Erosive effect of hangover-curing beverages on enamel surface

Hye-Jin Lee; Suk-Jin Hong; Choong-Ho Choi

doi:10.11149/jkaoh.2013.37.3.119

Journal List > J Korean Acad Oral Health > v.37(3) > 1057558

Go to TopGo to Top Go to BottomGo to Bottom

TOOLS

Lee, Hong, and Choi: Erosive effect of hangover-curing beverages on enamel surface

Original Article

J Korean Acad Oral Health 2013;37(3):119-125.

Published online: 12 September 2013

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11149/jkaoh.2013.37.3.119

Erosive effect of hangover-curing beverages on enamel surface

Hye-Jin Lee^1,², Suk-Jin Hong^1,³, Choong-Ho Choi^1,^2,³

¹Department of Preventive & Public Health Dentistry, Chonnam National University, Gwang-ju, Korea

²Brain Korea 21 Project, Chonnam National University, Gwang-ju, Korea

³Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University, Gwang-ju, Korea

Corresponding Author: Choong-Ho Choi Department of Preventive & Public Health Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University, 77 Yongbong-ro, Buk-gu, Gwang-ju 500-707, Korea Tel: +82-62-530-5839 Fax: +82-62-530-5810 E-mail: hochoi@chonnam.ac.kr

Received 31 July 2013 Revised 23 September 2013 Accepted 24 September 2013

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of present study was to evaluate the effect of hangover-curing beverages on dental erosion.

Methods

The pH and titratable acidity of 12 hangover-curing beverages were measured. Of these, we selected Morning Care, Condition Power, and Dawn 808 as experimental beverages and distilled water as control. The concentrations of fluoride, Ca, and P were measured for all four beverages. Bovine tooth enamel samples were treated with the four beverages for 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, and 30 min. Surface microhardness (Vickers hardness number [VHN]) was measured using the microhardness tester before and after treatment. The surface of specimens was observed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) only after treatment.

Results

1) The average pH of the hangover-curing beverages was 3.6±0.06. 2) The differences between the surface microhardness (ΔVHN) before and after 30-min treatment were statistically significant among all the groups (P<0.05). According to SEM findings, Morning Care and Condition Power caused showed erosion of enamel surface. However, Dawn 808, which contained Ca (178.9 mg/kg) and fluoride (4.90 ppm), did not erode enamel after immersion for 30 min.

Conclusions

Some hangover-curing beverages with low pH could induce dental erosion on enamel surface.

Keywords: Dental erosion, Hangover-curing beverages, Micro hardness

References

1. Featherstone JD, Mellberg JR. Relative rates of progress of artificial carious lesions in bovine, ovine and human enamel. Caries Res. 1981; 15:109–114.

2. Imfeld T. Dental erosion, Definition, classification and links. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996; 104:151–155.

3. Scheutzel P. Etiology of dental erosion intrinsic factors. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996; 104:178–190.

4. Zero DT. Etiology of dental erosion-extrinsic factor. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996; 104:162–177.

5. Srinivasan N, Kavitha M, Loganathan SC. Comparison of the remineralization potential of CPP-ACP and CPP-ACP with 900 ppm fluoride on eroded human enamel: An in situ study. Arch Oral Biol. 2001; 55:541–544.

6. Attin T, Weiss K, Becker K, Buchalla W, Wiegand A. Impact of modified acidic soft drinks on enamel erosion. Oral Dis. 2005; 11:7–12.

7. Birkhed D. Sugar content, acidity and effect on plaque pH of fruit juices, fruit drinks, carbonated beverages and sport drinks. Caries Res. 1984; 18:120–127.

8. Brunton PA, Hussain A. The erosive effect of herbal tea on dental enamel. J Dent. 2001; 29:517–520.

9. Shim JH, Jeong TS, Kim S. A study on the enamel erosion by fermented milks. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent. 2004; 31:555–561.

10. Brown CJ, Smith G, Shaw L, Parry J, Smith AJ. The erosive potential of flavoured sparkling water drinks. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2007; 17:86–91.

11. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Beverages safety survey. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare;2000. p. 16–17.

12. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Fermented milk and children beverages safety survey. Seoul: Ministry of Health and Welfare;2005. p. 5–6. 12.

13. Statistics Korea. International Statistic Year book. Seoul: Statistics Korea;2008. p. 490.

14. Donga News. Korea has fallen into the liquor jug [Internet]. [cited 2013 Jul 14]. Available from:. http://news.donga.com/3/all/20011217/7770145/1.

15. Korea food information institute. Market trends of beverage for after drinking. Seoul: Korea food information institute;2009. p. 38–43.

16. Choson News. The war of pharmaceutical companies for hangover beverage [Internet]. [cited 2013 Jul 14]. Available from:. http://biz.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2010/01/28/2010012840017.html.

17. Shin YH, Kim YJ. Study on enamel erosion of the primary teeth caused by children beverage. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent. 2009; 36:227–234.

18. Hwang SH. Surface micro-hardness and color changes caused by commercial alcoholic drinks on composite resin material [master’ s thesis]. Gwangju: Chonnam National University;2010. [Korean].

19. Lussi A, Jaeggi T, Jaeggi-Schärer S. Prediction of the erosive potential of some beverages. Caries Res. 1995; 29:349–354.

20. Rytömaa I, Meurman JH, Koskinen J, Laakso T, Gharazi L, Turunen R. In vitro erosion of bovine enamel caused by acidic drinks and other foodstuffs. Scand J Dent Res. 1988; 96:324–333.

