Application of the ASE Model to the Assertive Behavior of Non-smoking College Students Under Secondhand Smoke Exposure

Jina Choo; Eun Kyung Kim

doi:10.12799/jkachn.2011.22.1.1

Journal List > J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs > v.22(1) > 1058205

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Choo and Kim: Application of the ASE Model to the Assertive Behavior of Non-smoking College Students Under Secondhand Smoke Exposure

Original Article

Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing 2011; 22(1): 1-10.

Published online: 4 April 2014

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2011.22.1.1

Application of the ASE Model to the Assertive Behavior of Non-smoking College Students Under Secondhand Smoke Exposure

Jina Choo¹, Eun Kyung Kim²

¹Assistant Professor, College of Nursing, Korea University, Korea.

²Assistant Professor, Department of Nursing, Suwon Science College, Korea.

Address reprint requests to: Choo, Jina, College of Nursing, Korea University, Anam-dong, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul 136-701, Korea. Tel: 82-2-3290-4925, Fax: 82-2-927-4676, jinachoo@korea.ac.kr

Received 15 January 2011 Revised 11 March 2011 Accepted 14 March 2011

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

The present study was to apply the Attitudes-Social influence-Efficacy (ASE) model in order to identify factors associated with the assertive behavior of non-smoking college students when they are exposed to secondhand smokes in Korea.

Methods

Data were collected from non-smoking college students (N=1,656, 76.6% female) at two universities in Seoul and Gyeonggi-do. The main outcome measure was the assertive behavior. ASE factors such as attitudes toward being assertive, social influences, and self-efficacy as well as socio-demographic, health- related, and smoking-related factors were self-administrated.

Results

The mean of the assertive behavior (range 1~5 points) was 2.23; 37.6% was not at all assertive, while 4.3% was always assertive. Higher assertiveness was significantly correlated with a higher level of positive attitude, social influence and self-efficacy (p<.05 for all). Stepwise multiple regression analyses showed that the social influence was the strongest factor associated with the assertive behavior (β=0.430, p<.001, R²=.246), followed by self-efficacy, motive to assertiveness, having any family member who had diseases, and male gender. These factors explained the assertive behavior by 39.7%.

Conclusion

The ASE model may explain the assertive behavior of non-smoking college students under secondhand smoke exposure. Social influence and self-efficacy were significant factors associated with their assertive behavior.

Keywords: Secondhand smoke, Assertiveness, Attitude, Social behavior, Self-efficacy

Figures and Tables

Table 1

Sociodemographic, Health- and Smoking-related Factors and Assertive Behavior Levels (N=1,656)

SHS=secondhand smoking, M=mean; SD=standard deviation.

^†N=358.

Table 2

Levels of the Assertive Behavior and ASE-related Factors (N=1,656)

ASE=attitude, social influence, and efficacy; M=mean; SD=standard deviation.

Table 3

Correlations between the Assertive Behavior and ASE-related Factors (N=1,656)

ASE=attitude, social influence, and efficacy.

Table 4

Factors Associated with the Assertive Behavior (N=1,656)

SE=standard error.

^†Dummy variable: motive to assertiveness yes=1, no=0; ^‡Dummy variable: family member's disease yes=1, no=0; ^§Dummy variable: male=1, female=0

Notes

This work was supported by a Korea University Grant (K0823601).

References

1. Aspropoulos E, Lazuras L, Rodafinos A, Eiser JR. Can you please put it out? Predicting non-smokers' assertiveness intentions at work. Tob Control. 2010; 19:148–152.

2. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall;1986.

3. Choi S, Oh H. Korean women's clothing behaviors observed by the Korean who has lived in the U.S.A. J Korean Home Econ Assoc. 2001; 39(1):11–27.

4. Choo J, Kim E. Levels of secondhand smoking and their correlates for college students in Korea. In : Paper presented at the meeting of Korean Society for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention; Seoul, Korea.

5. Chon MY, Kim MH, Cho CM. Predictors of health promoting lifestyles in Korean undergraduate students. J Korean Soc Health Educ Promot. 2002; 19(2):1–13.

6. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley;1975.

7. Glymour MM, Defries TB, Kawachi I, Avendano M. Spousal smoking and incidence of first stroke the health and retirement study. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 35(3):245–248.

8. Gottlieb NH, Eriksen MP, Lovato CY, Weinstein RP, Green LW. Impact of a restrictive worksite smoking policy on smoking behavior, attitudes and norms. J Occup Med. 1990; 32:16–23.

9. Helgason AR, Lund KE. Environmental tobacco smoke exposure of young children-attitudes and healthrisk awareness in the Nordic countries. Nicotine Tob Res. 2001; 3(4):341–345.

10. Hughes SC, Corcos IA, Hofstetter CR, Hovell MF, Seo DC, Irvin VL, et al. Secondhand smoke exposure among nonsmoking adults in Seoul, Korea. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2008; 9:247–252.

11. Humble C, Croft J, Gerber A, Casper M, Hames CG, Tyroler HA. Passive smoking and 20-year cardiovascular disease mortality among nonsmoking wives. Am J Public Health. 1990; 80(5):599–601.

12. Im HS. The Korean social changes and value. Seoul: Nanam;1996.

13. Lee AH. A pilot intervention for pregnant women in Sichuan, China on passive smoking. Patient Educ Couns. 2008; 71(3):396–401.

14. Lin PL, Huang HL, Lu KY, Chen T, Lin WT, Lee CH, et al. Secondhand smoke exposure and the factors associated with avoidance behavior among the mothers of pre-school children: A school-based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2010; 10:606.

15. Lund KE, Helgason AR. Environmental tobacco smoke in Norwegian homes, 1995 and 2001: Changes in children's exposure and parents attitudes and health risk awareness. Eur J Public Health. 2005; 15(2):123–127.

16. Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs. 2009 Yearbook of Health, Welfare and Family Statistics. 2009. Retrieved July, 2010. from http://stat.mw.go.kr/stat/data/cm_data_view.Jsp?menu_code=MN02010000&cont_seq=13118&page=1&search_key=&search_word=.

17. Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs. 2008 Statistics for people's health. 2008. Retrieved October, 2009. from http://stat.mw.go.kr/stat/data/cm_data_view.jsp?menu_code=MN01010402&cont_seq=14713.

18. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol. 1992; 47(9):1102–1114.

19. Sim HS, Lee KS, Hong HS, Meng KH. The awareness and countermeasures against harmful effect of passive smoking in Korean adults. Korean J Prev Med. 2000; 33(1):91–98.

20. Yoon HS, Cho YC. A study on preventive attitudes and health behavior of life-style related disease in college students. J Korean Soc Health Educ Promot. 2005; 22(4):245–256.

21. Willemsen MC, DeVries H. Saying "no" to environmental tobacco smoke: Determinants of assertiveness among nonsmoking employees. Prev Med. 1996; 25(5):575–582.

TOOLS

Similar articles