Journal List > J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs > v.27(1) > 1058444

Lee and Lee: The Effect of a Comprehensive Intervention Program on the Functional Status and Bone Density of the Socially-Vulnerable and Frail Elderly

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to provide a disease management, nutrition education, and group exercise program for three months to the moderately frail elderly whose physical functions have deteriorated, and to investigate its effects in order to develop an intervention program.

Methods

As a quasi-experiment, this study was conducted based on non-equivalence studies designed as a similar experiment. The milk intake group and calcium intake group participated in the disease education, individual nutrition education, and group exercise program for three months, and the control group was visited once in the three months by a nurse who provided disease education, nutrition education, and oral instruction of exercise, and asked them to exercise on their own every day. For the data analysis, x2-test, ANOVA and Scheffé test were used.

Results

After three months of intervention, there was a significant difference in the frailty level (p=.029) and bone density (p=.001) between the groups.

Conclusion

The comprehensive intervention program had an effect on the bone density and the frailty level of the socially-vulnerable and moderately frail elderly, suggesting that the program can be used as a nursing intervention to prevent functional deterioration and damage of the moderately frail elderly.

References

1. Korean Statistical Information Service. Part attempt to estimate future population 2013-2040 [Internet]. Seoul: Statistics Korea;2014. [cited 2016 February 1] Available from:. http://kosis.kr/.
2. Shin YH. Nursing intervention for frail elderly. Keimyung Journal of Nursing Science. 2006; 10(1):25–30.
3. Rennie MJ, Wackerhage H, Spagenburg EE, Booth FW. Control of the size of the human muscle mass. Annual Review Physiology. 2004; 66:799–828.
crossref
4. Gill TM, Baker DI, Gottschalk M, Peduzzi PN, Allore H, Van Ness PH. A rehabilitation program for the prevention of functional decline: Effect on higher-level physical function. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2004; 85(7):1043–1049.
5. Mitniski AB, Graham JE, Mogilner AJ, Rockwood K. Frailty, fitness and late-life mortality in relation to chronological and biological age. BMC Geriatrics. 2002; 2(1):1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-2-1.
crossref
6. Jung KH, Oh YH, Lee YK, Son CK, Park BM, Lee SY. . Senior survey. Research Report. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare;2011. Report No.: 2012-04.
7. Jung KH, Oh YH, Kim EN, Kim JH, Sun WD, Oh MA. . Senior survey. Research Report. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare;2014. Report No.: 2014-61.
8. Yoo JS, Jeon MY, Kim CG. Effects of a fall prevention program on falls in frail elders living at home in rural communities. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2013; 43(5):613–625.
crossref
9. Cusimano MD, Kwok J, Spadafora K. Effectiveness of multifaceted fall-prevention programs for the elderly in residential care. Injury Prevention. 2008; 14:113–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ip.2007.017533.
crossref
10. Kwon MS. Effects of a fall prevention program on physical fitness and psychological functions in community dwelling elders. Journal of Korean Academic Nursing. 2011; 41(2):165–174.
crossref
11. Michel JP, Alfonso J. Cruz-Jentoft, Cederholm T. Frailty, exercise and nutrition. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine. 2015; 31(3):375–387.
12. De Boer IH, Tinker LF, Connelly S, Curb JD, Howard BV, Kestenbaum B. . Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and the risk of incident diabetes in the women’s health initiative. Diabetes Care. 2008; 31(4):701–707.
crossref
13. Boonen S, Vanderschueren D, Haentjens P, Lips P. Calcium and vitamin D in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis a clinical update. Journal of Internal Medicine. 2006; 259(6):539–552.
14. Lee IS, Ko Y, Lee KO, Yim ES. Evaluation of the effects of a frailty preventing multi-factorial program concentrated on local commucities for high-risk younger and older elderly people. Journal of Korean Academic Community Health Nursing. 2012; 23(2):201–211.
15. Kwon SM, Park JS. The effect of health promotion program for frail elderly residents on health promoting behavior and health status. The Korean Academic Society of Adult Nursing. 2013; 25(2):194–206.
crossref
16. Lee HY, Choi SM, Choi SH. The effects of Korean DASH diet education with Calcium/Vitamin D supplements on nutrient intakes, food consumption, bone turnover markers and bone mineral density among Korean elderly women. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2015; 27(1):94–105.
crossref
17. Kim HS, Jung GH, Jang DM, Kim SH, Lee BK. Increased calcium intake through milk consumption and Bone Mineral Density of elderly women living in asan. Journal of the Korean Dietetic Association. 2005; 11(2):242–250.
18. Lee IS, Park YI, Park EO, Lee SH, Jeong IS. Validation of instruments to classify the frailty of the elderly in community. Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing. 2011; 22(3):302–314.
crossref
19. World Health Organization. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. WHO Technical Report. Geneva: World Health Organization;1994. Report No.: 843.
20. Kee BS. A preliminary study for the standardization of geriatric depression scale short-form-Korea version. Journal of the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association. 1996; 35(2):298–307.
21. Yang DW. Production and computerization of dementia screening tool for Korean. Research Report. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare;2002.
22. Cranney A, Horsley T, O’Donnell S, Weiler H, Puil L, Ooi D. . Effectiveness and safety of vitamin D in relation to bone health. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment. 2007; 158:1–235.
23. Park MH, Ha JC, Shin IH, Kim HG, Lee SY, Cho JH. . 2008; survey for the elderly-national living profiles and welfare service needs of older persons in Korea’s survey. Research Report. Seoul: Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Family Affairs and Keimyung University;2009; Report No.: 11-1351000-000316-12.
24. Yirmiya R, Bab I. Major depression is a risk factor for low bone mineral density: A meta-analysis. Biological Psychiatry. 2009; 66(5):423–432.
crossref
25. Mun JH, Og JS, Park U. The effect of 12 week exercise program on muscle fitness, flexibility and balance in the fall down female elderly. Exercise Science. 2004; 13(1):77–86.
26. Kim SM. A study of self exercise program for the health of aged. Sport Science in Donga University. 2006; 24(1):31–45.
27. Min YK. Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Korean Journal of Bone Metabolism. 2008; 15(2):99–108.
28. Shin HA, Om AS. The correlation between dietary intakes of calcium and vitamin D and osteoporosis, hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Korean Journal of Dairy Science Technology. 2009; 27(2):17–23.
29. Hitz MF, Jensen JE, Eskildsen PC. Bone mineral density and bone markers in patients with a recent low-energy fracture: Effect of 1y of treatment with calcium and vitaminD. American journal of clinical nutrition. 2007; 86(1):251–259.