21. West NX, Hughes JA, Addy M. The effect of pH on the erosion of dentine and enamel by dietary acids in vitro. J Oral Rehabil. 2001; 28:860–864.

22. Meurman JH, Häarköonen M, Näaveri H, Koskinen J, Torkko H, Rytöomaa I, et al. Experimental sports drinks with minimal dental erosion effect. Scand J Dent Res. 1990; 98:120–128.

23. Attin T, Meyer K, Hellwig E, Buchalla W, Lennon AM. Effect of mineral supplements to citric acid on enamel erosion. Arch Oral Biol. 2003; 48:753–759.

24. Kim YJ. Effect of soft drinks on dental hydroxyapatite [dissertation]. Seoul: Dongguk University;2003. [Korean].

25. Larsen MJ, Nyvad B. Enamel erosion by some soft drinks and orange juices relative to their pH, buffering effect and contents of calcium phosphate. Caries Res. 1999; 33:81–87.

26. Hooper S, Hughes J, Parker D, Finke M, Newcombe RG, Addy M, et al. Clinical study in situ to assess the effect of a food approved polymer on the erosion potential of drinks. J Dent. 2007; 35:541–546.

27. Tahmassebi JF, Duggal MS, Malik-Kotru G, Curzon ME. Soft drinks and dental health:a review of the current literature. J Dent. 2006; 34:2–11.

28. Larsen MJ, Richards A. Fluoride is unable to reduce dental erosion from soft drinks. Caries Res. 2002; 36:75–80.

29. Sorvari R, Kiviranta I, Luoma H. Erosive effect of a sport drink mixture with and without addition of fluoride and magnesium on the molar teeth of rats. Scand J Dent Res. 1988; 96:226–231.

30. Hughes JA, West NX, Addy M. The protective effect of fluoride treatments against enamel erosion in vitro. J Oral Rehabil. 2004; 31:357–363.

31. Larsen MJ. Prevention by means of fluoride of enamel erosion as caused by soft drinks and orange juice. Caries Res. 2001; 35:229–234.

Fig. 1.

SEM findings on enamel surface of experimental groups after treatment (A: Condition power×50,000, B: Dawn808×50,000, C: Morning Care×50,000, D: Distilled water×50,000).

Table 1.

Hangover beverages used in the experiment

Classification	Brand name	Manufacturer
Mixed beverage	Condition power	Cheiljedang
	Dawn808	Glami
	Morning Care	Dong-A pharm
	Hutge morning happy time	Kung nam pharm
	Hutge thankyou	Jongkundang
	Good morning power	Jongkundang health
	Altin zero	Borung
	Again	Borung
	Doctor zero	Yakult
	Choa Antichake gold	Cho-a pharmaceutical company
	Morning power	Food science
	Sok-pul-eo	Wales Korea pharm
	Distilled water (control)	-

Table 2.

The pH and titratable acidity of hangover beverages

Brand name	pH	Titratable acidity		Added acid
Brand name	pH	pH 5.5	pH 7.0	Added acid
Condition power	3.64±0.02	2.2±0.01	3.4±0.05	Citric
Dawn808	4.53±0.02	0.5±0.00	0.8±0.00	-
Morning Care	3.35±0.01	3.2±0.20	4.1±0.50	Citric
Hutge morning happy time	3.33±0.01	1.5±0.01	1.8±0.01	Citric
Hutge thankyou	2.87±0.00	1.0±0.01	1.4±0.01	Citric
Goodmorning power	2.90±0.03	1.7±0.01	2.0±0.01	Citric
Altin zero	2.76±0.01	2.0±0.07	2.6±0.10	Citric
Again	3.43±0.00	1.5±0.01	1.8±0.01	Citric
Doctor zero	4.65±0.01	0.3±0.00	0.8±0.00	-
Choa Antichake gold	3.76±0.00	2.5±0.01	2.7±0.05	Citric
Morning power	4.20±0.01	1.0±0.00	1.5±0.00	Citric
Sok-pul-eo	3.88±0.01	1.5±0.00	2.0±0.05	Aspartic
Distilled water (control)	6.17±0.01	-	0.01±0.00	-

All values are mean±SD.

Table 3.

The concentration levels of F, Ca and P in treatment groups

	F (ppm)	Ca (mg/kg)	P (mg/kg)
Condition power	0.08±0.00	42.8±0.00	418.91±1.65
Dawn808	4.90 ±0.40	178.9±0.00	34.65±0.33
Morning Care	0.01±0.00	11.7±0.00	401.24±3.37
Distilled water (control)	<0.01	8.0±0.01	-

All values are mean±SD.

Table 4.

Comparisons of surface microhardness according to immersion time of beverages on enamel Unit: VHN

Time (min)		Beverage*
Time (min)	Condition power^b	Dawn808^a	Morning Care^b	Distilled water^a
0	300.75±11.77	300.65±10.08	300.06±8.12	300.42±7.30
1	298.64±12.93	300.75±10.39	298.49±7.78	300.40±7.19
3	291.65±12.60	300.25±10.28	295.13±7.99	300.35±7.18
5	281.66±13.75	300.27±9.33	282.62±10.12	300.39±7.34
10	264.16±11.68	299.55±9.27	251.11±8.89	300.44±7.27
15	245.30±13.75	299.45±8.73	231.78±8.42	300.17±7.24
30	219.90±16.92	299.29±8.71	192.64±7.61	299.81±7.53

All values are mean±SD. *Statistically significant by repeated measured ANOVA at the 0.05 level.

^a .bThe same letter indicates no significant difference by Tukey.

TOOLS

Similar articles