Journal List > Korean J Schizophr Res > v.18(1) > 1057811

Oh, Hong, Shin, Yoon, Sun, Kim, Kim, and Kim: Characteristics of Self-Other Boundary Recognition Using Morphed Face Pictures in Patients with Schizophrenia

Abstract

Objectives

Disturbance in self-experience has been considered to be a core feature of schizophrenia. Evidence from mirror face-recognition tasks supports the connection between self-face recognition and self-awareness which is a part of self-experience. The aim of this study was to investigate the self-other boundary recognition using morphed face pictures in patients with schizophrenia.

Methods

Twenty-one patients with schizophrenia and twenty-three healthy controls completed the self-face recognition task that consisted of various morphed pictures. Participant's own picture was morphed with each of three different, unknown, gender-matched facial identities in steps of 10%; each pair producing 11 images with graded blending of facial features. Thirty-three images in total were randomly presented as stimuli in a run, which was repeated three times. Participants were instructed to choose whether the stimulus was self-face or not.

Results

Self-face proportion was significantly lower in the schizophrenia group at both recognition start point I and II (33.33% vs. 53.04%, p<0.001; 61.43% vs. 70.87%, p=0.01, respectively). Using the mean value of each recognition start point in the control group, we calculated the difference in self-face proportion for each individual with schizophrenia. There was a significant correlation between the degree of this difference and total Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) score at recognition start point I (r=0.507, p=0.019).

Conclusion

The difference in self-other boundary recognition in this study may account for self-disturbance of schizophrenia. Its correlation with SANS total score may reflect the shared nature of persistent disturbance between the disturbance in self-experience and the negative symptom.

REFERENCES

1). Bleuler E. Dementia Praecox, or the Group of Schizophrenias (Translated by J. Zinkin) International Universities Press. New York (original work published in 1911);1950.
2). Parnas J, Sass LA. Self, solipsism, and schizophrenic delusions. Philos Psychiatr Psychol. 2001; 8:101–120.
crossref
3). Schneider K. Clinical psychopathology.(Trans. by MW Hamilton). 1959.
4). Sass LA, Parnas J. Schizophrenia, consciousness, and the self. Schizophr Bull. 2003; 29:427–444.
crossref
5). Frith CD, Done DJ. Towards a neuropsychology of schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry. 1988; 153:437–443.
crossref
6). McGuire PK, Silbersweig DA, Wright I, Murray RM, David AS, Frac-kowiak RS, et al. Abnormal monitoring of inner speech: a physiological basis for auditory hallucinations. Lancet. 1995; 346:596–600.
crossref
7). Allen PP, Johns LC, Fu CHY, Broome MR, Vythelingum GN, McGuire PK. Misattribution of external speech in patients with hallucinations and delusions. Schizophr Res. 2004; 69:277–287.
crossref
8). Waters F, Woodward T, Allen P, Aleman A, Sommer I. Self-recognition deficits in schizophrenia patients with auditory hallucinations: a metaanalysis of the literature. Schizophr Bull. 2012; 38:741–750.
crossref
9). Johns LC, Allen P, Valli I, Winton-Brown T, Broome M, Woolley J, et al. Impaired verbal self-monitoring in individuals at high risk of psychosis. Psychol Med. 2010; 40:1433–1442.
crossref
10). Daprati E, Franck N, Georgieff N, Proust J, Pacherie E, Dalery J, et al. Looking for the agent: an investigation into consciousness of action and self-consciousness in schizophrenic patients. Cognition. 1997; 65:71–86.
crossref
11). Thakkar KN, Nichols HS, McIntosh LG, Park S. Disturbances in body ownership in schizophrenia: evidence from the rubber hand illusion and case study of a spontaneous out-of-body experience. PLoS One. 2011; 6:e27089.
crossref
12). Kircher TT, Seiferth NY, Plewnia C, Baar S, Schwabe R. Self-face recognition in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2007; 94:264–272.
crossref
13). Lee J, Kwon JS, Shin YW, Lee KJ, Park S. Visual self-recognition in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2007; 94:215–220.
crossref
14). Heinisch C, Wiens S, Grundl M, Juckel G, Brune M. Self-face recognition in schizophrenia is related to insight. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2013; 263:655–662.
crossref
15). Zahavi D, Roepstorff A. Faces and ascriptions: mapping measures of the self. Conscious Cogn. 2011; 20:141–148.
crossref
16). Preyer WT. The Mind of the Child: The development of the intellect: Appleton. 1889.
17). Amsterdam B. Mirror self-image reactions before age two. Dev Psy-chobiol. 1972; 5:297–305.
crossref
18). Sugiura M, Sassa Y, Jeong H, Wakusawa K, Horie K, Sato S, et al. Self-face recognition in social context. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012; 33:1364–1374.
crossref
19). Lee J, Nam S, Lee M, Lee J, Lee S. Rosenberg self-esteem scale: analysis of item-level validity. The Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2009; 21:173–189.
20). Kim JH, Ahn CY. Effect of self-focused attention on anxiety. Kor J Psychol: Clin. 1991; 10:243–261.
21). Lee YJ, Seok JH, Jeon JH, An SK, Kim JJ, Lee HS. Development of Korean Version of Schizotypal Ambivalence Scale (K-SAS). J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2005; 44:58–64.
22). Yi JS, Ahn YM, Shin HK, An SK, Joo YH, Kim SH, et al. Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2001; 40:1090–1105.
23). Andreasen NC, Arndt S, Miller D, Flaum M, Nopoulos P. Correlational studies of the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms and the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms: an overview and update. Psychopathology. 1995; 28:7–17.
crossref
24). Kirkpatrick B, Fenton WS, Carpenter WT Jr, Marder SR. The NIMH-MATRICS consensus statement on negative symptoms. Schizophr Bull. 2006; 32:214–219.
crossref
25). Welham J, Stedman T, Clair A. Choosing negative symptom instruments: issues of representation and redundancy. Psychiatry Res. 1999; 87:47–56.
crossref
26). Park JY, Oh JM, Kim SY, Lee MK, Lee CR, Kim BR, et al. Korean Facial Expressions of Emotion. KOFEE. Section of Affect & Neuroscience, Institute of Behavioral Science in Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. 2011.
27). Kim Y, Sakamoto K, Sakamura Y, Kamo T, Kotorii N. Subjective experience and related symptoms in schizophrenia. Compr Psychiatry. 1997; 38:49–55.
crossref
28). Schultze-Lutter F. Subjective symptoms of schizophrenia in research and the clinic: the basic symptom concept. Schizophr Bull. 2009; 35:5–8.
crossref

