Journal List > J Korean Acad Oral Health > v.41(2) > 1057725

Choi, Park, and Jung: The relationship between pit and fissure sealant (PFS) experience and the socio-economic factors of adolescents before and after coverage by National Health Insurance (NHI)

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to review the relationship between pit and fissure sealant (PFS) experience and the socio-economic factors of adolescents before and after coverage by National Health Insurance (NHI).

Methods

Our sources were the Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Surveys from 2008 and 2014. The variables used were PFS experience, demographic factors, socio-economic factors, and oral health-related behaviors.

Results

PFS experience was higher in 2014 than in 2008. The relationship between PFS experience and socio-economic factors was significant in both 2008 and 2014. Although the inequity of PFS experience among adolescents was reduced as PFS was included in NHI coverage, a disparity still exists.

Conclusions

Even after NHI coverage included PFS, the policies to reduce the inequity of PFS experiences among adolescents should be further devised. In addition, a longitudinal study is recommended to determine the relationship between PFS experience and various socio-economic or behavioral factors.

References

1. Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2000 Korean National Oral Health Survey. Seoul: Ministry of Health & Welfare;2001. p. 193.
2. Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2012 Korean National Oral Health Survey. Seoul: Ministry of Health & Welfare;2013. p. 309.
3. OECD. Health at a Glance 2009-OECD INDICATORS. Paris: OECD;2009. p. 35.
4. Han SY, Sung SH, Kim DK. A study on the analysis of caries preventive effectiveness on occlusal pit and fissure sealing. J Korean Acad Oral Health. 1995; 19:51–64.
5. Jung SH. chpater 10 Oral health policy and program on Korea:New Dental Public Health. 1th ed. Seoul: Kommonsa;2012. p. 191–238.
6. Korea ministry of government legislation. Legislation search, Concerning standard of medical care expenses on national Health Insurance [Internet]. [cited 2015 Feb 08]. Available from:. http://www.law.go.kr/.
7. Choi JS, Ma DS, Jung SH, Cho EP, Park DY. Changes in the amount of pit and fissure sealants supplied in Korea after inclusion in the National Health Insurance coverage. J Korean Acad Oral Health. 2015; 39:69–77.
crossref
8. Lee YH, Kwon HK, Kim BI. The dental caries experience of Korean in 2000 by tooth and surface type. J Korean Acad Oral Health. 2004; 28:315–323.
9. Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2010 oral health services manual. Seoul: Ministry of Health & Welfare;2010. p. 3–194.
10. Lee HS. A study of dental health behavior in Chollabuk-do Republic of Korea-a path analysis of the utilization of dental services. J Korean Acad Oral Health. 1993; 17:121–134.
11. Lee HS. Children’s dental visits in relation to their mothers’ socioeconomic factors and dental health behaviors. J Korean Acad Oral Health. 1997; 21:87–105.
12. Murakami K, Aida J, Ohkubo T, Hashimoto H. Income-related inequalities in preventive and curative dental care use among working-age Japanese adults in urban areas: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2014; 14:117–125.
crossref
13. Polk DE, Weyant RJ, Manz MC. Socioeconomic factors in adolescents’ oral health: are they mediated by oral hygiene behaviors or preventive interventions? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2010; 38:1–9.
crossref
14. Korea centers for disease control and prevention. The 2014 Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Survey(KYRBS). Cheongju: Korea centers for disease control and prevention;2014. p. 3–10.
15. Korea centers for disease control and prevention. The raw data manual on Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-based Survey(KYRBS). Cheongju: Korea centers for disease control and preven-tion;2014. p. 128–131.
16. Okunseri C, Okunseri E, Garcia RI, Gonzalez C, Visotcky A, Szabo A. Impact of Wisconsin medicaid policy change on dental sealant utilization. Health Serv Res. 2016; Dec 12 [Epub]. DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.12627.
crossref
17. Cheon GT, Song HJ, Lyoo YJ, Kim IS, Shin SC, Cho JW. The supplies of pit and fissure sealants for Korean children and adolescents in 2003. J Korean Acad Oral Health. 2006; 30:204–211.
18. Choi JS, Park DY. Comparison of supplied amount of pit and fissure sealing on the first permanent molars by age and disparity of dental accessibility using National Health Insurance data. J Korean Acad Oral Health. 2016; 40:171–177.
crossref
19. Ahn ES, Han JH. Measure of unmet dental care needs among Korean adolescent. J Dent Hyg Sci. 2015; 15:91–97.
crossref
20. Kim WK. Predictors of health behaviors among male and female youth in Korea. Korean Journal of Youth Studies. 2015; 22:131–154.
21. Levin KA, Currie C. Inequalities in toothbrushing among adolescents in Scotland 1998-2006. Health Educ Res. 2009; 24:87–97.
crossref
22. Lee HR, Ma DS, Park DY, Jung SH. Clusters of oral health-related behaviors by gender and their relationship with psychosocial factors for adolescents in Gangneung. J Korean Acad Oral Health. 2013; 37:241–247.
crossref
23. Al Agili DE, Griffin SO. Effect of family income on the relationship between parental education and sealant prevalence, National health and nutrition examination survey, 2005-2010. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015; Aug 27 [Epub]. 138. DOI: 10.5888/pcd12.150037.
crossref
24. Al Agili DE, Niazy HA, Pass MA. Prevalence and socioeconomic determinants of dental sealant use among schoolchildren in Saudi Arabia. East Mediterr Health J. 2012; 18:1209–1216.
crossref
25. Levin KA, Currie C. Adolescent toothbrushing and the home environment: sociodemographic factors, family relationships and mealtime routines and disorganisation. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2010; 38:10–18.
crossref
26. Al Agili DE, Griffin SO. Effect of family income on the relationship between parental education and sealant prevalence, National health and nutrition examination survey 2005-2010. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015; Aug 27. 12:[Epub]. 138. DOI:10.5888/pcd12.150037.
crossref
27. Kim JH, Lee MH, Kim HY. Influences of parental education level on oral health. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society. 2015; 16:1182–1188.
28. Kaur B. Evaluation of parental awareness regarding their child’s oral hygiene Indian. J Dent Res. 2009; 20:463–465.
29. Seoul metropolitan government. The manual on the continuous dental care program for student and child. Seoul: Seoul metropolitan government.;2015. p. 5.
30. Makhija SK, Childers NK, Lauten J, Dorantes CE, Chafin T, Dasanay-ake AP. Evaluation of initial caries score and caries incidence in a public health sealant program: a retrospective study. Pediatr Dent. 2006; 28:420–424.

