Bone Mineral Density, Body Mass Index, Stress, and Health Promotion Lifestyle of Female College Students

Chunmi Kim; Eun Man Kim

doi:10.12799/jkachn.2010.21.3.333

Journal List > J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs > v.21(3) > 1058179

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Kim and Kim: Bone Mineral Density, Body Mass Index, Stress, and Health Promotion Lifestyle of Female College Students

Original Article

Journal of Korean Academy of Community Health Nursing 2010; 21(3): 333-340.

Published online: 4 April 2014

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12799/jkachn.2010.21.3.333

Bone Mineral Density, Body Mass Index, Stress, and Health Promotion Lifestyle of Female College Students

Chunmi Kim, Eun Man Kim

Associate Professor, Department of Nursing, Sunmoon University, Korea.

Address reprint requests to: Kim, Eun Man, Department of Nursing, Sunmoon University, 100 Kalsan-ri, Tangjeong-myeon, Asan 336-708 Tel: 82-41-530-2756, Fax: 82-41-530-2767, emkim@sunmoon.ac.kr

Received 15 July 2010 Revised 9 September 2010 Accepted 16 September 2010

(open-access):

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine the bone mineral density (BMD), body mass index (BMI), stress, and health promotion lifestyle of female college students and to assess relations among them.

Methods

A total of 220 female college students were assessed through anthropometric measurements and bone mineral density test using quantitative ultrasound. In addition, the subjects were asked about stress and health promotion lifestyle with a self-rating questionnaire. Collected data were processed with the SPSS/WIN 12.0 program.

Results

1) Of the students, 67.8% had weight control experience. The percentage of the osteoporosis, osteopenia and normal groups were 2.8%, 53.5% and 43.8%, respectively, and the percentage of the underweight, normal and overweight groups according to BMI were 27.9%, 57.2% and 14.9%, respectively. 2) The levels of stress and health promotion lifestyle were 2.9 and 2.3, respectively. 3) There was a positive correlation between BMD and BMI (r=.196, p<.01). There was a negative correlation between stress and health promotion lifestyle (r=-.35, p<.01). 4) Weight control experience made negative effects on BMD and BMI.

Conclusion

The findings of this study suggest the necessity of new health promotion programs to increase bone density of female college students. Stress management programs are also needed.

Keywords: Bone mineral density, Body mass index, Health promotion, Lifestyle, Stress

Figures and Tables

Table 1

General Characteristics and Weight Control Experience of Objects

Table 2

Level of Bone Mineral Density and Body Mass Index of Objects

Table 3

Level of Stress and Health Promotion Lifestyle of Objects

Table 4

Bone Mineral Density, Body Mass Index, Stress and Health Promotion Lifestyle by Weight Control Experience

Table 5

Correlation among Bone Mineral Density, Body Mass Index, Stress and Health Promotion Lifestyle

BMD=bone mineral density; BMI=body mass index; HPLP=health promoting lifestyle profile.

^*p<.01.

References

1. Brener ND, Eaton DK, Lowry R, McManus T. The association between weight perception and BMI among high school students. Obes Res. 2004; 12(11):1866–1874.

2. Chang EY, Kim JS, Shin SJ. Health promotion lifestyle according to self-perception of obesity and objective status measured by bioelectric impedance analysis in college women. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2009; 39(5):693–699.

3. Cho DS, Lee JY. Bone mineral density and factors affecting in female college students. Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2008; 14(4):297–305.

4. Choi SN, Song CH, Kim SR, Chung NY. Bone density and related factors of university student in Seoul area. Korean J Food Cult. 2006; 21(6):596–605.

5. Chon MY, Kim MH, Cho CM. Predictors of health promoting lifestyles in Korean undergraduate students. J Korean Soc Health Educ Promot. 2002; 19(2):1–13.

6. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983; 24:385–396.

7. Kang J, Kim YY, Kim M, Jung D. A study on body attitude, body mass index, and perceived stress among women's college students. J Korean Acad Public Health Nurs. 2009; 23(2):296–305.

8. Kim DY. Clinical application of bone mineral density measurement. Korean J Nucl Med. 2004; 38(4):275–281.

9. Kim H, Oh E, Hyong H, Cho E. A study on factors influencing health promotion lifestyle in college students. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs. 2008; 19(3):506–520.

10. Kim IS, Paik YC. Relating factors influencing health promoting behavior of college women. J Korean Soc Matern Child Health. 2002; 6(2):245–256.

11. Kim JH. An effect of guided image applied to hemodialysis patients. Seoul: Seoul National University;1995. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.

12. Kim MH, Kim JS. The relationship between body composition and bone density in college women. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2003; 33(3):312–320.

13. Kim MS, Koo JO. Comparative analysis of food habits and bone density risk factors between normal and risk women living in Seoul area. Korean J Community Nutr. 2008; 13(1):125–133.

14. Kim OS, Yoon HS. Factors associated with weight control behavior among high school females with normal body weight. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2000; 30(2):391–401.

15. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal and coping. New York: Springer Publishing Company;1984.

16. Lee MO. Factors related to bone-density among postmenopause women. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ. 2006; 12(2):214–223.

17. Lee PS. Correlational study among anger, perceived stress and mental health status in middle aged women. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2003; 33(6):856–864.

18. Mazess RB. Preventing osteoporosis. Br Med J. 1991; 303:921.

19. Moon T, Park S. A study on the relationships of demographic characteristics to stressor and stress coping behaviors among university students. J Sport Leis Stud. 2007; 30:913–925.

20. Pender NJ. Health promotion in nursing practice. 2nd ed. New York, Norwark: Conn, Appleton & Lange;1987.

21. Pender NJ. Health promotion in nursing practice. 3rd ed. Stanford: Appleton & Lange;1996.

22. Seo HM, Ha YS. A study of factors influencing on health promoting lifestyle in the elderly. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2004; 34(7):1288–1297.

23. Shin D, Chung N. Covert narcissism and fear of negative evaluation, body cathexis on binge drive for thinness. Korean J Health Psychol. 2007; 12(1):77–94.

24. Shin SJ, Shin KR, Kim EH. Health promoting lifestyle, stress and depression in college women. Nurs Sci. 2005; 17(1):40–47.

25. Sung M. Factors related to health promoting lifestyle in college women. J Korean Soc Sch Health. 2004; 17(2):97–105.

26. Sung M, Chang K. Correlations among life stress, dietary behaviors and food choice of college students. J East Asian Soc Diet Life. 2006; 16(6):655–662.

27. Ulla Diaz SM, Perez-Fortis A. Socio-demographic predictors of health behaviors in Mexican college students. Health Promot Int. 2010; 25(1):85–93.

28. Walker SN, Sechrist KR, Pender NJ. Health promoting lifestyle profile: Development and psychometric characteristics. Nurs Res. 1987; 36(2):76–81.

29. World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight. 2009. Retrieved February 20, 2009. from http://www.who.int/mediacenter/factsheets/fs311/en/index.html.

30. Yang SO. The diagnosis of osteoporosis. Paper presented at the meeting of the Korean Society of Bone Metabolism, The 4th summing-up in osteoporosis. Seoul. 2001.

TOOLS

Similar articles