PDF
ePub
Citation
Print
Abstract
Objectives
The purpose of this study was to develop a dentine hypersensitivity (DH) manual for a dental hospital.
Methods
The records of all DH patients who presented between 2005 to 2010 were analyzed to determine their age group, awareness of DH, and DH distribution before and after dental treatment.
Results
Out of 953,272 patients, data of 4,646 were analyzed. The male to female ratio of DH patients was found to be 1:1:1. The prevalence of DH was highest in patients in the age group of 40-49 years. The DH awareness rate was high to time, temperature and after dental treatment factor in the middle-age group.
References
1. Choi ES, Kim SD. An analysis of the concept of pain. Korean J Woman Health Nurs. 2001; 7:284–292.
2. Coleman TA, Grippo JO, Kinderknecht KE. Cervical dentine hypersensitivity. Part II: Association with abfractive lesions. Quintessence Int. 2000; 31:466–473.
3. Addy M. Etiology and clinical implications of dentine hypersensitivity. Dent Clin North Am. 1990; 34:503–514.
4. Rees JS. The prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity in general dental practice in the UK. J Clin Periodontol. 2000; 27:860–865.
5. Bal J, Kundalgurki S. Tooth sensitivity prevention and treatment. Oral Health. 1999; 89:33–41.
6. Taani DQ, Awartani F. Prevalence and distribution of dentin hypersensitivity and plaque in a dental hospital population. Quintessence Int. 2001; 32:372–376.
7. Rees JS, Addy M. A cross-sectional study of buccal cervical sensitivity in UK general dental practice and a summary review of prevalence studies. Int J Dent Hyg. 2004; 2:64–69.
8. Bamise CT, Olusile AO, Oginni AO, Dosumu OO. The prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity among adult patients attending a Nigerian teaching hospital. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2007; 5:49–53.
9. Udoye CI. Pattern and distribution of cervical dentine hypersensitivity in a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Odontostomatol Trop. 2006; 29:19–22.
10. Fischer C, Fischer RG, Wennberg A. Prevalence and distribution of cervical dentine hypersensitivity in a population in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J Dent. 1992; 20:272–276.
11. Liu HC, Lan WH, Hsieh CC. Prevalence and distribution of cervical dentin hypersensitivity in a population in Taipei, Taiwan. J Endodon. 1998; 24:45–47.
12. Rees JS, Addy M. A cross-sectional study of dentine hypersensitivity. J Clin Periodontol. 2002; 29:997–1003.
13. Chabanski MB, Gillam DG, Bulman JS, Newman HN. Clinical evaluation of cervical dentine sensitivity in a population of patients referred to a specialist periodontology department: a pilot study. J Oral Rehabil. 1997; 24:666–672.
14. Rees JS, Jin LJ, Lam S, Kudanowska I, Vowles R. The prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity in a hospital clinic population in Hong Kong. J Dent. 2003; 31:453–461.
15. Ministry of Health and Welfare. 2009 National health statistics - The fourth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Seoul: Ministry of Health & Welfare;2009.
16. Leonard RH, Haywood VB, Phillips C. Risk factors for developing tooth sensitivity and gingival irritation associated with nightguard vital bleaching. Quintessence Int. 1997; 28:527–534.
17. Trowbridge HO, Silver DR. A review of current approaches to in-office management of tooth hypersensitivity. Dent Clin North Am. 1990; 34:561–581.
Table 1.
Prevalence of dentine hypersensivitity by age group Unit: N (%)
Table 2.
Rate of awareness of category by age group (%)
Table 3.
DH distribution of before & after dental treatment by age group Unit: N (%)
XML Download