Journal List > J Korean Acad Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs > v.26(1) > 1058106

Kim and Kim: Effects of the Self-transcendence Enhancement Program among Patients with Drug Addiction: A Mixed Method Research

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this mixed method study was to examine effects of the self-transcendence enhancement program among patients with drug addiction, and to explore their experiences through the program.

Methods

For the quantitative study, a non-equivalent control group quasi-experimental design was used. The sample was 49 hospitalized patients with drug addiction. The self-transcendence enhancement program was provided twice a week for 6 weeks. Quantitative data were analyzed using x2 test, t-test and ANCOVA. For the qualitative study, 12 patients in the experimental group participated in a focus group interview, and data were analyzed using the content analysis technique.

Results

After the intervention, there were significant improvements for the experimental group in self-transcendence and declines in depression compared to the control group. From the qualitative findings three themes were identified as the change process after the intervention: ‘looking back at myself’, ‘gaining confidence through small changes’, and ‘finding meaning in life’.

Conclusion

Results suggest that the self-transcendence enhancement program can be utilized as a nursing intervention program for patients with drug addiction.

REFERENCES

1. Supreme Public Prosecutors' Office. A white paper on drugs crime 2015 [Internet]. Seoul: Supreme Public Prosecutors' Office;2016. [cited 2005 Aug]. Available from. http://www.spo.go.kr/spo/major/drug/data/drugbbs04.jsp.
2. World Drug Report 2013-by United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. 2014; 33(2):1–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.12110.
3. Kim BS, Kim HB. The new paradigm to the addiction crime. Journal of Korean Association of Addiction Crime. 2011; 1(1):89–113.
4. Urbanoski K, Kenaszchuk C, Veldhuizen S, Rush B. The clustering of psychopathology among adults seeking treatment for alcohol and drug addiction. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2015; 49:21–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2014.07.004.
crossref
5. Watkins KE, Hunter SB, Hepner KA, Paddock SM, de la Cruz E, Zhou AJ, et al. An effectiveness trial of group cognitive behavioral therapy for patients with persistent depressive symptoms in substance abuse treatment. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2011; 68(6):577–584.
crossref
6. Sorensen T, Lien L, Landheim A, Danbolt LJ. Meaning-making, religiousness and spirituality in religiously founded substance misuse services-A qualitative study of staff and patients’ experiences. Religions. 2015; 6(1):92–106. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel6010092.
7. Heo G. Alcoholism and spiritual recovery of spiritual disease. Studies on Life and Culture. 2004; 6:1–10.
8. Joe YO. A study of healing relation addiction. Theology and Praxis. 2014; 38:409–440. https://doi.org/10.14387/jkspth.2014.38.409.
crossref
9. Park SG. The development and effectiveness of a self-love program for the treatment of drug abusers. The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2002; 21(4):693–703.
10. Kim HK, Lee MH. Effectiveness of forgiveness therapy on resilience, self-esteem, and spirituality of wives of alcoholics. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2014; 44(3):237–247. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2014.44.3.237.
crossref
11. Kang SJ, Kim SJ. Effects of forgiveness therapy program on self-esteem, anger, and forgiveness in people who abuse alcohol. Journal of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 2015; 24(4):300–309. https://doi.org/10.12934/jkpmhn.2015.24.4.300.
crossref
12. Orbon M, Mercado J, Balila J. Effects of forgiveness therapy on recovery among residents of drug rehabilitation centers. Pro-cedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015; 165:12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.599.
crossref
13. Bowen S, Witkiewitz K, Kclifasefi SL, Grow J, Chawla N, Hsu SH, et al. Relative efficacy of mindfulness-based relapse prevention, standard relapse prevention, and treatment as usual for substance use disorders: a randomized clinical trial. Journal of the American Medical Association Psychiatry. 2014; 71(5):547–556. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.4546.
14. Park SG. The 48 step Happiness Program in the drug addiction treatment. Ministry of Justice a Service Report. Gongju, Institute of Forensic Psychiatry Ministry of Justice. 2011. Report No. 11-1270241-000007-01.
15. Kim SS, Reed PG, Kang YM, Oh JN. Translation and psychometric testing of the korean versions of the spiritual perspective scale and the self-transcendence scale in korean elders. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2012; 42(7):974–983. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2012.42.7.974.
crossref
16. Kim MR. Moderating effect of spirituality in the relationship between self-focused attention and depression. Korean Journal of Religious Education. 2014; 44:21–44.
17. Cho JH, Son CN. Effects of the mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) program on depression, impulsivity, and drug abstinence self-efficacy of drug addicts. The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2013; 32(1):13–31. https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2013.32.1.002.
18. Lim YJ. Efficacy of positive psychotherapy on college students with major depressive disorder. Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2012; 31(3):679–692. https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2012.31.3.003.
19. Jang YH, Kwon MG. A research about spiritual program influence upon the anxiety and depression of women going through their menopause. Journal of Digital Convergence. 2014; 12(4):437–442. https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2014.12.4.437.
crossref
20. Otaka K, Shimai S, Tanaka-Matsumi J, Otsui K, Fredrickson BL. Happy people become happier through kindness: A counting kindness intervention. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2006; 7(3):361–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-005-3650-z.
21. Kwon KI, Yang JY. Trends in mixed methods research in counseling. CNU Journal of Educational Studies. 2014; 35(1):103–124. https://doi.org/10.18612/cnujes.2014.35.1.103.
22. Huh J. The Right sample size using IBM SPSS sample power. Seoul: Hannarau Academy;p. 90.
23. Jon BJ. Self-esteem: A test of its measurability. Yonsei Medical Journal. 1974; 11:109–129.
24. Cho MJ, Kim KH. Diagnostic validity of the CES-D (Korean version) in the assessment of DSM-III-R major depression. Journal of the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association. 1993; 32(3):381–399.
25. Mitrovic M, Hadzi-Pesic M, Stojanovic D, Milicevic N. Personality traits and global self-esteem of alcohol addicts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014; 127:255–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.251.
crossref
26. Park JH. A Review of forgiveness psychological theory and education program. The Korean Journal of Human Development. 2006; 13(1):117–134.
27. Baik HU, Han IY. The recovery experience of drug addicts in a community - the regeneration in the real world. Mental Health & Social Work. 2014; 42(3):151–177.
28. Park SS, Kim WJ. Effects of treatment program for drug abusers in prison. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 2010; 10(4):348–358. https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2010.10.4.348.
crossref

