Validation of a Path Model to Prevent Sexual Risk Behavior in Adolescents

Hyun Sook Park; Sun Young Jung

doi:10.12934/jkpmhn.2011.20.1.49

Journal List > J Korean Acad Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs > v.20(1) > 1057927

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Park and Jung: Validation of a Path Model to Prevent Sexual Risk Behavior in Adolescents

Original Article

Journal of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 2011; 20(1): 49-60.

Published online: 31 March 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12934/jkpmhn.2011.20.1.49

Validation of a Path Model to Prevent Sexual Risk Behavior in Adolescents

Hyun Sook Park¹, Sun Young Jung²

¹Professor, College of Nursing, Catholic University of Daegu, Korea.

²Doctoral Student, College of Nursing, Catholic University of Daegu, Korea.

Address reprint requests to: Jung, Sun Young, College of Nursing, Catholic University of Daegu, 3056-6 Daemyeong 4-dong, Nam-gu, Daegu 705-718, Korea. Tel: 82-10-8952-1646, Fax: 82-53-650-4392, jungsy@cu.ac.kr

Received 13 January 2011 Revised 14 March 2011 Accepted 18 March 2011

(open-access):

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

In this study the fitness of a path model on sexual risk behavior in adolescents was examined including the relationship of the following sensation seeking, parent-adolescent communication, exposure to pornography, friends' attitudes to sex, attitudes to sexual behavior, sexual permissiveness, perceived behavioral control, and sexual behavioral intention.

Methods

The participants were 354 adolescents. Data were analyzed using the SPSS and AMOS programs.

Results

Parent-adolescent communication, exposure to pornography, friends' attitudes to sex, and sexual behavioral intention showed a direct effect on sexual risk behavior in adolescents, while sensation seeking, exposure to pornography, friends' attitudes to sex, attitudes to sexual behavior, sexual permissiveness, and perceived behavioral control showed an indirect effect on sexual risk behavior in adolescents. The modified path model of adolescent's sexual risk behavior had a good fit with the data.

Conclusion

Based on the outcomes of this study, it is necessary to design intervention programs that emphasize increasing parent-adolescent communication, perceived behavioral control, and sexual behavioral intention and reducing exposure to pornography, friends' attitudes to sex, attitudes to sexual behavior, and sexual permissiveness in order to decrease adolescent's sexual risk behavior.

Keywords: Adolescent, Risk, Sexual behavior

Figures and Tables

Figure 1

Hypothetical model with parameter estimates.

Figure 2

Modified model with parameter estimates.

Table 1

Descriptive Statistics for Variables (N=354)

Table 2

Pearson Coefficient Correlations for Measured Variables (N=354)

X1=sensation seeking; X2=parent-adolescent communication; X3=exposure to pornography; X4=friends' attitudes to sex; Y1=attitudes to sex behavior; Y2=sexual permissiveness; Y3=perceived behavioral control; Y4=sexual behavioral intention; Y5=sexual risk behavior.

Table 3

Parameter Estimates for Modified Structural Model and Standardized Direct, Indirect, and Total Effects (N=354)

SP=standardized parameter; CR=critical ratio; SMP=squared multiple correlation.

Notes

This study was supported by research funds from Catholic University of Daegu, 2010.

References

1. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Human Decis Process. 1991; 50(2):179–211.

2. Arnett J. Sensation seeking: A new conceptualization and a new scale. Personal Individ Differ. 1994; 16(2):289–296.

3. Bae BR. Structural equation modeling with AMOS 7: Principles and practice. Seoul: Choungaram Books;2007.

4. Bae KE, Kang YH. Sexual attitudes, sexual behaviors, and self-esteem of male high school students in Busan. Korean Parent Child Health J. 2007; 10(1):36–47.

5. Chen AC, Thompson EA, Morrison-Beedy D. Multi-system influences on adolescent risky sexual behavior. Res Nurs Health. 2010; 33:512–527.