Fig. 1.
Recognition Start Point. HC : Healthy control, SPR : Schizophrenia.
kjsr-18-21f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Scatter plot between Difference in Recognition Start Point I and SANS score in Schizophrenia group. r : Pearson's correlation efficient
kjsr-18-21f2.tif
Table 1.
Clinical characteristics of the subjects
Characteristic Healthy control (n=23) Schizophrenia (n=21) p-value
Gender (male : female) 11 : 12 12 : 9 0.537
Age (years) 40.13±9.61 40.95±9.88 0.781
Education (years) 14.87±2.93 12.10±2.23 0.001
Schizotypal Ambivalence Scale (SAS) 5.43±3.74 10.05±5.55 0.003
Rosenburg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) 30.30±4.55 25.86±6.86 0.014
Self-Consciousness Scale (SCS) 38.91±11.15 46.81±10.84 0.022
 Private self-consciousness subscale 19.35±5.01 20.86±4.69 0.309
 Public self-consciousness subscale 12.39±4.30 14.90±5.23 0.088
 Social anxiety subscale 7.17±4.20 11.05±5.58 0.012
PANSS - 85.71±27.81
 Positive scale - 20.81±8.12
 Negative scale - 23.33±6.56
 General psychopathology scale - 41.57±15.98
SANS - 53.19±23.48

: p<0.05. PANSS : Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale, SANS : Scales for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms

Table 2.
Reaction time and omission rate
Characteristic Healthy control (n=23) Schizophrenia (n=21) p-value
Total mean reaction time (ms) 1005.84±219.38 1639.12±1205.47 0.027
 At recognition start point I 1183.55±347.12 1598.26±823.28 0.042
 At recognition start point II 1253.94±466.73 2114.84±2348.88 0.113
Omission rate (%) 0.35±0.58 1.20±1.55 0.026

: p<0.05

TOOLS
Similar articles