Figure 1.
Conceptual framework of this study.
jkapmhn-26-1f1.tif
Table 1.
Self-Transcendence Enhancement Program
Session Topic Stage Contents Homework
1 Orientation Meeting Introduction Introducing MC Explaining program and schedule Writing special things in life
    Content development Concept of self-transcendence and spirituality Structuring groups and forming relationship Sharing motivation for program Positive self-introduction  
    Completion Sharing, feedback  
2 Intrapersonally Self-forgiveness Introduction Content development Homework sharing Understanding true meaning of forgiveness Drawing life curve, group presentation Self-forgiveness Sharing thoughts about forgiving experiences Writing things to be tankful for
    Completion Sharing, feedback  
3 Transpersonally Forgiveness of others Introduction Content development Homework Sharing Understanding others anf writing forgiving letter Group presentation Writing recent things to be tankful for
    Completion Sharing, feedback  
4 Intrapersonally Seeking thanks Introduction Content development Homework sharing Searching for things to be thankful for Writing gratitude note to those who were not thanked Expressing things to be thankful for
    Completion Sharing, feedback  
5 Interpersonally Expression of thanks Introduction Content development Homework sharing Appreciating someone to be thankful to by presenting a little candle Writing feelings after being thankful
    Completion Sharing, feedback  
6 Interpersonally Practicing kindness Introduction Content development Homework sharing Sharing recent behaviors of kindness Planning kind behaviors Practicing kind behaviors planned
    Completion Sharing, feedback  
7 Intrapersonally Meaning of kindness Introduction Content development Homework Sharing Writing feelings after kind behaviors Sharing feedbacks on presenting feelings after kind behaviors Behave kindly Making a list of self compliment
    Completion Sharing, feedback  
8 Intrapersonally Recognizing strength Introduction Content development Homework Sharing Seeking representative strength Group presentation on strength and giving constructive feedbacks Seeking the way to apply representative strength Behaving on representative strength
    Completion Sharing, feedback  
9 Interpersonally Compliments Introduction Content development Homework Sharing Presenting activities applied with representative strength Giving feedbacks in each group on activities applied with personal strength Sharing feelings of compliment and learning how to compliment right Complimenting others
    Completion Sharing, feedback  
10 Temporally Positive thoughts Introduction Content development Homework sharing Sharing positive and negative thoughts on case Positive thoughts on worries Getting positive feedback Thinking about positive future
    Completion Sharing, feedback  
11 Transpersonally Temporally Optimism Introduction Content development Homework sharing Drawing the best of oneself to be able to reach in the future Presentation after discussion among participants Describing oneself in five years Practicing an activity for happiness
    Completion Sharing, feedback  
12 Termination Introduction Explaining about purpose of this class  
    Content development Summarizing contents of program and activity Giving feedbacks on progression and contents of program Filling in questionnaire  
Table 2.
Homogeneity of General Characteristics and Dependent Variables (N=49)
Characteristics Categories Total Exp. (n=24) Cont. (n=25) x2 or t p
n (%) or M±SD n (%) or M±SD n (%) or M±SD
Age (year)   43.16±8.34 44.20±8.39 42.16±8.34 0.85 .396
Marital state Single 29 (59.2) 12 (50.0) 17 (68.0) 1.79 .408
  Have a spouse 6 (12.2) 4 (16.7) 2 (8.0)    
  Divorce/separation 14 (28.6) 8 (33.3) 6 (24.0)    
Religion Having 39 (79.6) 19 (79.2) 20 (80.0) 0.00 .942
  Not having 10 (20.4) 5 (20.8) 5 (20.0)    
Education Elementary school 12 (24.5) 8 (33.3) 4 (16.0) 2.09 .351
  Middle school 22 (44.9) 10 (41.7) 12 (48.0)    
  ≥High school 15 (30.6) 6 (25.0) 9 (36.0)    
Hospitalization on Having 44 (89.8) 21 (87.5) 23 (92.0) 0.27 .667
  Not having 5 (10.2) 3 (12.5) 2 (8.0)    
Initial doping age   21.87±8.08 22.00±9.19 21.76±7.03 0.10 .919
Hospitalization times (rate)   5.32±3.79 4.95±3.35 5.68±4.21 −0.66 .511
Self-transcendence   42.04±4.50 42.04±4.20 42.04±4.84 0.00 .999
Self-esteem   29.39±4.71 28.04±4.97 30.68±4.14 −2.02 .049
Depression   16.63±11.59 17.20±10.11 16.08±13.03 0.33 .737