Table 1.
Homogeneity of General Characteristics before Intervention
Characteristics Categories Cont.
Milk G.
Calcium G.
x2 or F p
n (%) or M±SD n (%) or M±SD n (%) or M±SD
Gender Male 15 (22.1) 13 (20.6) 14 (21.9) 0.05 .977
Female 53 (77.9) 50 (79.4) 50 (78.1)
Age (year) 74.09±5.39 73.71±4.28 75.52±5.76 2.15 .120
Academic ability No 30 (44.1) 33 (52.4) 30 (46.9) 5.82 .667
Elementary school 21 (30.9) 14 (22.2) 16 (25.0)
≥Middle school 17 (25.0) 16 (25.4) 18 (28.1)
Depression 6.63±3.47 6.51±3.84 7.19±3.79 0.61 .543
BMI (kg/m2) 24.01±3.27 24.85±3.63 23.71±3.09 1.97 .142
Frailty (range: 0~31) 10.44±3.06 10.40±2.94 10.34±3.24 0.09 .915
BMD (T score) −2.79±0.85 −2.78±0.65 −2.93±0.70 0.82 .441
Bone density 1.25 .870
Normal ≥-1.5 6 (8.8) 4 (6.3) 3 (4.7)
Osteopenia −2.5≤T<-1.5 19 (28.0) 16 (25.4) 16 (25.0)
Osteoporosis <-2.5 43 (63.2) 43 (68.3) 45 (70.3)
Total cholesterol 196.66±41.20 197.97±35.74 194.84±39.83 0.10 .903
HDL 47.32±10.60 46.95±9.42 48.73±10.54 0.54 .582
TG 156.34±103.44 4 154.97±74.32 134.84±74.46 1.28 .281
LDL 118.07±40.26 120.02±33.28 119.14±33.82 0.05 .953
Total 68 (100.0) 63 (100.0) 64 (100.0)

