Journal List > J Korean Acad Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs > v.25(3) > 1058081

Jung and Lee: Effects of Ego-resilience Interventions among Children and Adolescents in Korea: A Meta-analysis

Abstract

Purpose

This study was a meta-analysis planned to exam effects of ego-resilience interventions among children and adolescents in Korea.

Methods

Search for relevant articles included several electronic databases and hand-search from article references. Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria from 1,638 studies. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (version 3) and Review Manager (version 5) were used to analyze effect sizes, investigate possible causes of heterogeneity and check publication bias with a funnel plot and its trim-and-fill analysis.

Results

Overall effect size of ego-resilience interventions were medium (Hedges'g=0.66) and medium heterogeneity (I2=54%). Subgroup analysis was performed to estimate causes of heterogeneity. The effect size for normal populations (g=0.70) was larger than for risk populations (g=0.64). Interventions for primary school students (g=0.74) were more effective than interventions for adolescents (g=0.51). Interventions in the community (g=0.72) shown larger effect size than intervention at school (g=0.51). Art therapy (g=0.79) had a better effect than cognitive behavior therapy (g=0.62). Interventions with over 1,000 minutes (g=1.10) and intervention with over 11 sessions (g=1.40) were effective. This study found no significant publication bias.

Conclusion

Based on current findings, there is obvious evidence that ego-resilience interventions have significant effects in improving ego-resilience among children and adolescents in Korea.

Figures and Tables

Figure 1

Flow of studies included from database search.

jkapmhn-25-237-g001
Figure 2

Forest plots of the effects of ego-resilience interventions.

jkapmhn-25-237-g002
Figure 3

Funnel plot of effect sizes by standard error.

jkapmhn-25-237-g003
Table 1

Characteristics of Enrolled Study

jkapmhn-25-237-i001

RCT=Randomized controled trial; NRCT=Non-randomized controled trial; CBT=Cognitive behavior therapy; AT=Art therapy; ERS=Ego-Resilience Scale (ERS, Block & Kremen, 1996); RSA=Resilience Scale for Adolescent (RSA, Joo & Lee, 2011); RQT=Resilience Quotient Test (RQT, Reivich & Shatte, 2002); WestED=Healthy Kids Resilience Assessment (WestED, 1999); IR=Interpersonal relationship; EV=Energy or vitality; EC=Emotional control; Cu=Curiosity; Op=Optimism; SE=Self-efficacy; PBS=Problem solving skill; StC=Study competence; RNF=Regulating negative emotion; SR=Supportive relationship; Co=Control; Sp=Spontaneity; SC=Social competence; ASS=Autonomy and sence of self; SMP=Sense of meaning and purpose.

Table 2

Results for Subgroups Analysis

jkapmhn-25-237-i002

k=Number of studies; CI=Confidence interval; Qb=Q-value between subgroups.

Notes

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The authors declared no conflict of interest.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Studies Included in Meta-analysis

T=Thesis; J=Published journal article.
jkapmhn-25-237-a001

Appendix 2

Quality Assessment of Studies Included in Meta-analysis (SIGN)

Y=Yes; N=No; N/R=Not-reported; NA=Not applicable; ++=All or most of the criteria have been fulfilled; where they have not been fulfilled the conclusions of the study or review are thought very unlikely to be altered; +=Some of the criteria have been fulfilled; those criteria that have not been fulfilled or not adequately described are thought unlikely to alter the conclusions.
jkapmhn-25-237-a002

References

1. Cho BH. Development of daily hassles scale and daily hassles coping behaviors scale for elementary school children. J Child Educ. 2006; 15(3):5–21.
2. Statistics Korea. 2015 Youth Statistics [Internet]. 2015. 04. cited 2016 Jun 28. Available from: http://www.kostat.go.kr/portal/korea/kor_nw/2/1/index.board?bmode=read&aSeq=335384.
3. Tugade MM, Fredrickson BL. Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004; 86(2):320–333. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.320.
4. Block J, Kremen AM. IQ and ego-resiliency: conceptual and empirical connections and separateness. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996; 70(2):349–361. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.349.
5. Beutel ME, Glaesmer H, Decker O, Fischbeck S, Braähler E. Life satisfaction, distress, and resiliency across the life span of women. Menopause. 2009; 16(6):1132–1138. DOI: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181a857f8.
6. Burns RA, Anstey KJ. The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): testing the invariance of a uni-dimensional resilience measure that is independent of positive and negative affect. Pers Individ Dif. 2010; 48(5):527–531. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.11.026.
7. Lee YS. Theoretical consideration about a resilience concept. Korean J Play Ther. 2013; 16(4):259–284.
8. Bae J, Park HJ, Yang MK. Effects of a Self-discovery Program for Ego resilience, Self-esteem, Stress and Depression in Elementary School Students. J Korean Acad Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2012; 21(3):210–219.
9. Park WJ, Kim MY. Effects of literary therapy intervention on ego resilience and maladaptive behavior in children of broken homes. J Korean Acad Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2011; 20(2):143–156. DOI: 10.12934/jkpmhn.2011.20.2.143.
10. Yoe JY. The effect of music therapy activities on resilience of internet addicted adolescents. Korean J Music Ther. 2012; 14(1):21–40.
11. Hwang SD. Publication baias in meta-analysis: its meaning and analysis. Korean J Human Development. 2016; 23(1):1–19. DOI: 10.15284/kjhd.2016.23.1.1.
12. Leppin AL, Bora PR, Tiburt JC, Gionfriddo MR, ZeballosPalacios C, Dulohery MM, et al. The efficacy of resiliency training programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. PLoS One. 2014; 9(10):1–15. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111420.
13. Zenner C, Herrnleben-Kurz S, Walach H. Mindfulness-based interventions in schools-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Psychol. 2014; 5(603):1–20. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00603.
14. Hu T, Zhang D, Wang J. A meta-analysis of the trait resilience and mental health. Pers Individ Dif. 2015; 76:18–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.039.
15. Connor KM, Davidson JR. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety. 2003; 18(2):76–82. DOI: 10.1002/da.10113.
16. Harvey J, Delfabbro PH. Psychological resilience in disadvantaged youth: a critical overview. Australian Psychologist. 2004; 39(1):3–13. DOI: 10.1080/00050060410001660281.
17. Dray J, Bowman J, Wolfenden L, Campbell E, Freund M, Hodder R, et al. Systematic review of universal resilience interventions targeting child and adolescent mental health in the school setting: review protocol. Syst Rev. 2015; 4:186–194. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-015-0172-6.
18. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. SIGN 50: a guideline developer's handbook [Internet]. 2012. 05. cited 2016 Mar 29. Available from: http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/50/index.html.
19. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986; 7(3):177–188.
20. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 1992; 1(3):98–101. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783.
21. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003; 327(7414):557–560. DOI: 10.1136/327.7414.557.
22. Duval S, Tweedie R. A nonparametric "trim and fill" method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. J Am Stat Assoc. 2000; 95(449):89–98. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2000.10473905.
23. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997; 315(7109):629–634.
24. Windle G, Bennett KM, Noyes J. A methodological review of resilience measurement scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011; 9(8):1–18. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-8.
25. Kim KK, Im SI, Park IS. Meta-analysis of self-esteem improvement program. J Educational Research. 2015; 13(1):21–42.
TOOLS
Similar articles