Journal List > J Korean Acad Oral Health > v.40(1) > 1057702

Kim, Kim, Jun, Kim, and Jeong: The growth inhibitory effect of some vegetable oils on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus casei

Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the growth inhibitory effects of some vegetable oils on Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and Lactobacillus casei (L. casei).

Methods

Two bacterial strains and 5 kinds of test solutions (3 experimental groups: orange essential oil, olive oil, soybean oil; 1 positive control group: chlorhexidine solution; 1 negative control group: broth medium) were used in this study. S. mutans and L. casei pellets were exposed to 1 ml of one of the test solutions for 1 minute. Then, the treated bacterial cells were incubated in fresh broth medium for 0, 4, 8, 16, and 24 hours. The optical density of the broth medium was measured using an ELISA reader at 620 nm. A nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test (with Mann-Whitney U tests) was performed to compare the change in optical density between different groups at different time points.

Results

Bacterial growth was significantly inhibited in all experimental groups compared to the negative control group. The growth of L. casei was less affected by experimental oils than that of S. mutans. Orange essential oil had the maximum growth inhibitory effect on S. mutans up to 8 hours, similar to that in the positive control group (P<0.01). Experimental oils had greater growth inhibitory effect on L. casei than chlorhexidine solution.

Conclusions

This in vitro study confirmed the growth inhibitory effect of some vegetable oils on S. mutans and L. casei. Rising of the mouth using these vegetable oils is expected to have an anti-plaque effect, but additional clinical studies are needed to confirm this.

References

1. Paster BJ, Olsen I, Aas JA, Dewhirst FE. The breadth of bacterial diversity in the human periodontal pocket and other oral sites. Peri-odontol 2000. 2006; 42:80–87.
crossref
2. Loesche WJ. Role of Streptococcus mutans in human dental decay. Microbiol Rev. 1986; 50:353–380.
crossref
3. Song YJ. Classification of Periodontal Pathogens Based on Genetic Specificity[master’s thesis]. Seoul: Seoul National University;2014. [Korean].
4. Listgarten MA. The structure of dental plaque. Periodontol 2000,. 1994; 5:52–65.
crossref
5. Kim EJ. Study on the reduction effects on oral microorganisms through the different methods of controlling dental plaque[master’s thesis]. Seoul: Dankook University;2003. [Korean].
6. Filoche SK, Soma K, Sissons CH. Antimicrobial effects of essential oils in combination with chlorhexidine digluconate. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2005; 20:221–225.
crossref
7. Palombo EA. Traditional medicinal plant extracts and natural products with activity against oral bacteria: potential application in the prevention and treatment of oral diseases. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011; 2011:1–15.
crossref
8. Trahan L. Xylitol: a review of its action on mutans streptococci and dental plaque-its clinical significance. Int Dent J. 1995; 45:77–92.
9. Hwang JK, Shim JS, Baek NI, Pyun YR. Xanthorrhizol: a potential antibacterial agent from Curcuma xanthorrhiza against Streptococcus mutans. Planta Med. 2000; 66:196–197.
10. Baratta MT, Dorman HJ, Deans SG, Figueiredo AC, Barroso JG, Ruberto G. Antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of some commercial essential oils. Flavour Fragr J. 1998; 13:235–244.
crossref
11. Lee SY, Kim JK, Baek BJ, Yang YM, Lee KY, Lee YH, et al. Antibacterial effect of essential oils on oral bacteria. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent. 2009; 36:1–11.
12. Takarada K, Kimizuka R, Takahashi N, Honma K, Okuda K, Kato T. A comparison of the antibacterial efficacies of essential oils against oral pathogens. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2004; 19:61–64.
crossref
13. Lim DJ. Extraction of natural citrus by SC-CO2 and their pharmacological effect on aroma therapy[docter of philosophy]. Busan: Pukyong National University;2014. [Korean].
14. Fife B. Oil pulling therapy : detoxifying and healing the body through oral cleansing. Seoul: Piccadilly Books;2013. p. 274–280.
15. Tomar P, Hongal S, Jain M, Rana K, Saxena V. Oil Pulling and Oral Health: A Review. IJSS. 2014; 1:33–37.
16. Asokan S, Rathan J, Muthu MS, Rathna PV, Emmadi P, Raghura-man , et al. Effect of oil pulling on Streptococcus mutans count in plaque and saliva using Dentocult SM Strip mutans test: a randomized, controlled, triple-blind study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2008; 26:12–17.
17. Amith HV, Ankola AV, Nagesh L. Effect of oil pulling on plaque and gingivitis. J Oral Health Comm Dent. 2007; 1:12–18.
18. Kim JH. Antiocidant and antimicrobial effects of lemon and eucalyptus essential oils[master’s thesis]. Seoul: Konkuk University;2011. [Korean].
19. Kang SM. Effect of essential oil mouthrinse on oral squamous epithelial cells (KB Cells)[master’s thesis]. Seoul: Chung-ang Univer- sity;2010. [Korean].
20. Kim SH, Lim SA, Park SJ, Kim DK. Assessment oral Health-related quality of life using the Oral Health Impact Profile(OHIP). J Korean Acad Oral Health. 2004; 28:559–569.
21. Bakkali F, Averbeck S, Averbeck D, Idaomar M. Biological effects of essential oils-a review. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008; 46:446–475.
22. Shapiro S, Meier A, Guggenheim B. The antimicrobial activity of essential oils and essential oil components towards oral bacteria. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1994; 9:202–208.
crossref
23. Ouhayoun JP. Penetrating the plaque biofilm: impact of essential oil mouthwash. J Clin Periodontol. 2003; 30:10–12.
crossref
24. Charles CH, Mostler KM, Bartels LL, Mankodi SM. Comparative an-tiplaque and antigingivitis effectiveness of a chlorhexidine and an essential oil mouthrinse: 6-month clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2004; Oct. 31(10):878–84.
crossref
25. Scheie AA, Rukke HV, Perterson FC. Are antibacterials necessary in caries prophylaxis? Fejerskov O, Nyvad B, Kidd E, editors. Dental caries: the disease and its clinical management. 3rd ed.Oxford: Wiley Blackwell;2015. p. 287–301.
26. Hugo WB, Longworth AR. Some aspects of the mode of action of chlorhexidine. J Pharm Phamacol. 1964; 16:655–662.
crossref
27. Emilson CG. Susceptibility of various microorganisms to chlorhexidine. Scand J Dent Res. 1977; 85:255–265.
crossref
28. Emilson CG. Outlook for Hibitane in dental caries. J Clin Periodon-tol. 1977; Dec. 4:136–143.
crossref
29. Joyston-Bechal S, Hayes K. Davenport ES, Hardie JM. Caries incidence, mutans streptococci and lactobacilli in irradiated patients during a 12-month preventive programme using chlorhexidine and fluoride. Caries Res. 1992; 26:384–390.
30. Cleghorn B, Bowden GH. The effect of pH on the sensitivity of species of Lactobacillus to chlorhexidine and the antibiotics minocycline and spiramycin. J Dent Res. 1989; 68:1146–1150.
crossref

