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Fair Poor 2 (20.0) 7 (70.0)
Very poor 1 (10.0)
Issues to consider Aspect of health education in school
Enough time for health education 5 (23.8)
Competency for the school health teacher 4 (19.0)
Aspect of mental health education Development of the practical teaching materials 7 (33.3)
Connection with mental health resources Strategies to self-directed learning 3 (14.3) 2 (9.5)

Multiple responses are possible;

Free text response.

Table 4.
Needs for Protective Factors in Mental Health Education from Students (N=328)
Variables Categories Boys
Girls
Total
n (%) n (%) n (%)
Demand Extremely 86 (58.1) 107 (59.4) 193 (58.8)
Very 34 (23.0) 49 (27.2) 83 (25.3)
Moderately 24 (16.2) 20 (11.1) 44 (13.4)
Slightly 3 (2.0) 2 (1.1) 5 (1.5)
Not at all 1 (0.7) 2 (1.1) 3 (0.9)
Frequency 3 31 (20.9) 52 (28.9) 83 (25.3)
2 74 (50.0) 81 (45.0) 155 (47.3)
1 37 (25.0) 36 (20.0) 73 (22.3)
Other 6 (4.1) 11 (6.1) 17 (5.2)
Teaching method Lecture 59 (39.9) 58 (32.2) 117 (26.0)
Discussion 55 (37.2) 53 (29.4) 108 (24.0)
Role play 38 (25.7) 77 (42.8) 115 (25.6)
Case study 26 (17.6) 29 (16.1) 55 (12.2)
Self-directed learning 17 (11.5) 38 (21.1) 55 (12.2)
Instructional media Printed media such as textbook 15 (10.1) 20 (11.1) 35 (7.1)
Audiovisual media such as video 109 (73.6) 126 (70.0) 235 (47.7)
Non-projected media such as real objects 25 (16.9) 23 (12.8) 48 (9.7)
Computer media such as multimedia 34 (23.0) 41 (22.8) 75 (15.2)
Smart media such as smart phone 41 (27.7) 59 (32.8) 100 (20.3)

Multiple responses are possible.

Table 5.
Priority of Topics Enhancing Protective Factors in Mental Health Education
Participants Topics Rank
Weighted score Overall priority
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
n (%)
n (%)
n (%)
n (%)
n (%)
n (%)
n (%)
School health teachers (n=10) Parent-child relationship 4 1 3 1 0 1 0 5.5 2
(40.0) (10.0) (30.0) (10.0) (0.0) (10.0) (0.0)
Peer relationship 1 4 1 1 2 0 1 4.7 3
(10.0) (40.0) (10.0) (10.0) (20.0) (0.0) (10.0)
Self-esteem 5 2 2 1 0 0 0 6.1 1
(50.0) (20.0) (20.0) (10.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0)
Self-efficacy 0 0 1 1 5 1 2 2.8 5
(0.0) (0.0) (10.0) (10.0) (50.0) (10.0) (20.0)
Emotional regulation 0 2 0 4 2 2 0 3.8 4
(0.0) (20.0) (0.0) (40.0) (20.0) (20.0) (0.0)
Optimism 0 1 0 1 0 4 4 2.2 7
(0.0) (10.0) (0.0) (10.0) (0.0) (40.0) (40.0)
Resilience 0 0 3 1 1 2 3 2.9 6
(0.0) (0.0) (30.0) (10.0) (10.0) (20.0) (30.0)
Students(n=271) Parent-child relationship 96 65 43 29 14 18 6 5.5 1
(35.4) (24.0) (15.9) (10.7) (5.2) (6.6) (2.2)
Peer relationship 45 70 54 31 25 12 34 4.7 2
(16.6) (25.8) 19.9) (11.4) (9.2) (4.4) (12.5)
Self-esteem 70 29 40 32 44 32 24 4.5 3
(25.8) (10.7) (14.8) (11.8) (16.2) (11.8) (8.9)
Self-efficacy 14 29 36 61 61 33 37 3.6 5
(5.2) (10.7) (13.3) (22.5) (22.5) (12.2) (13.7)
Emotional regulation 26 39 42 46 44 39 35 3.9 4
(9.6) (14.4) (15.5) (17.0) (16.2) (14.4) (12.9)
Optimism 9 23 30 38 42 74 55 3.1 6
(3.3) (8.5) (11.1) (14.0) (15.5) (27.3) (20.3)
Resilience 12 17 27 34 40 62 79 2.9 7
(4.4) (6.3) (10.0) (12.5) (14.8) (22.9) (29.2)
TOOLS
Similar articles