Table 1.
The variables in this study
Classification Categories Variables
Dependent variable Dental care utilization factors Experienced pit and fissure sealing during recent one year Yes, No
Independent variable Demographic factors Gender Male, Female
Grade 1st-3rd graders of middle school,
1st-3rd graders of high school
Socio-economic factors Father’s education status ≥College, High school,
Mother’s education status ≤Middle school, Don’t know,
No response
Subjective households-economic status High, Middle, Low
Oral health related behaviors factors Daily tooth brushing frequency ≥3, 1-2, No
Oral health education experience in school Yes, No
Table 2.
The distribution of subjects who have experienced pit and fissure sealing (PFS) during recent one year in 2008 and 2014 year
Classification 2008 year
2014 year
N Subjects experienced PFS
N Subjects experienced PFS
N Wt% P-value N Wt% P-value
Total 75,238 16,001 21.5 72,060 19,487 26.9
Demographic factors
Gender <0.001 <0.001
Male 39,278 7,563 19.5 36,470 8,780 24.1
Female 35,960 8,438 23.7 35,590 10,707 30.0
Grade <0.001 <0.001
1st graders of Middle school 13,037 3,259 25.6 11,661 3,640 31.5
2nd graders of Middle school 13,056 3,259 21.1 12,275 3,528 29.2
3rd graders of Middle school 12,850 2,743 22.0 12,220 3,340 27.2
1st graders of High school 12,720 2,718 21.3 11,824 3,112 26.3
2nd graders of High school 12,375 2,436 19.9 12,152 3,028 24.5
3rd graders of High school 11,200 2,006 17.4 11,928 2,839 23.5
Socio-economic factors
Father’s education status
≥College 27,838 6,698 24.2 <0.001 33,794 9,963 29.3 <0.001
High school 28,435 5,797 20.5 21,483 5,551 25.6
≤Middle school 5,496 990 17.2 2,118 507 23.2
Don't know 8,035 1,443 17.9 11,630 2,706 23.1
No response 5,434 1,073 20.2 3,035 760 24.4
Mother’s education status <0.001 <0.001
≥College 19,341 4,838 25.3 28,668 8,536 29.6
High school 36,511 7,647 21.1 27,391 7,223 26.1
≤Middle school 5,628 989 17.0 1,845 449 24.6
Don't know 8,746 1,609 18.7 11,200 2,603 22.9
No response 5,012 918 18.3 2,956 676 22.3
Subjective households-economic status <0.001 <0.001
High 20,801 5,264 25.7 23,945 7,197 30.0
Middle 35,770 7,433 20.9 35,040 9,221 26.0
Low 18,667 3,304 17.5 13,075 3,069 23.1
Oral health related behaviors factors
Daily toothbrushing frequencies <0.001 <0.001
≥3 61,819 13,828 22.5 37,152 10,591 28.3
1-2 12,652 2,062 16.5 34,219 8,750 25.5
No 767 111 15.5 689 146 21.6
Oral health education experience in school <0.001 <0.001
Yes 15,754 4,412 28.2 17,314 6,010 34.7
No 59,484 11,589 19.8 54,746 13,477 24.5

The data were analysed by Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test.

Weighted value.

Table 3.
Odds ratios of PFS experience during recent one year among groups categorized by socio-economic factors OR (95% CI)
Classification Model 1
Model 2
2008 year 2014 year 2008 year 2014 year
Father’s education status ≥College Ref. 1.000
High 0.821 0.849 0.824 0.847
(0.783-0.860) (0.812-0.886) (0.786-0.865) (0.811-0.886)
≤Middle 0.693 0.776 0.705 0.774
(0.632-0.758) (0.685-0.878) (0.643-0.773) (0.683-0.877)
Mother’s education status ≥College Ref. 1.000
High 0.818 0.862 0.821 0.866
(0.778-0.860) (0.828-0.898) (0.781-0.863) (0.831-0.902)
≤Middle 0.656 0.819 0.671 0.821
(0.601-0.716) (0.714-0.940) (0.614-0.734) (0.715-0.944)
Subjective households-economic status High Ref. 1.000
Middle 0.767 0.833 0.776 0.843
(0.735-0.801) (0.801-0.866) (0.743-0.810) (0.811-0.877)
Low 0.629 0.730 0.654 0.742
(0.593-0.668) (0.694-0.768) (0.615-0.695) (0.705-0.780)

The data were analysed by Complex Samples Logistic Regression. *P<0.05,

P<0.01,

P<0.001. Model 1: Adjusting for Gender and Grade. Model 2: Adjusting for Gender, Grade, Daily toothbrushing, Oral health education experience in school.

TOOLS
Similar articles