Journal List > J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs > v.21(4) > 1058193

Kim: The Process of Nurses' Experience in Public Health Program Performance

Abstract

Purpose

This study was to describe and develop public health nursing.

Methods

Data were collected from 19 nurses sampled from 5 public health centers. The grounded theory of Strauss and Corbin (1990) was applied.

Results

As a result, 48 concepts, 23 subcategories, and 11 categories were deduced from open coding. In axial coding, casual conditions 'facing difficulties of practical administration' and 'attaching importance to health support for residents' and context condition 'assessing of residents' service needs' impacted phenomenon 'searching for efficient performing methods.' Intervening conditions 'forming of support system' and 'working with positive,' and action-interaction conditions 'improving of resident's health and medical accessibility' and 'striving for self-development' lead to consequences 'carried out promptly for field-based problem solving,' 'mastered of successful program planning methods' and 'solving the issues with existing style.' The periods of process were divided into 4 stages, confirming program-contents, probing program-method, developing program-strategies, and applying program-competencies. The core category, 'strengthening of practical-planning work competencies' incorporated the relationship between and among all categories and explained the process.

Conclusion

This study described public health nurses' performance in Korea. These findings have important implications for the practice and must be considered to develop competencies for planning and practice of public health.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1
The Process of 'strengthening of practical·planning competencies'.
jkachn-21-468-g001
Table 1
Categorization by Grounded Theory
jkachn-21-468-i001

Notes

This article is based on a part of the first doctoral dissertation from Ewha Womans University.

References

1. American Nurses Association. Public health nursing: Scope and standards of practice. Silver Spring, Maryland: American Nurses Association;2007.
2. Bae SS, Ham SG. Activation of health promotion program of public health centers. Korean Public Health Res. 2007; 33(1):1–13.
3. Chang LC, Liu CH, Yen EH. Effects of an empowerment-based education program for public health nurses in Taiwan. J Clin Nurs. 2008; 17(20):2782–2790.
crossref
4. Choi YH. A survey on awareness of health education in the manpower of public health center. J Korean Community Nurs. 2004; 15(4):528–538.
5. Cutcliffe JR. Adapt or adopt: Developing and transgressing the methodological boundaries of grounded theory. J Adv Nurs. 2005; 51(4):421–428.
crossref
6. Hall-Long B. Nursing and public policy: A tool for excellence in education, practice, and research. Nurs Outlook. 2009; 57(2):78–83.
crossref
7. Irvine F. Exploring district nursing competencies in health promotion: The use of the Delphi technique. J Clin Nurs. 2005; 14(8):965–975.
crossref
8. Kim JS. Improvement of health accessibility for vulnerable people. Public Health Nurs. 2006; 13(6):39–65.
9. Kim HY. A positive study on satisfaction in public medical service according to types of community people. Korean Gov Rev. 2007; 14(2):325–347.
10. Kim JS. A study on health promotion experience of elderly women in community health center. Qual Res. 2008; 9(1):71–85.
11. King MG, Erickson GP. Development of public health nursing competencies: An oral history. Public Health Nurs. 2006; 23(2):196–201.
crossref
12. Kim SL, Yu SJ, Choi SE, Lee SH. A comparative study on the commitment of home health care nurse and public health nurses. J Korean Community Nurs. 2001; 12(1):39–48.
13. Korea Health Industry Development Institute. The development of performance evaluation system in community health centers. Seoul: Moonyoungsa;2007.
14. Lee SJ. Development of an application and expansion plan of manpower for effective activities of public health organization. Seoul: Korean Health Industry Development Institute;2007.
15. MacDonald MB, Schoenfeld BM. Expanding roles for public health nursing. Can Nurse. 2003; 99(7):18–22.
16. Markham T, Carney M. Public health nurses and the delivery of quality nursing care in the community. J Clin Nurs. 2008; 17(10):1342–1350.
crossref
17. Morse JM. Ethnography and issues in mixed qualitative research method design. Seoul: Korea Center for Qualitative Methodology;2005.
18. National Institute of the Korean Language. Standard dictionary of the Korean language. 2009. Retrieved December, 26, 2009. from http://www.korean.go.kr.
19. Park ES, Ryu HS. A study on developing strategies for expanding the roles of public health nurses. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2001; 31(4):712–721.
crossref
20. Racher FE. The evolution of ethics for community practice. J Community Health Nurs. 2007; 24(1):65–76.
crossref
21. Ryu H, Myoung J, Hwang N. An estimation on the need and supply for visiting nursing services for health center in Seoul. J Korean Community Nurs. 2003; 14(4):1–11.
22. Simonsen-Rehn N, Øvretveit J, Laamanen R, Suominen S, Sundell J, Brommels M. Determinants of health promotion action: comparative analysis of local voluntary associations in four municipalities in Finland. Health Promot Int. 2006; 21(4):274–283.
crossref
23. Speziale HJS, Carpenter DR. Qualitative research in nursing. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2007.
24. Strauss AL, Corbin JM. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory, procedures, and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications;1990.
25. Sung KW. A comparative study on main role, professional self concept and job satisfaction of public health nurses and clinical nurses. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2002; 32(2):219–230.
crossref
26. World Health Organization. The Ottawa charter for health promotion. Geneva: World Health Organization;1986.
27. Zurmehly J. A Qualitative case study review of role transition in community nursing. Nurs Forum. 2007; 42(4):162–170.
crossref
TOOLS
Similar articles