Fig. 1.
experimental procedure for measurement of optical density.
jkaoh-40-24f1.tif
Fig. 2.
The result of growth curve on S. mutans and L. casie for 0, 4, 8, 16, 24 hours. NC: Negative control, CHx: hexamedine solution, LS: listerine zero, OO: olive oil, OEO: essential oil, SO: soybean oil.
jkaoh-40-24f2.tif
Table 1.
Test solution of this study
Experimental Groups Test solution
Negative control Brain Heart Infusion broth (Bacto BHI, BD, USA) for S. mutans
Lactobacilli MRS (Difco MRS, BD, USA) for L. casei
Positive control Chlorhexidine solution (Hexamedine, Bukwang co., KOR)
Experimental solution 1 Olive oil (100% of Spanish Extra virgin olive oil, CJ co., KOR)
Experimental solution 2 Orange Essential oil (Sweet Orange, Euro Aroma, DEU)
Experimental solution 3 Soybean oil (Handmade in domestic soybean oil, CJ co., KOR)
Table 2.
Optical density (620 nm) of S. mutans according to the test solution per time (Mean±SD)
N 0 h 4 h 8 h 16 h 24 h P-value
NC 9 0.00±0.00a 0.02±0.01bA 0.26±0.02cA 0.25±0.01cA 0.23±0.01dA P<0.001
CHx 9 0.00±0.00a 0.00±0.00aB 0.00±0.00aB 0.00±0.00aB 0.00±0.01aB P=0.048
OEO 9 0.00±0.00a 0.00±0.01aBC 0.00±0.01aB 0.22±0.01bC 0.24±0.01bA P<0.001
OO 9 0.00±0.00a 0.01±0.00bAD 0.18±0.01cC 0.25±0.01dA 0.23±0.01eA P<0.001
SO 9 0.00±0.00a 0.01±0.01aBD 0.06±0.01bD 0.26±0.01cA 0.23±0.01dA P<0.001
P-value P=1.000 P<0.001 P<0.001 P<0.001 P<0.001

NC: Negative control, CHx: hexamedine solution, OO: olive oil, EO: essential oil, SO: soybean oil. P-value was determined by nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test.

a bcdeIndicates difference between measurement time at each group by post hoc Mann-Whitney test.

A BCDIndicates difference between groups at each time by post hoc Mann-Whitney test.

Table 3.
Optical density (620 nm) of L. casei according to the test solution per time (Mean±SD)
N 0 h 4 h 8 h 16 h 24 h P-value
NC 9 0.00±0.00a 0.26±0.01bA 0.59±0.06cA 0.94±0.06dA 1.03±0.03eAB P<0.001
CHx 9 0.00±0.00a 0.21±0.01bB 0.54±0.08cAC 0.91±0.08dAB 1.00±0.01dA P<0.001
OEO 9 0.00±0.00a 0.12±0.02bC 0.49±0.09cBC 0.85±0.09dACD 1.01±0.02eAB P<0.001
OO 9 0.00±0.00a 0.17±0.03bD 0.56±0.06cAB 0.83±0.06dBC 1.03±0.02eB P<0.001
SO 9 0.00±0.00a 0.15±0.01bCD 0.49±0.04cB 0.77±0.04dCD 1.01±0.01eAB P<0.001
P-value P=1.000 P<0.001 P<0.001 P<0.001 P<0.05

NC: Negative control, CHx: hexamedine solution, OO: olive oil, EO: essential oil, SO: soybean oil. P-value were determined from nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test.

was evaluated to growth on L casei,

abcde Denoted by Mann-Whitney U test.

was performed to compare the optical density between hours,

ABCD Denoted by Mann-Whitney U test.

TOOLS
Similar articles