Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship among family functioning, empathy and aggression by high school students.
Methods
This was a descriptive study. The survey participants were 467 high school students from M city. Data were collected from November 29 to December 7, 2012 and self-report questionnaires including a Family Adaptability Cohesion Evaluation Scale, Interpersonal Reactivity Indexes, and an Aggression Questionnaire. The collected data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, independent-samples t-test, ANOVA, stepwise multiple regression.
Results
The majority of the subjects were 2nd graders (42.0%) and female (57.2%). 59.7% of the subjects had religion, 84.8% were living together with parents. The mean ages of their fathers and mothers were 49.90±0.20 and 46.85±0.19 respectively. Aggression was found to have a statistically negative correlation with family functioning and empathy. Stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed that the most powerful predictor of aggression was empathic concern. Empathic concern, family cohesiveness, perspective taking, personal distress and gender accounted for 16.7% of the variances.
References
2. Chae YG. The influence of family functioning, marital conflicts, and spirituality well-being on aggression in adolescence. Fam Cult. 2005; 17(2):189–209.
3. Chung MS. The effects of empathy training group art therapy on adolescents with histories of school violence: Focusing on the variables of emotional empathy and aggression. Stud Korean Youth. 2010; 21(4):51–77.
4. Coie JD, Lochman JE, Terry R, Hyman C. Predicting early adolescent disorder from childhood aggression and peer rejection. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1992; 60(5):783–792.
5. Crick NR, Ostrov JM, Burr JE, Cullerton-Sen C, Jansen-Yeh E, Ralston P. A longitudinal study of relational and physical aggression in preschool. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2006; 27(3):254–268.
6. Davis MH. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. J Suppl Abstr Serv Cat Sel Doc Psychol. 1980; 10(3):85–104.
7. De Wied M, Gispen-de Wied C, Van Boxtel A. Empathy dysfunction in children and adolescents with disruptive behavior disorders. Eur J Pharmacol. 2010; 626(1):97–103.
8. Feshbach ND, Feshbach S. Empathy training and the regulation of aggression: Potentialities and limitations. Acad Psychol Bull. 1982; 4(3):399–413.
9. Jo HI, Lee MH. The mediating effect of prosocial behavior in the relation between empathic ability and psychological well-being. Korean J Youth Stud. 2010; 17(11):140–159.
10. Jung DH. A buffering effects of social support on children's school stress and maladjustments. Seoul: Korea University;1996. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
11. Kim DW. A study on the types of leisure among senior high schoolers. J Leis Recreation Stud. 2008; 32(3):41–57.
12. Kim KA. Predictors of adolescent aggression's fluctuation: Three years longitudinal study. Seoul: Sookmyung Women's University;2008. Unpublished master's thesis.
13. Kim HS, Kim HS. Aggression in Korean adolescents: Relevant variables and path diagram. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2004; 43(1):75–85.
14. Kim YH. The interrelationship between the juvenile delinquency and the couple relationship, parent-adolescent communication, and family functioning. Seoul: Sookmyung Women's University;1990. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
15. Koestner R, Franz C, Weinberger J. The family origins of empathic concern: A 26-year longitudinal study. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990; 58(4):709–717.
16. Lee OS, Lee DG. The effects of an enneagram group counseling using morning unsupervised learning hours on empathy, interpersonal relationships, and self-identity in male high school students. J Hum Underst Couns. 2011; 32(1):15–30.
17. Ministry of Gender Equality & Family. The white paper of youth in 2012. Seoul: Author;2012. 12.
18. Min SG, Go KB, Kim KH, Kim BH, Kim I, Kim JJ, et al. Modern psychiatry. 3rd ed. Seoul: Iljogak;1998.
19. Nurco DN, Lerner M. A complementary perspective to primary socialization theory. Subst Use Misuse. 1999; 34(7):993–1003.
20. Oetting ER, Deffenbacher JL, Donnermeyer JF. Primary socialization theory. The role played by personal traits in the etiology of drug use and deviance. II. Subst Use Misuse. 1998; 33(6):1337–1366.
21. Olson DH, Portner J, Lavee Y. Family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scale III. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press;1985.
22. Olson SL, Bates JE, Sandy JM, Lanthier RJ. Early developmental precursors of externalizing behavior in middle childhood and adolescence. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2000; 28(2):119–133.
23. Park JE, Lee EH. Adolescents' insecure attachments and problem behaviors: The moderating role of empathic ability. Korean J Couns Psychother. 2008; 20(2):369–389.
24. Shin HS, Kwak YM, Kim SM. Multiple mediated effects of depression and dysfunctional impulsivity in the relation between perceived parental control and adolescent. Korean J Sch Psychol. 2012; 9(2):347–366.
25. Sim HO. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study on bullying/victimization and oven/relational aggression. J Korean Living Sci Assoc. 2007; 16(6):1107–1118.
26. Song DH, Lee HS, Kim L, Kim CH, Kim JW, Min SK. A cross-cultural study on psychosocial risk factors of adolescent depression between Koreans and Korean-Russians. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 1999; 38(5):944–955.
27. Yun EK, Shin SH. Comparison of the factors influencing young adolescents' aggression according to family structure. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2013; 43(3):321–330.
28. Shin KH. The effect of person-oriented interaction and position-oriented interaction between parent and child on children's empathy, aggression R self-concept. Korean J Educ Psychol. 2004; 18(2):143–159.
29. Statistics Korea. 2012 employment survey by provinces. 2012. Retrieves December 17, 2013. from http://www.kostat.go.kr.