Exp.=Experimental group; Cont.=Control group.

Table 3.
Differences in Dependent Variables between Experimental and Control Groups (N=49)
Variables Groups Pretest Posttest t or F p
M±SD Posttest M±SD
Self-transcendence Exp. (n=24) 42.04±4.21 45.04±4.87 3.33 .002
  Cont. (n=25) 42.04±4.84 41.64±4.73    
Self-esteem Exp. (n=24) 28.04±4.97 29.88±4.73 1.41 .241
  Cont. (n=25) 30.68±4.14 30.48±6.09    
Depression Exp. (n=24) 17.21±10.11 13.75±9.80 −2.96 .005
  Cont. (n=25) 16.08±13.03 17.48±12.88    

Exp=Experimental group; Cont=Control group.

ANCOVA with pretest value as covariate.

Table 4.
Sub-categories, Categories, and Themes
Themes Categories Sub-Categories
Looking back at myself Facing myself in the dark past Exploring lives distorted by drugs Exploring myself who have been weak to depend on drugs
  Looking at myself through others Exploring the lives of others who have depended on drugs Reflecting my life onto the lives of others
Gaining confidence through small changes Positive expression Taking one step forward for a little change Getting encouraged by being satisfied with a little change
Experience in positive relationships Experiencing changed relationships with my changes Growing confidence that leads to reconciliations of relationships by positive changes
Finding meanings in life Determination of cutting off drugs Searching for the meaning of cutting off drugs for my family and myself Searching for the way to be independent from drugs
Living together Searching for the value of my existence on the way of helping others in trouble Dreaming of hopeful future by becoming the one who doesn't disappoint the family
TOOLS
Similar articles