Journal List > J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs > v.27(2) > 1058412

Cha: The Relationships between Academic Stress and Adjustment at University Life in Korean University Students

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper was to identify the correlations among academic stress and adjustment at university life in university students.

Methods

A total of 489 subjects aged 17 and 36 were selected through convenient sampling. Data were collected with a self reported questionnaire from September 2 to November 30, 2015. Collected data were analyzed with SPSS/WIN.

Results

There were statistical differences between academic stress and adjustment at university life. Academic stress were significantly different according to gender, grade, economic status, health status major department of study, drinking and smoking. Adjustment at university life were significantly different according to gender, economic status, health status. 25.4% of variance in adjustment at university life were explained by academic stress, major department of study, health status.

Conclusion

The finding of this study may be useful in understanding the academic stress expression of university students and developing more specific programs on adjustment at university life.

References

1. Cha NH, Lee J. Kei-Jo imperial university and the upward mobility of traditional “middle class” during the Japanese colonial period in Korea. Discourse 21. 2010; 13(4):5–36.
2. National Statistical Office. 2013 The percentage of school attendance and entrance rate [Internet]. Seoul: Statistics Korea;2013. [cited 2013 October 10]. Available from:. http://www.index.go.kr/potal/main/EachDtlPageDetail.do?idx_cd=1520.
3. Kim HJ. 40% of nation, there are not compulsory a college-pre-paratory course. Yonhap News. 2010 November 1; Sect. 05.
4. National Statistical Office. Citizen living standard and an attitude survey in Ulsan metropolitan city - 2013 investigation guide [Internet]. Seoul: Statistics Korea;2013. [cited 2014 January 16]. Available from:. http://www.kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId=207&tblId=DT_20704_033_2013&vw_cd=&list_id=&scrId=&seqNo=&lang_mode=ko&obj_var_id=&itm_id=&conn_path=K1&path.
5. Korea Education Development Institute. 2014 education basic statistical survey [Internet]. Seoul: Korea Education Development Institute;2015. [cited 2014 August 29]. Available from:. https://www.kedi.re.kr/khome/main/announce/selectAnnounceForm.do?currentPage=1&editor_use_yn=Y&selectTP= 0&article_sq_no=24832&board_sq_no=3.
6. Yoon SK, Han YK, Im SH, Kim WY. A study on the factors that affect college and major selection. The Journal of Korean Education. 2015; 42(2):87–107.
7. Kim SJ, Moon HK. Status and consciousness of freshman year 2004. The Journal of Creativity Development Research. 2005; 8:1–48.
8. Hanis AA, Szujakowski M. A cognitive stress-reduction intervention program for adolescents. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 1990; 37(1):79–84.
crossref
9. Lee GY, Choi TW, Lee YS. Stress effects on employment of college students college life. Korean Review of Management Consulting. 2015; 6(2):197–209.
crossref
10. Misra R, McKean M, West S, Russo T. Academic stress of college students: Comparison of student and faculty perceptions. College Student Journal. 2000; 34(2):236–245.
11. Akgun S, Ciarrochi J. Learned resourcefulness moderates the relationship between academic stress and academic performance. Educational Psychology: An international Journal of Experi-menta; Educational Psychology. 2003; 23(3):287–294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0144341032000060129.
crossref
12. Kang CW. The relationship between study stress, academic attitude, school adjustment by teakwondo major college students [dissertation]. [Seoul]: Kyunghee University;2014. p. 83 p.
13. Kwon HJ. An analysis of the relationship between student adaptation to college and scholastic achievement with the university environment climate perception [master’s thesis]. [Seoul]: Yonsei University;2007. p. 114 p.
14. Compas BE, Davis GE, Forsythe CJ, Wagner BM. Assessment of major and daily stressful events during adolescence: The adolescent perceived events scale. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1987; 55(4):534–541. http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-006X.55.4.534.
crossref
15. Oh MH, Cheon SM. Analysis of academic stressors and symptoms of juveniles and effects of meditation training on academic stress reduction. Understanding People. 1994; 15(1):63–96.
16. Lee YG. The difference between undergraduates’ academic stress on dysfunctional attitudes and academic emotions [master’s thesis]. [Seoul]: Sookmyung Women’s University;2014. p. 98 p.
17. Kim AY. Development of standardized student motivation scales. Journal of Educational Evaluation. 2002; 15(1):157–184.
18. Sung MJ, Chang KJ. Correlations among life stress, sleep, an-thropoimetric measurement and nutrition intakes of college students. Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition. 2007; 36(7):840–848.
19. Seo M, Choi BY, Jo HI. The effect of life stress, stress coping, and social support on mental health. The Korean Journal of Counseling. 2006; 7(2):271–288.
20. Cha NH. The relationships between stress and health locus of control in nursing college students. Journal of East-West Nursing Research. 2013; 19(2):177–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.14370/jewnr.2013.19.2.177.
crossref
21. Im MA. The effect of life stress on the aggressiveness of university students [master’s thesis]. [Seoul]: Myoungji University;2007. p. 65 p.
22. Jang YG, Park K, Choi SY. Mental health of modern man. Seoul: Hakjisa;2006. p. 392 p.
23. Lee EH. Life stress and depressive symptoms among college students: Testing for moderating effects of coping style with structural equations. The Korean Journal of Health Psychology. 2004; 9(1):25–48.
24. National Statistical Office. 2016 economic activity census [Internet]. Seoul: Statistics Korea;2016. [cited 2016 May11]. Available from. http://www.kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/3/index.board? bmode=read&aSeq=353780.
25. Byun IS. Health locus of control for college students specializing in dancing and research on health promoting lifestyle. Journal of Korean Physical Education Association for Girls and Women. 2003; 17(1):127–137.
26. Kim R, Park IS. The relationship between health locus of control and health promoting behaviors in the nursing students. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education. 2006; 12(2):162–169.
27. Arnold LE. Childhood stress. Chichester, WS: John Wiley & Sons, INC.;1990. p. 543 p.