Cont.=control group; Milk G.=milk group; Calcium G.=calcium group; BMI=body mass index; BMD=bone mineral density; HDL=high density lipoprotein; TG=tiglyceride; LDL=low density lipoprotein.

Table 2.
Differences before and after Intervention (N=195)
Variables Cont. (n=68)
Milk G. (n=63)
Calcium G. (n=64)
F p
n (%) or M±SD n (%) or M±SD n (%) or M±SD
Frailty −1.31±2.67 −2.44±1.95 −2.20±2.97 3.59 .029
BMD 0.25±0.36 0.49±0.46 0.54±0.52 7.69 .001
Total cholesterol 1.44±30.09 9.52±29.58 −1.05±23.02 2.51 .084
HDL 2.46±7.11 4.13±6.85 1.91±6.54 1.82 .166
TG −11.00±66.13 3.17±80.41 0.11±62.01 0.76 .471
LDL 1.19±29.51 4.76±25.15 −2.98±20.93 1.46 .235
Depression −1.21±3.23 −1.14±2.80 −1.14±3.64 0.07 .933

Cont.=control group; Milk G.=milk group; Calcium G.=calcium group; BMD=bone mineral density; HDL=high density lipoprotein; TG=triglyceride; LDL=low density lipoprotein.

Table 3.
Frailty and BMD after Intervention
Variables Group (I) Group (J) Mean (I-J) SD p
Frailty Cont. Calcium G 0.894 .45 .138
Milk G. 1.135 .45 .043
Milk G. Calcium G −0.241 .46 .869
Cont. −1.135 .45 .043
Calcium G Milk G. 0.241 .46 .869
Cont. −0.894 .45 .138
BMD Cont. Calcium G −0.286 .08 .002
Milk G. −0.235 .08 .012
Milk G. Calcium G −0.050 .08 .820
Cont. 0.235 .08 .012
Calcium G Milk G. 0.050 .08 .820
Cont. 0.286 .08 .002

BMD=bone mineral density; Cont.=control group; Milk G.=milk group; Calcium G.=calcium group.

Table 4.
Differences of BMD before and after Intervention
Before Groups BMD
x2 p
Normal Osteopenia Osteoporosis Total
Normal Cont. 6 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 6 (100.0) 2.45 .296
Milk G. 3 (75.0) 1 (25.0) 4 (100.0)
Cont. 3 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 3 (100.0)
Total 12 (92.3) 1 (7.7) 13 (100.0)
Osteopenia Cont. 3 (15.8) 12 (63.2) 4 (21.0) 19 (100.0) 6.17 .187
Milk G. 8 (50.0) 7 (43.8) 1 (6.3) 16 (100.0)
Calcium G 5 (31.3) 10 (62.5) 1 (6.2) 16 (100.0)
Total 16 (31.4) 29 (56.9) 6 (11.8) 51 (100.0)
Osteoporosis Cont. 0 (0.0) 7 (16.3) 36 (83.7) 43 (100.0) 6.09 .192
Milk G. 0 (0.0) 15 (34.9) 28 (65.1) 43 (100.0)
Calcium G 1 (2.2) 10 (22.2) 34 (75.6) 45 (100.0)
Total 1 (0.8) 32 (24.4) 98 (74.8) 131 (100.0)

BMD=bone mineral density; Cont.=control group; Milk G.=milk group; Calcium G.=calcium group.

TOOLS
Similar articles