Journal List > Korean J Schizophr Res > v.16(1) > 1057787

Oh, Chun, and Kim: Deficits in Abstract Thinking Assessed by Theme Identification in Patients with Schizophrenia

Abstract

Objectives

Patients with schizophrenia often have a concrete thinking or an impairment in abstract thinking, but there has been a limitation in quantitatively measuring this cognitive function. The aim of the current study was to investigate a deficit in abstract thinking in patients with schizophrenia using the theme identification task.

Methods

Twenty subjects with schizophrenia and 20 healthy volunteers participated in the behavioral study for theme identification. The visual stimuli were composed of a series of pictures, which contained positive or negative emotional situations. Three words, indicating a main theme of the picture, a theme-related item and a theme-unrelated item, respectively, were presented in the bottom of the pictures, and participants had to select a theme.

Results

The patient group selected theme words at significantly lower rate in both emotional conditions than the control group (positive, p=0.002; negative, p=0.001). Especially, in the negative condition, the patient group more selected theme-unrelated items than the control group (p=0.001). The rates of theme identification were inversely correlated with scores of the Social Anhedonia Scale (positive, r=-0.440, p=0.007; negative, r=-0.366, p=0.028).

Conclusion

Patients with schizophrenia exhibited an impairment in abstract thinking, and it was remarkable in the negative condition. The ability to think abstractly was associated with the severity of social anhedonia. The impairment of abstract thinking may become one of the reasons for poor social functioning in socially anhedonic patients.

REFERENCES

1). Sadock BJ, Sacock VA. Synopsis of Psychiatry; Tenth edition: 273.
2). Kim IJ, Shin MS. Assessment of concrete and abstract thinking of child-psychiatric children with the draw-a-person test and kedi-wisc similarity test. Kor J Child Adolescent Psychiatry. 1999; 10:186–194.
3). Kuperberg G, Heckers S. Schizophrenia and cognitive function. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2000; 10:205–210.
crossref
4). Sharma T, Antonova L. Cognitive function in schizophrenia Deficits, functional consequences, and future treatment. Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2003; 26:25–40.
5). Peuskens J, Demily C, Thibaut F. Treatment of cognitive dysfunction in schizophrenia. Clin Ther. 2005; 27:S25–S37.
crossref
6). Kim CK, Choe BM, Ha MY, Kim SH, Seo JM. Comparisons of Symptoms and Neurocogntive functions in Schizophrenic Patients Divided by Social Functioning. J Kor Neuropsychiatric Association. 2002; 41:1020–1029.
7). Lysaker PH, Bryson GJ, Davis LW, Bell MD. Relationship of impaired processing speed and flexibility of abstract thought to improvements in work performance over time in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2005; 75:211–218.
crossref
8). Schmittmann VD, Visser I, Raijmakers MEJ. Multiple learning modes in the development of performance on a rule-based category-learning task. Neuropsychologia. 2006; 44:2079–2091.
crossref
9). Harrow M, Adler D. Abstract and concrete thinking in schizophrenia during the prechronic phases. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1974; 31:27–33.
crossref
10). Flavell JH. Thinking and social behavior in schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 1956; 52:208–211.
11). Kaland N, Smith L, Mortensen EL. Brief Report: Cognitive Flexibility and Focused Attention in Children and Adolescents with Asperger Syndrome or High-Functioning Autism as Measured on the Computerized Version of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. J Autism Dev Disorder. 2008; 38:1161–1165.
crossref
12). Gorham. Use of the proverbs test for differentiating schizophrenics from normals. J Consult Psychol. 1956; 20:435–440.
13). Nahor, Vannicelli. The influence of instructional set on schizophrenic vs. organic concreteness. Confin Psychiatr. 1976; 19:89–95.
14). Kiang M, Light GA, Prugh J, Coulson S, Braff DL, Kutas M. Cognitive, neurophysiological, and functional correlates of proverb interpretation abnormalities in schizophrenia. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007; 13:653–663.
crossref
15). Christian GK, Travis HT, Warren BB, Collen MB. Facial emotion recognition in schizophrenia: intensity effects and error pattern. Am J Psychiatry. 2003; 160:1768–1774.
16). Manoabc QR, Brownabc GG. Emotion-cognition interactions in schizophrenia: Implicit and explicit effects of facial expression. Neuropsychologia. 2010; 48:997–1002.
crossref
17). Blanchard JJ, Mueser KT, Bellack AS. Anhedonia, Positive and Negative Affect, and Social Functioning in Schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1998; 24:413–424.
crossref
18). Chapman LJ, Chapman JP, Roulin ML. Scales for physical and social anhedonia. J Abnorm Psychol. 1976; 85:374–382.
crossref
19). Kay SR, Flazbein A, Opler LA. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1987; 13:261–276.
crossref
20). Albert, Wolfe, Lafleche. Differences in abstraction ability with age. Psychol Aging. 1990; 5:94–100.
21). Citron FMM, Weekes BS, Ferstl EC. Effects of valence and arousal on written word recognition: Time course and ERP correlates. Neurosci Lett. 2013; 15:90–95.
crossref
22). Quintana J, Lee J, Marcus M, Kee K, Wong T, Yerevanian A. Brain dysfunctions during facial discrimination in schizophrenia: Selective association to affect decoding. Psychiatry Res. 2011; 191:44–50.
crossref
23). Vercarmmen A, Morris R, Green MJ, Lenroot R, Kulkarni J, Carr VJ, et al. Reduced neural activity of the prefrontal cognitive control circuitry during response inhibition to negative words in people with schizophrenia. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2012; 37:379–388.
crossref
24). Kohler CG, Turner TH, Bilker WB, Brensinger CM, Siegel SJ, Kanes SJ, et al. Facial emotion recognition in schizophrenia: intensity effects and error pattern. Am J Psychiatry. 2003; 160:1768–1774.
crossref
25). van't Wout M, van Dijke A, Aleman A, Kessels RPC, Pijpers W, Kahn RS. Fearful faces in schizophrenia: the relationship between patient characteristics and facial affect recognition. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2007; 195:758–764.
26). Bruce N. Carpenter. Relationship of scales of schizophrenia proneness and premorbid adjustment to thinking deficits in schizophrenia. J Clin Psychol. 1983; 39:311–314.
27). Kwapil T. Social anhedonia as a predictor of the development of schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. J Abnorm Psychol. 1998; 107:558–565.
crossref
28). O'Reilly P, Harrison K. The Gorham Proverbs Test. Dis Nerv Syst. 1960; 21:382–385.
29). Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Manual. Psychological Corp. 1955.
30). Corrigan. Social cue perception and intelligence in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 1994; 13:73–79. S.

