Trend Analysis of Experimental Research Papers on Community Health Nursing: Based on Researches Published in the Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing, 1989~2012

Chunmi Kim; Seung Joo Lim

doi:10.12799/jkachn.2014.25.2.146

Journal List > J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs > v.25(2) > 1058345

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Kim and Lim: Trend Analysis of Experimental Research Papers on Community Health Nursing: Based on Researches Published in the Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing, 1989~2012

Original Article

Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing 2014; 25(2): 146-157.

Published online: 30 June 2014

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2014.25.2.146

Trend Analysis of Experimental Research Papers on Community Health Nursing: Based on Researches Published in the Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing, 1989~2012

Chunmi Kim¹, Seung Joo Lim²

¹Department of Nursing, Sunmoon University, Asan, Korea.

²Department of Nursing, Hoseo University, Research Institute for Basic Science, Asan, Korea.

Corresponding author: Lim, Seung Joo. Department of Nursing, Hoseo University, 79 Hoseo-ro, Baebang-eup, Asan 336-795, Korea. Tel: +82-41-540-9534, Fax: +82-41-540-9558, sjlim@hoseo.edu

Received 5 April 2014 Revised 19 June 2014 Accepted 24 June 2014

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this study is to analyze systematically the trends of experimental researches in the area of community health nursing.

Methods

This is a study based on literature review, which analyzed 137 experimental research papers in the Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing, from the first issue in 1989 to those in 2012.

Results

1) The proportion of experimental researches in the total published papers was 14.9%. 2) The mainly used research method was quasi-experiment, which was 60.6% of them, and there was no RCT. 3) Convenient sampling was used in 95.6% of the researches. 4) Only 5.1% were reviewed for keeping the ethical standards for the study objects by the IRB. 5 When classified by the Omaha Classification System, psycho-social researches were most frequent, which were followed by physiological, health-related behavioral, and environmental ones in order of frequency.

Conclusion

This study found that the proportion of experimental research papers was increasing in the 2000s and ethical standards were required more rigorously. However, it was suggested that the research design be more elaborated and sampling methods be manifested to reduce research bias and errors.

Keywords: Intervention study, Community health nursing, Experimental design, Trends

Figures and Tables

Table 1

General Characteristics of Experimental Research (N=137)

^†Other discipline for multidisciplinary study.

Table 2

Research Characteristics according to Publication Year (N=137)

IRB=institutional review board; TC=telephone counseling.

^†Overlap count.

Table 3

Research Methods & Outcome Variables Frequency according to Intervention Method (N=137)

A=community health center; B=school; C=industry; D=welfare center; E=medical institution; F=home; G=others; D1=one group pretest-posttest design; D2=one group time series design; D3=nonequivalent control group pretest-posttest design; D4=nonequivalent control group time series design; HRB=health related behavioral domain; PH=physiological domain; PS=psycho-social domain; EV=environmental domain; SP=Single program; CP=Complex program; EDU=education; EXE=exercise; HBRP=health behaviors related program; PSRP=psycho-social related program; AT=alternative therapy; CM=case management; CH=case management+hope intervention; CT=complex exercise program+telephone counseling; PT=physical activity promotion program+telephone coaching; AH=aroma therapy+hand massage.

Table 4

The Significance of Outcome Variables according to Intervention Method

HRB=health related behavioral domain; PH=physiological domain; PS=psycho-social domain; EV=environmental domain; BC=body composition; BL=blood lipid; VS=vital sign; PF/HP=physical function/health problem; P=psychological variables; S=social variables; SP=Single program; CP=Complex program; EDU=education; EXE=exercise; HBRP=health behaviors related program; PSRP=psycho-social related program; AT=alternative therapy; CM=case management; CH=case management+hope intervention; CT=complex exercise program+telephone counseling; PT=physical activity promotion program+telephone coaching; AH=aroma therapy+hand massage.

^†Significant research/total research.

References

1. Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing. The history of 40 years of Korean academy of community health nursing [Internet]. Yangsan: Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing;2011. cited 2014 May 31. Available from: http://www.kchn.or.kr/new/community/community02_2.php.

2. Lee EO, Yim NY, Park HA, Lee IS, Kim JI, Bae JY, et al. Nursing research and statistical analysis. Seoul: Soomoonsa Publishing Company;2009. p. 773.

3. Shin HS, Hyun MS, Ku MO, Cho MO, Kim SY, Jeong JS, et al. Analysis of research papers published in the journal of the Korean academy of nursing-focused on research trends. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2010; 40(1):139–149.

4. Park MH. Understanding and application of evidence based nursing. Seoul: Koonja Publishing Company;2006. p. 261.

5. Suh MJ, Jeong JS, Oh HS. Analysis on content and trend of nursing intervention studies published in adult nursing area. J Korean Biol Nurs Sci. 2003; 5(2):41–51.

6. Ryu HS, Song NH, So AY, Kim EJ, Im MY, Suk MH. . Community health nursing I. Seoul: Soomoonsa Publishing Company;2011. p. 706.

7. Kim SJ, Kim KB, Yi MS, Lee KJ, Ahn YH, Kim HS, et al. The trends of nursing in research in the journals of seven branches of the Korean academy of nursing. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2002; 32(1):114–130.

8. Lee IS, Kim YN, Choi KW, Chin YR. A trend of research in community health nursing. J Korean Community Nurs. 2001; 12(1):288–298.

9. Kim CM, Park MS, Kim SH. Analysis of trends in non-pharmacological studies for elders with dementia in Korea. J Korean Gerontol Nurs. 2012; 14(2):129–141.

10. Lee MH, Chung MS, Lim JY, Lee SJ. Analysis of nursing intervention studies on major korean nursing Journals. J Korean Acad Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2006; 15(4):420–433.

11. Choi MA, Hong KJ, Han KJ, Park YS, Park SA, Hah YS, et al. Trends of doctoral dissertations of one college of nursing in korea. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ. 2009; 15(1):32–43.

12. Kim HS. Identifying alternative linkages among philosophy, theory, and method in nursing science. J Adv Nurs. 1993; 18(5):793–800.

13. Bang KS, Kang HJ, Kim MY, Min SJ, Lee SJ, Lee HE, et al. The analysis of research trend on pediatric nursing intervention studies in Korea, 2000-2011. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ. 2008; 19(1):24–32.

14. Suh MJ, Jeong JS, Oh HS. Analysis on content and trend of nursing intervention studies published in adult nursing area. J Korean Biol Nurs Sci. 2003; 5(2):41–51.

15. Suh YO, Park JS, Yang JH, Kim HW, Suk MH, Shin HS, et al. Analysis of research papers published in the journal of Korean academy of nursing. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2007; 37(6):1013–1019.

TOOLS

Similar articles