6. Jackson DL. Revisiting sample size and number of parameter estimates: Some support for the N:q hypothesis. Struc Equ Modeling. 2003; 10:128–141.

7. Jeong MJ, Park HS, Lee JS, Park CA. Premarital sexual attitudes and behavior among the youth. J Korean Home Econ Assoc. 1995; 33(6):11–23.

8. Jo JY, Kim YH. A path model of self, family, & extrafamilial system factors associated with adolescents' sexual risk behaviors. J Korean Home Econ Assoc. 2006; 44(3):181–195.

9. Kann L, Kinchen SA, Williams BI, Ross JG, Lowry R, Hill C, et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance: United States, 1997. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 1998; 47:1–89.

10. Kang J. The effect of perceived parenting behavior, self-control, and delinquency on sexual risk behavior in male high school students. Jeonju: Chonbuk National University;2007. Unpublished master's thesis.

11. Kim JS, Kim KH. A study about the factors affecting the sexual permissiveness for male students of middle schools. Korean J Youth Stud. 2005; 12(4):169–194.

12. Koo HY, Kim SS. Relationships among cybersex addiction, gender egalitarianism, sexual attitude, and the allowance of sexual violence in adolescents. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2007; 37:1202–1211.

13. Korean Women's Development Institute. A study about unmarried mothers. Seoul: Author;1984.

14. Kotchick BA, Shaffer A, Forehand R, Miller KS. Adolescent's sexual risk behavior: A multi-system perspective. Clin Psychol Rev. 2001; 21:493–519.

15. Kwon HJ, Kim KH, Choi MH, Kim HY. A study on the variables forecasting female adolescents' sexual intercourse. J Korean Acad Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2006; 15:170–178.

16. Lee HJ. Relationship among environmental factors, personal factors, exposure to obscenity, and sexual delinquency of adolescents. Busan: Busan National University;1997. Unpublished master's thesis.

17. Lee SH, Chon MY. Undergraduate students' sexual behavior and influencing factors: An analysis based on the theory of planned behavior. J Korean Acad Adult Nurs. 2006; 18:553–563.

18. Lee YM. The sexual knowledge, attitude, and behavior experience of the middle school students. Busan: Kosin University;2000. Unpublished master's thesis.

19. Min HY. A study on the relationship between Juvenile delinquency and Juvenile delinquent's perception of parent-adolescent communication, family cohesion, and adaptability. Seoul: Seoul National University;1991. Unpublished master's thesis.

20. Min SH. A study on the decisive factors of high school students sexual behavior. Masan: Kyungnam National University;2005. Unpublished master's thesis.

21. Moon SB. Basic concepts and applications of structural equation modeling with AMOS 17.0. Seoul: Hakjisa;2009.

22. Nam YO, Lee SJ. Relationship among adolescents' cyber-sex addiction, exposure to cyber obscenities, and cyber sexual activities. Korean J Youth Stud. 2002; 9(3):185–212.

23. Oh MK, Park SY. The effects of sensation seeking and socialization on risk behaviors in adolescent girls and boys. Korean J Child Stud. 1998; 19:211–227.

24. Olson DH, MacCubbin HI, Barnes HL, Larsen A, Muxen M, Wilson M. Family inventories. Minnesota, MN: University of Minnesota Press;1982.

25. Reiss IL. The scale of premarital sexual permissiveness. J Marriage Fam. 1964; 26:188–198.

26. Ryu EJ, Seo JS, Ham MY, Park YR, Moon SW, Nam BW. Sex-role identity in adolescents and its relation to anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation. J Korean Acad Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2006; 15:136–143.

27. Yoon MS, Lee JK. The relationships between parent attachment and adolescent's sexual behaviors. Ment Health Soc Work. 2008; 30:272–300.

28. Yoon HM, Nam YO. Factors associated with adolescents' risk-taking behaviors: The medicating pathway of psycho-emotional factors. J Korean Soc Child Welf. 2007; 23:127–153.

TOOLS

Similar articles