Table 1.
General Characteristics of Subject (N=489)
Characteristics Variables n (%) or M±SD
Age (year) (Range: 17~36) 20.21±0.16
Gender Male 195 (39.8)
Female 294 (60.2)
Grade 1~2 grade 437 (89.3)
3~4 grade 52 (10.7)
Economic status High 74 (15.2)
Middle 354 (72.3)
Lower 61 (12.5)
Health status Good 263 (53.7)
Average 204 (41.8)
Bad 22 (4.5)
Religion Catholic 48 (9.7)
Buddhism 81 (16.6)
Protestantism 55 (11.3)
None 305 (62.4)
Major department of study Nursing course 203 (41.3)
Humanities, 139 (28.5)
social course
Natural course 94 (19.3)
Engineering course 53 (10.9)
Parent's working together Yes 341 (69.8)
No 148 (30.2)
Drinking Yes 247 (50.5)
No 242 (49.5)
Smoking Yes 62 (12.7)
No 427 (87.3)
Table 2.
Scores of Academic Stress and Adjustment at University Life
Variables Range (score) Mean (score) SD
Academic stress 42~210 (1~5) 112.81 (2.70) 21.78
Adjustment at university life 27~135 (1~5) 90.40 (3.18) 10.45
Table 3.
Differences in Academic Stress and Adjustment at University Life to General Characteristics of the Subjects (N=489)
Characteristics Subcategories Academic stress
Adjustment at university life
M±SD t or F (p) M±SD t or F (p)
Gender Male 107.44±24.19 −4.42 (<.001) 92.43±12.23 3.31 (<.001)
Female 116.40±19.27 88.99±8.99
Grade 1~2 grade 113.91±21.47 2.85 (.005) 90.10±10.37 −1.43 (.155)
3~4 grade 104.75±22.91 92.31±11.52
Economic status High 102.01±23.92 11.15 (<.001) 93.44±11.83b 3.36 (.036)
Middle 113.88±21.28 89.96±10.14a
Lower 118.96±18.83 89.45±11.12
Health status Good 108.59±1.52ab 10.75 (<.001) 92.09±10.85b 7.82 (<.001)
Average 117.35±18.14a 88.52±9.73a
Bad 121.00±16.44b 86.75±10.49
Religion Catholic 113.11±22.70 1.37 (.242) 91.32±10.59 1.48 (.207)
Buddhism 112.00±21.41 91.31±9.80
Protestantism 110.73±18.69 92.80±11.74
None 113.71±22.13 89.51±10.48
Major department ofstudy Nursing course 119.54±19.21ab 6.89 (<.001) 91.15±8.74 1.85 (.077)
Humanities, social course 112.24±22.75b 88.85±11.74
Natural course 112.24±22.76b 89.89±10.51
Natural course 112.24±22.76b 89.89 10.51
Engineering course 106.72±15.83a 87.80±10.71
Rank betweenbrothers First born 113.63±22.91 1.29 (.273) 90.35±9.70 1.15 (.335)
Middle born 109.95±23.37 89.97±11.59
Last born 112.62±19.94 90.58±11.12
Single 116.64±17.48 89.52±10.17
Parent's workingtogether Yes 112.01±21.70 −1.11 (.267) 91.00±10.69 1.61 (.109)
No 114.51±21.58 89.25±10.10
Drinking Yes 110.83±21.76 −2.07 (.039) 90.58±10.43 0.54 (.587)
No 115.03±21.65 90.05±10.59
Smoking Yes 106.70±24.89 −2.40 (.017) 92.61±13.17 1.49 (.142)
No 113.85±21.14 89.99±10.01

Scheffé test.

Table 4.
Correlation among Academic Stress and Adjustment at University Life
Variables Academic stress Adjustment at university life
Academic stress 1
Adjustment at university life −.47 (<.001) 1
Table 5.
Factors Influencing the Adjustment at University Life of Subjects
Variables B SE β t p
(Constant) 123.42 4.32 28.59 <.001
Academic stress −0.23 0.02 −.48 −10.74 <.001
Grade 1.14 1.44 .03 0.79 .429
Health status −1.83 0.80 −.10 −2.29 .022
Economic status −0.44 0.92 −.02 −0.48 .631
Major department of study −0.98 0.22 −.20 −4.47 <.001
Drinking 0.76 0.90 .04 0.85 .396
Smoking −1.32 1.33 −.43 −0.99 .322
Adj. R=.25, F=22.01, p<.001
TOOLS
Similar articles