Fig. 1.
Examples of the theme identification task (Left) and the emotion recognition task (Right).
kjsr-16-25f1.tif
Fig. 2.
Selection rate of related versus unrelated words in the wrong trials on the theme identification task. ∗ : p<0.01. SPR : schizophrenia.
kjsr-16-25f2.tif
Table 1.
Clinical characteristics of the subjects
Characteristic Normal (N=20) Schizophrenia (N=20) p-value
Male/Female 9/11 10/10 0.752
Age (years) 32.6±8.1 31.7±7.50 0.733
Education (years) 15.8±1.6 13.2±2.40 <0.001
P-AS 12.6±5.9 19.4±9.40 0.019
S-AS 07.6±4.1 15.9±6.80 <0.001
Duration of illness (years) 6.3 ±5.70
PANSS_positive 18.7±7.40
PANSS_negative 17.8±6.00
PANSS_general 38.5±11.7
PANSS_total 74.9±23.5

: by chi-square for categorical variable and independent sample t-test for continuous variable. P-AS : Physical Anhedonia Scale, S-AS : Social Anhedonia Scale, PANSS : Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale

Table 2.
Behavioral responses in the theme identification task
Normal Schizophrenia p-value
Response rate (%) 092.2±19.60 88.3±20.30 0.543
Correct Response rate (%)
 Positive 077.1±9.200 58.2±22.90 0.001
 Negative 078.8±10.30 60.8±20.20 0.002
 Overall 078.0±8.200 59.5±19.60 0.001
Response time (msec)
 Positive 738.9±232.2 914.7±334.6 0.061
 Negative 840.6±380.9 1,076.0±470.7 0.090
 Overall 789.8±257.8 995.4±341.0 0.038

: by independent sample t-test, Values are mean±SD. Response time : Mean response time during the theme identification task

Table 3.
Behavioral responses in the emotion recognition task
Normal SPR p-value F
Positive picture 0.773 0.258
 Mean number of positive response 12.9±1.90 11.5±2.80
 Mean number of neutral response 1.7±1.5 2.2±2.4
 Mean number of negative response 0.9±0.9 1.2±1.5
Negative picture 0.499 0.702
 Mean number of positive response 0.8±1.1 1.2±1.2
 Mean number of neutral response 3.8±3.5 2.5±1.8
 Mean number of negative response 10.9±3.50 9.8±3.8
Positive_RT (msec) 638.2±224.1 934.4±323.4 0.002
Negative_RT (msec) 673.6±242.1 885.1±336.8 0.031

: by ANCOVA (covariate : education) for mean number of response and independent sample t-test for response time, Values are mean±SD. SPR : schizophrenia. Positive_RT : Mean response time during the emotion recognition task with positive picture, Negative_RT : Mean response time during the emotion recognition task with negative picture

TOOLS
Similar articles